Leviticus 25:14 · Bible study
Leviticus 25:14 Commentary: Fair Dealing in the Jubilee Economy
Hebrew · 8 what the commentators say
Meaning in one sentence
This verse prohibits oppression in buying and selling, grounding economic ethics in God's ownership of the land and his covenant with Israel.
Research Summary
- Meaning: This verse prohibits taking advantage of another person in any commercial transaction, whether as buyer or seller.
- Key words: 'Wrong/oppress' (H3238 yanah), to treat violently, maltreat, do wrong; 'sell' (H4376 makar); 'buy' (H7069 qanah); 'neighbor' (H5997 amit); 'brother' (H0251 ach).
- Main debate: Whether the command applies strictly to land sales within the Jubilee context (Barnes, Gill) or extends to all commercial dealings (Clarke, Wesley).
- Theological theme: Economic ethics flow from God's ownership of the land and his identity as the God who redeems. Fair dealing is an expression of fearing God.
- Best use: As a key text for teaching biblical fairness in business, supporting just prices, and reminding Christians that all transactions occur before the face of God.
Translation Comparison
BSB Berean Standard Bible 2020
If you make a sale to your neighbor or a purchase from him, you must not take advantage of each other.
WEB World English Bible 2000
“‘If you sell anything to your neighbor, or buy from your neighbor, you shall not wrong one another.
KJV King James Version 1769
And if thou sell ought unto thy neighbour, or buyest ought of thy neighbour’s hand, ye shall not oppress one another:
ASV American Standard Version 1901
And if thou sell aught unto thy neighbor, or buy of thy neighbor’s hand, ye shall not wrong one another.
YLT Young's Literal Translation 1898
`And when thou sellest anything to thy fellow, or buyest from the hand of thy fellow, ye do not oppress one another;
Darby Darby Bible 1890
And if ye sell ought unto your neighbour, or buy of your neighbour's hand, ye shall not overreach one another.
Douay-Rheims Douay-Rheims Bible 1899
When thou shalt sell any thing to thy neighbour, or shalt buy of him: grieve not thy brother. But thou shalt buy of him according to the number of years from the jubilee.
Translations in other languages (10 available)
Y cuando vendiereis algo á vuestro prójimo, ó comprareis de mano de vuestro prójimo, no engañe ninguno á su hermano:
E quando venderdes algo a vosso próximo, ou comprardes da mão de vosso próximo, não engane ninguém a seu irmão:
Si vous vendez à votre prochain, ou si vous achetez de votre prochain, qu’ aucun de vous ne trompe son frère.
Wenn du nun etwas deinem Nächsten verkaufst oder ihm etwas abkaufst, soll keiner seinen Bruder übervorteilen,
Daarom, wanneer gij aan uw naaste wat veilbaars verkopen, of uit de hand uws naasten kopen zult, dat niemand de een den ander verdrukke.
Se vendete qualcosa al vostro prossimo o se comprate qualcosa dal vostro prossimo, nessuno faccia torto al suo fratello.
Jeźli co sprzedasz bliźniemu twemu, albo co kupisz od bliźniego twego, niech nie oszukiwa jeden drugiego.
Если будешь продавать что ближнему твоему, или будешь покупать что у ближнего твоего, не обижайте друг друга;
你若 賣 甚麼 給鄰舍,或是 從鄰舍 的手中 買甚麼,彼此 不可 虧負。
And in the business of trading goods for money, do no wrong to one another.
Verse in Context
Original Language (Biblical Hebrew)
Old Testament · Biblical Hebrew · Leviticus 25:14
Source: STEPBible TAGNT/TEHB (CC-BY 4.0). Click or tap a morphology code to see the full parsing.
Scholars' Consensus
Commentators agree that Leviticus 25:14 forbids taking advantage of one another in any commercial transaction, whether buyer or seller. Adam Clarke states that to buy below value or sell above value, exploiting the other party's ignorance, is 'no better than a thief.' Matthew Henry and Wesley echo this: neither the seller by requiring more, nor the buyer by giving less due to the other's necessity, may oppress. Gill's Exposition adds that the prohibition covers 'anything saleable,' including land and goods, reinforcing the importance of fair price. Barnes notes the word 'oppress' here means 'overreach', to gain by craft. The Cambridge Bible points out the shift from 'thou' to 'ye' as a feature of the sources, but the core command remains consistent. All agree the rule operates within the Jubilee framework: land sales are actually leases of crop-years, so price must be proportional to remaining harvests (v.15-16). The shared conviction: God's people are to reflect his character in even the most ordinary exchanges.
How settled is the interpretation?
Interpretive difficulty: Medium
Main views:
- Jubilee-specific reading: The immediate context (v.15-16) ties the verse directly to land sales priced by crop-years until jubilee, suggesting the wrong is disregarding that temporal limitation.
- General commercial ethics reading: The language of 'sell anything' and 'buy' is broad; cross-references like Leviticus 19:13 and Deuteronomy 16:19-20 show a wider concern for justice in all dealings.
- Restrictive view (to fellow Israelites): The terms 'neighbor' and 'brother' are used, and Jewish commentators traditionally limit the command to the covenant community.
What is clear: The verse indisputably forbids using one's position, knowledge, or power to take unfair advantage of another in a commercial transaction.
What Scholars Agree and Debate
| Topic | Agreed | Debated |
|---|---|---|
| Meaning of 'oppress/wrong' (yanah) | All traditions agree it forbids exploiting another in a transaction, whether by price, deception, or pressure. | Some (e.g., Jewish reading, Gill) restrict it to physical goods or land; others (Clarke, Wesley) treat it as a broad ethical principle against any economic unfairness. |
| Scope: land only or all commerce | The immediate context (v.15-16) is land sales before Jubilee, so the primary reference is real estate. | Conservative interpreters (Barnes, Jewish commentators) limit the application to land and movable goods that are 'bought by the hand.' Others see a general ethical principle for all trade. |
| Applicability to non-Israelites | The verse addresses 'your neighbor' and 'your brother,' implying the covenant community. | Jewish tradition (Jarchi, Gill) restricts the command to fellow Israelites. Christian tradition consistently extends it to all people, arguing that the moral principle of fairness is universal. |
| Relation to Jubilee | The command is set within the Jubilee laws and depends on the structure of land leases to families. | Is the command only meaningful if Jubilee is practically observed? Christians differ: some see it as a timeless principle of fair dealing; others view it as a specific social-economic law for ancient Israel that illustrates God's heart but is not directly binding today. |
Historical & Cultural Context
Leviticus 25 gives Israel its economic constitution. The jubilee year (v.10-13) resets land ownership every fifty years because the land belongs to God (v.23). So what looks like a sale is really a lease of the harvests until the next jubilee. Verse 14 is inserted right before instructions for pricing according to the number of years after jubilee (v.15-16). The command not to 'wrong one another' holds this new system together.
The Hebrew verb translated 'oppress' or 'wrong' is yanah. It appears elsewhere in contexts of violent oppression (Judges 4:3; 2 Chronicles 16:10), but here the force is economic: a buyer who pressures the needy seller for a low price, or a seller who hides the short time remaining until jubilee to demand a high price. The word amit (neighbor) and ach (brother) refer to fellow Israelites, part of the covenant community. This is not just a general business ethics rule, it is tied to the identity of God's redeemed people.
Cross-references like Leviticus 19:13 ('You shall not oppress your neighbor') and I Samuel 12:3-4 (Samuel's testimony that he never defrauded or oppressed) show this command was taken seriously. Wesley notes that neither party is to take advantage of the other's weakness. The surrounding verses (v.17-22) ground the command in the fear of God and promise safety in the land. The jubilee economy was designed to prevent permanent poverty and maintain family inheritances. Verse 14 stands as the ethical spine of that system: because God owns the land and is the true master, Israel must not use land transactions to build wealth at a brother's expense.
Textual Notes
The consulted sources note no significant textual variants for Leviticus 25:14. The Cambridge Bible observes a shift in person from singular ('thou') to plural ('ye'), which it attributes to the combination of two literary sources rather than a textual corruption. The verse is stable across the Masoretic Text and the versions cited (Greek, Latin, Syriac are not directly referenced in the supplied material, but no variants are claimed).
Reception History
Jewish tradition has read Leviticus 25:14 as a foundational principle of honest weights and measures, with early rabbinic discussion focusing on the precise definition of ona'ah (overreaching). Maimonides and other medieval Jewish commentators taught that price deception violates the command. In Christian tradition, the verse has been cited throughout church history to condemn usury, price gouging, and economic exploitation. The Church Fathers (such as Ambrose and Chrysostom) appealed to it in their moral critiques of the wealthy. During the Reformation, both Catholic and Protestant exegetes treated the verse as a divine mandate for just pricing in the marketplace. Modern readers often turn to this passage in discussions of economic justice, fair trade, and the ethics of business. The enduring consensus is that God cares about the details of how we buy and sell.
Preaching This Verse
Three-point outline
- The Command: Do Not Wrong One Another, The verb is active, a clear prohibition. It forbids any form of exploitation in buying or selling, whether by price manipulation, deception, or taking advantage of someone's ignorance or need.
- The Context: Jubilee Justice, This command lives inside God's economic restart. Since land returns to families every fifty years, no sale is permanent. Therefore, every transaction is a limited lease, and price reflects time, not permanent ownership. To 'wrong' someone is to ignore God's ownership and treat the sale as final.
- The Motivation: Fear of God, Verse 17 ties the command directly to 'fear your God.' Honest business is not just a social good; it is worship. When God's people deal fairly, they display God's character. When they exploit, they forget that God is watching.
Five-point outline
- The Prohibition, 'You shall not wrong one another' (v.14). The Hebrew verb yanah means to oppress, maltreat, or do violence. In commerce, this violence is economic.
- The Parties, 'Neighbor' (amit) and 'brother' (ach) signal a relationship within the covenant community. This law addresses those with a shared identity and responsibility.
- The Transactions, 'Sell' and 'buy' cover both sides of any exchange. The command applies to both the seller and the buyer, neither may exploit the other.
- The Principle, Fair price is based on honest value. Clarke says taking advantage of another's ignorance is theft. Wesley says neither party should gain from the other's necessity.
- The Foundation, 'For I am Yahweh your God' (v.17). The ultimate reason for fairness is not economic efficiency, but the character of God. The land is his; the people are his tenants. They must act like him.
Illustration hooks
- A used car dealer knows the transmission is failing, but says nothing to the buyer. That silence is a form of oppression.
- After a natural disaster, a store raises the price of bottled water to triple. That price gouging violates the spirit of this command.
- When negotiating a salary, an employer withholds information about the budget to keep pay low. The inequality of knowledge becomes a tool for oppression.
Questions your congregation is asking
- What counts as 'wronging' someone in a business deal today when most exchanges are between strangers, not neighbors?
- How does this command apply to modern investments, land development, or corporate profit margins?
- If a Christian businessperson must compete in an unfair market, where is the line between shrewdness and sin?
Leading a Discussion
This small-group guide helps you explore Leviticus 25:14 in its full Jubilee context. The command against economic oppression is not an isolated rule; it is part of God's design for a community where no one is permanently trapped in poverty. As you discuss, consider how your own buying and selling habits reflect (or fail to reflect) the character of a God who owns everything.
Discussion questions
- Observation: What specific action does this verse forbid? To whom does the command apply, the seller, the buyer, or both?
- Context: Read Leviticus 25:8-17. Why does the law talk about prices in terms of 'years of crops' until the Jubilee? What does that reveal about the nature of land sales in Israel?
- Word Study: The Hebrew verb yanah is used here (to oppress, maltreat). Look at cross-references like Judges 4:3 and 2 Chronicles 16:10. How does the meaning of 'oppression' shift when applied to buying and selling?
- Theology: Verse 17 connects 'not wronging one another' with 'fear your God.' Why is the fear of God the foundation for fair business practices? What does that connection tell us about God's character?
- Application: Identify a time when you felt taken advantage of in a purchase or sale. How did that feel? Now consider a time you might have benefited from another person's ignorance or need. How could this verse change how you handle such situations?
- Wider Principle: The law was given to Israel for its land-based economy. What principles transfer to our economy of stocks, services, and complex contracts? How might we 'wrong' others without realizing it?
- Communal Responsibility: How can your small group or church actively build an environment where members are not exploited in their financial dealings, especially those who are vulnerable?
Word Study
The key original-language words in this verse. Select any word for its full lexicon entry — meaning, every occurrence in Scripture, and related words.
Cross-References
Source: Treasury of Scripture Knowledge (TSK, public domain)
| Leviticus 19:13 | “‘You shall not oppress your neighbor, nor rob him. “‘The wages of a hired servant shall not remain with you all night until the morning. |
| Leviticus 25:17 | You shall not wrong one another, but you shall fear your God; for I am Yahweh your God. |
| Deuteronomy 16:19 | You shall not pervert justice. You shall not show partiality. You shall not take a bribe, for a bribe blinds the eyes of the wise and perverts the words of the righteous. |
| Deuteronomy 16:20 | You shall follow that which is altogether just, that you may live and inherit the land which Yahweh your God gives you. |
| Judges 4:3 | The children of Israel cried to Yahweh, for he had nine hundred chariots of iron; and he mightily oppressed the children of Israel for twenty years. |
| I Samuel 12:3 | Here I am. Witness against me before Yahweh and before his anointed. Whose ox have I taken? Whose donkey have I taken? Whom have I defrauded? Whom have I oppressed? Of whose hand have I taken a bribe to make me blind my eyes? I will restore it to you.” |
| I Samuel 12:4 | They said, “You have not defrauded us, nor oppressed us, neither have you taken anything from anyone’s hand.” |
| II Chronicles 16:10 | Then Asa was angry with the seer, and put him in the prison; for he was in a rage with him because of this thing. Asa oppressed some of the people at the same time. |
Interlinear and lexical data from STEPBible (CC BY 4.0). Cross-reference data from OpenBible.info (CC BY 4.0). Commentaries are public domain.
For personal reflection
Read the devotional page — prayer, application, and "for families"
What the Commentators Say
8 public-domain commentaries, condensed into plain language.
Adam Clarke's Commentary Methodist/Wesleyan 1826
Clarke zeroes in on the practical meaning of not oppressing one another in trade. He argues that buying goods below their worth or selling above it, when done by exploiting the other person's ignorance of the true value, is nothing less than robbery.
Barnes' Notes on the Bible Protestant 1832
Barnes clarifies that the command against oppressing one another specifically means not overreaching or defrauding each other in business dealings. He takes "sell ought" to refer to selling any piece of land, grounding the instruction in honest transactions.
Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges Anglican 1880
This commentator notes that the Jubilee year set the value of land transactions, with prices rising or falling based on the years remaining until that reset. A shift between "thou" and "ye" in the text points to two combined sources, and a rare Hebrew word for "neighbour" appears almost exclusively in the Holiness Code.
Geneva Bible Notes Reformed 1599
The Geneva annotators specify that the command not to "oppress" one another in trade directly forbids deception or trickery. Buying and selling must be conducted with honesty, not by taking unfair advantage through fraud or misrepresentation.
Gill's Exposition of the Bible Baptist 1748
Gill clarifies that the command against oppressing a neighbor in trade applies specifically to fellow Israelites, not to Gentiles. He insists the law demands fair pricing without advantage-taking, and corrects the idea that Jews could never sell land: they could not sell it permanently, only until the Jubilee.
Lange's Commentary Reformed 1857
Lange sees the Sabbatical and Jubilee years as a comprehensive system for keeping holy the land, its produce, and the social order of Israel. The fundamental thought is that Jehovah alone owns the land and everything in it, so these institutions periodically restore the divinely appointed relations that get disturbed over time.
Matthew Henry's Commentary Reformed/Presbyterian 1710
Henry ties the Jubilee directly to the Day of Atonement, noting that the same day that brought pardon also proclaimed liberty, restoring every person to their family and property. This design, he argues, prevented lasting inequality and enforced the command not to oppress, since the land and its inhabitants belonged to God.
Wesley's Explanatory Notes Methodist/Wesleyan 1754
Wesley defines oppression in commerce as a two-sided sin. It includes the seller who demands more than fair value, and the buyer who exploits a brother's need to pay less than something is worth. Both actions misuse the other's position for unjust gain.