Ruth 4:13 · Bible study
Ruth 4:13 Commentary: Boaz Marries Ruth; Yahweh Enables Conception
Hebrew · 7 what the commentators say
Meaning in one sentence
Explore Ruth 4:13 meaning: Boaz marries Ruth the Moabite, God enables conception. Commentary on divine providence, law, and family.
Research Summary
- Meaning: Boaz marries Ruth, God enables her to conceive, and she bears Obed, the grandfather of King David.
- Key words: “Yahweh gave her conception” (יְהוָה הֵרָיוֹן), God is the direct source of life and fertility, a recurring theme in Genesis.
- Main debate: How could Boaz lawfully marry a Moabitess? Commentators argue the law (Deut 23:3) applied only to men or only to those who remained pagan; Ruth was a sincere convert.
- Theological theme: God’s providence works through human obedience, legal customs, and the gift of children to restore what was lost.
- Best use: Preaching on God’s sovereignty in family, the value of faithful loyalty, and the inclusion of Gentiles in God’s plan.
Translation Comparison
BSB Berean Standard Bible 2020
So Boaz took Ruth, and she became his wife. And when he had relations with her, the LORD enabled her to conceive, and she gave birth to a son.
WEB World English Bible 2000
So Boaz took Ruth and she became his wife; and he went in to her, and Yahweh enabled her to conceive, and she bore a son.
KJV King James Version 1769
So Boaz took Ruth, and she was his wife: and when he went in unto her, the Lord gave her conception, and she bare a son.
ASV American Standard Version 1901
So Boaz took Ruth, and she became his wife; and he went in unto her, and Jehovah gave her conception, and she bare a son.
YLT Young's Literal Translation 1898
And Boaz taketh Ruth, and she becometh his wife, and he goeth in unto her, and Jehovah giveth to her conception, and she beareth a son.
Darby Darby Bible 1890
And Boaz took Ruth, and she became his wife; and he went in unto her, and Jehovah gave her conception, and she bore a son.
Douay-Rheims Douay-Rheims Bible 1899
Booz therefore took Ruth, and married her: and went in unto her, and the Lord gave her to conceive, and to bear a son.
Translations in other languages (10 available)
Booz pues tomó á Ruth, y ella fué su mujer; y luego que entró á ella, Jehová le dió que concibiese y pariese un hijo.
Então Boaz tomou a Rute, e ela foi sua mulher; e logo que entrou a ela, o SENHOR lhe deu que concebesse e desse à luz um filho.
Boaz prit Ruth, qui devint sa femme, et il alla vers elle. L’ Éternel permit à Ruth de concevoir, et elle enfanta un fils.
Also nahm Boas die Ruth, daß sie sein Weib ward. Und da er zu ihr einging, gab ihr der HERR, daß sie schwanger ward und gebar einen Sohn.
Alzo nam Boaz Ruth, en zij werd hem ter vrouwe, en hij ging tot haar in; en de HEERE gaf haar, dat zij zwanger werd en een zoon baarde.
Così Boaz prese Ruth, che divenne sua moglie. Egli entrò da lei, e l’Eterno le diè la grazia di concepire, ed ella partorì un figliuolo.
A tak pojął sobie Booz Rutę, i była mu za żonę; a gdy wszedł do niej, tedy jej dał Pan, że poczęła, i porodziła syna.
И взял Вооз Руфь, и она сделалась его женою. И вошел он к ней, и Господь дал ей беременность, и она родила сына.
於是,波阿斯 娶了 路得 為 妻,與她 同房。耶和華 使 她 懷孕 生了 一個兒子。
So Boaz took Ruth and she became his wife; and he went in to her, and the Lord made her with child and she gave birth to a son.
Verse in Context
Original Language (Biblical Hebrew)
Old Testament · Biblical Hebrew · Ruth 4:13
Source: STEPBible TAGNT/TEHB (CC-BY 4.0). Click or tap a morphology code to see the full parsing.
Scholars' Consensus
Commentators agree that this verse records the joyful climax of the book: Boaz marries Ruth, God enables her to conceive, and she bears a son. The marriage and birth are presented as a divine gift, not merely a human arrangement. Matthew Henry calls Ruth “a virtuous woman, purely for her virtues” who is now “preferred.” The narrator’s phrase “Yahweh enabled her to conceive” (Hebrew Va/yitten Yahweh lah herayon) deliberately echoes patriarchal birth accounts such as Genesis 25:21 (Isaac and Rebekah) and Genesis 30:22 (Rachel). Keil and Delitzsch note that the narrator attributes conception directly to God to show that the line of David is divinely established. On the legal question, how a Moabite could marry an Israelite, Clarke and Wesley argue that the Mosaic prohibition (Deuteronomy 23:3) did not apply to women, or that Ruth’s sincere conversion made her a full proselyte, exempt from the ban. Gill adds that the marriage proceeded without elaborate ceremonies, reflecting simpler customs. The birth of Obed fulfills the elders’ blessing in verse 11, 12 and brings Naomi from emptiness to fullness.
How settled is the interpretation?
Interpretive difficulty: Medium
Main views:
- Prohibition not applied to women: Adam Clarke notes Jewish tradition held the law of Deut 23:3 extended only to men, not to Moabite women.
- Prohibition applied only to heathens: John Wesley argues the ban was against those who remained heathen; Ruth was a sincere convert, so the marriage was permissible.
What is clear: The marriage took place and was blessed by God with a child, and the narrator presents it as a righteous and providential event that restores Naomi and continues the Davidic line.
What Scholars Agree and Debate
| Topic | Agreed | Debated |
|---|---|---|
| Lawfulness of marriage to a Moabitess | The marriage is presented in the narrative as good and blessed by God. | Some traditions say the Mosaic prohibition (Deut 23:3) did not apply to women; others say it applied only to those who remained heathen, and Ruth’s conversion made her a full member of Israel. |
| Role of God in conception | God is directly credited with enabling conception; this is a recurring biblical theme. | Some traditions emphasize this as special divine intervention; others see it as a general statement that all life comes from God. |
| Ruth’s status as a proselyte | Ruth left her country and gods to follow the Lord (Ruth 1:16, 17). | Some see her conversion as making her fully Israelite, so the marriage is lawful; others argue the narrative does not address the legal issue but shows God’s grace overrides the law. |
Historical & Cultural Context
Ruth 4:13 sits in the period of the Judges, a time of instability and moral chaos. Yet this family story in Bethlehem shines with loyalty and divine order. The marriage of Boaz and Ruth follows the legal process of redemption (goel) described in chapter 4. Boaz first secured the right from a nearer kinsman at the city gate, with elders as witnesses. The transaction included purchasing land from Naomi and marrying Ruth to “raise up the name of the dead” (4:10), a practice similar to levirate marriage (Deuteronomy 25:5, 10).
Ruth was a Moabitess, and Scripture prohibited Moabites from entering the assembly of the Lord “even to the tenth generation” (Deuteronomy 23:3). This raised a legal obstacle that the commentators address. Adam Clarke notes that Jewish tradition held the prohibition extended only to men, not women. Wesley adds that the ban was aimed at those who remained heathen, and Ruth had left her people and gods to cling to the Lord (Ruth 1:16, 17). The narrative itself offers no apology for the marriage; it is presented as the rightful and blessed outcome of Boaz’s faithful obedience and Ruth’s courage.
The cultural practice of “giving conception” (Hebrew herayon) as a direct act of God was a common biblical affirmation. Genesis 20:17, 29:31, and 30:22 all speak of God opening wombs. In a world where childlessness was considered a reproach, this divine gift restores Naomi’s family line and secures the future of Israel’s monarchy. The child Obed becomes the grandfather of King David, linking this domestic drama to God’s redemptive history.
Textual Notes
The consulted sources note no significant textual variants for Ruth 4:13. The Hebrew text is stable across manuscripts. The phrase “Yahweh enabled her to conceive” is consistent in the Masoretic Text and supported by the ancient versions.
Reception History
Throughout church history, Ruth 4:13 has been read as the joyful resolution of a story of faithfulness. Early Jewish interpreters saw it as proof that a sincere proselyte could be fully embraced by Israel. Medieval Christian commentators often highlighted Ruth as a type of the Gentile Church grafted into the people of God. In times of mourning or infertility, the verse has been used to affirm that God hears prayers and gives children as a blessing. The genealogy that follows (4:18, 22) connects this domestic birth to the Messianic line, making the verse a staple in Advent readings that trace Jesus’ ancestry back through Boaz and Ruth.
Preaching This Verse
Three-point outline
- Divinely Directed Marriage: Boaz “took Ruth” in a legal, public act (4:9, 10). The marriage is not a romantic accident but a covenant step guided by God through Naomi’s counsel, Ruth’s loyalty, and Boaz’s integrity.
- God as the Giver of Life: The narrator carefully shifts agency: “Yahweh enabled her to conceive.” Conception is not merely biological, it is a gift from the Lord. This echoes the prayers of barren women like Rachel and Rebekah and shows that every child is a divine trust.
- Joy Restored to Naomi: The birth of Obed transforms Naomi’s bitterness (1:20) into blessing. The women of Bethlehem celebrate that Naomi now has a “restorer of life” (4:15). God’s faithfulness comes through family, community, and a child.
Five-point outline
- Legal Redemption Completed: Boaz publicly secures the right to redeem Naomi’s land and marry Ruth, fulfilling the goel duty (4:9, 12).
- Marriage as Covenant: Boaz and Ruth enter a marriage that blends Levirate-like obligation with personal devotion. Their union honors the dead and serves the living.
- God’s Sovereign Intervention: “Yahweh gave her conception”, a theological declaration that children are a gift from the Lord, not merely a natural result.
- The Birth of Obed: The son is born, named Obed (meaning “servant”), and becomes the link in the Davidic lineage (4:17).
- Naomi’s Reception: Naomi takes the child as her own, symbolizing the restoration of her family line. The community’s blessing (4:14, 15) is fulfilled.
Illustration hooks
- A couple facing opposition from family or church because of different backgrounds, but their faith and commitment prove stronger.
- Someone who has been waiting for a child through infertility or adoption, struggling to see God’s hand, then receives a birth as an answer to prayer.
- An elderly person who lost children or family but gains new life through a grandchild or a younger friend who becomes like a child to them.
Questions your congregation is asking
- How can I trust God when my family situation seems hopeless or broken?
- Does God still give children in answer to prayer, or was that only in Bible times?
- What does a “kinsman-redeemer” mean for my life today, is there a New Testament parallel?
Leading a Discussion
This small group study focuses on God’s hand in the events of Ruth 4:13. Discuss how the verse ties together marriage, family, and divine intervention.
Discussion questions
- Read Ruth 4:13 aloud. What words or phrases stand out to you about how the marriage and birth are described?
- Why do you think the narrator specifically credits Yahweh with enabling conception? What does this imply about God’s role in everyday life?
- Compare this verse with Genesis 25:21 and Genesis 30:22. What pattern do you see in how the Bible speaks about conception?
- How does the community respond to the birth in verses 14, 17? What does their blessing reveal about their view of God’s faithfulness?
- The Mosaic law prohibited Moabites from entering the assembly (Deut 23:3). Yet Ruth is fully accepted. What does this teach about God’s grace and the inclusion of outsiders?
- How does this story encourage you when you face obstacles that seem to block God’s promises?
- Think of a time you saw God “give conception” in a non-literal sense, a project, a relationship, a ministry that God brought to life unexpectedly. Share with the group.
Word Study
The key original-language words in this verse. Select any word for its full lexicon entry — meaning, every occurrence in Scripture, and related words.
Cross-References
Source: Treasury of Scripture Knowledge (TSK, public domain)
| Genesis 20:17 | Abraham prayed to God. So God healed Abimelech, his wife, and his female servants, and they bore children. |
| Genesis 21:3 | Abraham called his son who was born to him, whom Sarah bore to him, Isaac. |
| Genesis 25:21 | Isaac entreated Yahweh for his wife, because she was barren. Yahweh was entreated by him, and Rebekah his wife conceived. |
| Genesis 29:31 | Yahweh saw that Leah was hated, and he opened her womb, but Rachel was barren. |
| Genesis 30:2 | Jacob’s anger burned against Rachel, and he said, “Am I in God’s place, who has withheld from you the fruit of the womb?” |
| Genesis 30:22 | God remembered Rachel, and God listened to her, and opened her womb. |
| Genesis 30:23 | She conceived, bore a son, and said, “God has taken away my reproach.” |
| Genesis 33:5 | He lifted up his eyes, and saw the women and the children; and said, “Who are these with you?” He said, “The children whom God has graciously given your servant.” |
Interlinear and lexical data from STEPBible (CC BY 4.0). Cross-reference data from OpenBible.info (CC BY 4.0). Commentaries are public domain.
For personal reflection
Read the devotional page — prayer, application, and "for families"
What the Commentators Say
7 public-domain commentaries, condensed into plain language.
Adam Clarke's Commentary Methodist/Wesleyan 1826
Clarke points out that the Mosaic law banning Moabites from the congregation did not apply to women, according to Jewish understanding. Ruth's situation was also exceptional because she had already joined the family by marriage and abandoned her country and gods to become a follower of the true God.
Geneva Bible Notes Reformed 1599
So Boaz tooke Ruth, and she was his wife: and when he went in vnto her, the Lord gaue that she conceiued, and bare a sonne.
Gill's Exposition of the Bible Baptist 1748
Gill notes that this marriage took place without the elaborate rites later Jewish tradition would require; the simple recorded event was sufficient. He also observes that conception is always God's gift, regardless of the woman's age or natural capacity.
Keil & Delitzsch OT Commentary Protestant 1876
Keil and Delitzsch focus on the economic reason the nearer redeemer refused: buying the field would benefit Ruth's future son, not his own heirs, so he would lose the capital. They also explain the shoe ceremony as a symbol of transferring land ownership, rooted in the ancient practice of taking possession by treading on the soil.
Lange's Commentary Reformed 1857
Lange argues that Ruth's self-sacrificing love, not legal duty, makes Obed Naomi's true redeemer. The child becomes a grandchild of love because of Ruth's devotion, transcending blood ties. This love, which supersedes the letter of the law, points forward to Christ's teaching that love fulfills the law.
Matthew Henry's Commentary Reformed/Presbyterian 1710
Henry contrasts Ruth's reward with Orpah's loss: Orpah returned to her people and gods, but Ruth chose to trust under God's wings and was blessed with a husband and child. Those who leave everything for Christ find more than they gave up, and Boaz became the answer to his own prayer for her.
Wesley's Explanatory Notes Methodist/Wesleyan 1754
Wesley argues that Boaz could lawfully marry Ruth because the prohibition against Moabite marriages applied only to those who remained pagans. Since Ruth was a genuine convert to the God of Israel, the restriction no longer held. He then applies the principle: those who forsake all for Christ will find more than all with him.