GospelMount
Search Topics Scripture Prayer Resources Ebooks About Support the mission Saved articles
Jump to ▾

Acts 8:6 · Bible study

Acts 8:6 Commentary: Hearing Word and Seeing Signs in Faith

Greek · 9 what the commentators say

Meaning in one sentence

Explore how the Samaritans' unified response to Philip's preaching and signs illustrates the role of word and miracle in bringing faith and joy.

Research Summary

  • Meaning: Unified response of Samaritans to Philip's word and signs, resulting in great joy.
  • Key words: προσεῖχον (were giving heed, imperfect continuous), ὁμοθυμαδόν (with one accord), σημεῖα (signs, divine authentication), ἀκούειν/βλέπειν (hearing/seeing as occasion).
  • Main debate: Does the crowd's attention equal saving faith (Barnes, Calvin) or is it initial interest short of πίστις (Lange)?
  • Theological theme: Word and sign as complementary means of divine confirmation in mission.
  • Best use: Demonstrating how God uses both proclamation and demonstration to gather a community to Christ.

Translation Comparison

BSB Berean Standard Bible 2020

The crowds gave their undivided attention to Philip’s message and to the signs they saw him perform.

WEB World English Bible 2000

The multitudes listened with one accord to the things that were spoken by Philip when they heard and saw the signs which he did.

KJV King James Version 1769

And the people with one accord gave heed unto those things which Philip spake, hearing and seeing the miracles which he did.

ASV American Standard Version 1901

And the multitudes gave heed with one accord unto the things that were spoken by Philip, when they heard, and saw the signs which he did.

YLT Young's Literal Translation 1898

the multitudes also were giving heed to the things spoken by Philip, with one accord, in their hearing and seeing the signs that he was doing,

Darby Darby Bible 1890

and the crowds with one accord gave heed to the things spoken by Philip, when they heard [him] and saw the signs which he wrought.

Douay-Rheims Douay-Rheims Bible 1899

And the people with one accord were attentive to those things which were said by Philip, hearing, and seeing the miracles which he did.

Translations in other languages (10 available)
ES Reina-Valera 1909 1909

Y las gentes escuchaban atentamente unánimes las cosas que decía Felipe, oyendo|strong="G1722, G0191" y viendo las señales que hacía.

PT Almeida Livre 1994

E as multidões prestavam atenção em concordância às coisas que eram ditas por Filipe, ao ouvirem e verem os sinais que ele fazia.

FR Louis Segond 1910

Les foules tout entières étaient attentives à ce que disait Philippe, lorsqu’ elles apprirent et virent les miracles qu’ il faisait.

DE Luther Bibel 1912 1912

Das Volk aber hörte einmütig und fleißig zu, was Philippus sagte, und sah die Zeichen, die er tat.

NL Statenvertaling 1637

En de scharen hielden zich eendrachtelijk aan hetgeen van Filippus gezegd werd, dewijl zij hoorden en zagen de tekenen, die hij deed.

IT Riveduta 1927

E le folle di pari consentimento prestavano attenzione alle cose dette da Filippo, udendo e vedendo i miracoli ch’egli faceva.

PL Biblia Gdańska 1632

A lud miał wzgląd jednomyślnie na to, co Filip mówił, słuchając i widząc cuda, które czynił.

RU Синодальный перевод 1876

Народ единодушно внимал тому, что говорил Филипп, слыша и видя, какие он творил чудеса.

ZH 和合本 1919

眾人 聽見了,又 看見 腓利 所行 的神蹟,就同心合意地 聽從 他的話。

EN Bible in Basic English 1949

And all the people gave attention to the words which Philip said, when they saw the signs which he did.

Verse in Context

4 Therefore those who were scattered abroad went around preaching the word.
5 Philip went down to the city of Samaria and proclaimed to them the Christ.
6 The multitudes listened with one accord to the things that were spoken by Philip when they heard and saw the signs which he did.
7 For unclean spirits came out of many of those who had them. They came out, crying with a loud voice. Many who had been paralyzed and lame were healed.
8 There was great joy in that city.

Original Language (Koine Greek)

προσεῖχον proseichon V-IAI-3P G4337 Were giving heed
δὲ de CONJ G1161 now
οἱ hoi T-NPM G3588 the
ὄχλοι ochloi N-NPM G3793 crowds
τοῖς tois T-DPN G3588 to the [things]
λεγομένοις legomenois V-PPP-DPN G3004 being spoken
ὑπὸ hupo PREP G5259 by
τοῦ tou T-GSM G3588 <the>
Φιλίππου Philippou N-GSM-P G5376 Philip
ὁμοθυμαδὸν homothumadon ADV G3661 with one accord
ἐν en PREP G1722 in
τῷ tō T-DSN G3588 the [time]
ἀκούειν akouein V-PAN G0191 to hear
αὐτοὺς autous P-APM G0846 them
καὶ kai CONJ G2532 and
βλέπειν blepein V-PAN G0991 to see
τὰ ta T-APN G3588 the
σημεῖα sēmeia N-APN G4592 signs
ἃ ha R-APN G3739 that
ἐποίει· epoiei V-IAI-3S G4160 he was performing;

Source: STEPBible TAGNT/TEHB (CC-BY 4.0). Click or tap a morphology code to see the full parsing.

Scholars' Consensus

The Greek imperfect προσεῖχον (were giving heed) signals continuous sustained attention, not a passing glance. The adverb ὁμοθυμαδόν (with one accord) suggests a whole community responding together. Barnes notes they listened 'unitedly, or with one mind.' The construction ἐν τῷ ἀκούειν ... καὶ βλέπειν (in the time of hearing and seeing) places the sensory experiences as the occasion for their attention. The Cambridge Bible explains the signs were intended 'to be signs that the message . . . was from God.' Calvin stresses that hearing comes first, then miracles confirm faith. Consensus holds that word and sign together provide the basis for believing, though commentators differ on whether 'gave heed' implies full faith (Barnes) or initial stepping toward it (Lange). The reader sees that God uses both the preached message and confirming works to draw people to himself.

How settled is the interpretation?

Interpretive difficulty: Medium

Main views:

  1. Initial interest: Lange distinguishes προσεῖχον from ἐπίστευον, suggesting attentiveness short of full faith.
  2. Genuine faith: Barnes and Calvin equate 'gave heed' with embracing belief.

What is clear: The multitudes gave unified attention to Philip's preaching because they heard his message and saw the confirming signs, resulting in great joy in the city.

What Scholars Agree and Debate

TopicAgreedDebated
Nature of the crowd's responseBoth Lange and Barnes agree the crowd gave unified attention (προσεῖχον) to Philip.Lange argues this is not yet πίστις (saving faith), while Barnes equates 'gave heed' with embracing belief.
Role of signsSigns served to confirm the divine origin of the message (Cambridge Bible).Calvin sees hearing as the essential first step and signs as secondary; others view signs as integral to the faith response of this particular audience.
Historical circumstancesPhilip's mission resulted from persecution and fulfilled Jesus' command in Acts 1:8.Some emphasize the providence of sending a Hellenist (JFB), others highlight the Samaritans' prior exposure to Jesus (John 4).

Historical & Cultural Context

Acts 8 opens with Stephen's death and a persecution that scatters believers. Philip the evangelist, one of the seven deacons, heads north to Samaria. The Samaritans were descendants of Northern Israelites mixed with foreign settlers. They worshipped at Mount Gerizim and expected a prophet like Moses (Deuteronomy 18). To a Judean Jew, Samaria was off limits, but Philip was a Hellenist, which, as Jamieson-Fausset-Brown note, was providential: a Grecian Jew could cross that boundary where a native Judean might not. The city was captivated by Simon Magus, a sorcerer whose tricks amazed the people. Philip's signs, exorcisms, healings, stood in stark contrast. The phrase 'with one accord' (ὁμοθυμαδόν) recurs in Acts to mark the Spirit's work of unity (Acts 1:14, 2:46). Here it signals the first major gospel breakthrough to a mixed-ethnic community, fulfilling Jesus' command to witness in Samaria (Acts 1:8). The result is great joy (v.8), the natural response when a divided people meet Christ.

Textual Notes

The supplied sources note no significant textual variants for Acts 8:6. Manuscript evidence is consistent; minor spelling differences do not affect meaning.

Reception History

Acts 8:6 has been read across church history as a model of apostolic evangelism combining word and miracle. Early writers like Irenaeus saw Philip's signs as authenticating the new covenant message. During the Reformation, Calvin used the verse to argue that hearing the word is the ordinary means of faith, while signs serve as an occasional confirmation. In modern missionary movements, especially in Pentecostal traditions, this passage illustrates the continuing role of supernatural confirmations. The story also inspires cross-cultural mission: ethnic and historical barriers break down when Christ is proclaimed and his power is shown.

Preaching This Verse

Three-Point Outline

  1. The Word Must Be Heard. Calvin calls hearing 'the beginning of faith.' The crowds gave attention because Philip proclaimed Christ. No message, no faith.
  2. The Word Is Confirmed by Signs. The signs (σημεῖα) pointed beyond themselves to the divine source of the message. Cambridge Bible: they were to show the message came from God.
  3. The Word Creates Unified Joy. Lange notes the 'entire unanimity' of the crowd. The same Spirit that united the early church now unites Samaria, producing great joy (v.8).

Five-Point Outline

  1. The Scattering: Persecution becomes the engine of mission (v.4).
  2. The Preacher: Philip, a Hellenistic deacon, crosses ethnic lines (v.5).
  3. The Message: He proclaims the Christ, the object of Samaritan hope.
  4. The Means: Hearing the word and seeing signs work together to generate faith.
  5. The Outcome: Great joy fills the city, and a community is transformed.

Illustration Hooks

  • When buying a used car, you need both the seller's description (word) and the test drive (sign). One without the other leaves doubt.
  • A doctor's diagnosis becomes convincing when you see the X-ray. The image confirms the report.
  • A divided neighborhood might unite temporarily for a festival. The unity from hearing God's word and seeing his power is deeper and lasting.

Questions Your Congregation Is Asking

  • If signs were so effective in Samaria, why does God not always use miraculous signs when we share the gospel?
  • What priority should we give to the preached word versus demonstrations of power in our evangelism?
  • Can you think of a time when a sign, an answered prayer, a changed life, confirmed the truth of the gospel for you?

Leading a Discussion

Philip's mission to Samaria is a turning point. The gospel crosses ethnic lines, and the combination of word and signs produces a unified response. As your group explores this passage, consider how God still uses both message and demonstration to draw people to Christ.

Discussion Questions

  1. What details in verses 4 through 8 highlight the contrast between Philip's ministry and the environment of Samaria?
  2. The text says the crowds 'gave heed' to Philip's words. How does the Greek imperfect tense (προσεῖχον) help us understand the nature of their response?
  3. Why might Luke emphasize that they both heard and saw the signs? What does each contribute to the formation of faith? (Cross reference John 4:41-42.)
  4. How does the unity of the Samaritans (with one accord) compare to the unity of the believers in Acts 2:42-47? What produces it here?
  5. In a culture that values signs and wonders, how do we keep the word of Christ central without dismissing the role of miraculous confirmation?
  6. Verse 8 says there was great joy in that city. What does this tell us about the result of authentic encounter with the gospel?
  7. Philip was driven by persecution; he had no plan B except to preach. When have difficulties in your own life caused the gospel to spread to unexpected places?

What the Commentators Say

9 public-domain commentaries, condensed into plain language.

Adam Clarke's Commentary Methodist/Wesleyan 1826

Clarke observes that the people's full attention was secured by two factors working together: the weighty substance of the preaching itself and the miracles that accompanied it. Neither alone would have held them; the gravity of the message and the visible signs reinforced each other.

Barnes' Notes on the Bible Protestant 1832

Barnes clarifies that the phrase "with one accord" points to a united, single-minded action by the crowd, not merely physical proximity. He explains "gave heed" as actively paying attention and embracing the message, while "hearing" refers to listening to the specific words being spoken.

Calvin's Commentaries Reformed 1564

Calvin traces the orderly progression to faith: hearing first, then attentiveness, and finally faith itself. He stresses that hearing alone is not enough; the majesty of the doctrine must stir the heart to give it serious attention. The unified attentiveness of the crowd shows the power of Philip's preaching to win many at once.

Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges Anglican 1880

The commentator stresses that the people's unified attention was an act of faith and consent to Philip's message. The miracles were signs, not mere wonders, designed to confirm that this teaching came from God. Crowds believed because they heard reports and saw cures with their own eyes.

Geneva Bible Notes Reformed 1599

The Geneva note highlights that the people gave heed to Philip's message with remarkable unity. Their unified attention flowed from both hearing his words and seeing the miracles he performed, as the signs confirmed the truth of what he spoke.

Gill's Exposition of the Bible Baptist 1748

Gill notes that the Samaritans were drawn to believe Philip's message by two things working together: the compelling truth of what he preached and the miracles that visibly backed it up. Both the word itself and the signs confirming it moved them to give full attention and acceptance.

Jamieson-Fausset-Brown Commentary Protestant 1871

JFB highlights divine providence in sending Philip, a Hellenistic Jew, to the Samaritans, who due to deep national hostility would have rejected a messenger from Judea. This choice, along with the Lord's earlier ministry among them, explains the people's remarkable openness to Philip's message.

Lange's Commentary Reformed 1857

Lange draws a sharp contrast between two types of faith: Philip preaches only Christ, never himself, while Simon promotes his own greatness. Simon's belief is merely intellectual amazement at miracles he cannot replicate, not heart-faith that transforms. This distinguishes genuine conversion from a superficial impression that leaves the soul unchanged.

Matthew Henry's Commentary Reformed/Presbyterian 1710

Henry observes that persecution, which was meant to destroy the early church, actually helped spread the gospel. He compares the believers to scattered sparks that set new places ablaze rather than being extinguished, turning an intended blow into an occasion of growth.

Word Study

The key original-language words in this verse. Select any word for its full lexicon entry — meaning, every occurrence in Scripture, and related words.

Cross-References

Source: Treasury of Scripture Knowledge (TSK, public domain)

II Chronicles 30:12 Also the hand of God came on Judah to give them one heart, to do the commandment of the king and of the princes by Yahweh’s word.
Matthew 20:15 Isn’t it lawful for me to do what I want to with what I own? Or is your eye evil, because I am good?’
Matthew 20:16 So the last will be first, and the first last. For many are called, but few are chosen.”
John 4:41 Many more believed because of his word.
John 4:42 They said to the woman, “Now we believe, not because of your speaking; for we have heard for ourselves, and know that this is indeed the Christ, the Savior of the world.”
Acts 13:44 The next Sabbath, almost the whole city was gathered together to hear the word of God.

Interlinear and lexical data from STEPBible (CC BY 4.0). Cross-reference data from OpenBible.info (CC BY 4.0). Commentaries are public domain.

For personal reflection

Read the devotional page — prayer, application, and "for families"

← Devotional