GospelMount
Search Topics Scripture Prayer Resources Ebooks About Support the mission Saved articles
Jump to ▾

Leviticus 20:12 Meaning: Why Death for a Daughter-in-Law?

“‘If a man lies with his daughter-in-law, both of them shall surely be put to death. They have committed a perversion. Their blood shall be upon themselves.

Meaning in one sentence

Leviticus 20:12 commands death for incest with a daughter-in-law. What does the word 'confusion' mean, and how should Christians read this today?

Leviticus Old Testament Hebrew

Context

Leviticus 20 gathers the laws for holy living into a list of punishments. The chapter moves through crimes that break the family and the community: cursing parents, adultery, incest, same-sex acts, bestiality. Each one carries a sentence, often death. This verse sits alongside others that protect the boundaries God set around marriage and kinship (Leviticus 18:15 had already forbidden the act). The penalty is severe because the wound goes deep, not just a private sin but a tearing of the fabric God wove when He made families. Israel was called to be different from the nations around them, and these laws marked out that difference.

Key Words

The Hebrew word translated perversion or confusion is tevel (תֶּבֶל). It appears only a few times in the Old Testament, always describing a violation of the created order, mixing what God intended to keep separate. Wesley describes it as 'perverting the order which God hath appointed, and making the same offspring both his own child and his grandchild.' The word carries the sense of something tangled, a knot that should not exist.

The other key term is kallah (כַּלָּה), which can mean daughter-in-law but also bride. The overlap is telling: a young woman who enters a family by marriage becomes a daughter, not a sexual partner for her husband's father. The law draws a line that protects her and preserves the family line.

The phrase 'their blood shall be upon them' means the death they die is their own doing, the community acts as God's agent, but the guilt belongs to the offenders.

How Christians Read This Verse

Christians across traditions read this verse as a divine boundary for the family. Catholic and Orthodox teaching sees it as rooted in natural law, the relationship between a man and his son’s wife violates the bond of kinship God created. Protestant commentators like Matthew Henry and Calvin treat it as part of the civil law given to Israel, not directly binding on modern governments, but still revealing God's abhorrence of sexual sin within families. Some traditions note that the death penalty in these cases was carried out by stoning, as the community purged evil from among them. All traditions agree that the moral principle, that sexual intimacy has no place in the relationship between a parent and child-in-law, remains for the Church, even when the civil penalty is not applied.

A common misunderstanding

A common misreading is to treat 'perversion' (or 'confusion') as a vague label for any sexual sin. The word tevel is not a general slur. It names a specific kind of wrong: mixing relationships that God designed to stay distinct. A son's wife becomes like a daughter; to have sex with her is to collapse two relationships into one tangled mess. The point is not shock value but the precision of a God who knows how families hold together.

Living This Out

This verse does not call you to enforce ancient civil law. But it does ask you to honor the boundaries God built into family life. That might look like guarding your own heart toward a child's spouse, no sentimental closeness that crosses a line, no private jokes that exclude your son or daughter. It might mean speaking up when you see a family friend or relative treat their in-law in a way that feels off. The holiness this chapter demands is protective: God builds walls so that the people inside them can flourish. Ask Him to show you where a wall needs strengthening, not as a judge but as someone who knows how much those walls matter.

Main takeaway: God's command against sex with a daughter-in-law protects the family order He created, and 'confusion' is the name for mixing what He meant to keep separate.

Questions People Ask

Why does God command the death penalty for this sin?

In ancient Israel, certain sins were capital crimes because they struck at the heart of the community's holiness and stability. Sexual sin with a daughter-in-law broke the family bond and threatened the social order. The penalty reflected how seriously God takes the boundaries of marriage and kinship. Christians today do not apply this civil penalty, but we still affirm the moral wrong.

What does 'confusion' or 'perversion' mean in this verse?

The Hebrew word 'tevel' means a mixing or blurring of what God created distinct. Commentators like John Wesley explained it as 'perverting the order which God hath appointed, and making the same offspring both his own child and his grandchild.' It is not just a general label for sexual sin but a specific kind of disorder, mixing family roles that should remain separate.

Does Leviticus 20:12 apply to Christians today?

The moral principle, that sexual intimacy between a parent and child-in-law is deeply wrong, is reaffirmed in the New Testament and by the whole Christian tradition. The civil penalty (death) was part of Israel's theocratic law and is not enforced by the Church or the state today. Christians understand the cross of Christ as the place where judgment for all sin, including this kind, was carried once for all.

Is this verse relevant for families that don't live in a theocracy?

Yes, because it reveals God's heart for family boundaries. Even where the penalty is not applied, the command shows that God cares about the relationships a family depends on. Parents and in-laws are called to protect, not exploit, the trust placed in them. Every Christian family can learn from this verse the seriousness of keeping sexual intimacy within God’s design.

For pastors & researchers

Hebrew interlinear, 8 commentaries & word study

Study page →