Deuteronomy 3:4 · Bible study
Deuteronomy 3:4 Commentary: Sixty Cities of God's Faithfulness
Hebrew · 10 what the commentators say
Meaning in one sentence
Deuteronomy 3:4 recounts the capture of sixty fortified cities from Og of Bashan, a sign of God's faithfulness to His covenant promises.
Research Summary
- Meaning: God's total victory over the kingdom of Og, demonstrated by the capture of sixty fortified cities.
- Key words: capture (לכד), sixty (ששּׁים), region of Argob (חבל ארגב), kingdom of Og (ממלכת עוג).
- Main debate: The exact location of Argob, whether it is the volcanic region of el-Leja (Trachonitis) or another part of Bashan.
- Theological theme: God's faithfulness to His covenant promises; His power to overcome human obstacles.
- Best use: A passage for teaching God's sovereignty over history and the concrete nature of His blessings.
Translation Comparison
BSB Berean Standard Bible 2020
At that time we captured all sixty of his cities. There was not a single city we failed to take—the entire region of Argob, the kingdom of Og in Bashan.
WEB World English Bible 2000
We took all his cities at that time. There was not a city which we didn’t take from them: sixty cities, all the region of Argob, the kingdom of Og in Bashan.
KJV King James Version 1769
And we took all his cities at that time, there was not a city which we took not from them, threescore cities, all the region of Argob, the kingdom of Og in Bashan.
ASV American Standard Version 1901
And we took all his cities at that time; there was not a city which we took not from them; threescore cities, all the region of Argob, the kingdom of Og in Bashan.
YLT Young's Literal Translation 1898
and we capture all his cities at that time, there hath not been a city which we have not taken from them, sixty cities, all the region of Argob, the kingdom of Og in Bashan.
Darby Darby Bible 1890
And we took all his cities at that time: there was not a town which we took not from them, sixty cities, the whole region of Argob, the kingdom of Og in Bashan.
Douay-Rheims Douay-Rheims Bible 1899
Wasting all his cities at one time, there was not a town that escaped us: sixty cities, all the country of Argob the kingdom of Og in Basan.
Translations in other languages (10 available)
Y tomamos entonces todas sus ciudades; no quedó ciudad que no les tomásemos: sesenta ciudades, toda la tierra de Argob, del reino de Og en Basán.
E tomamos então todas suas cidades; não restou cidade que não lhes tomássemos: sessenta cidades, toda a terra de Argobe, do reino de Ogue em Basã.
Nous prîmes alors toutes ses villes, et il n’ y en eut pas une qui ne tombât en notre pouvoir: soixante villes, toute la contrée d’Argob, le royaume d’ Og en Basan.
Da gewannen wir zu der Zeit alle seine Städte (und war keine Stadt, die wir ihm nicht nahmen): sechzig Städte, die ganze Gegend Argob, das Königreich Ogs von Basan.
En wij namen te dier tijd al zijn steden; er was geen stad, die wij van hen niet namen: zestig steden, de ganse landstreek van Argob, het koninkrijk van Og in Bazan.
Gli prendemmo in quel tempo tutte le sue città; non ci fu città che noi non prendessimo loro: sessanta città, tutta la contrada d’Argob, il regno di Og in Basan.
Wzięliśmy też wszystkie miasta jego na on czas; nie było miasta, którego byśmy im nie wzięli, sześćdziesiąt miast, wszystkę krainę Argob królestwa Ogowego w Basan.
и взяли мы в то время все города его; не было города, которого мы не взяли бы у них: шестьдесят городов, всю область Аргов, царство Ога Васанского;
那 時,我們奪了 他所有的 城,共有六十 座,沒 有 一座城 不 被我們所 奪。這為亞珥歌伯 的全 境,就是巴珊地 噩 王的國。
At that time we took all his towns; there was not one town of the sixty towns, all the country of Argob, the kingdom of Og in Bashan, which we did not take.
Verse in Context
Original Language (Biblical Hebrew)
Old Testament · Biblical Hebrew · Deuteronomy 3:4
Source: STEPBible TAGNT/TEHB (CC-BY 4.0). Click or tap a morphology code to see the full parsing.
Scholars' Consensus
Commentators agree that this verse underscores the totality of Israel's victory in Bashan and God's active role in it. Calvin highlights 'the special power of God' in enabling Israel to take so many well-fortified cities in a short time. Keil and Delitzsch note that 'the whole region of Argob' included the sixty towns, and that the detail of sixty cities demonstrates the extent of the land God gave. Barnes identifies these as the cities of Jair (Deuteronomy 3:14). Gill remarks that sixty cities was a large number for such a small country, showing it was well inhabited. The Cambridge Bible points to the identification of Argob with the region of Trachonitis (Leja), a stony lava plateau. The common thread is that the verse documents a complete and divinely enabled conquest, fulfilling God's promise to defeat the Amorite kings (Deuteronomy 3:2).
How settled is the interpretation?
Interpretive difficulty: Low
What is clear: The capture of sixty cities in Bashan demonstrates God's faithfulness in fulfilling His promise to give Israel the land, and that the victory was total and divinely enabled.
What Scholars Agree and Debate
| Topic | Agreed | Debated |
|---|---|---|
| Location of Argob | Argob was a distinct region within the kingdom of Og in Bashan, known for its stony terrain. | Some identify it with the Trachonitis plateau (el-Leja), while others point to the area around Gerasa or other parts of Hauran. |
| Number of cities | The sixty cities represent the fortified towns of Bashan, and the number is literal and historically significant. | Some debate whether these are the 'cities of Jair' (Num 32:41) or a separate group, but the text equates them with the whole region of Argob. |
| Interpretation of conquest | The conquest was a divine gift to Israel, fulfilling the promise to give them the land. | Christians differ on how to apply the conquest narratives today: some see them as historical events with spiritual lessons about God's power; others also read them as types of Christ's victory over sin and the world. Both perspectives honor the text. |
Historical & Cultural Context
The region of Argob, meaning 'stone-heap,' is a distinctive area in Bashan, often identified with the volcanic lava field of el-Leja (Trachonitis). As Barnes notes, its borders are like a rugged shore-line, earning the description 'the girdle of the stony country.' The Hebrew word for 'region' is חבל (chevel), literally a rope or cord used for measuring land, suggesting that the territory was delineated and assigned. This matches the practice of land measurement by cords, noted by Clarke.
Bashan itself, meaning 'fruitful,' was a fertile plateau east of the Jordan, famous for its rich pastures and oak forests. The sixty cities were fortified with high walls, gates, and bars (v. 5), indicating a well-established urban network. The size of the kingdom is also hinted at by the mention of Og's iron bedstead (v. 11), underscoring his legendary stature.
Literarily, this passage appears within Moses' retelling of the conquest in Deuteronomy 3, which emphasizes that the victories were God's doing (v. 3). The precision of the number, sixty cities, is intended to affirm that the victory was not partial but complete. For the original audience, this record served both as praise for God's power and as an assurance that the land they were inheriting was extensive and secure.
This historical detail reminds readers that God's promises come with concrete, verifiable outcomes. The territory that once belonged to a giant king became an inheritance for God's people, a sign that no obstacle is too great for the Lord.
Textual Notes
The consulted commentaries and textual sources do not note any significant textual variants for Deuteronomy 3:4. The verse is stable across the major Hebrew manuscripts and ancient translations. The primary interpretative questions revolve around the identification of the geographical names rather than textual differences.
Reception History
Deuteronomy 3:4, with its precise record of sixty cities, has been noted by ancient Jewish sources (e.g., Targum Onkelos renders Argob as 'Tracona'). Jerome's Onomasticon identifies a village named Arga near Gerasa, preserving the name. In Christian exegesis, the conquest of Bashan has often been seen as a demonstration of God's covenant faithfulness. The passage is referenced in 1 Kings 4:13 to describe the prosperity of Solomon's kingdom, linking the region to Israel's later glory. Throughout church history, interpreters have used the detail of sixty cities to emphasize that God does not give vague promises but concrete, numbered blessings. The verse continues to remind believers of the thoroughness of God's deliverance.
Preaching This Verse
Three-point outline
- God's power over human fortifications. The sixty cities were well fortified (v. 5), yet Israel took them all. God's strength surpasses every human defense.
- God's faithfulness in fulfilling promises. The Lord had told Moses not to fear (v. 2), and He delivered Og and his land. The conquest was not a fluke but a covenant fulfilment.
- The completeness of God's deliverance. “There was not a city which we didn't take.” God does things thoroughly; His salvation leaves no gaps.
Five-point outline
- The promise (v. 2): God assures Moses before the battle.
- The battle (v. 3): God gives the victory over Og and his people.
- The scope (v. 4): Sixty cities taken, no exceptions.
- The inheritance (v. 12-17): The land is distributed to the tribes (Reuben, Gad, half-Manasseh).
- The memory (v. 11): Og's bed is preserved as a reminder of God's triumph over the giants.
Illustration hooks
- Facing a large task that seems impossible, like taking sixty fortified cities, but discovering that each step of obedience reveals a bigger God than the obstacle.
- Surveying a piece of land: the act of measuring out a region with a rope, claiming it as one's own before any development begins. God measured Argob and gave it to Israel as a settled possession.
- A house renovation that uncovers hidden problems: God's conquest was thorough; He exposed and removed every resistance, leaving nothing for later regret.
Questions your congregation is asking
- Why does God command total destruction of entire cities? How does this fit with His love and justice?
- How can I apply the conquest narrative to my own spiritual battles without misusing it to justify violent attitudes?
- If God gave Israel such a comprehensive victory, why do so many believers today still struggle with persistent sin or hardship?
Leading a Discussion
This verse sits within the history of Israel's conquest of Canaan. At this point, Moses is recounting to the new generation the victories God gave them over Sihon and Og. The mention of sixty cities is a powerful detail: it shows that God's deliverance was total, and that the land He promised was extensive and prosperous. For a small-group discussion, let the numbers and geography remind you that God works in specific, measurable ways.
Discussion questions
- Read verses 1, 11. What do you notice about the way Moses describes the conquest? How does he give credit to God?
- The text specifically lists “sixty cities.” Why do you think the number is preserved? What effect does that detail have on you as a reader?
- How does the description of Argob (a “stone-heap” region) help you visualize the land Israel received?
- In what ways does this passage connect to God's earlier promises to Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob?
- What does the existence of fortified cities say about the challenges Israel faced? How did God meet those challenges?
- This conquest is part of the “Old Covenant” story. How do you see continuity with God's work in the New Testament and in your own life?
- Take one verse or phrase from this passage and turn it into a prayer of thanks for God's faithfulness.
Word Study
The key original-language words in this verse. Select any word for its full lexicon entry — meaning, every occurrence in Scripture, and related words.
Cross-References
Source: Treasury of Scripture Knowledge (TSK, public domain)
| Numbers 32:33 | Moses gave to them, even to the children of Gad, and to the children of Reuben, and to the half-tribe of Manasseh the son of Joseph, the kingdom of Sihon king of the Amorites, and the kingdom of Og king of Bashan; the land, according to its cities and borders, even the cities of the surrounding land. |
| Numbers 32:42 | Nobah went and took Kenath and its villages, and called it Nobah, after his own name. |
| Joshua 12:4 | and the border of Og king of Bashan, of the remnant of the Rephaim, who lived at Ashtaroth and at Edrei, |
| Joshua 13:30 | Their border was from Mahanaim, all Bashan, all the kingdom of Og king of Bashan, and all the villages of Jair, which are in Bashan, sixty cities. |
| Joshua 13:31 | Half Gilead, Ashtaroth, and Edrei, the cities of the kingdom of Og in Bashan, were for the children of Machir the son of Manasseh, even for the half of the children of Machir according to their families. |
| I Kings 4:13 | Ben Geber, in Ramoth Gilead (the towns of Jair the son of Manasseh, which are in Gilead, belonged to him; and the region of Argob, which is in Bashan, sixty great cities with walls and bronze bars, belonged to him); |
Interlinear and lexical data from STEPBible (CC BY 4.0). Cross-reference data from OpenBible.info (CC BY 4.0). Commentaries are public domain.
For personal reflection
Read the devotional page — prayer, application, and "for families"
What the Commentators Say
9 public-domain commentaries, condensed into plain language.
Adam Clarke's Commentary Methodist/Wesleyan 1826
Clarke notes that the Hebrew phrase for "all the region of Argob" literally means "all the cable or cord of Argob," showing that land was measured by lines or cords, much like the Egyptian schoenus. He adds that this region may later have been called Trachonites.
Barnes' Notes on the Bible Protestant 1832
Barnes observes that the Hebrew word for “region” literally means “rope” or “cable,” suggesting a measured portion of land. He explains that Argob means “stone-heap” or “rough country,” with borders compared to a rugged shoreline, making the phrase “the girdle of the stony
Calvin's Commentaries Reformed 1564
Calvin highlights the sheer number of well-fortified cities taken in such a short time as clear evidence of God's extraordinary help. He then points to the giant Og and his iron bedstead to magnify the marvel: one man who could terrify an army was overcome by God's power working through Israel.
Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges Anglican 1880
The Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges notes that the Hebrew term for region implies a measured piece of land, while Argob likely derives from a word for clod or glebe. This suggests the name describes the lava field of Leja in Hauran, a clumpy, cracked mass sharply distinct from the surrounding plain.
Geneva Bible Notes Reformed 1599
The Geneva Notes emphasize the total and immediate conquest of Og's kingdom. All sixty cities in the region of Argob in Bashan were taken at the same moment, with not a single city left untouched, underscoring the completeness of Israel's victory.
Gill's Exposition of the Bible Baptist 1748
Gill identifies the region of Argob with Trachonitis, based on Targum and Josephus, and notes that Jewish sources say Argob was named after a man. He also points to Jerome's mention of a village called Arga and the Mishnah's mention of Ragab, showing the area's later significance. For Gill, the sixty captured cities reveal how densely populated this small region was.
Keil & Delitzsch OT Commentary Protestant 1876
Keil-Delitzsch draws attention to the volcanic landscape of Bashan, whose black basaltic stone and rocky soil perfectly match the biblical report of sixty fortified towns. The region's characteristic stone doors, high walls, and iron gates reflect a durable, ancient building style that agrees with the description of Og's kingdom.
Matthew Henry's Commentary Reformed/Presbyterian 1710
Henry highlights that the conquests of Sihon and Og are frequently linked in Scripture because they mark the beginning of Israel's triumphs, and are recalled in the Psalms to the praise of God. He notes that even a formidable giant like Og was no match for God's promise, making these victories a foundation for later confidence.
Wesley's Explanatory Notes Methodist/Wesleyan 1754
Wesley clarifies that the phrase points not to the river itself but to the land beyond it. He notes that Jabbok marked the Ammonite border, so crossing it meant entering enemy territory. This geographical detail sharpens the reader's sense of the setting.