1 Corinthians 6:1 Meaning: Dare to Sue a Brother Before Unbelievers?
Dare any of you, having a matter against his neighbor, go to law before the unrighteous, and not before the saints?
Dare any of you, having a matter against another, go to law before the unjust, and not before the saints?
Dare any of you, having a matter against his neighbor, go to law before the unrighteous, and not before the saints?
Dare any one of you, having a matter with the other, go to be judged before the unrighteous, and not before the saints?
Dare any one of you, having a matter against another, prosecute his suit before the unjust, and not before the saints?
Meaning in one sentence
Paul asks why believers take their disputes to unbelieving judges instead of settling them among the saints. What does this mean for Christians today?
Context
Paul is writing to a church he planted in Corinth, a city known for its wealth, diversity, and love of litigation. By chapter six, he has already addressed divisions, sexual sin, and a case of incest that the church failed to discipline. Now he turns to a different failure: Christians suing each other in Roman courts. The Corinthians were apparently taking property and financial disputes before pagan magistrates, airing their conflicts in public and bringing shame on the name of Christ. In the surrounding verses, Paul argues that if believers will one day judge the world and even angels, they ought to be able to settle small disagreements among themselves. The issue is not merely legal procedure; it is the reputation of the gospel and the unity of God's people.
Key Words
Three words anchor this verse.
Dare (Greek tolmaō) carries the sense of boldness in a bad direction, presumption, even audacity. Paul is shocked: how can you have the nerve to do this? It is not a neutral question; it expects the answer, “No.”
Matter (pragma) is a business or legal dispute, something tied to daily life and property. It is not about criminal charges or grave sin, but the ordinary squabbles that crop up between people. The word itself suggests something relatively small.
Unrighteous (adikoi) and saints (hagioi) are set in stark contrast. The “unrighteous” are not necessarily corrupt judges in every case, but people who do not know God and are not part of His holy people. The “saints” are those set apart for God, called to reflect His character. Paul is asking: why would you take your small quarrel to outsiders when you have a family of forgiven people who can help?
How Christians Read This Verse
Christians have read this verse in different ways. Many in the Reformed and Protestant traditions (Calvin, Matthew Henry) emphasize that Paul condemns going before unbelievers specifically, because it dishonors Christ and treats fellow believers with contempt. They often allow lawsuits in civil courts when necessary, but urge Christians to seek arbitration within the church first.
Other traditions, including some Anabaptist and pacifist groups, see here a complete prohibition on any Christian taking another believer to court, regardless of the judge. They point to verse 7, “Why not rather be wronged?”, as a call to surrender personal rights entirely.
Catholic moral theology has historically permitted lawsuits as a last resort for serious matters, but strongly encourages mediation and reconciliation, echoing the early church practice of private Christian arbitration mentioned in the Apostolic Constitutions. All traditions agree that the heart of Paul’s concern is love for the brother and witness to the world.
A common misunderstanding
Some readers think Paul forbids all legal action, even in criminal cases or when a believer is wronged by an unbeliever. In fact, the context limits this to disputes between believers about everyday matters, things that should be settled quietly among God’s people. Paul does not address cases of violence, fraud by outsiders, or matters of public justice. His shock is that Christians are dragging their family squabbles before a watching world, damaging the testimony of the gospel.
Living This Out
This week, consider any unresolved conflict you have with another believer, a sharp word, a financial disagreement, a hurt that has gone unaddressed. Before you take it to a lawyer, a boss, or social media, ask: have I tried to sort this out within the family of God? Could I invite a wise, neutral Christian friend to help us talk? The goal is not to win the argument but to preserve love and protect the name of Christ. Sometimes the hard but right step is to let go of what you are owed, trusting God to make things right in the end.
Main takeaway: Believers should seek to resolve disputes within the church community rather than taking them before unbelievers, honoring Christ above personal rights.
For Families
For ages 5, 8
When you have a problem with a friend, it is better to talk to them or ask a grown-up who loves Jesus than to tell a stranger. God wants us to work things out in His family.
For ages 9, 12
Paul was upset that Christians were taking their arguments to court in front of people who did not know God. He said believers should be able to solve their own problems by talking to wise people in the church. That way, outsiders see love instead of fighting. If you have a disagreement with a friend who follows Jesus, try to make peace instead of making it public.
Questions People Ask
What does 'dare' mean in 1 Corinthians 6:1?
The Greek word 'tolmaō' means to be bold or to have the nerve to do something audacious. Paul uses it to express shock: how can a believer presume to take another believer to court before pagans, when that dishonors Christ and the church? It is not a neutral word but one of strong reproof.
Is it always wrong for Christians to go to court?
Paul’s main concern is believers suing each other before unbelieving judges in cases about everyday matters. Many Christian traditions allow lawsuits in serious cases like criminal acts or when justice requires it, but they emphasize that Christians should first seek reconciliation and arbitration within the church. The heart of the passage is to avoid bringing shame on the gospel.
What about disputes with unbelievers?
Paul does not directly address lawsuits against unbelievers in this passage. His instruction is about believers taking other believers to court. When dealing with those outside the church, Christians are free to use civil courts as a means of justice (see Acts 19:38). However, the same spirit of love and forgiveness should guide those actions.
How should Christians resolve conflicts instead of going to court?
Paul suggests two approaches: first, settle the matter within the church by asking wise believers to arbitrate (1 Cor 6:5). Second, if necessary, be willing to accept loss rather than take a brother to court (1 Cor 6:7). Jesus also taught a pattern of private confrontation, then involving witnesses, then the church (Matthew 18:15-17). The goal is restoration and peace.
Does this verse apply to criminal cases or only property disputes?
The Greek word 'pragma' in verse 1 refers to a business matter or civil dispute, not a criminal accusation. Paul is specifically talking about disagreements over money, property, or everyday affairs. Serious crimes like theft or assault involve broader justice concerns, and the passage does not directly address them. Christians should still pursue justice through proper channels, but always with a heart of love and integrity.
For pastors & researchers
Greek interlinear, 8 commentaries & word study