Matthew 6:25 · Bible study
Matthew 6:25 Commentary: 'Do Not Be Anxious', The Real
Greek · 11 what the commentators say
Meaning in one sentence
Study Matthew 6:25: original Greek analysis of μὴ μεριμνᾶτε. Does Jesus forbid forethought or anxiety? In-depth commentary and cross-references.
Research Summary
- Meaning: Jesus commands freedom from anxious worry, not from responsible care, based on trust in the Father who gives greater gifts.
- Key words: μεριμνάω (merimnaō, to worry), present imperative, stopping an ongoing action; Διὰ τοῦτο (because of this) linking to the impossibility of serving God and money.
- Main debate: None over the meaning of the prohibition, all major commentators agree it is anxiety, not planning, that is forbidden. The pastoral challenge lies in applying the distinction.
- Theological theme: Creation and providence: the God who made life and the body sustains them, and is to be trusted for daily needs.
- Best use: Comfort for the worried heart; correction for those who mistake panic for responsibility; invitation to rely on the Father’s care.
Translation Comparison
BSB Berean Standard Bible 2020
Therefore I tell you, do not worry about your life, what you will eat or drink; or about your body, what you will wear. Is not life more than food, and the body more than clothes?
WEB World English Bible 2000
Therefore I tell you, don’t be anxious for your life: what you will eat, or what you will drink; nor yet for your body, what you will wear. Isn’t life more than food, and the body more than clothing?
KJV King James Version 1769
Therefore I say unto you, Take no thought for your life, what ye shall eat, or what ye shall drink; nor yet for your body, what ye shall put on. Is not the life more than meat, and the body than raiment?
ASV American Standard Version 1901
Therefore I say unto you, Be not anxious for your life, what ye shall eat, or what ye shall drink; nor yet for your body, what ye shall put on. Is not the life more than the food, and the body than the raiment?
YLT Young's Literal Translation 1898
`Because of this I say to you, be not anxious for your life, what ye may eat, and what ye may drink, nor for your body, what ye may put on. Is not the life more than the nourishment, and the body than the clothing?
Darby Darby Bible 1890
For this cause I say unto you, Do not be careful about your life, what ye should eat and what ye should drink; nor for your body what ye should put on. Is not the life more than food, and the body than raiment?
Douay-Rheims Douay-Rheims Bible 1899
Therefore I say to you, be not solicitous for your life, what you shall eat, nor for your body, what you shall put on. Is not the life more than the meat: and the body more than the raiment?
Translations in other languages (10 available)
Por tanto os digo: No os congojéis por vuestra vida, qué habéis de comer, ó qué habéis de beber; ni por vuestro cuerpo, qué habéis de vestir: ¿ no es la vida más que el alimento, y el cuerpo que el vestido?
Por isso vos digo: não andeis ansiosos por vossa vida, sobre o que haveis de comer, ou que haveis de beber; nem por vosso corpo, sobre com que vos haveis de vestir. Não é a vida mais que o alimento, e o corpo mais que a roupa?
C’ est pourquoi je vous dis: Ne vous inquiétez pas pour votre vie de ce que vous mangerez, ni pour votre corps, de quoi vous serez vêtus. La vie n’est-elle pas plus que la nourriture, et le corps plus que le vêtement?
Darum sage ich euch: Sorget nicht für euer Leben, was ihr essen und trinken werdet, auch nicht für euren Leib, was ihr anziehen werdet. Ist nicht das Leben mehr denn Speise? und der Leib mehr denn die Kleidung?
Daarom zeg Ik u: Zijt niet bezorgd voor uw leven, wat gij eten, en wat gij drinken zult; noch voor uw lichaam, waarmede gij u kleden zult; is het leven niet meer dan het voedsel, en het lichaam dan de kleding?
Perciò vi dico: Non siate con ansietà solleciti per la vita vostra di quel che mangerete o di quel che berrete; né per il vostro corpo di che vi vestirete. Non è la vita più del nutrimento, e il corpo più del vestito?
Dlatego powiadam wam: Nie troszczcie się o żywot wasz, co byście jedli, albo co byście pili, ani o ciało wasze, czem byście się odziewali; azaż żywot nie jest zacniejszy niż pokarm, i ciało niż odzienie?
Посему говорю вам: не заботьтесь для души вашей, что вам есть и что пить, ни для тела вашего, во что одеться. Душа не больше ли пищи, и тело одежды?
「所以 我告訴 你們,不要 為 生命 憂慮 吃 甚麼, 喝 甚麼;為 身體 憂慮穿 甚麼。生命 不 勝於 飲食嗎? 身體 不勝於衣裳嗎?
So I say to you, Take no thought for your life, about food or drink, or about clothing for your body. Is not life more than food, and the body more than its clothing?
Verse in Context
Original Language (Koine Greek)
New Testament · Koine Greek · Matthew 6:25
Source: STEPBible TAGNT/TEHB (CC-BY 4.0). Click or tap a morphology code to see the full parsing.
Scholars' Consensus
Commentators across traditions agree that Jesus is not forbidding all forethought or responsible planning, but the kind of anxious, distrustful worry that springs from unbelief. The Greek verb μεριμνᾶτε (merimnate) is a present imperative, commanding an ongoing activity to stop. Vincent points out that when the KJV rendered it 'take no thought,' the word 'thought' still meant 'anxiety' in Elizabethan English. Calvin argues that 'immoderate care is condemned for two reasons': when men tease themselves to no purpose or when they trust their own industry rather than God. Barnes calls it 'anxiety, solicitude, trouble.' The argument then anchors on a logic of trust: God gave the life and the body, far greater gifts than the food and clothing that sustain them. As Gill puts it, 'since God has given these the greater gifts, it may be depended upon, that he will give the lesser.' The verse does not dismiss the value of work; it dismantles the fear that God will not provide.
How settled is the interpretation?
Interpretive difficulty: Low
What is clear: Jesus condemns anxious, distrustful worry, not prudent planning and labor — a reading affirmed across all major commentaries and traditions.
What Scholars Agree and Debate
| Topic | Agreed | Debated |
|---|---|---|
| The nature of the prohibited care | Christians across traditions agree that Jesus condemns anxious, distrustful worry, not all forethought or prudent planning. The older English 'take no thought' meant anxiety, not reflection. | No meaningful debate on the meaning of the prohibition itself, the unanimous reading is against worry, not against work or careful provision. |
| The meaning of μεριμνάω | The Greek verb can mean both legitimate care (1 Corinthians 12:25) and anxious worry (Matthew 6:25). The context determines which is meant. | Some traditions have historically used this verse to argue for radical simplicity without provision; others emphasize that the same word is used positively of caring for the church. Both readings affirm the core point: worry is forbidden. |
| The command and work | Faith in God’s provision does not replace human labor. All traditions affirm that work is part of God’s design and that idleness is sin. | Disagreement arises over the degree of planning that is wise. Some stress that believers should not store up treasures at all (following v.19), while others advocate prudent savings. Both appeal to the same Lord and the same Scripture. |
| Application in times of real scarcity | Jesus’ promise does not guarantee that believers will never experience hunger or lack. Instead, it reorients the heart toward the Father’s knowledge and care. | Christians differ on how to comfort those in extreme poverty, some emphasize the eschatological hope beyond this life, others stress the responsibility of the community to provide. Both see the verse as a summons to trust, not a formula for comfort. |
Historical & Cultural Context
The opening 'Therefore' (Διὰ τοῦτο) ties this verse directly to the previous warning against serving both God and Mammon (v.24). Jesus is addressing a peasant society in first-century Galilee where daily survival depended on harvests, seasonal labor, and the goodwill of patrons. Food shortages were common; clothing was labor-intensive and expensive. In this setting, worry about the next meal or a warm garment was not abstract, it was the background hum of daily life.
Jesus, however, reframes the conversation. The argument from greater to lesser runs through the whole passage: if God gave life itself and formed the body with such care, can He not be trusted with what sustains them? This reasoning echoes Old Testament wisdom. As Adam Clarke notes, μεριμνάω originally suggested a mind 'divided' or 'distracted', a term well suited to a people pulled between trust in God and the relentless pressure of scarcity. The command is not to withdraw from work (Scripture commends labor), but to withdraw the heart from the panic that forgets the Father's care.
Textual Notes
Adam Clarke notes that 'what ye shall eat' is omitted in two Greek manuscripts, most of the ancient versions, and several early church fathers. Griesbach marked the phrase as doubtful. However, the phrase appears in the majority of manuscripts and in the parallel at Luke 12:22. The textual variation does not affect the meaning of the verse, both with and without the phrase, the subject remains anxious worry about food and drink. The consulted sources note no other significant variants for this verse.
Reception History
Throughout church history, Matthew 6:25 has been a touchstone for teaching on divine providence and the proper attitude toward material goods. Early Christian writers such as Chrysostom used it to encourage believers facing persecution and economic uncertainty, arguing that trust in God frees the soul from enslavement to fear. In the monastic tradition, the verse was taken as a mandate for radical simplicity, inspiring communities that owned no personal property. The Protestant Reformers, especially Calvin and Luther, emphasized that the command does not forbid work or prudent care, but rather the anxiety that displaces faith. In modern times, the verse has been referenced in discussions of mental health and worry, with pastoral counselors pointing out that Jesus names the very pattern of rumination that characterizes anxiety disorders. Across eras, the constant thread has been the invitation to release the burden of provision into the hands of a Father who knows what we need.
Preaching This Verse
Jesus does not forbid prudence; He forbids panic. The word translated 'take no thought' in older English meant anxious, churning worry, the kind that divides the mind and paralyzes trust.
Three-point outline
- The command: stop being anxious. The Greek present imperative implies stopping an ongoing habit, not merely avoiding worry once, but breaking the pattern of distrustful thought.
- The argument: the greater includes the lesser. God gave life and body. If He gave the bigger gift, He will surely supply the smaller needs of food and clothing. This is an argument from the nature of God, not a promise of abundance.
- The implication: trust looks like work without worry. Diligence is not the same as anxiety. We labor, but we do not carry the weight of the outcome. That belongs to the Father.
Five-point outline
- The connection to the preceding verse: You cannot serve God and money. Anxiety about provision is a symptom of misplaced trust.
- The meaning of μὴ μεριμνᾶτε: It is not a blanket ban on thinking ahead. Every commentator in the tradition agrees on this. The prohibition is against anxious solicitude that arises from unbelief.
- The logic of creation: The God who made life and the body has the power to sustain them. He is not caught off guard by my needs.
- Application vs. passivity: Christ’s teaching does not contradict Paul’s 'If anyone will not work, let him not eat.' Anxiety is not the engine of diligence; it is the enemy of trust.
- The comfort of the argument: If the Father already gave the most costly gifts before we asked, He will not hold back the smaller ones when we come to Him.
Illustration hooks
- The gardener and the frost: A farmer plants seeds, waters them, and then goes to bed. He cannot force the growth. Anxious pacing around the field does not add a single sprout. He works and he trusts.
- The child on the father’s shoulders: A small child riding on her father’s shoulders does not worry about the path ahead, she can see further from there, but she trusts the one carrying her. The worry would only make her grip too tight and spoil the ride.
- The difference between steering and white-knuckling: A driver on a winding road keeps both hands on the wheel and watches the road. That is proper care. But if he white-knuckles in fear that he will crash, his judgment suffers. Care becomes anxiety when fear replaces trust.
Questions your congregation is asking
- ‘Isn’t it irresponsible not to worry about the future?’ The confusion comes from equating anxiety with responsibility. Jesus distinguishes careful planning from anxious fear. Prudent work is obedience; worry is distrust dressed up as diligence.
- ‘Does this promise work for people who are truly in need, not just anxious?’ The text does not guarantee that believers will never face hunger. It reorients the heart toward the Father who knows our needs and is faithful, even when the path includes hardship.
- ‘How do I know if I’m being anxious or just thoughtful?’ A useful test: does your planning produce peace or panic? Does it lead you to pray or to fret? If the thoughts make you forget God’s care, they have crossed into the worry Jesus forbids.
Leading a Discussion
Matthew 6:25 raises a question every Christian has wrestled with: does Jesus really command us not to think about tomorrow? In this study, open the conversation by acknowledging that the verse has been misunderstood, even misused to discourage prudence. The key is the difference between thoughtful planning and anxious worry. Read the verse together and then move through the questions.
Discussion questions
- Observation: What does the verse say we should not be anxious about? Make a list: life, food, drink, body, clothing. Why do you think Jesus mentions these particular things?
- Observation: The verse begins with 'Therefore.' What does that 'therefore' connect to, what has Jesus just said in verse 24 about serving two masters?
- Interpretation: The Greek word μεριμνάτε is translated 'be anxious.' How is anxiety different from normal planning and forethought? Why might a present imperative ('stop being anxious') be significant?
- Interpretation: Jesus argues that life is more than food and the body more than clothing. How does that argument actually prove that God will provide the lesser things? What does it assume about God’s character?
- Application: Think of a situation where you felt genuine worry about provision. How might this verse speak into that moment without dismissing the real pressure you felt?
- Application: Some Christians have used this verse to justify a lack of financial planning or preparation. How would you respond to that, using the whole of Scripture? Consider also 1 Timothy 5:8 and Proverbs 6:6, 8.
- Prayer: What is one thing you are currently anxious about that you could place before the Father this week, not as a plan to fix, but as a trust to hand over?
Word Study
The key original-language words in this verse. Select any word for its full lexicon entry — meaning, every occurrence in Scripture, and related words.
Cross-References
Source: Treasury of Scripture Knowledge (TSK, public domain)
| Psalms 55:22 | Cast your burden on Yahweh and he will sustain you. He will never allow the righteous to be moved. |
| Matthew 5:22 | But I tell you that everyone who is angry with his brother without a cause will be in danger of the judgment. Whoever says to his brother, ‘Raca!’ will be in danger of the council. Whoever says, ‘You fool!’ will be in danger of the fire of Gehenna. |
| Matthew 5:28 | but I tell you that everyone who gazes at a woman to lust after her has committed adultery with her already in his heart. |
| Matthew 6:27 | “Which of you by being anxious, can add one moment to his lifespan? |
| Matthew 6:28 | Why are you anxious about clothing? Consider the lilies of the field, how they grow. They don’t toil, neither do they spin, |
| Matthew 6:31 | “Therefore don’t be anxious, saying, ‘What will we eat?’, ‘What will we drink?’ or, ‘With what will we be clothed?’ |
| Matthew 6:34 | Therefore don’t be anxious for tomorrow, for tomorrow will be anxious for itself. Each day’s own evil is sufficient. |
| Matthew 10:19 | But when they deliver you up, don’t be anxious how or what you will say, for it will be given you in that hour what you will say. |
Interlinear and lexical data from STEPBible (CC BY 4.0). Cross-reference data from OpenBible.info (CC BY 4.0). Commentaries are public domain.
For personal reflection
Read the devotional page — prayer, application, and "for families"
What the Commentators Say
11 public-domain commentaries, condensed into plain language.
Adam Clarke's Commentary Methodist/Wesleyan 1826
Clarke draws a sharp line between prudent care and anxious worry. The Greek word means a mind divided and pulled in different directions. He argues that Jesus forbids this distracting anxiety, not reasonable planning. Trust in God rests on the experience of receiving life itself, the greater gift that guarantees provision for the lesser needs.
Barnes' Notes on the Bible Protestant 1832
Barnes clarifies that when Jesus tells his followers not to take thought, he means they should not be anxious. Anxiety is wrong, but thoughtful planning is proper. God who gave the greater gifts of life and the body can surely be trusted for the smaller needs of food and clothing.
Calvin's Commentaries Reformed 1564
Calvin distinguishes between legitimate care and sinful anxiety. Christ does not forbid all concern for daily needs, but only immoderate worry that springs from distrust. Believers labor according to their calling and pray, yet rest in God's providence, avoiding both idleness and the torment that consumes unbelievers.
Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges Anglican 1880
Cambridge Bible Schools notes that the phrase "take no thought" originally meant "do not be anxious," not an instruction to be careless. The argument is that since God already gave the greater gifts of life and the body, He will surely provide the lesser needs of food and clothing.
Geneva Bible Notes Reformed 1599
Therefore I say vnto you, be not carefull for your life, what ye shall eate, or what ye shall drinke: nor yet for your body, what ye shall put on. Is not the life more worth then meate? and the bodie then raiment?
Gill's Exposition of the Bible Baptist 1748
Gill distinguishes between lawful care for daily needs and the anxious, distrustful worry that dishonors God. He argues from the greater to the lesser: since God gave life and the body without human effort, He will surely provide the smaller gifts of food and clothing to sustain them.
Jamieson-Fausset-Brown Commentary Protestant 1871
JFB clarifies that being "solicitous" is the sin condemned, not thoughtfulness itself. Planning for temporal needs is required by Scripture and common sense, but anxious care born from unbelief is forbidden. He argues that if God gives and sustains the greater gift of life itself, He will not withhold the lesser provisions of food and clothing.
Lange's Commentary Reformed 1857
Lange reads this passage as Jesus exposing the hidden worldliness that lurks beneath false spirituality. He argues that the Pharisees' hypocrisy, long prayers, and showy piety disguised a heart divided between God and money. For Lange, the "evil eye" means double vision — trying to serve two masters while pretending to serve only one.
Matthew Henry's Commentary Reformed/Presbyterian 1710
Henry sees anxious worry about life's needs as a serious sin that Jesus warns against with exceptional force and many arguments. Such distracting cares reveal that a person's heart and treasure are still tied to earth rather than to God's kingdom.
Vincent's Word Studies Evangelical 1887
Vincent clarifies that the Greek word rendered "take no thought" originally meant anxious worry, not ordinary thinking or planning. He shows the same word elsewhere describes positive, non-anxious care. Jesus condemns uneasiness about the future, not thoughtful provision.
Wesley's Explanatory Notes Methodist/Wesleyan 1754
Wesley insists that anxious worry is fundamentally incompatible with serving God. He argues that since God has already given the greater gift of life itself, He can be trusted for the smaller needs like food. Worry, in his view, is as contrary to true service as outright worldly desire.