Jeremiah 5:12 · Bible study
Jeremiah 5:12 Commentary: Denying God's Word and Judgment
Hebrew · 11 what the commentators say
Meaning in one sentence
Study Jeremiah 5:12: Did the people deny God's existence or only His judgment? Explore the Hebrew, key commentators, and pastoral application.
Research Summary
- Meaning: The people refused to believe that God would bring judgment, effectively denying His authority and warning.
- Key words: “Denied” (כָּחַשׁ) can mean deceive, lie, or deny; “It is not he” (לֹא הוּא) is ambiguous between outright atheism and dismissal of prophetic threat.
- Main debate: Did “denied Yahweh” mean they denied His existence or only His active engagement in judgment?
- Theological theme: The human tendency to reject uncomfortable divine truth and presume upon grace.
- Best use: A warning against false security and the refusal to heed prophetic warnings.
Translation Comparison
BSB Berean Standard Bible 2020
They have lied about the LORD and said: “He will not do anything; harm will not come to us; we will not see sword or famine.
WEB World English Bible 2000
They have denied Yahweh, and said, “It is not he. Evil won’t come on us. We won’t see sword or famine.
KJV King James Version 1769
They have belied the Lord, and said, It is not he; neither shall evil come upon us; neither shall we see sword nor famine:
ASV American Standard Version 1901
They have denied Jehovah, and said, It is not he; neither shall evil come upon us; neither shall we see sword nor famine:
YLT Young's Literal Translation 1898
They have lied against Jehovah, And they say, ` It is not He, Nor come in against us doth evil, Yea, sword and famine we do not see.
Darby Darby Bible 1890
They have denied Jehovah, and say, He is not; and evil shall not come upon us, nor shall we see sword nor famine;
Douay-Rheims Douay-Rheims Bible 1899
They have denied the Lord, and said, It is not he: and the evil shall not come upon us: we shall not see the sword and famine.
Translations in other languages (10 available)
Negaron á Jehová, y dijeron: El no es, y no vendrá mal sobre nosotros, ni veremos cuchillo ni hambre;
Negaram ao SENHOR, e disseram: Não é ele; não virá mal sobre nós; não veremos espada, nem fome;
Ils renient l’ Éternel, ils disent: Il n’ existe pas!
Sie verleugnen den HERRN und sprechen: “Das ist er nicht, und so übel wird es uns nicht gehen; Schwert und Hunger werden wir nicht sehen.
Zij verloochenen den HEERE, en zeggen: Hij is het niet, en ons zal geen kwaad overkomen, wij zullen noch zwaard noch honger zien.
Rinnegano l’Eterno, e dicono: “Non esiste; nessun male ci verrà addosso, noi non vedremo né spada né fame;
Zadali kłamstwo Panu, i rzekli: Nie tak, nie przyjdzieć na nas nic złego, a miecza i głodu nie doznamy.
они солгали на Господа и сказали: "нет Его, и беда не придет на нас, и мы не увидим ни меча, ни голода.
他們不認 耶和華,說:這並不是 他,災禍 必不 臨到 我們;刀劍 和饑荒,我們也看不 見。
They would have nothing to do with the Lord, saying, He will do nothing, and no evil will come to us; we will not see the sword or be short of food:
Verse in Context
Original Language (Biblical Hebrew)
Old Testament · Biblical Hebrew · Jeremiah 5:12
Source: STEPBible TAGNT/TEHB (CC-BY 4.0). Click or tap a morphology code to see the full parsing.
Scholars' Consensus
Commentators agree that the Hebrew verb כִּֽחֲשׁוּ (ki.cha.Shu) with the preposition ב means “they denied” or “they disavowed.” Calvin, Gill, and Barnes all read the construction as denial rather than deception. What they denied, however, is debated.
Calvin insisted the people denied God’s existence outright, calling them “atheists at heart.” Barnes and Poole pushed back, arguing that the following phrase לֹא הוּא (“It is not he”) meant the people denied that God spoke through the prophets or that He would bring the threatened judgment. Gill described their denial as tacit atheism: they would not say “there is no God,” but their actions and words effectively denied His providence and justice. Keil and Delitzsch tie the denial directly to the false prophets’ message of peace in verse 13. Matthew Henry saw it as “belied the Lord” by refusing to believe His word.
Across the debate, the core remains: the people refused to take God’s warning seriously. They rejected both the messenger and the message, convinced that nothing bad would happen to them. That practical certainty is what the verse confronts.
How settled is the interpretation?
Interpretive difficulty: Medium
Main views:
- Outright atheism: Calvin argues that the verb with the preposition ב means “they denied,” and the following phrase “It is not he” means there is no God; the people were atheists at heart.
- Denial of prophetic authority: Barnes and Poole contend that the people denied that God spoke through the prophets, not God’s existence; “It is not he” dismisses Jeremiah’s message.
- Practical atheism: Gill and Matthew Henry see a denial of God’s providence and justice: the people did not say “no God,” but lived as if He would not act.
What is clear: The people refused to believe that God would bring the judgment announced by the prophets, and their words reveal a fundamental rejection of God’s authority.
What Scholars Agree and Debate
| Topic | Agreed | Debated |
|---|---|---|
| Nature of the denial | The people rejected God's word and did not believe judgment would come. | Calvin argued outright atheism (they said “there is no God”). Barnes and Poole argued they denied that God was speaking through the prophets or would act in judgment. |
| Meaning of 'It is not he' | The phrase expresses a dismissal of God’s involvement or presence. | Calvin reads it as a statement of nonexistence. Barnes reads it as a rejection of prophetic authority: “It is not he who speaks in the prophets.” Gill sees it as practical atheism: God does not concern Himself. |
| People’s expectation of peace | They expected peace and safety despite prophetic warnings. | Some say this was rooted in theological presumption (the temple is inviolable); others say it was simple complacency reinforced by false prophets. |
| Role of false prophets | False prophets supported the people’s denial. | Were the people primarily deceived by false prophets, or were they willfully choosing to believe a lie? The text blames both the people and the prophets (v.13, 31). |
Historical & Cultural Context
Jeremiah prophesied in the final decades of the kingdom of Judah, roughly 627, 580 BC. After King Josiah’s religious reforms, the people quickly returned to idolatry and social injustice. False prophets filled the temple courts with assurances of peace, saying the city would never fall (Jer. 4:10; 28:1, 4).
The surrounding context makes this conflict clear. Verse 8 describes rampant sexual immorality; verse 9 records God’s question: “Shouldn’t I punish them for these things?” Verse 10 summons an enemy to destroy the land. Verse 11 charges both Israel and Judah with treachery. Then verse 12 gives the people’s defiant response: they deny Yahweh and say evil will not come.
Their denial was not an abstract philosophical statement. It was a survival strategy. If they could convince themselves that the prophets were wrong, they could keep living as they were. The phrase “It is not he” (לֹא הוּא) may echo a courtroom dismissal: the accused is not the one. In this case, the Lord is not the one who speaks through Jeremiah; He is not the one who will bring sword and famine.
Cross-references reinforce this. Deuteronomy 29:19 describes someone who, hearing the curse, says “I shall have peace, though I walk in the stubbornness of my heart.” Isaiah 28:15 records the leaders boasting of a “covenant with death,” confident that the “overflowing scourge” would not touch them. The same false confidence appears here. The people had a theology of exemption: they believed God would never punish His own chosen city. Jeremiah’s message shattered that assumption, and they responded with denial.
Textual Notes
The supplied sources note no significant textual variants for Jeremiah 5:12. The verse is textually stable across the Hebrew manuscripts and the ancient versions (LXX, Vulgate, Syriac).
Reception History
Jeremiah 5:12 has been cited in Christian preaching as a warning against presumptuous denial of God’s judgment. Calvin used it to argue that even God’s covenant people can fall into practical atheism. The Catholic tradition, reflected in the Douay-Rheims translation (“They have denied the Lord”), read it as a rejection of God’s authority and a failure to trust His justice. Protestant commentators such as Matthew Henry applied it to the danger of self-deception, noting that the people “belied the Lord” by refusing to believe His word. In revival preaching, the verse has often been paired with the image of God’s word as fire (v.14) to warn that ignoring the message does not nullify the judgment. The verse continues to speak in any age where God’s people discount His warnings in favor of comfortable predictions.
Preaching This Verse
Three-point outline
- Denial begins with rejecting God’s word. The people did not simply doubt the prophecy; they denied the Lord behind it. Their refusal to listen was a refusal to relate to God on His terms.
- False security follows every denial. “Evil won’t come on us. We won’t see sword or famine.” Once the truth is suppressed, the heart builds a fortress of self-deception.
- God’s word becomes fire. Verse 14 answers denial with a consuming word. What the people rejected as wind (v.13) becomes the very flame that devours them.
Five-point outline
- The sin: “They have denied Yahweh.” The root is not ignorance but active refusal.
- The claim: “It is not he.” They declared God absent or irrelevant.
- The false hope: “Evil won’t come on us. We won’t see sword or famine.” A confident prediction based on nothing but wishful thinking.
- The false prophets: “The prophets will become wind” (v.13). The people preferred a word they made up to the Word God actually spoke.
- The judgment: God’s words in Jeremiah’s mouth become fire, and the people become wood (v.14). The very message they dismissed brings their destruction.
Illustration hooks
- A doctor gives a clear diagnosis, but the patient insists the test results are wrong and continues unhealthy habits.
- A driver ignores a “bridge out” sign, trusting the familiar road over the warning.
- A student skips studying because the exam feels distant, only to fail when it arrives.
Questions your congregation is asking
- How do I know if my confidence in God’s mercy is real faith or false security?
- What does it look like to deny God without ever saying “there is no God”?
- How can I tell the difference between a prophet who speaks for God and one who just says what I want to hear?
Leading a Discussion
The people in Jeremiah 5:12 were not atheists in the modern sense. They believed God existed, but they refused to believe He would act against them. Their denial was practical: their life choices assumed God would not keep His word. This passage invites us to examine our own assumptions about God and judgment. Do we live as though God will really do what He says?
Discussion questions
- Read Jeremiah 5:12 aloud. What does the people’s statement reveal about their view of God?
- The Hebrew verb כִּֽחֲשׁוּ can mean “deny,” “lie,” or “deceive.” How does the choice of translation affect your understanding of their sin?
- Why would the people say “It is not he”? What might that phrase have meant in their daily experience?
- Verse 13 mentions the prophets becoming “wind.” How do false prophets contribute to the denial seen in verse 12?
- What are some modern versions of “It is not he” that Christians are tempted to believe?
- In verse 14, God says His words will become fire. What does this image tell you about the power of God’s word?
- Where in your own life have you assumed that evil will not come, even when God’s word warns differently? How can this passage correct that assumption?
Word Study
The key original-language words in this verse. Select any word for its full lexicon entry — meaning, every occurrence in Scripture, and related words.
Cross-References
Source: Treasury of Scripture Knowledge (TSK, public domain)
| Deuteronomy 29:19 | and it happen, when he hears the words of this curse, that he bless himself in his heart, saying, “I shall have peace, though I walk in the stubbornness of my heart,” to destroy the moist with the dry. |
| I Samuel 6:9 | Behold, if it goes up by the way of its own border to Beth Shemesh, then he has done us this great evil; but if not, then we shall know that it is not his hand that struck us. It was a chance that happened to us.” |
| II Chronicles 36:16 | but they mocked the messengers of God, despised his words, and scoffed at his prophets, until Yahweh’s wrath arose against his people, until there was no remedy. |
| Psalms 10:6 | He says in his heart, “I shall not be shaken. For generations I shall have no trouble.” |
| Isaiah 28:14 | Therefore hear Yahweh’s word, you scoffers, that rule this people in Jerusalem: |
| Isaiah 28:15 | “Because you have said, ‘We have made a covenant with death, and we are in agreement with Sheol. When the overflowing scourge passes through, it won’t come to us; for we have made lies our refuge, and we have hidden ourselves under falsehood.’” |
| Jeremiah 4:10 | Then I said, “Ah, Lord Yahweh! Surely you have greatly deceived this people and Jerusalem, saying, ‘You will have peace;’ whereas the sword reaches to the heart.” |
| Jeremiah 5:31 | The prophets prophesy falsely, and the priests rule by their own authority; and my people love to have it so. What will you do in the end of it? |
Interlinear and lexical data from STEPBible (CC BY 4.0). Cross-reference data from OpenBible.info (CC BY 4.0). Commentaries are public domain.
For personal reflection
Read the devotional page — prayer, application, and "for families"
What the Commentators Say
10 public-domain commentaries, condensed into plain language.
Adam Clarke's Commentary Methodist/Wesleyan 1826
Clarke highlights the logical chain in their denial: because they claim God is not real, they conclude no judgment will come. On their own false premise this follows consistently. They have not merely disbelieved in words but are atheists at heart, reasoning away any fear of accountability.
Barnes' Notes on the Bible Protestant 1832
Barnes clarifies that the "he" in question does not refer to a specific individual person, such as Christ directly, but to the divine voice that speaks through the prophets. His point distinguishes the agency of prophetic revelation from a direct personal reference, emphasizing that the message comes from God mediated through the prophetic tradition.
Calvin's Commentaries Reformed 1564
Calvin argues that the Hebrew construction with the preposition "in" means the people denied God, not merely lied to him. He insists the context supports this: they said "It is not he," which is a flat denial of God's presence and work among them.
Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges Anglican 1880
The Cambridge Bible notes that the phrase "not he" is a colloquial dismissal, the taunt of people who rejected prophetic warnings of disaster. It is their blunt rejoinder, like a modern shrug, refusing to believe judgment will come.
Geneva Bible Notes Reformed 1599
The people deny more than the Lord's authority; they deny that He is the one who threatens them. They go further and claim that the promised calamities of plague, sword, and famine will never actually arrive. The Geneva Notes highlight this arrogant refusal to acknowledge both God's hand and His coming judgment.
Gill's Exposition of the Bible Baptist 1748
Gill argues that by denying God's providence and disbelieving the prophets, the people effectively denied the Lord himself, even if they did not openly say there is no God. Their claim it is not he meant God takes no notice and has not sent the threatened judgment, and they insisted no sword or famine would come.
Jamieson-Fausset-Brown Commentary Protestant 1871
JFB notes that the people's denial takes two forms: either they deny that the Lord is the true and only God, or they deny that He will punish their sins. Both amount to a practical rejection of who He is and what He has said.
Keil & Delitzsch OT Commentary Protestant 1876
Keil-Delitzsch reads the summons to destroy as directed against the walls of God's vineyard, the theocracy, where the command to spare the vine means only spurious members are removed. They interpret
Matthew Henry's Commentary Reformed/Presbyterian 1710
Matthew Henry emphasizes that the people's sin is twofold: they have forsaken God's law and claimed the Lord is not involved in their affairs. Their punishment fits the crime—as they served foreign gods in their own land, they will serve foreign masters in a land not theirs. Yet God tempers judgment by promising not to make a full end.
Wesley's Explanatory Notes Methodist/Wesleyan 1754
Belied - Not believing that these words of the prophet were God's word.