Matthew 13:34 · Bible study
Matthew 13:34 Commentary: Parables and Jesus' Teaching Method
Greek · 9 what the commentators say
Meaning in one sentence
Why did Jesus speak only in parables to the crowds? Examine the double purpose of revelation and concealment in Matthew 13:34.
Research Summary
- Meaning: Jesus exclusively used parables to the crowds on this occasion, simultaneously revealing and concealing kingdom truths.
- Key words: πάντα (all, emphasizing the whole discourse), παραβολαῖς (parables: earthly stories with heavenly meaning), χωρίς (without: total absence of non-parabolic speech on that day), the aorist/imperfect verb shift (specific occasion vs. ongoing practice).
- Main debate: Was this primarily judgment against the hardened (Calvin) or accommodation to human capacity (Clarke)? Most agree it served both.
- Theological theme: The paradox of revelation: God hides in order to be truly found, and Christ’s words invite response while also testing hearts.
- Best use: Teaching on how God adapts communication to our spiritual condition, how Scripture’s harder passages can still teach us, and how the gospel addresses both insiders and outsiders.
Translation Comparison
BSB Berean Standard Bible 2020
Jesus spoke all these things to the crowds in parables. He did not tell them anything without using a parable.
WEB World English Bible 2000
Jesus spoke all these things in parables to the multitudes; and without a parable, he didn’t speak to them,
KJV King James Version 1769
All these things spake Jesus unto the multitude in parables; and without a parable spake he not unto them:
ASV American Standard Version 1901
All these things spake Jesus in parables unto the multitudes; and without a parable spake he nothing unto them:
YLT Young's Literal Translation 1898
All these things spake Jesus in similes to the multitudes, and without a simile he was not speaking to them,
Darby Darby Bible 1890
All these things Jesus spoke to the crowds in parables, and without a parable he did not speak to them,
Douay-Rheims Douay-Rheims Bible 1899
All these things Jesus spoke in parables to the multitudes: and without parables he did not speak to them.
Translations in other languages (10 available)
Todo esto habló Jesús por parábolas á las gentes, y sin parábolas no les hablaba:
Tudo isto Jesus falou por parábolas às multidões. Sem parábolas ele não lhes falava,
Jésus dit à la foule toutes ces choses en paraboles, et il ne lui parlait point sans parabole,
Solches alles redete Jesus durch Gleichnisse zu dem Volk, und ohne Gleichnis redete er nicht zu ihnen,
Al deze dingen heeft Jezus tot de scharen gesproken door gelijkenissen, en zonder gelijkenis sprak Hij tot hen niet.
Tutte queste cose disse Gesù in parabole alle turbe e senza parabola non diceva loro nulla,
To wszystko mówił Jezus w podobieństwach do ludu, a bez podobieństwa nie mówił do nich;
Все сие Иисус говорил народу притчами, и без притчи не говорил им,
這 都 是耶穌 用 比喻 對眾人 說的話； 若不用 比喻，就不 對他們 說甚麼。
All these things Jesus said to the people in the form of stories; and without a story he said nothing to them:
Verse in Context
Original Language (Koine Greek)
New Testament · Koine Greek · Matthew 13:34
Source: STEPBible TAGNT/TEHB (CC-BY 4.0). Click or tap a morphology code to see the full parsing.
Scholars' Consensus
Commentators agree that Matthew 13:34 describes a specific occasion, not Jesus' entire ministry, when he addressed the multitudes exclusively in parables. Gill notes that “in that sermon, and at that time, he thought fit to make use of no other method.” Jamieson-Fausset-Brown concur, specifying “on this occasion.” Wesley likewise sharpens the point: “that is, not at that time; at other times he did.” The Greek reinforces this: the first verb, ἐλάλησεν (aorist), reports a single instance of speaking; the second, ἐλάλει (imperfect), describes ongoing practice during that period, he was not speaking without a parable. Calvin sees a dual purpose: parables kept the hearers attentive while also concealing truth from the hardened, delaying full disclosure until a “more convenient time.” Clarke emphasizes accommodation: “Divine things cannot be taught to man but through the medium of earthly things.” The consensus holds that Jesus used parables on this day both to reveal kingdom mysteries to those with ears to hear and to veil them from those who had already rejected his message.
How settled is the interpretation?
Interpretive difficulty: Low
What is clear: Jesus deliberately limited his public teaching to parables on this specific occasion, a method that both revealed kingdom mysteries to seekers and concealed them from the hardened.
What Scholars Agree and Debate
| Topic | Agreed | Debated |
|---|---|---|
| Purpose of exclusive parable use | Jesus deliberately chose this method to address the mixed crowd on that day. | Some emphasize judgment on the hard-hearted (Calvin, connecting to Matthew 13:13-15), while others stress accommodation to human weakness (Clarke, seeing parables as a 'descent to earthly things'). |
| Temporal scope of 'without a parable he didn't speak' | The verse describes a specific occasion, not Jesus' entire ministry; at other times he spoke plainly (John 16:25). | A minority (some readers of Calvin) have applied the statement broadly, but most commentators (Gill, Wesley, JFB) limit it to 'at that time.' |
| Fulfillment of Psalm 78:2 | Matthew sees Jesus' use of parables as a parallel to the prophet Asaph's method. | Whether this fulfillment is purely typological (Barnes: 'the sense, not the very words') or a direct prophecy of Christ (traditional Reformed view) is a difference in hermeneutical approach. |
| Audience: 'multitudes' vs. disciples | The public teaching was in parables; the disciples later received private explanations (v.36, Mark 4:34). | The extent to which the disciples themselves understood the parables without explanation is debated; the text shows they needed interpretation (v.36, v.51). |
Historical & Cultural Context
Matthew 13 stands as the third major discourse in the Gospel, a collection of parables about the kingdom of heaven delivered from a boat to a large crowd on the shore (Matthew 13:1-2). The setting is likely the Sea of Galilee, with Jesus seated in the posture of a Jewish teacher. The use of parables (παραβολαί) was familiar in Jewish tradition; the Hebrew mashal encompassed proverbs, riddles, and extended comparisons. Poole notes that Jotham's parable (Judges 9) is an early biblical example, showing that “this was a very ancient way of instruction.” In this chapter, Jesus draws images from everyday life, farming, fishing, baking, to convey truths about the kingdom’s present growth and future consummation.
The crowds were a mixed group: disciples who followed daily, curious onlookers, and skeptical religious leaders. Just before this passage, Matthew records that the Pharisees accused Jesus of casting out demons by Beelzebul (Matthew 12:24). Jesus had begun to speak in parables as a judgment on their hardness, as he explains in Matthew 13:13-15. Calvin remarks that Jesus “withdrew the light of doctrine from the reprobate” while also “accommodating himself to the capacity” of willing hearers. The quotation from Psalm 78:2 (Matthew 13:35) frames Jesus’ method as fulfillment of prophetic pattern: the psalmist Asaph, a prophet, also used parables to utter “things hidden from the foundation of the world.”
Mark’s parallel (Mark 4:33-34) adds that Jesus “spoke the word to them as they were able to hear it” but “privately to his own disciples he explained everything.” This confirms the historical function of parables: they were a temporary mode of public instruction, followed by private explanation for those who sought deeper understanding. The house setting in verse 36 marks the transition from public concealment to private revelation.
Textual Notes
The consulted sources note no significant textual variants for Matthew 13:34. The Greek text is well established, with only minor variations in word order (e.g., the position of πάντα) that do not affect meaning. The reading is secure across the major manuscript families.
Reception History
Early church fathers such as Chrysostom and Augustine saw Jesus' exclusive use of parables in Matthew 13 as a divine condescension to human weakness, while also noting the judicial aspect of hiding truth from the unworthy. Thomas Aquinas, in the Summa Theologica, discussed how sensible images in parables suit human nature's need to learn through material things. The Reformation brought a sharper focus on the judgment dimension: Calvin argued that God sometimes withholds clarity to expose the reprobate. In later centuries, this verse became key for the ‘parable theory’ debate: some argued the kingdom was entirely hidden in this age (dispensationalism), while others saw parables as pedagogical invitations (most mainline traditions). Today, Christians from all traditions recognize that Jesus' method in Matthew 13 calls for an active response, a willingness to seek the meaning behind the story.
Preaching This Verse
Three-point outline
- The exclusivity of the method. Jesus “without a parable spoke nothing to them” on this occasion. The Greek imperfect ἐλάλει stresses that this was his consistent practice during that day’s teaching.
- The mixed audience. The multitudes included hard hearts and open hearts. Parables simultaneously judged the resistant and invited the seekers to press further.
- The prophetic pattern. Matthew cites Psalm 78:2, showing that this method was not a retreat but a fulfillment: the Messiah would speak in stories that conceal and then reveal hidden things.
Five-point outline
- “All these things”, the completeness of the discourse: the parables of the sower, weeds, mustard seed, and leaven.
- “In parables”, the literary form: earthly stories carrying heavenly meaning, grounded in daily life.
- “To the multitudes”, the audience: a broad mix of disciples, seekers, and opponents.
- “Without a parable he didn’t speak to them”, the exclusivity: nothing plain, only figures, at this stage.
- “That it might be fulfilled”, the theological purpose: Jesus’ method matches prophetic Scripture, and it separates the truly interested from the merely curious.
Illustration hooks
- A teacher uses a story to explain a tough concept when students are not ready for the abstract principle. Jesus used parables when the crowds were not yet ready for the full revelation of the kingdom.
- A parent speaks in simple, guarded ways to a young child about a serious family matter, revealing enough truth but protecting the child from what they cannot handle. Jesus protected the mysteries of the kingdom from those who would only mock them.
- Gradual truth-telling: you don’t share your deepest secrets with someone you just met. Jesus revealed the kingdom gradually, with parables inviting trust before transparency.
Questions your congregation is asking
- Why doesn’t God just make everything clear in the Bible?
- What if I read a parable and don’t understand it, does that mean I’m not a real Christian?
- Was Jesus being intentionally difficult, or was he being kind by using stories?
Leading a Discussion
This verse marks a turning point in Matthew’s Gospel. Jesus, having faced growing opposition, begins to speak to the crowds exclusively in parables. Why would the Son of God choose stories that both reveal and hide? This passage invites us to consider how people respond to Jesus’ teaching, with curiosity, hardness, or hunger for truth.
Discussion questions
- What does this verse say about Jesus’ teaching method on this particular day? (Read the surrounding parables in Matthew 13 to see examples.)
- Why do you think Jesus chose to speak only in parables to the multitudes at this point in his ministry? What had happened just before (Matthew 12:22-45)?
- The Greek shifts from a one-time act (ἐλάλησεν) to continuous practice (ἐλάλει). How does that change how you understand “without a parable he didn’t speak to them”?
- How does Matthew 13:13-15 connect to this verse? What does it tell us about the purpose of parables in relation to people’s hearts?
- In what ways can parables be both revealing and concealing? Can you think of a modern example where a story teaches more than direct instruction?
- How should this influence the way we read the parables of Jesus? Do we approach them as puzzles to solve or invitations to draw near?
- What does this passage suggest about the nature of faith? Is seeking understanding part of following Jesus?
Word Study
The key original-language words in this verse. Select any word for its full lexicon entry — meaning, every occurrence in Scripture, and related words.
Cross-References
Source: Treasury of Scripture Knowledge (TSK, public domain)
| Matthew 13:13 | Therefore I speak to them in parables, because seeing they don’t see, and hearing, they don’t hear, neither do they understand. |
| Mark 4:33 | With many such parables he spoke the word to them, as they were able to hear it. |
| Mark 4:34 | Without a parable he didn’t speak to them; but privately to his own disciples he explained everything. |
| John 16:25 | “I have spoken these things to you in figures of speech. But the time is coming when I will no more speak to you in figures of speech, but will tell you plainly about the Father. |
Interlinear and lexical data from STEPBible (CC BY 4.0). Cross-reference data from OpenBible.info (CC BY 4.0). Commentaries are public domain.
For personal reflection
Read the devotional page — prayer, application, and "for families"
What the Commentators Say
8 public-domain commentaries, condensed into plain language.
Adam Clarke's Commentary Methodist/Wesleyan 1826
Clarke sees parables as God's necessary concession to human limitation. If God spoke in heaven's own language, we would comprehend nothing. In the parables, spiritual truths take on a body and become something we can actually grasp.
Barnes' Notes on the Bible Protestant 1832
Barnes stresses that the fulfillment here is not a word-for-word prediction but a correspondence in the method of teaching. Christ taught in parables just as Asaph did in the psalm. For Barnes, the prophecy is fulfilled in the manner and sense of the instruction, not in the precise wording.
Calvin's Commentaries Reformed 1564
Calvin argues that Jesus spoke in parables not to fully instruct the crowds but to keep them attentive until a more convenient time. The private explanations to the disciples show that the public was not yet ready for the full gospel. This method accommodated their unpreparedness while still leaving them without excuse.
Geneva Bible Notes Reformed 1599
The Geneva note emphasises that Jesus spoke to the crowds exclusively in parables, withholding plain speech from them. This deliberate method was not merely a teaching style but a judgment that veiled truth from those who were unwilling to receive it.
Gill's Exposition of the Bible Baptist 1748
Gill clarifies that "without a parable spake he not unto them" refers only to this particular sermon, not to all of Jesus' teaching. On this occasion Jesus chose to speak exclusively in parables and dismissed the crowd without explaining their meaning, though he later explained some to his disciples when asked.
Jamieson-Fausset-Brown Commentary Protestant 1871
JFB stresses that Jesus spoke nothing to the crowd except in parables on this occasion. He refrained not only from plain teaching but even from explaining the parables to the mixed multitude, leaving them with the stories alone and no interpretation.
Lange's Commentary Reformed 1857
Lange views the seven parables as a connected sequence tracing the kingdom of heaven from start to finish. He uniquely links each parable to a specific era of church history: the sower to the apostolic age, the tares to early heresies, the mustard seed to Constantine's state church, and so on up to the final judgment.
Wesley's Explanatory Notes Methodist/Wesleyan 1754
Wesley clarifies that when Scripture says Jesus spoke only in parables, it refers specifically to that particular time and audience. At other times and to other listeners, he spoke plainly and directly. The statement describes a temporary teaching method, not a permanent pattern.