Judges 2:5 · Bible study
Judges 2:5 Commentary: Bochim: Weeping That Leads to Sacrifice
Hebrew · 9 what the commentators say
Meaning in one sentence
Explore Judges 2:5: Why did Israel weep and then sacrifice at Bochim? Discover the nature of genuine repentance in response to God's rebuke.
Research Summary
- Meaning: Bochim means “weepers”; the people weep for their sin and then offer sacrifices to Yahweh, showing repentance that goes beyond emotion.
- Key words: qara (call, name), zavach (sacrifice), Bochim (weepers), Yahweh (the LORD).
- Main debate: The location of Bochim, whether it was Shiloh, Bethel, or an unknown site, and whether the sacrifice was offered at a legitimate sanctuary.
- Theological theme: Genuine repentance moves from grief over sin to action that restores relationship with God through His appointed means.
- Best use: Teaching on the nature of true repentance; as a contrast to shallow regret that does not result in change.
Translation Comparison
BSB Berean Standard Bible 2020
So they called that place Bochim and offered sacrifices there to the LORD.
WEB World English Bible 2000
They called the name of that place Bochim, and they sacrificed there to Yahweh.
KJV King James Version 1769
And they called the name of that place Bochim: and they sacrificed there unto the Lord.
ASV American Standard Version 1901
And they called the name of that place Bochim: and they sacrificed there unto Jehovah.
YLT Young's Literal Translation 1898
and they call the name of that place Bochim, and sacrifice there to Jehovah.
Darby Darby Bible 1890
And they called the name of that place Bochim; and they sacrificed there to Jehovah.
Douay-Rheims Douay-Rheims Bible 1899
And the name of that place was called, The place of weepers, or of tears: and there they offered sacrifices to the Lord.
Translations in other languages (10 available)
Y llamaron por nombre aquel lugar Bochîm: y sacrificaron allí á Jehová.
E chamaram por nome aquele lugar Boquim: e sacrificaram ali ao SENHOR.
Ils donnèrent à ce lieu le nom de Bokim, et ils y offrirent des sacrifices à l’ Éternel.
und hießen die Stätte Bochim und opferten daselbst dem HERRN.
Daarom noemden zij den naam dier plaats Bochim; en zij offerden aldaar den HEERE.
E posero nome a quel luogo Bokim e vi offrirono dei sacrifizi all’Eterno.
I nazwali imię miejsca onego Bochym, a tamże ofiarowali Panu.
От сего и называют то место Бохим. Там принесли они жертву Господу.
於是給那 地方 起名 叫 波金(就是哭的意思)。眾人在那裡 向耶和華 獻祭。
And they gave that place the name of Bochim, and made offerings there to the Lord.
Verse in Context
Original Language (Biblical Hebrew)
Old Testament · Biblical Hebrew · Judges 2:5
Source: STEPBible TAGNT/TEHB (CC-BY 4.0). Click or tap a morphology code to see the full parsing.
Scholars' Consensus
Commentators agree that the naming of the place Bochim (“weepers”) and the subsequent sacrifice mark a moment of genuine repentance. Adam Clarke notes the word bochim means “weepings” or “lamentations,” derived from the people’s tears. Gill and Keil & Delitzsch emphasize that the weeping was not mere emotion but led to concrete action: they “sacrificed there to Yahweh.” Keil specifies these were likely sin-offerings and burnt-offerings, offered to obtain mercy. Matthew Henry calls this an “awakening sermon” that produced sincere contrition. There is debate about the location, Gill suggests it was Shiloh, the tabernacle site; Barnes and the Cambridge Bible note the site is unknown but near Shechem. Yet the central religious act remains undisputed: the people responded to the angel’s rebuke by turning back to God in worship, acknowledging their guilt through the established sacrificial system.
How settled is the interpretation?
Interpretive difficulty: Low
What is clear: The people wept, named the place “Bochim,” and offered sacrifices to Yahweh, demonstrating that their sorrow led to concrete acts of worship and atonement.
What Scholars Agree and Debate
| Topic | Agreed | Debated |
|---|---|---|
| Location of Bochim | The name means “weepers” and commemorates the people’s weeping. | Some identify it with Shiloh (Gill), others with Bethel (lexicon), while Barnes and the Cambridge Bible state the site is unknown but near Shechem. |
| Nature of the Repentance | The weeping and sacrifice together indicate that the people acknowledged their sin and sought atonement. | Interpreters differ on whether this repentance was lasting; Matthew Henry sees it as sincere but short-lived, while Keil and Gill view it as a genuine turning that restored their relationship with God at that moment. |
| Identity of the Angel | The messenger speaks in the first person as Yahweh, indicating divine authority. | Keil and Delitzsch argue this is the pre-incarnate Angel of the Lord (one with Jehovah), while other commentators (e.g., Matthew Henry) note that Old Testament prophets are never called angels of the Lord, but some traditions see a prophet or a representative. |
| Legitimacy of Sacrifice at Bochim | The people offered sacrifices, and God accepted them. | Some (Gill) assume the tabernacle was at Bochim (Shiloh); others (Keil) argue that the angel’s presence sanctified the place, making sacrifice lawful even outside the central sanctuary, as in Judges 6 and 13. |
Historical & Cultural Context
Judges 2 forms a prologue to the entire book, explaining why Israel’s possession of Canaan would be a struggle rather than a smooth inheritance. The angel of the Lord moves from Gilgal, Joshua’s base camp, to Bochim, a place that will receive its name from the weeping that follows. His speech (vv. 1, 3) echoes a covenant lawsuit: God reminds Israel of His faithfulness (the exodus, the land, the promise never to break covenant) and charges them with disobedience (making treaties, failing to tear down altars). The judgment is that the remaining nations will become “thorns in your sides” and their gods a snare.
In the ancient Near East, naming a place memorialized a significant event; here the name “Bochim” (weepers) preserves the people’s corporate grief. The subsequent sacrifice is striking because the tabernacle was at Shiloh, not Bochim. Keil & Delitzsch argue that the angel’s presence made the location a legitimate place for worship, just as Gideon later built an altar where the angel appeared (Judges 6:24). The people’s action shows they understood that the rebuke required more than tears, it demanded atonement. This pattern, hearing God’s word, grieving, then turning back through prescribed worship, will recur throughout the cycles of the judges, though often with less sincerity.
Pastorally, this verse invites readers to see that true repentance is not an emotion that fades. It moves toward the means God provides for restoration: confession, sacrifice, and renewed worship.
Textual Notes
The consulted sources note no significant manuscript variants for Judges 2:5. The Hebrew text is stable, and differences among modern translations reflect interpretation (e.g., the place-name “Bochim” is rendered as “weepers” in the Douay-Rheims) rather than textual uncertainty.
Reception History
This verse has been read across Christian traditions as a model of repentance that moves from emotion to action. Matthew Henry (1710) calls it an “awakening sermon” that produced contrition. Wesley (1754) uses it to discuss the nature of divine decrees, though his note reflects more his theological concerns than the verse itself. In liturgical traditions, the place Bochim has been referenced in hymns and prayers as a symbol of holy sorrow that leads to the cross. The passage is commonly cited in teachings on the difference between regret and genuine repentance, emphasizing that tears alone do not restore relationship with God, the appointed means of atonement must follow.
Preaching This Verse
Three-point outline
- The Angel’s Rebuke (vv. 1, 3): God confronts Israel with His faithfulness and their failure. The covenant is broken from their side.
- The People’s Weeping (v. 4): Grief is the first response to being caught, but it is not yet repentance.
- The Sacrifice (v. 5): They name the place and offer sacrifices. Real repentance acts on its sorrow by seeking atonement through God’s appointed way.
Five-point outline
- God sends a messenger to speak directly to His people.
- The message recounts grace and calls for accountability.
- The people’s weeping shows they understood their guilt.
- The naming of the place “Bochim” gives concrete witness to their grief.
- The sacrifice moves them from sorrow to worship, restoring relationship with Yahweh.
Illustration hooks
- A person who crashes a car and first feels fear, then remorse, then calls the insurance company and pays the deductible. The payment is the “sacrifice” that sets things right.
- A child who breaks a neighbor’s window and cries, but then goes with a parent to apologize and offer to pay. The tears are real, but the visit and payment are what repair the relationship.
Questions your congregation is asking
- “How do I know if my sorrow over sin is just regret or real repentance?”
- “What ‘sacrifice’ can I bring to God when I have sinned, now that Christ is our once-for-all offering?”
- “Why does God sometimes let consequences linger even after I have repented and been forgiven?”
Leading a Discussion
This passage shows a whole community moved from tears to worship. It raises a question that each group member can ask themselves: when we realize we have disobeyed God, is our first instinct to change or just to feel bad? The people at Bochim did both, and their weeping led them to offer sacrifices, which was the God-given way to find mercy.
Discussion questions
- Observation: What did the angel say to Israel, and how did the people respond in verses 4, 5?
- Observation: What does the name “Bochim” mean, and why did they give the place that name?
- Interpretation: Why do you think the people sacrificed to Yahweh right after weeping? What does that combination suggest about their understanding of forgiveness?
- Interpretation: The angel’s words included both a review of God’s faithfulness and a charge of disobedience. How does that two-part structure relate to the way we read our own lives?
- Application: Think of a time you were confronted with a sin. What did you do first: apologize, feel bad, or try to make it right? Which of those matches the pattern in this passage?
- Application: How can your small group or church help you move from “weeping” to “sacrifice”, that is, from feeling sorry to taking concrete steps toward restoration?
- Application: In light of Christ’s once-for-all sacrifice, what does “offering a sacrifice” look like for Christians today? (See Romans 12:1; Hebrews 13:15, 16.)
Word Study
The key original-language words in this verse. Select any word for its full lexicon entry — meaning, every occurrence in Scripture, and related words.
Cross-References
Source: Treasury of Scripture Knowledge (TSK, public domain)
| Genesis 35:8 | Deborah, Rebekah’s nurse, died, and she was buried below Bethel under the oak; and its name was called Allon Bacuth. |
| Joshua 7:26 | They raised over him a great heap of stones that remains to this day. Yahweh turned from the fierceness of his anger. Therefore the name of that place was called “The valley of Achor” to this day. |
| Judges 6:24 | Then Gideon built an altar there to Yahweh, and called it “Yahweh is Peace.” To this day it is still in Ophrah of the Abiezrites. |
| Judges 13:19 | So Manoah took the young goat with the meal offering, and offered it on the rock to Yahweh. Then the angel did an amazing thing as Manoah and his wife watched. |
| I Samuel 7:9 | Samuel took a suckling lamb, and offered it for a whole burnt offering to Yahweh. Samuel cried to Yahweh for Israel, and Yahweh answered him. |
Interlinear and lexical data from STEPBible (CC BY 4.0). Cross-reference data from OpenBible.info (CC BY 4.0). Commentaries are public domain.
For personal reflection
Read the devotional page — prayer, application, and "for families"
What the Commentators Say
8 public-domain commentaries, condensed into plain language.
Adam Clarke's Commentary Methodist/Wesleyan 1826
Clarke explains that Bochim means weepings or lamentations, so the place was named for the people’s mourning there. He also notes that the angel speaking to them does so in the person of God, as the prophets often did.
Barnes' Notes on the Bible Protestant 1832
Barnes explains that Bochim means "weepers" and notes its location near Shechem, though the exact site is unknown. He draws a comparison to other places in Genesis that received names from significant events of mourning.
Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges Anglican 1880
The Cambridge Bible notes that the place name Bochim (Weepers) is linguistically unusual for a location and was probably adapted from an original name meaning balsam trees. The narrator shaped it to preserve the memory of the Angel's reproof and the people's repentance.
Geneva Bible Notes Reformed 1599
The Geneva note observes that the people named the place Bochim, meaning weepers, to memorialize their sorrow for sin after God's rebuke. The sacrifices they offered there were not merely ritual but expressed their repentance and renewed dedication to the Lord.
Gill's Exposition of the Bible Baptist 1748
Gill notes that the place called Bochim, meaning weepers, was likely Shiloh itself, renamed because of the people’s sorrow. He observes that their sacrifices acknowledged guilt and followed God’s directions, and suggests that if offered in faith in the Messiah’s sacrifice, they were truly acceptable.
Keil & Delitzsch OT Commentary Protestant 1876
Keil-Delitzsch notes that the people's sacrifice at Bochim, where no sanctuary stood, proves the one who appeared was not a prophet or ordinary angel but the Angel of the Lord, who is one with Jehovah. Only His presence authorized sacrifice apart from the tabernacle.
Matthew Henry's Commentary Reformed/Presbyterian 1710
Henry emphasizes that God did not rest with giving Israel the written law alone; He sent particular messages from heaven as each occasion required. This angelic rebuke marked a new phase in God's dealings: when the people rejected Moses, God tried whether they would heed a messenger from heaven.
Wesley's Explanatory Notes Methodist/Wesleyan 1754
Wesley rejects Matthew Henry's claim that the goodness of God's promised land will intensify the punishment of those who perish. He argues that this reasoning fails under predestination: if some are not elected, they never had a genuine offer, and if all the elect are saved, the grant was never free to the others.