Matthew 5:35 · Bible study
Matthew 5:35 Commentary: Earth as Footstool, Jerusalem as Great King's City
Greek · 6 what the commentators say
Meaning in one sentence
Why does Jesus say swearing by the earth and Jerusalem is wrong? The significance of calling them God's footstool and city of the great King.
Research Summary
- Meaning: Jesus forbids swearing by earth or Jerusalem because both belong to God (footstool and city of the great King).
- Key words: γῆ (earth), ὑποπόδιον (footstool), Ἱεροσόλυμα (Jerusalem), πόλις τοῦ μεγάλου βασιλέως (city of the great King).
- Main debate: Whether Jesus absolutely forbids all oaths or only casual/evasive ones; the meaning of this verse itself is not disputed.
- Theological theme: God’s sovereignty over creation and the call to truthful, simple speech.
- Best use: Preaching on integrity, the holiness of ordinary things, and the third commandment in the Sermon on the Mount.
Translation Comparison
BSB Berean Standard Bible 2020
or by the earth, for it is His footstool; or by Jerusalem, for it is the city of the great King.
WEB World English Bible 2000
nor by the earth, for it is the footstool of his feet; nor by Jerusalem, for it is the city of the great King.
KJV King James Version 1769
Nor by the earth; for it is his footstool: neither by Jerusalem; for it is the city of the great King.
ASV American Standard Version 1901
nor by the earth, for it is the footstool of his feet; nor by Jerusalem, for it is the city of the great King.
YLT Young's Literal Translation 1898
nor by the earth, because it is His footstool, nor by Jerusalem, because it is a city of a great king,
Darby Darby Bible 1890
nor by the earth, because it is [the] footstool of his feet; nor by Jerusalem, because it is [the] city of the great King.
Douay-Rheims Douay-Rheims Bible 1899
Nor by the earth, for it is his footstool: nor by Jerusalem, for it is the city of the great king:
Translations in other languages (10 available)
Ni por la tierra, porque es el estrado de sus pies; ni por Jerusalem, porque es la ciudad del gran Rey.
Nem pela terra, porque é o suporte de seus pés; nem por Jerusalém, porque é a cidade do grande Rei.
ni par la terre, parce que c’ est son marchepied; ni par Jérusalem, parce que c’ est la ville du grand roi.
noch bei der Erde, denn sie ist seiner Füße Schemel, noch bei Jerusalem, denn sie ist des großen Königs Stadt.
Noch bij de aarde, omdat zij is de voetbank Zijner voeten; noch bij Jeruzalem, omdat zij is de stad des groten Konings;
né per la terra, perché è lo sgabello dei suoi piedi; né per Gerusalemme, perché è la città del gran Re.
Ani na ziemię, gdyż jest podnóżkiem nóg jego; ani na Jeruzalem, gdyż jest miasto wielkiego króla;
ни землею, потому что она подножие ног Его; ни Иерусалимом, потому что он город великого Царя;
不可 指著 地起誓,因為 地是 他的 腳 凳;也不可 指著 耶路撒冷起誓,因為 耶路撒冷是 大 君 的京城;
Or by the earth, because it is the resting-place for his foot; or by Jerusalem, because it is the town of the great King.
Verse in Context
Original Language (Koine Greek)
New Testament · Koine Greek · Matthew 5:35
Source: STEPBible TAGNT/TEHB (CC-BY 4.0). Click or tap a morphology code to see the full parsing.
Scholars' Consensus
Commentators across traditions agree that Jesus prohibits swearing by the earth or Jerusalem because both belong to God. Barnes notes that swearing by the earth is “really swearing by God,” since the earth is His footstool, a lowly object compared to God, yet still His possession. Gill adds that the Jews commonly swore by the earth and by Jerusalem, and Jesus condemns this because such oaths ultimately invoke God Himself, who owns those things. Jamieson-Fausset-Brown supply the Old Testament sources: the earth as footstool comes from Isaiah 66:1, Jerusalem as the city of the great King from Psalm 48:2. The earth is the place where God “manifests forth his glory” (Gill), and Jerusalem is the city where God dwelt among His people. Therefore, swearing by these created things is not a harmless evasion of God’s name, it is an indirect appeal to God, and Jesus calls His followers to a more direct honesty.
How settled is the interpretation?
Interpretive difficulty: Low
What is clear: Jesus forbids swearing by the earth and Jerusalem because they belong to God, and that the earth is His footstool and Jerusalem is the city of the great King, linking these prohibitions to God's sovereignty.
What Scholars Agree and Debate
| Topic | Agreed | Debated |
|---|---|---|
| Meaning of 'swear not at all' | Jesus prohibits casual and evasive oaths that use creation as a substitute for God's name. | Some Christians read this as an absolute ban on all oaths (including legal ones), while others hold that solemn oaths in court or marriage are permitted because they honor God. |
| Earth as footstool, Jerusalem as city of the great King | Both phrases show that the created world belongs to God and carries His authority. | No significant debate on the meaning of these titles; all consulted commentators agree they point to God's ownership. |
| Application to modern speech | Christians should be people whose simple word can be trusted, without needing oaths. | Whether phrases like 'I swear' or 'honest to God' in everyday conversation fall under this prohibition is interpreted differently across traditions. |
Historical & Cultural Context
In first-century Judaism, oaths were woven into daily speech and legal practice. The Mishnah (Nedarim) records forms of swearing “by Jerusalem” or “by the earth,” as Gill documents. People used these substitutes thinking they could avoid taking God’s name in vain while still making a binding commitment. The practice was common enough that the rabbis debated its validity: some ruled that an oath “as Jerusalem” meant nothing unless the speaker intended something offered in Jerusalem (Gill, citing the Gemara). Jesus steps into this culture with a radical claim: these evasions do not work. He traces earth and Jerusalem back to their Creator. The phrase “footstool of his feet” echoes Isaiah 66:1, where God says heaven is His throne and earth His footstool. This image comes from ancient Near Eastern practice: a king’s footstool showed his dominion over a conquered territory. Calling earth God’s footstool makes it a sign of His rule, not a neutral object to swear by. Jerusalem, the capital of Israel, was celebrated in the Psalms as the place where the “great King” (God) dwells (Psalm 48:2). By adding these examples, Jesus shows that all things belong to God, and therefore all oaths, whether they use God’s name directly or not, invoke Him. The Sermon on the Mount context is key: Jesus is correcting the tradition of the elders (v.33-37), calling His disciples to a truthfulness that needs no oath at all.
Textual Notes
The supplied sources note no significant textual variants for Matthew 5:35. The verse is stable across the manuscript tradition, with only minor differences in word order (e.g., the position of ἐστιν) that do not affect meaning.
Reception History
Matthew 5:35 has been central in Christian discussions of oath-taking. Early church writers like Tertullian and Origen cited this passage to argue against swearing in everyday life. During the Reformation, Anabaptist groups used it to reject all oaths, including in courts and civic offices, while Reformed and Catholic traditions permitted solemn oaths taken in God’s name for serious matters. The imagery of earth as God’s footstool also shaped Christian worship, appearing in hymns and liturgies that stress God’s majesty (drawing on Isaiah 66 and Psalm 99). In the Eastern Orthodox tradition, the verse is read as part of Christ’s fulfillment of the Law, calling believers to a higher standard of truthfulness that mirrors God’s own faithfulness.
Preaching This Verse
Three-point outline
- What we swear by reveals what we trust. The Jews used earth and Jerusalem as guarantees, thinking they were safe substitutes for God. Jesus says those things are God’s, so the oath still reaches Him.
- Creation belongs to God. Earth is His footstool, lowly but sacred. Jerusalem is His city. Swearing by them treats them as neutral, but they are charged with His presence.
- Honest speech needs no crutch. Jesus goes on to say, “Let your ‘Yes’ be ‘Yes’” (v.37). The goal is not better oaths but no oaths, speech that stands on its own.
Five-point outline
- Jesus forbids swearing by the earth because it is God’s footstool (Isa 66:1).
- Jesus forbids swearing by Jerusalem because it is the city of the great King (Ps 48:2).
- These prohibitions expand the third commandment: do not misuse what belongs to God.
- The earth and Jerusalem are not ours to use as bargaining chips.
- The solution is not to find new things to swear by, but to speak with integrity.
Illustration hooks
- A child promises a friend “I swear on my mom’s life” as a way to be believed. The gesture feels powerful, but it’s using someone else’s worth to prop up your word. Jesus says your own word should be enough.
- In court, witnesses swear on a Bible. The practice assumes the Bible is holy. Jesus’ point is deeper: everything is holy because God made it. So swearing by the earth is just as serious as swearing by God.
- People today say “I swear to God” casually, even in lies. Jesus invites us to drop the drama and speak plainly.
Questions your congregation is asking
- Is it wrong to say “I swear to God” in everyday speech, or is that a sin?
- Does Jesus forbid all oaths, including legal oaths in court?
- What’s the difference between a promise and an oath, and should Christians make promises?
Leading a Discussion
This verse is part of Jesus’ teaching on oaths in the Sermon on the Mount. The Jews of His day had developed a system of substitute oaths that seemed to avoid God’s name but still carried weight. Jesus exposes these evasions by showing that every created thing belongs to God. Swearing by the earth or Jerusalem is still swearing by the Creator who owns them.
Discussion questions
- Read Matthew 5:33-37 aloud. What is Jesus forbidding, and what reasons does He give for each example?
- Why did first-century Jews think swearing by the earth or by Jerusalem was acceptable? What does that reveal about their view of God?
- Jesus calls the earth God’s footstool and Jerusalem the city of the great King. What do these titles tell us about God’s relationship to creation?
- How does this passage challenge the way you use words to make promises or to convince others?
- In what situations do you feel pressure to add extra weight to your promises (e.g., “I swear,” “honest”)?
- What would it look like in your daily life to let your “Yes” be “Yes” and your “No” be “No”?
- How does this teaching about oaths connect with Jesus’ larger theme of the Kingdom of God in the Sermon on the Mount?
Word Study
The key original-language words in this verse. Select any word for its full lexicon entry — meaning, every occurrence in Scripture, and related words.
Cross-References
Source: Treasury of Scripture Knowledge (TSK, public domain)
| II Chronicles 6:6 | but now I have chosen Jerusalem, that my name might be there; and I have chosen David to be over my people Israel.’ |
| Psalms 48:2 | Beautiful in elevation, the joy of the whole earth, is Mount Zion, on the north sides, the city of the great King. |
| Psalms 87:2 | Yahweh loves the gates of Zion more than all the dwellings of Jacob. |
| Psalms 99:5 | Exalt Yahweh our God. Worship at his footstool. He is Holy! |
| Malachi 1:14 | “But the deceiver is cursed who has in his flock a male, and vows and sacrifices to the Lord a defective thing; for I am a great King,” says Yahweh of Armies, “and my name is awesome among the nations.” |
| Revelation of John 21:2 | I saw the holy city, New Jerusalem, coming down out of heaven from God, prepared like a bride adorned for her husband. |
| Revelation of John 21:10 | He carried me away in the Spirit to a great and high mountain, and showed me the holy city, Jerusalem, coming down out of heaven from God, |
Interlinear and lexical data from STEPBible (CC BY 4.0). Cross-reference data from OpenBible.info (CC BY 4.0). Commentaries are public domain.
For personal reflection
Read the devotional page — prayer, application, and "for families"
What the Commentators Say
6 public-domain commentaries, condensed into plain language.
Barnes' Notes on the Bible Protestant 1832
Barnes argues that swearing by heaven, earth, or Jerusalem is actually swearing by God, since these things belong to Him. Such oaths are either meaningless if they do not invoke the living God, or wicked because they use God's property irreverently. The real issue is that only God has power to enforce an oath.
Geneva Bible Notes Reformed 1599
The Geneva Study Bible notes that swearing by the earth or by Jerusalem still invokes God, since the earth is His footstool and Jerusalem is the city of the great King. Nothing is outside His dominion, so no oath can escape His name.
Gill's Exposition of the Bible Baptist 1748
Gill explains that Jesus forbids swearing by the earth because it is God's footstool, and by Jerusalem because it is the city of the great King, meaning God Himself. He supports this by pointing out that these were common Jewish oath formulas, but their value lies entirely in the divine connection.
Jamieson-Fausset-Brown Commentary Protestant 1871
Nor by the earth; for it is his footstool —(quoting Isa 66:1 ); neither by Jerusalem for it is the city of the great King —(quoting Ps 48:2 ).
Lange's Commentary Reformed 1857
Lange argues that Christ does not abolish the law but fulfills it by tracing each command back to the heart. The Pharisees had turned the law into mere outward rules; Jesus shows its spiritual depth, targeting the inner attitudes behind murder, adultery, and other sins. True righteousness goes beyond external compliance to inner transformation.
Matthew Henry's Commentary Reformed/Presbyterian 1710
Matthew Henry points out that the light of nature itself condemns perjury as a combination of irreverence toward God and injustice toward people. He observes that the universal human practice of turning oaths into self-curses shows an instinctive awareness that God's wrath follows a false oath.