Joshua 6:17 · Bible study
Joshua 6:17 Commentary: Devoted to God, Rahab Spared
Hebrew · 10 what the commentators say
Meaning in one sentence
Why Jericho was placed under the ban (herem) and why Rahab alone was spared, firstfruits theology and grace amid judgment.
Research Summary
- Meaning: The city is placed under a divine ban (cherem), set apart for God through destruction; only Rahab and her household are spared because of her faith in hiding the spies.
- Key words: cherem (devoted/accursed), Rahab ha-zonah (the prostitute), tichyeh (she will live).
- Main debate: Whether the herem decree was given directly by God or was Joshua’s own pious initiative (per Jewish sources cited by Gill).
- Theological theme: Firstfruits consecration to God, judgment on Canaanite sin, and grace toward those who trust in the God of Israel.
- Best use: A lens for understanding God’s holiness, the cost of allegiance, and the surprising reach of saving mercy.
Translation Comparison
BSB Berean Standard Bible 2020
Now the city and everything in it must be devoted to the LORD for destruction. Only Rahab the prostitute and all those with her in her house will live, because she hid the spies we sent.
WEB World English Bible 2000
The city shall be devoted, even it and all that is in it, to Yahweh. Only Rahab the prostitute shall live, she and all who are with her in the house, because she hid the messengers that we sent.
KJV King James Version 1769
And the city shall be accursed, even it, and all that are therein, to the Lord: only Rahab the harlot shall live, she and all that are with her in the house, because she hid the messengers that we sent.
ASV American Standard Version 1901
And the city shall be devoted, even it and all that is therein, to Jehovah: only Rahab the harlot shall live, she and all that are with her in the house, because she hid the messengers that we sent.
YLT Young's Literal Translation 1898
and the city hath been devoted, it and all that is in it, to Jehovah; only Rahab the harlot doth live, she and all who are with her in the house, for she hid the messengers whom we sent;
Darby Darby Bible 1890
And the city shall be accursed, it and all that is in it, to Jehovah; only Rahab the harlot shall live, she and all that are with her in the house, because she hid the messengers that we sent.
Douay-Rheims Douay-Rheims Bible 1899
And let this city be an anathema, and all things that are in it, to the Lord. Let only Rahab, the harlot, live, with all that are with her in the house: for she hid the messengers whom we sent.
Translations in other languages (10 available)
Mas la ciudad será anatema á Jehová, ella con todas las cosas que están en ella: solamente Rahab la ramera vivirá, con todos los que estuvieren en casa con ella, por cuanto escondió los mensajeros que enviamos.
Mas a cidade será anátema ao SENHOR, ela com todas as coisas que estão nela: somente Raabe a prostituta viverá, com todos os que estiverem em casa com ela, porquanto escondeu os mensageiros que enviamos.
La ville sera dévouée à l’ Éternel par interdit, elle et tout ce qui s’ y trouve; mais on laissera la vie à Rahab la prostituée et à tous ceux qui seront avec elle dans la maison, parce qu’ elle a caché les messagers que nous avions envoyés.
Aber diese Stadt und alles, was darin ist, soll dem HERRN verbannt sein. Allein die Hure Rahab soll leben bleiben und alle, die mit ihr im Hause sind; denn sie hat die Boten verborgen, die wir aussandten.
Doch deze stad zal den HEERE verbannen zijn, zij en al wat daarin is; alleenlijk zal de hoer Rachab levend blijven, zij en allen, die met haar in het huis zijn, omdat zij de boden, die wij uitgezonden hadden, verborgen heeft.
E la città con tutto quel che contiene sarà sacrata all’Eterno per essere sterminata come un interdetto; solo Rahab, la meretrice, avrà salva la vita: lei e tutti quelli che saranno in casa con lei, perché nascose i messaggeri che noi avevamo inviati.
I niech będzie to miasto przeklęstwem Panu, ono, i wszystko co w niem jest; tylko Rachab wszetecznica żywo zostanie, ona i wszyscy, którzy z nią są w domu, gdyż utaiła posłów, któreśmy byli posłali.
но вы берегитесь заклятого, чтоб и самим не подвергнуться заклятию, если возьмете что-нибудь из заклятого, и чтобы на стан [сынов] Израилевых не навести заклятия и не сделать ему беды;
這城 和其中 所有的 都要 在耶和華面前 毀滅;只有 妓女 喇合 與她 家中 所有的 可以存活,因為 她隱藏了 我們所 打發 的使者。
And the town will be put to the curse, and everything in it will be given to the Lord: only Rahab, the loose woman, and all who are in the house with her, will be kept safe, because she kept secret the men we sent.
Verse in Context
Original Language (Biblical Hebrew)
Old Testament · Biblical Hebrew · Joshua 6:17
Source: STEPBible TAGNT/TEHB (CC-BY 4.0). Click or tap a morphology code to see the full parsing.
Scholars' Consensus
Commentators agree that Joshua 6:17 establishes the principle of herem (devotion to destruction) for Jericho as the first city taken in the conquest. Calvin, Barnes, and Gill all describe Jericho as “firstfruits”, the initial fruits of the land, wholly consecrated to God. This meant no plunder for the people; all living things were slain (except Rahab and her household), and metals went to the sanctuary treasury (v.19). Matthew Henry notes the severity was to strike terror into other enemies. On the exception: commentators uniformly trace Rahab’s survival to her act of hiding the spies (Joshua 2), which the book of Hebrews (11:31) later cites as an act of faith. There is some disagreement among Jewish interpreters, Kimchi believes the herem command came from God, while other rabbis (per Gill) suggest Joshua declared it on his own initiative, but Christian commentators generally see it as a direct divine ordinance.
How settled is the interpretation?
Interpretive difficulty: Medium
Main views:
- Divine firstfruits command: Commentators (Calvin, Barnes, Gill) emphasize that God commanded the total destruction as a firstfruits offering, based on the unique status of Jericho as the first city taken.
- Joshua’s personal initiative: Jewish sources cited by Gill suggest Joshua declared the herem on his own authority, though this view is less common among Christian interpreters.
What is clear: God set Jericho apart as wholly His, and Rahab was spared because she aligned herself with Israel and its God through her act of faith in hiding the spies.
What Scholars Agree and Debate
| Topic | Agreed | Debated |
|---|---|---|
| Source of the herem command | The city is devoted to Yahweh as a firstfruits offering. | Jewish doctors (per Gill) thought Joshua ordered it himself; Kimchi believed God commanded it. Christian commentators generally see it as a direct divine ordinance. |
| Purpose of the destruction | It establishes God’s claim on the land and judges Canaanite sin. | Wesley adds it prevented soldiers from growing sluggish; Matthew Henry sees it as striking terror; Calvin emphasizes it as a pledge of gratitude. |
| Rahab’s profession and character | She is called a prostitute (<em>zonah</em>) in the text, yet she is spared because of her faith. | Some ancient versions (Targum) render <em>zonah</em> as “innkeeper,” perhaps to soften the term. Calvin and others accept the plain reading but highlight her faith, not her past. |
| Moral justification of the herem | It was an act of God’s righteous judgment on a culture that had filled up its iniquity. | Some modern readers find the level of destruction troubling. Historic commentators generally accept it as God’s sovereign right; contemporary theologians often emphasize the unique context of the conquest. |
| Applicability for Christians today | The herem is not a direct model for Christian conduct in warfare. | Some traditions see it as a type of God’s final judgment on sin; others view it as a unique historical command that does not carry over into the New Covenant. |
Historical & Cultural Context
Jericho was the first fortified Canaanite city Israel encountered after crossing the Jordan. Its capture was not merely a military event but a theological one. The term cherem (Strong’s H2764) carried the sense of “ban” or “devoted thing”, something withdrawn from common use and given wholly to God. In ancient Near Eastern warfare, victors often devoted captured cities to their gods. For Israel, the herem was commanded by Yahweh as an act of judgment on the Canaanites, whose sins had “filled up their iniquities” (Gen 15:16; see also Lev 18:24-28).
Jericho received the weight of this judgment first. Barnes and Calvin both point out that the first city taken was to be a firstfruits offering. By destroying it entirely and taking no spoils, Israel declared that the whole land came from God’s hand. The city’s walls fell by miracle, not human strength, so the victory clearly belonged to Yahweh alone. The sparing of Rahab, a Canaanite prostitute who hid the spies, broke the pattern of total destruction. Her house marked with a scarlet cord (Joshua 2:18-21) became a zone of safety. This exception was grounded in her faith and her act of allegiance to Israel’s God. She and her family were “saved alive” and later incorporated into the people of Israel (Josh 6:25).
The wider context reinforces the unique status of Jericho. Silver, gold, and metal vessels were not destroyed but consecrated to the sanctuary (v.19). The city itself was never to be rebuilt (v.26). These details show that the herem was both a judgment and a holy offering, a solemn act that set the pattern for how Israel was to receive the land.
Textual Notes
The consulted commentaries note no significant textual variants for Joshua 6:17. The reading is stable across Hebrew manuscripts and ancient versions (Septuagint, Vulgate). The key term cherem is consistently rendered “accursed” or “devoted” in English translations, reflecting the same underlying form.
Reception History
From the early church onward, Joshua 6:17 has been read as a striking intersection of judgment and mercy. Origen and Augustine saw in Rahab a type of the church, a sinful outsider saved by faith and the sign of the scarlet cord (interpreted as the blood of Christ). In the Reformation, Calvin and Luther emphasized the herem as a demonstration of God’s sovereignty and the seriousness of firstfruits devotion. Matthew Henry and later Wesleyan commentators stressed both the terror of the judgment and the grace extended to Rahab, holding them together as parts of one divine act. In modern interpretation, the passage has prompted deeper reflection on the ethics of holy war and the nature of divine judgment, with many Christians reading it as a pointer to the ultimate judgment that fell on Christ, the one who bore God’s curse so that outsiders like Rahab could be brought in. The book of Hebrews (11:31) and James (2:25) both celebrate Rahab as a model of living faith.
Preaching This Verse
Three-point outline
- The Firstfruits Principle. The first city taken belonged wholly to God. This calls believers to give God the first and best of what they receive, acknowledging Him as the giver of all victory.
- Judgment and Holiness. God’s holiness consumes what stands against Him. The herem is a stark reminder that sin invites divine judgment, but it also sets the stage for mercy.
- Grace for the Unexpected. Rahab, a prostitute and an outsider, is saved because she turned toward the God of Israel. Grace can reach anyone, anywhere, who trusts in Him.
Five-point outline
- God Claims the First City as His Own.
- Total Devotion Required: No Plunder, No Profit.
- The Danger of Taking What Is Set Apart (v.18).
- Rahab’s Faith Made Visible in Action.
- The City Falls, but Mercy Endures.
Illustration hooks
- The first paycheck. When someone gets their first salary and decides to give a major portion to God before spending any, that is the firstfruits principle. It costs something.
- A demolition order. A city condemned for safety: everything inside must be removed or destroyed. Some things cannot be salvaged; the whole structure must come down. God’s judgment on Jericho was final, but He marked one house for salvation.
- The outsider welcomed in. A person who was once hostile to a community is given protection because of a single act of trust. Rahab’s story still surprises.
Questions your congregation is asking
- “Why would God command the death of every person, including children and animals?”
- “What does this say about God’s character? Is He loving or violent?”
- “How can Rahab’s story, a prostitute and an outsider, be relevant to my life today?”
Leading a Discussion
This passage confronts us with God’s holiness and His mercy. The command to destroy Jericho was not arbitrary; it was an act of judgment on a culture that had rejected God for centuries. Yet in the midst of judgment, God provided a way of escape for anyone who would trust Him, even a Canaanite prostitute. Use these questions to help your group dig into the text and apply it.
Discussion questions
- Read Joshua 6:17 carefully. What does it mean that the city is “devoted” to the Lord? How does Leviticus 27:28-29 help explain this concept?
- Why was Jericho treated differently from other cities in the conquest? (See also Deuteronomy 20:10-17 for comparison.)
- What reasons do the commentators give for the herem on Jericho? Which reason strikes you most?
- Rahab is singled out for mercy. What did she do that set her apart? How does her faith (Hebrews 11:31) connect to her actions?
- If you had been an Israelite soldier, how would you have felt about killing everyone but sparing one household? What does this reveal about obedience and trust?
- In what areas of your life is God asking you to “devote” something wholly to Him, not holding back or taking a share for yourself?
- How does this story shape your understanding of God’s judgment and His grace? Where do you see yourself in the story, among Israel, or like Rahab, an outsider receiving mercy?
Word Study
The key original-language words in this verse. Select any word for its full lexicon entry — meaning, every occurrence in Scripture, and related words.
Cross-References
Source: Treasury of Scripture Knowledge (TSK, public domain)
| Genesis 12:3 | I will bless those who bless you, and I will curse him who treats you with contempt. All the families of the earth will be blessed through you.” |
| Leviticus 27:28 | “‘Notwithstanding, no devoted thing that a man devotes to Yahweh of all that he has, whether of man or animal, or of the field of his possession, shall be sold or redeemed. Everything that is permanently devoted is most holy to Yahweh. |
| Leviticus 27:29 | “‘No one devoted to destruction, who shall be devoted from among men, shall be ransomed. He shall surely be put to death. |
| Numbers 21:2 | Israel vowed a vow to Yahweh, and said, “If you will indeed deliver this people into my hand, then I will utterly destroy their cities.” |
| Numbers 21:3 | Yahweh listened to the voice of Israel, and delivered up the Canaanites; and they utterly destroyed them and their cities. The name of the place was called Hormah. |
| Deuteronomy 20:17 | but you shall utterly destroy them: the Hittite, the Amorite, the Canaanite, the Perizzite, the Hivite, and the Jebusite, as Yahweh your God has commanded you; |
| Joshua 2:1 | Joshua the son of Nun secretly sent two men out of Shittim as spies, saying, “Go, view the land, including Jericho.” They went and came into the house of a prostitute whose name was Rahab, and slept there. |
| Joshua 2:4 | The woman took the two men and hid them. Then she said, “Yes, the men came to me, but I didn’t know where they came from. |
Interlinear and lexical data from STEPBible (CC BY 4.0). Cross-reference data from OpenBible.info (CC BY 4.0). Commentaries are public domain.
For personal reflection
Read the devotional page — prayer, application, and "for families"
What the Commentators Say
9 public-domain commentaries, condensed into plain language.
Adam Clarke's Commentary Methodist/Wesleyan 1826
Clarke suggests that the city was offered peace before the destruction, and the extermination followed only after that offer was rejected. The term "accursed" or devoted to destruction refers to the inhabitants' fate, not an unconditional command to kill.
Barnes' Notes on the Bible Protestant 1832
Barnes draws a sharp contrast: in ordinary conquests only the people were killed and goods were taken as plunder, but Jericho was set apart as the first-fruits of the land to God. Every living thing was slaughtered as a sacrifice, and the durable items went into the sanctuary treasury.
Calvin's Commentaries Reformed 1564
Calvin explains that Jericho alone was consecrated as a kind of first fruits to God. The people were to renounce any plunder from it, since God alone brought down its walls. This taught Israel that everything they owned came from God's free generosity, and they owed Him the first and best.
Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges Anglican 1880
The commentary explains that the word translated "accursed" carries the meaning of being devoted or set apart to God, put under a ban that results in destruction and cannot be redeemed. It draws a direct parallel to the Greek term "anathema" used by Paul.
Geneva Bible Notes Reformed 1599
The Geneva note stresses that Jericho and everything in it is a devoted thing, placed under a holy ban of destruction by the Lord himself. Rahab alone is spared, and only those with her in her house, specifically because she hid the spies. The contrast between total judgment and one household's mercy is drawn sharply.
Gill's Exposition of the Bible Baptist 1748
Gill stresses that Jericho, as the first city conquered in Canaan, was devoted entirely to the Lord as firstfruits of the land. This act acknowledged God's gift and tested Israel's obedience, since such a fine city was to be destroyed rather than inhabited. He holds that the command came from God, not from Joshua's own decision.
Jamieson-Fausset-Brown Commentary Protestant 1871
jfb explains that Joshua pronounced the ban on Jericho by God's direct command. The severity was justified because the inhabitants had resisted the miracle at the Jordan and belonged to a race whose sins were complete. Destroying this wealthy city paralyzed the land, proving the conquest was God's work, not human power.
Matthew Henry's Commentary Reformed/Presbyterian 1710
Matthew Henry emphasizes the clear distinction between what is devoted to destruction and what is consecrated to the Lord. The entire city and its inhabitants were accursed, but the precious metals were set apart for God's treasury, and Rahab's family alone was preserved alive because of her faithful act in hiding the spies.
Wesley's Explanatory Notes Methodist/Wesleyan 1754
Wesley lists three reasons the spoils of Jericho were devoted to God: firstfruits belong to Him, keeping soldiers from becoming sluggish with plunder, and striking terror into remaining enemies. This was not a human decree but a specific command from God.