Psalms 120:5 · Bible study
Psalms 120:5 Commentary: Exile among Hostile Peoples
Hebrew · 11 what the commentators say
Meaning in one sentence
Why does the psalmist name Meshech and Kedar? Discover the meaning of this lament in Psalm 120:5, a Song of Ascents.
Research Summary
- Meaning: The psalmist cries out about living among people as hostile as the barbarian tribes Meshech and Kedar.
- Key words: “Woe” (אוֹיָה, H0190), a cry of deep distress. “Sojourn” (גּוּר, H1481), temporary lodging as a stranger. “Tents” (אֹהֶל, H0168), symbolic of nomadic, unsettled life.
- Main debate: Are Meshech and Kedar literal locations or symbolic names? Most commentators take the symbolic view because the tribes lived far apart.
- Theological theme: The believer’s exile in a hostile world, and the longing for God’s peace amidst conflict.
- Best use: Teaching on honest lament, living as aliens in a fallen world, and the hope of pilgrimage toward God’s presence.
Translation Comparison
BSB Berean Standard Bible 2020
Woe to me that I dwell in Meshech, that I live among the tents of Kedar!
WEB World English Bible 2000
Woe is me, that I live in Meshech, that I dwell among the tents of Kedar!
KJV King James Version 1769
Woe is me, that I sojourn in Mesech, that I dwell in the tents of Kedar!
ASV American Standard Version 1901
Woe is me, that I sojourn in Meshech, That I dwell among the tents of Kedar!
YLT Young's Literal Translation 1898
Woe to me, for I have inhabited Mesech, I have dwelt with tents of Kedar.
Darby Darby Bible 1890
Woe is me, that I sojourn in Meshech, that I dwell among the tents of Kedar!
Douay-Rheims Douay-Rheims Bible 1899
The Lord is thy keeper, the Lord is thy protection upon thy right hand.
Translations in other languages (10 available)
¡ Ay de mí, que peregrino en Mesech, y habito entre las tiendas de Kedar!
Ai de mim, que peregrino em Meseque, e habito nas tendas de Quedar!
Malheureux que je suis de séjourner à Méschec,
Wehe mir, daß ich ein Fremdling bin unter Mesech; ich muß wohnen unter den Hütten Kedars.
O, wee mij, dat ik een vreemdeling ben in Mesech, dat ik in de tenten Kedars wone.
Misero me che soggiorno in Mesec, e dimoro fra le tende di Kedar!
Niestetyż mnie, żem tak długo gościem w Mesech, a mieszkam w namiotach Kedarskich.
Господь - хранитель твой; Господь - сень твоя с правой руки твоей.
我寄居 在米設,住 在基達 帳棚 之中,有禍了!
Sorrow is mine because I am strange in Meshech, and living in the tents of Kedar.
Verse in Context
Original Language (Biblical Hebrew)
Old Testament · Biblical Hebrew · Psalms 120:5
Source: STEPBible TAGNT/TEHB (CC-BY 4.0). Click or tap a morphology code to see the full parsing.
Scholars' Consensus
Commentators across traditions agree that the place names in this verse are not meant literally. Meshech and Kedar were remote, barbarous peoples, the first from Asia Minor, the second from the Arabian desert. The psalmist is not claiming to live in both at once. Rather, as Calvin argues, he uses them as emblems of a savage and hostile environment. Barnes adds that the Hebrew verb for “sojourn” (גּוּר, gur) typically means a temporary stay, like a traveler passing through. This sharpens the pain: the poet is a stranger among people who oppose peace. Keil and Delitzsch state plainly, “both names of peoples are to be understood emblematically.” The Septuagint rendered Meshech as “my sojourning is prolonged,” but most commentators, including the Cambridge Bible, reject that because the parallel with Kedar (a clear place name) favors a proper name. So the consensus is clear: the cry is a lament over living among those who are like barbarians in their hatred of peace.
How settled is the interpretation?
Interpretive difficulty: Medium
Main views:
- Symbolic (emblematic) reading: Most commentators: the two tribes are too far apart to be literal; the parallelism and context of slander (vv. 2–4) point to metaphorical use.
- Literal geographical reading: A minority literal reading: some Jewish captives may have been settled in provinces near Meshech, and David spent time among Kedarites in Paran (1 Samuel 25:1).
- Appellative/protracted-sojourn reading: Based on the Septuagint and Vulgate, taking Meshech from the root 'mashak' (to draw out), rendering the line 'my sojourning is prolonged.'
What is clear: The psalmist expresses deep grief at being surrounded by people who oppose peace and truth, and he brings this lament directly to God as part of a prayer for deliverance.
What Scholars Agree and Debate
| Topic | Agreed | Debated |
|---|---|---|
| Meshech and Kedar: literal or symbolic? | Both are real historical peoples descended from Japheth and Ishmael (Genesis 10:2; 25:13). | Most commentators read them as symbolic of hostile, barbarous neighbors. A minority, preferring the Septuagint, treat Meshech as an appellative meaning 'protracted sojourn,' but this weakens the parallelism. |
| Identity of the psalmist | The speaker is someone surrounded by deceit and hostility, longing for deliverance. | Some connect it to David's exile among Philistines or in Paran (1 Samuel 25:1); others see a post-exilic setting with Jews living under foreign rule in Babylon. |
| Tense of the verbs | The Hebrew perfect tense describes a situation that has already begun and continues. | The Cambridge Bible reads it as present (I sojourn), while the Septuagint emphasizes the length of stay ('my sojourning is prolonged'). |
Historical & Cultural Context
Psalm 120 is the first of the fifteen Songs of Ascents, psalms likely sung by pilgrims traveling to Jerusalem for festivals. This verse gives voice to someone who feels completely out of place, surrounded by people as uncivilized as the ancient tribes of Meshech and Kedar.
Meshech appears in Genesis 10:2 as a son of Japheth, and Josephus and Strabo associate his descendants with the Moschi, a people between the Black and Caspian Seas. To the Hebrew ear, their name evoked a distant, warlike people far from Israel. Kedar, from Genesis 25:13, is a son of Ishmael, and his tribe roamed the Arabian desert. The Song of Solomon 1:5 mentions “Kedar’s tents,” suggesting dark goat-hair shelters of a nomadic people. Together, these two names frame the psalmist’s experience: he feels stuck among a people as foreign and threatening as the Scythians or Bedouin.
The grammar deepens the ache. The Hebrew verb garti (I have sojourned) uses the perfect tense, but as the Cambridge Bible notes, the experience is ongoing, he has long dwelt and still must dwell there. Barnes points out that a temporary resident faces more hardship than a permanent one: no roots, no safety, constant friction. Historically, some readers, like Adam Clarke, connect this to Jewish captives taken to Assyrian provinces by Nebuchadnezzar. Others, including Matthew Henry, think David wrote it while hiding in the wilderness of Paran (1 Samuel 25:1), surrounded by people like Nabal. Either way, the psalmist names not a literal address but a spiritual condition: exile among enemies of peace.
Textual Notes
The Hebrew text of this verse is stable, with no significant manuscript variants among the consulted sources. The main textual question involves interpretation, not transmission: the Septuagint and Vulgate read מֶשֶׁךְ (Meshekh) as deriving from the root מָשַׁךְ (“to draw out, prolong”), producing the reading “my sojourning is prolonged.” This is followed by Coverdale’s early English version. However, the Masoretic Text and nearly all modern translations treat it as the proper name Meshech, reinforced by the parallel with Kedar in the second half of the verse.
Reception History
This verse has been read across Christian tradition as a cry of the faithful living as aliens in a hostile world. Early translations, like the Septuagint and Vulgate, took the first place name as a reference to the duration of exile, and that reading influenced Coverdale’s Great Bible and the Bishops’ Bible. The Geneva Bible kept the proper names, reflecting the Reformed emphasis on literal interpretation. In later hymnody, phrases like “tents of Kedar” became shorthand for the believer’s temporary home amidst a fallen world. The Anglican tradition’s Book of Common Prayer used the Septuagint-influenced rendering in the Psalter, giving it a permanent place in daily prayer. Modern scholarship, from Keil and Delitzsch to the Cambridge Bible, has firmly returned to reading Meshech and Kedar as symbolic names for barbarous peoples.
Preaching This Verse
Three-point outline
- The cry of alienation. “Woe is me” opens with raw lament. The psalmist does not soften his pain. He names it, bringing it before God. This models honest prayer.
- The company of the hostile. Meshech and Kedar represent people governed by deceit and war (vv. 2, 3, 7). The psalmist feels trapped among them, a theme echoed in Jeremiah 9:2, 3.
- The commitment to peace. Verse 7 declares “I am for peace.” Even when others are for war. The lament does not turn to bitterness; it returns to the prayer for deliverance that opened the psalm.
Five-point outline
- Distress that drives us to God. The whole psalm begins with a cry that receives an answer (v. 1). The lament of v. 5 is not hopeless; it is spoken into a relationship with the Lord.
- Recognizing when we live among “Meshech and Kedar.” Not literal tribes, but any environment that opposes truth and peace, a workplace, a family, a society. The psalmist names it so he does not pretend.
- The length of the sojourn. The verb “dwell” can mean a prolonged stay. The Cambridge Bible notes the perfect tense expresses both past and present. Sometimes exile drags on.
- The temptation to match hostility with hostility. The psalmist never retaliates. He prays. He holds to peace even when others choose war.
- The hope of the ascents. This is a pilgrimage song. The journey toward God’s presence is the answer to the woe. The final destination comfort changes the journey.
Illustration hooks
- A teacher who is the only believer in a divisive staff room, feeling like she sojourns among barbarians every Monday.
- Someone stuck caring for a relative whose constant criticism and deceit are like “lying lips” (v. 2). They love the person but dread the conversation.
- A Christian in a workplace where backbiting is the norm. They keep speaking peace, but the culture is “for war.”
Questions your congregation is asking
- How do I survive spiritually when I cannot change my hostile environment?
- Is it wrong to express “woe is me” laments, or should I just trust God silently?
- Does the psalm promise deliverance in this life, or is the peace only in the journey toward God?
Leading a Discussion
This verse captures the ache of feeling out of place among people who oppose peace. The psalmist does not deny the pain, he brings it to God, naming exactly where he feels trapped. Use these questions to explore what it means to live faithfully in hostile surroundings.
Discussion questions
- Read the whole psalm (120:1, 7). What does the psalmist ask for in verse 2? How does that connect to the complaint in verse 5?
- The Hebrew verb for “sojourn” suggests a temporary stay. Why does that make the complaint more painful rather than less?
- Most commentators agree Meshech and Kedar are symbolic. Why do you think the psalmist chose those particular names? What do they convey that a general statement like “barbarians” would not?
- Verse 7 says, “I am for peace, but when I speak, they are for war.” Have you ever experienced a relationship or situation like that? How did you respond?
- The psalm begins with answered prayer (“He answered me”) but ends without a visible resolution. How does that shape your view of waiting on God in hard places?
- If you were to describe your own “Meshech” or “Kedar” today, what would you name? How might naming it help you pray?
- The Songs of Ascents were sung by pilgrims traveling to Jerusalem. How does the destination (God’s presence) change the perspective on the journey?
Word Study
The key original-language words in this verse. Select any word for its full lexicon entry — meaning, every occurrence in Scripture, and related words.
Cross-References
Source: Treasury of Scripture Knowledge (TSK, public domain)
| Genesis 10:2 | The sons of Japheth were: Gomer, Magog, Madai, Javan, Tubal, Meshech, and Tiras. |
| Genesis 25:13 | These are the names of the sons of Ishmael, by their names, according to the order of their birth: the firstborn of Ishmael, Nebaioth, then Kedar, Adbeel, Mibsam, |
| I Samuel 25:1 | Samuel died; and all Israel gathered themselves together and mourned for him, and buried him at his house at Ramah. Then David arose and went down to the wilderness of Paran. |
| Song of Solomon 1:5 | I am dark, but lovely, you daughters of Jerusalem, like Kedar’s tents, like Solomon’s curtains. |
| Isaiah 60:6 | A multitude of camels will cover you, the dromedaries of Midian and Ephah. All from Sheba will come. They will bring gold and frankincense, and will proclaim the praises of Yahweh. |
| Isaiah 60:7 | All the flocks of Kedar will be gathered together to you. The rams of Nebaioth will serve you. They will be accepted as offerings on my altar; and I will beautify my glorious house. |
| Jeremiah 9:2 | Oh that I had in the wilderness a lodging place of wayfaring men, that I might leave my people and go from them! For they are all adulterers, an assembly of treacherous men. |
| Jeremiah 9:3 | “They bend their tongue, as their bow, for falsehood. They have grown strong in the land, but not for truth; for they proceed from evil to evil, and they don’t know me,” says Yahweh. |
Interlinear and lexical data from STEPBible (CC BY 4.0). Cross-reference data from OpenBible.info (CC BY 4.0). Commentaries are public domain.
For personal reflection
Read the devotional page — prayer, application, and "for families"
What the Commentators Say
11 public-domain commentaries, condensed into plain language.
Adam Clarke's Commentary Methodist/Wesleyan 1826
Clarke links "Mesech" and "Kedar" to actual historical regions where Jewish captives were held after the Babylonian conquest. He identifies Mesech with tribes in the Caucasus mountains and Kedar with Arabia Petraea, treating the psalmist's lament as a literal cry from scattered exiles.
Barnes' Notes on the Bible Protestant 1832
Barnes notes that the psalmist's grief comes not from dwelling permanently among his enemies, but from feeling like a temporary lodger, a stranger forced to sojourn among barbarous and uncivilized people. The names Mesech and Kedar represent savage tribes, and the hardship is the heightened vulnerability of being an outsider in such a place.
Calvin's Commentaries Reformed 1564
Calvin argues that Mesech and Kedar are real, foreign tribes, not symbolic words for prolonged exile. He insists the poetic parallel between the two names supports reading both as places, and he dismisses alternative interpretations as without evidence.
Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges Anglican 1880
The commentator notes that the Psalmist uses present-tense verbs to describe an ongoing experience of living among hostile neighbors. Meshech and Kedar are not literal locations but symbolic names for barbarian tribes, applied here to the Psalmist's own countrymen to emphasize their uncongenial and hostile attitude.
Geneva Bible Notes Reformed 1599
The Geneva note interprets this as a spiritual lament, not a geographic one. Meschech and Kedar represent barbarous and hostile people, so the psalmist mourns being forced to live among those who are enemies of God and of peace. His complaint is about moral exile, not physical distance.
Gill's Exposition of the Bible Baptist 1748
Gill identifies Mesech and Kedar as actual barbarous peoples near Judea, not merely poetic symbols. He then applies this historically: even David's own countrymen could feel as oppressive as these pagan tribes, making the psalmist's cry one any believer may echo when surrounded by wickedness.
Jamieson-Fausset-Brown Commentary Protestant 1871
A residence in these remote lands pictures his miserable condition.
Keil & Delitzsch OT Commentary Protestant 1876
Keil-Delitzsch take Meshech and Kedar as emblems of savage, quarrelsome neighbors rather than literal peoples. The psalmist's rare cry of deep sighing (אויה) expresses his groaning at dwelling among them. He is peace itself, but
Lange's Commentary Reformed 1857
Lange reads this psalm as a symbolic portrayal of the believer's experience among hostile people, not tied to a specific historical event. He views the names Mesech and Kedar as figurative designations for rude, warlike companions rather than literal distant tribes. The psalmist's plea for peace highlights the painful contrast between his own longing for peace and the unrelenting hostility around him.
Matthew Henry's Commentary Reformed/Presbyterian 1710
Henry reads David's cry not as a complaint about literal enemies but about being cut off from God's ordinances. The deepest grief for a good person, he argues, is to be far from God's altars and unable to enjoy the means of grace and communion with God.
Wesley's Explanatory Notes Methodist/Wesleyan 1754
Wesley reads the names Mesech and Kedar not as literal peoples but as metaphors for hostile, barbarous neighbors. He understands the Psalmist to be describing painful proximity to ungodly people, using these well-known names to represent a wider spiritual and social reality.