Lamentations 5:20 · Bible study
Lamentations 5:20 Commentary: When God Seems to Forget
Hebrew · 9 what the commentators say
Meaning in one sentence
Why does the eternal God seem to forget his people for so long? Lamentations 5:20 gives voice to faithful lament in prolonged suffering.
Research Summary
- Meaning: A cry of faithful lament asking why God’s seeming forgetfulness lasts so long, grounded in the confession of God’s eternal reign.
- Key words: “Forget” (shakhach, H7911), “forsake” (azav, H5800), “forever” (netsach, H5331), “length of days” (orekh yamim, H0753 + H3117).
- Main debate: Whether the verse expresses doubt or faithful struggle; Calvin argues it is both complaint and prayer, not unbelief.
- Theological theme: The coexistence of God’s eternal sovereignty and human experience of divine absence in prolonged suffering.
- Best use: Pastoral care for those in long-term trials; modeling honest, reverent lament in corporate worship and personal prayer.
Translation Comparison
BSB Berean Standard Bible 2020
Why have You forgotten us forever? Why have You forsaken us for so long?
WEB World English Bible 2000
Why do you forget us forever, and forsake us for so long a time?
KJV King James Version 1769
Wherefore dost thou forget us for ever, and forsake us so long time?
ASV American Standard Version 1901
Wherefore dost thou forget us for ever, Andforsake us so long time?
YLT Young's Literal Translation 1898
Why for ever dost Thou forget us? Thou forsakest us for length of days!
Darby Darby Bible 1890
Wherefore dost thou forget us for ever, dost thou forsake us so long time?
Douay-Rheims Douay-Rheims Bible 1899
Why wilt thou forget us for ever? why wilt thou forsake us for a long time?
Translations in other languages (10 available)
¿ Por qué te olvidarás para siempre de nosotros, y nos dejarás por largos días?
Por que te esquecerias de nós para sempre e nos abandonarias por tanto tempo?
Pourquoi nous oublierais-tu pour toujours,
warum willst du unser so gar vergessen und uns lebenslang so gar verlassen?
Waarom zoudt Gij ons steeds vergeten? Waarom zoudt Gij ons zo langen tijd verlaten?
Perché ci dimenticheresti tu in perpetuo, e ci abbandoneresti per un lungo tempo?
Przeczże nas na wieki zapominasz, a opuszczasz nas przez tak długi czas?
Для чего совсем забываешь нас, оставляешь нас на долгое время?
你為何 永遠 忘記我們?為何許久 離棄我們?
Why have we gone from your memory for ever? why have you been turned away from us for so long?
Verse in Context
Original Language (Biblical Hebrew)
Old Testament · Biblical Hebrew · Lamentations 5:20
Source: STEPBible TAGNT/TEHB (CC-BY 4.0). Click or tap a morphology code to see the full parsing.
Scholars' Consensus
Commentators across traditions agree that this verse is a cry of lament, not of unbelief, but of honest prayer grounded in God’s eternal nature. Calvin notes that the faithful “familiarly deposit their complaints in his bosom” while still holding to reverence and hope. The Cambridge Bible sees the question as natural given the desolation described in the previous verses. Gill points out that God “seems to forget his people when he afflicts them” and that seventy years felt like an eternity. Keil and Delitzsch argue that the lament rises from the confession of God’s eternal throne in verse 19, making the plea a prayer for restoration. Matthew Henry emphasizes the deep grief over Zion’s ruin as the context for this cry. All agree: the question is not a denial of God’s faithfulness but an honest expression of prolonged suffering from a people who still trust in His covenant.
How settled is the interpretation?
Interpretive difficulty: Low
What is clear: God’s eternal reign is affirmed in the preceding verse, and the lament is an honest expression of prolonged suffering, not a denial of God’s faithfulness.
What Scholars Agree and Debate
| Topic | Agreed | Debated |
|---|---|---|
| Forever vs. so long | Both phrases express the experience of prolonged suffering that feels endless. | Some readers take ‘forever’ as hyperbole for the seventy-year exile; others see it as a genuine fear that God’s rejection might be final. |
| Complaint or prayer | The verse is spoken directly to God within a prayer context. | Calvin views it as faithful expostulation, while some traditions emphasize the element of complaint, seeing the hope more in the surrounding verses. |
| God's agency in forgetting | God is perceived as forgetting or forsaking the people. | Some highlight God’s active discipline (Jeremiah’s prophecy), while others stress the emotional perception of abandonment rather than a divine action. |
| Hope in lament | The lament is not the final word; the book moves toward petition. | Keil and Delitzsch see strong hope grounded in v.19; others read the tone as more tentative, leaving the outcome unresolved. |
Historical & Cultural Context
Lamentations 5 was written after the fall of Jerusalem in 587/586 BC. The Babylonians destroyed the temple, razed the city, and carried the leading citizens into exile. The book as a whole is a collection of dirges shaped by the acrostic form (each chapter except this one using the Hebrew alphabet), indicating careful literary composition for communal lament and memory.
By the time of chapter 5, the exiles had endured decades in Babylon. Jeremiah had prophesied a seventy-year captivity (Jeremiah 25:11, 12, 29:10), and that timeline appears in Gill’s note on “so long time.” The poem’s preceding verse (Lamentations 5:19) affirms that “You, Yahweh, remain forever; your throne is from generation to generation,” setting a theological anchor against the surrounding collapse. The people’s question in verse 20 emerges from the gap between God’s eternal reign and their persistent suffering.
The language echoes other laments in the Psalter, Psalm 13:1 (“How long, Yahweh? Will you forget me forever?”), Psalm 44:24, and Psalm 74:1, showing that this kind of expostulation was a recognized pattern in Israel’s worship. The poet, likely Jeremiah, deliberately places this complaint within a prayer that moves toward petition (verse 21). The context of the ruined temple, with foxes walking on Mount Zion (verse 18), makes the question painfully concrete. This was not abstract theology but the raw cry of a people whose entire world had collapsed.
Textual Notes
The consulted sources note no significant textual variants for Lamentations 5:20. The Hebrew text is consistent across the Masoretic tradition.
Reception History
Throughout church history, Lamentations 5:20 has been read as a model for honest prayer in times of protracted suffering. Calvin used it to teach that the faithful may “familiarly deposit their complaints” with God while holding onto hope. The Geneva Bible included marginal notes that directed readers to the theme of divine patience. In Jewish tradition, the verse is part of the lament liturgy for Tisha B’Av, commemorating the destruction of the temple. Christians in persecuted communities have found in it permission to voice the question “how long?” without abandoning trust. More broadly, the verse has been cited in pastoral literature addressing grief, exile, and the experience of spiritual dryness.
Preaching This Verse
Three-point outline
- The context of desolation. The weight of prolonged suffering, from a destroyed temple to a scattered community, presses the question: Why does God seem absent? (Lam 5:18, 19)
- The cry of honest lament. The verse does not deny God’s reign; it gives voice to the tension between faith and experience. Calvin calls this “familiarly depositing complaints in God’s bosom.”
- The foundation of hope. The very question is framed within a prayer that expects an answer. Keil and Delitzsch note that the preceding confession of God’s eternal throne makes the plea for restoration possible.
Five-point outline
- The shattered sanctuary. Zion desolate, foxes roaming the holy mountain, the visible signs of divine distance.
- The enduring throne. Verse 19: God remains forever. This is not recited to dismiss pain but to ground it in something solid.
- The unanswered question. “Why do you forget us forever?”, not an accusation but a raw, repeated cry from the exiles.
- The admission of time. “So long a time”, seventy years of waiting. Faith does not erase the ache of duration.
- The turn toward petition. Verse 21: “Turn us to yourself, Yahweh”, lament becomes supplication, showing that the conversation with God continues.
Illustration hooks
- A family waiting years for a prodigal child to return; the question “how long?” becomes a daily prayer.
- Church leaders watching a congregation shrink and decline, wondering if God has abandoned the work.
- A person living with chronic illness who prays for healing and finds only silence.
Questions your congregation is asking
- Does God still care when suffering lasts for years?
- Is it okay to express anger or confusion to God?
- How do we hold on to hope when there is no end in sight?
Leading a Discussion
Lamentations 5:20 sits at the heart of one of Scripture’s most honest prayers. The people have lost everything, yet they address God directly. This discussion guide helps your group explore the tension between God’s eternal faithfulness and the experience of prolonged suffering.
Discussion questions
- Observation: What words in this verse give you a sense of the speaker’s emotional state?
- Observation: How does verse 19 (“You, Yahweh, remain forever”) frame the question in verse 20?
- Interpretation: Calvin says the faithful “familiarly deposit their complaints in [God’s] bosom.” What does that suggest about the nature of biblical lament?
- Interpretation: Gill notes that seventy years of captivity felt like “forever.” How does the perception of time affect our experience of God’s presence?
- Application: When have you felt tempted to believe God has forgotten you? What helped you keep praying?
- Application: How can we create safe spaces in our church for people to voice questions like this without feeling judged?
- Going deeper: Read Psalm 13:1 and Psalm 44:24. What do these parallel prayers teach us about the legitimacy of honest complaint?
Word Study
The key original-language words in this verse. Select any word for its full lexicon entry — meaning, every occurrence in Scripture, and related words.
Cross-References
Source: Treasury of Scripture Knowledge (TSK, public domain)
| Psalms 13:1 | For the Chief Musician. A Psalm by David. How long, Yahweh? Will you forget me forever? How long will you hide your face from me? |
| Psalms 44:24 | Why do you hide your face, and forget our affliction and our oppression? |
| Psalms 74:1 | A contemplation by Asaph. God, why have you rejected us forever? Why does your anger smolder against the sheep of your pasture? |
| Psalms 77:7 | “Will the Lord reject us forever? Will he be favorable no more? |
| Psalms 77:10 | Then I thought, “I will appeal to this: the years of the right hand of the Most High.” |
| Psalms 79:5 | How long, Yahweh? Will you be angry forever? Will your jealousy burn like fire? |
| Psalms 85:5 | Will you be angry with us forever? Will you draw out your anger to all generations? |
| Psalms 89:46 | How long, Yahweh? Will you hide yourself forever? Will your wrath burn like fire? |
Interlinear and lexical data from STEPBible (CC BY 4.0). Cross-reference data from OpenBible.info (CC BY 4.0). Commentaries are public domain.
For personal reflection
Read the devotional page — prayer, application, and "for families"
What the Commentators Say
9 public-domain commentaries, condensed into plain language.
Calvin's Commentaries Reformed 1564
Calvin distinguishes genuine complaint from rebellion: faithful believers may cry out to God about prolonged suffering, but they never lose their reverence or submission. Such cries express human impatience, not distrust. Even so, believers must remember that God alone holds the timing, and they should not try to rush His appointed plan.
Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges Anglican 1880
Since this is so, why is Israel left desolate?
Geneva Bible Notes Reformed 1599
The Geneva Notes draw attention to the psalmist's urgent complaint, emphasizing that God's apparent neglect has stretched on so long it feels permanent. The question highlights both the prolonged duration and the desperate sense of abandonment the believer expresses.
Gill's Exposition of the Bible Baptist 1748
Gill notes that God's unchangeable nature makes the plea striking: his people feel forgotten even though his love and covenant remain constant. He ties "so long time" directly to the seventy years' captivity, showing that what seems like an eternity of divine absence is measured in real, extended suffering.
Jamieson-Fausset-Brown Commentary Protestant 1871
for ever —that is, for "so long a time."
Keil & Delitzsch OT Commentary Protestant 1876
Keil-Delitzsch ground the prayer in the contrast between Zion's fallen earthly glory and God's eternal throne. They interpret the request to "bring us back" as a plea for restoring the gracious relationship with God, not merely return from exile. The final "unless" is a hypothetical impossibility, intended to strengthen the petition.
Lange's Commentary Reformed 1857
Lange argues that this chapter is not a disconnected prose supplement but a carefully crafted lyrical poem. He points to its parallelisms, rhythmic structure, and deliberate use of assonance. He maintains it dovetails securely into the preceding chapters and forms an essential, fitting conclusion to the entire work.
Matthew Henry's Commentary Reformed/Presbyterian 1710
Henry highlights that the people's deepest distress is over the desolation of Zion, not their personal losses; the ruin of God’s house wounds them more than any other calamity. They find comfort only in God’s eternal nature and the permanence of his rule.
Wesley's Explanatory Notes Methodist/Wesleyan 1754
Wesley identifies a twofold loss: the community is without a king and without God's fatherly protection. He brings special attention to the resulting plight of orphaned children, left without any earthly parent.