GospelMount
Search Topics Scripture Prayer Resources Ebooks About Support the mission Saved articles
Jump to ▾

Luke 24:42 · Bible study

Luke 24:42 Commentary: Why Jesus Ate After the Resurrection

Greek · 8 what the commentators say

Meaning in one sentence

Jesus eats broiled fish and honeycomb to prove his bodily resurrection. Study the significance of this meal and what it teaches about his risen body.

Research Summary

  • Meaning: Jesus eats broiled fish and honeycomb to provide tangible proof that his resurrection body is physical, not a spirit.
  • Key words: “Broiled” (optos, G3702), appears only here in the NT. “Honeycomb” (melissios from bees, kērion tablet), some key manuscripts omit it.
  • Main debate: Textual authenticity of “and some honeycomb”; while most witnesses include it, the earliest MSS (Sinaiticus, Vaticanus) omit it. The omission does not affect the main point.
  • Theological theme: Bodily resurrection, Jesus’ risen body is continuous with his crucified body, yet glorified and free from physical limitations.
  • Best use: Apologetics for the physical resurrection; pastoral comfort for those struggling with doubt.

Translation Comparison

BSB Berean Standard Bible 2020

So they gave Him a piece of broiled fish,

WEB World English Bible 2000

They gave him a piece of a broiled fish and some honeycomb.

KJV King James Version 1769

And they gave him a piece of a broiled fish, and of an honeycomb.

ASV American Standard Version 1901

And they gave him a piece of a broiled fish.

YLT Young's Literal Translation 1898

and they gave to him part of a broiled fish, and of an honeycomb,

Darby Darby Bible 1890

And they gave him part of a broiled fish and of a honeycomb;

Douay-Rheims Douay-Rheims Bible 1899

And they offered him a piece of a broiled fish and a honeycomb.

Translations in other languages (10 available)
ES Reina-Valera 1909 1909

Entonces ellos le presentaron parte de un pez asado, y un panal de miel.

PT Almeida Livre 1994

Então eles lhe apresentaram parte de um peixe assado.

FR Louis Segond 1910

Ils lui présentèrent du poisson rôti et un rayon de miel.

DE Luther Bibel 1912 1912

Und sie legten ihm vor ein Stück von gebratenem Fisch und Honigseim.

NL Statenvertaling 1637

En zij gaven Hem een stuk van een gebraden vis, en van honigraten.

IT Riveduta 1927

Essi gli porsero un pezzo di pesce arrostito;

PL Biblia Gdańska 1632

A oni mu podali sztukę ryby pieczonej i plastr miodu.

RU Синодальный перевод 1876

Они подали Ему часть печеной рыбы и сотового меда.

ZH 和合本 1919

他們便 給 他 一片 燒 魚。(有古卷加:和一塊蜜房。)

EN Bible in Basic English 1949

And they gave him a bit of cooked fish.

Verse in Context

40 When he had said this, he showed them his hands and his feet.
41 While they still didn’t believe for joy, and wondered, he said to them, “Do you have anything here to eat?”
42 They gave him a piece of a broiled fish and some honeycomb.
43 He took them, and ate in front of them.
44 He said to them, “This is what I told you while I was still with you, that all things which are written in the law of Moses, the prophets, and the psalms concerning me must be fulfilled.”

Original Language (Koine Greek)

οἱ hoi T-NPM G3588 <the>
δὲ de CONJ G1161 And
ἐπέδωκαν epedōkan V-AAI-3P G1929 they gave
αὐτῷ autō P-DSM G0846 to Him
ἰχθύος ichthuos N-GSM G2486 of a fish
ὀπτοῦ optou A-GSM G3702 broiled
μέρος meros N-ASN G3313 part
καὶ kai CONJ G2532 and
ἀπὸ apo PREP G0575 from
μελισσίου melissiou A-GSN G3193 honeycomb
κηρίου. kēriou N-GSN G2781 tablet.

Source: STEPBible TAGNT/TEHB (CC-BY 4.0). Click or tap a morphology code to see the full parsing.

Scholars' Consensus

Commentators across traditions agree on the central purpose of this small meal. Matthew Henry says Jesus ate "to prove that he had a real body," and Barnes adds this was one of several "infallible proofs" (Acts 1:3) that convinced the disciples he was not a spirit. Gill notes the fish was common fare for fishermen, and the honeycomb was served separately. The act was not for nourishment but for demonstration. Vincent observes that the word for "broiled" (optos) appears only here in the New Testament, adding specificity to the scene. The meal, though humble, carries enormous weight: it is tangible evidence of the resurrection.

How settled is the interpretation?

Interpretive difficulty: Low

What is clear: Jesus ate after his resurrection to demonstrate the physical reality of his risen body, confirming he was not a disembodied spirit.

What Scholars Agree and Debate

TopicAgreedDebated
Purpose of Jesus eating after resurrectionAll traditions agree Jesus ate to demonstrate his physical, bodily resurrection, proving he was not a disembodied spirit.No disagreement among commentators; the act is uniformly read as evidence of corporeal resurrection.
Textual reading of 'and of a honeycomb'Most Greek manuscripts and later translations include honeycomb; the meal is presented as fish plus honeycomb.The earliest and best manuscripts (Sinaiticus, Vaticanus, Bezae) omit the phrase. Scholars differ on whether it was original or a scribal addition harmonizing with other accounts or local tradition.
Nature of the resurrected bodyChristians affirm that Jesus’ resurrected body was a real, physical body, capable of being touched and eating food.Some traditions emphasize continuity with the pre-resurrection body (the same wounds), while others highlight transformation (ability to appear through locked doors). Both are affirmed in the text.
Disciples’ response: 'believed not for joy'All traditions see this as a genuine human reaction of overwhelmed emotion, not as a refusal to believe.None; it is universally understood as a natural response to astonishing news.

Historical & Cultural Context

The meal in Luke 24:42 takes place on the evening of the resurrection day, in Jerusalem, behind locked doors (John 20:19). The disciples had gathered, fearful and confused, despite reports from Mary and the Emmaus travelers. When Jesus appeared suddenly, they were terrified, thinking they saw a spirit. Jesus responded by showing his hands and feet, inviting them to touch him, and then asking for food.

Fish was a staple in first-century Palestine. The Cambridge Bible notes that fish from the Lake of Gennesareth was regularly supplied to Jerusalem, as attested in the Talmud. Honey was also common: bees thrived in the caves and hollows of the land. The combination of broiled fish and honeycomb reflects an ordinary meal, likely whatever the disciples had on hand.

Lange describes this appearance as "the crown of all His appearances on the Resurrection day," because it brings together all the earlier witnesses into one decisive moment. Unlike previous appearances to individuals or pairs, this one gathers the entire group. Jesus addresses their unbelief directly, using physical evidence: his wounds, his touch, and his eating.

The cultural detail matters. In Jewish thought, spirits did not eat. By eating, Jesus aligns himself with the physical, created world. He is not a ghost; he is the same Jesus who shared meals with them before his death. The meal also echoes earlier resurrection appearances, especially the one by the Sea of Tiberias in John 21, where Jesus cooked fish for his disciples.

This historical setting underscores the lengths Jesus went to convince his followers. They were not gullible; they were skeptical. Their joy was mixed with doubt. Jesus met them where they were, using the most ordinary of actions, eating, to ground their faith in the most extraordinary truth.

Textual Notes

The phrase “and of a honeycomb” (καὶ ἀπὸ μελισσίου κηρίου) is omitted in some of the earliest and most important manuscripts, including Codex Sinaiticus (א), Codex Vaticanus (B), Codex Bezae (D), and Codex L. It appears in later manuscripts and most Textus Receptus editions. Vincent's Word Studies notes that “the best texts omit” it. The Cambridge Bible also marks the omission. The inclusion of honeycomb does not change the central meaning, Jesus ate to prove his physical resurrection, but it may reflect a scribal addition from local tradition or harmonization. The only other NT use of “broiled” (optos) is here, which is undisputed.

Reception History

From the earliest centuries, this verse was a key text in defending the physical reality of the resurrection. Irenaeus and other church fathers cited Jesus eating after his resurrection to refute docetist claims that his body was only an appearance. The act was seen as a direct refutation of any view that denied the full humanity of the risen Christ. In medieval art, the meal scene, often with fish and honeycomb, symbolized the tangible proof of Easter. During the Reformation, commentators like Matthew Henry and John Gill emphasized the pastoral comfort in Jesus’ patient response to the disciples’ doubt. The verse continues to be used in apologetics for the bodily resurrection and in sermons on the nature of the glorified body. Many hymns and Easter liturgies refer to Jesus eating with his disciples as a sign of restored fellowship.

Preaching This Verse

Three-point outline

  1. Jesus provides physical proof of his resurrection. He shows his hands and feet, invites touch, and eats before them (Luke 24:39-43). Each action refutes the assumption that he is a disembodied spirit.
  2. The disciples’ joy hinders their belief. Matthew Henry notes they “believed not for joy”, their overwhelming happiness actually made them doubt. Jesus meets their honest struggle not with rebuke but with gentle, patient evidence.
  3. The resurrected body is both physical and transformed. Jesus eats with a real mouth and digestive system, yet he appears through locked doors (John 20:19). His body is continuous with the one that died, yet glorified. This offers hope for our own resurrection: fully embodied, fully whole, fully with him.

Five-point outline

  1. Jesus appears suddenly. He stands in their midst, unexpected, yet fully present (v.36).
  2. Jesus calms fear with peace. “Peace be to you” is his first word, a salutation that restores and grounds them (v.36).
  3. Jesus invites physical confirmation. “See my hands and my feet… handle me and see” (v.39). He does not merely tell them; he invites their senses.
  4. Jesus eats ordinary food. The broiled fish and honeycomb are not a miracle meal, they are what is at hand, yet they become a miracle of proof (v.42-43).
  5. Jesus opens their minds to understand Scripture. After establishing his physical reality, he turns to the Word, showing how his suffering and resurrection were always God’s plan (v.44-47).

Illustration hooks

  • A meal that proves a miracle. Consider a family reunion where a loved one thought dead walks through the door. Before anyone can speak, they ask for a piece of bread. The simple act of eating, something a ghost cannot do, becomes the most convincing proof of life.
  • When good news is too good to believe. A parent hears that their child, presumed lost in a disaster, has been found safe. At first the joy is so overwhelming that they cannot accept it. They need to see, touch, hear. Jesus understands that kind of disbelief and meets it with patience.
  • Ordinary objects made sacred. A wedding ring, a worn Bible, a scrap of cloth, things that seem small but carry the weight of a relationship. The fish and honeycomb were ordinary leftovers, but Jesus used them to prove the central truth of the faith.

Questions your congregation is asking

  • Was Jesus’ resurrected body exactly the same as his pre-resurrection body, or was it different? If he could appear and disappear, why did he need to eat?
  • Why did the disciples not recognize Jesus at first? Is it possible to know Jesus and still not recognize his work in our lives?
  • What does the resurrection body mean for our hope of life after death? Will we eat, speak, and interact with each other?

Leading a Discussion

This passage shows Jesus patiently leading his disciples from fear to faith. He uses their own questions, their own senses, and their own food to prove he is alive. As you discuss, pay attention to how Jesus meets doubt, not with frustration but with gentle, concrete evidence.

Discussion questions

  1. Read Luke 24:36-43. What emotions do the disciples show? Why do you think joy made it hard for them to believe?
  2. Jesus asks, “Do you have anything here to eat?” Why do you think he asks for food rather than simply declaring his resurrection again?
  3. The fish is “broiled” (optos), a word used only here in the New Testament. What does this specific detail add to the story?
  4. Some early manuscripts include “and some honeycomb,” others omit it. How does the presence or absence of honeycomb affect your understanding of the scene?
  5. Jesus ate in front of them. What does this action teach about the nature of his resurrected body? How does it shape your hope for your own resurrection?
  6. In verse 41 the disciples “still didn’t believe for joy.” Have you ever experienced a joy that made you doubt? How did Jesus meet you in that place?
  7. After eating, Jesus opens their minds to understand Scripture (v.45). How do physical experiences (like a meal) and spiritual understanding work together in your faith?

What the Commentators Say

8 public-domain commentaries, condensed into plain language.

Barnes' Notes on the Bible Protestant 1832

Barnes stresses that Jesus gave the strongest possible proof of his bodily resurrection by appealing to the disciples' senses, letting them touch him and watching him eat. This showed he was not a ghost, and it implicitly affirms that a spirit can exist separately from a body. The disciples' initial disbelief came from overwhelming joy, not doubt.

Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges Anglican 1880

The writer notes that fish for a meal in Jerusalem would seem surprising unless one knows from the Talmud that the Sea of Galilee regularly supplied it. They also observe that the mention of honeycomb is missing from key early manuscripts, indicating a textual uncertainty.

Geneva Bible Notes Reformed 1599

Geneva’s note emphasizes that the broiled fish and honeycomb prove Christ’s resurrected body was true flesh, not a ghost or vision. The detail shows he could eat and be touched, confirming his bodily resurrection against those who denied it.

Gill's Exposition of the Bible Baptist 1748

Gill notes the disciples gave Jesus leftover broiled fish from their own meal, which was natural for fishermen. He also observes that the honeycomb was served after the fish, not alongside it, pointing to a deliberate order in the meal.

Jamieson-Fausset-Brown Commentary Protestant 1871

honeycomb —common frugal fare, anciently.

Lange's Commentary Reformed 1857

Lange treats this evening appearance as the crown of all the resurrection day

Matthew Henry's Commentary Reformed/Presbyterian 1710

Henry notes that Jesus appeared five separate times on the day of his resurrection, each to different individuals or groups. The appearance to the eleven disciples at night was the last of these, and their initial terror and later joy show how gradually and personally Jesus convinced them of his real bodily resurrection.

Vincent's Word Studies Evangelical 1887

Vincent notes that the word "broiled" occurs only here in the New Testament. He also observes that the best ancient manuscripts do not include the reference to honeycomb.

Word Study

The key original-language words in this verse. Select any word for its full lexicon entry — meaning, every occurrence in Scripture, and related words.

Interlinear and lexical data from STEPBible (CC BY 4.0). Commentaries are public domain.

For personal reflection

Read the devotional page — prayer, application, and "for families"

← Devotional