Judges 20:46 · Bible study
Judges 20:46 Commentary: The Cost of Sin
Hebrew · 8 what the commentators say
Meaning in one sentence
Why 25,000 instead of 25,100? Explore the numerical discrepancy in Judges 20:46, its meaning for OT narrative, and the tragic consequences of sin within
Research Summary
- Meaning: A summary of total Benjamite casualties on the third day, 25,000 experienced warriors, a round number that excludes the odd hundred.
- Key words: “Fell” (נָפַל, nafal), violent death; “drew the sword” (שֹׁלֵף חֶרֶב, sholef cherev), qualified soldier; “men of valor” (אַנְשֵׁי־חַיִל, anshei chayil), capable warriors.
- Main debate: Harmonizing the 25,000 here with the 25,100 in 20:35 (rounding vs. source-critical explanation).
- Theological theme: The tragic cost of sin and the completeness of divine judgment within the covenant community.
- Best use: Preaching and teaching on the seriousness of sin, the cost of division, and God’s justice tempered with mercy.
Translation Comparison
BSB Berean Standard Bible 2020
That day 25,000 Benjamite swordsmen fell, all men of valor.
WEB World English Bible 2000
So that all who fell that day of Benjamin were twenty-five thousand men who drew the sword. All these were men of valor.
KJV King James Version 1769
So that all which fell that day of Benjamin were twenty and five thousand men that drew the sword; all these were men of valour.
ASV American Standard Version 1901
So that all who fell that day of Benjamin were twenty and five thousand men that drew the sword; all these were men of valor.
YLT Young's Literal Translation 1898
And all those falling of Benjamin are twenty and five thousand men drawing sword, on that day--the whole of these are men of valour;
Darby Darby Bible 1890
So that all who fell that day of Benjamin were twenty-five thousand men that drew the sword: all these, men of valour.
Douay-Rheims Douay-Rheims Bible 1899
And so it came to pass, that all that were slain of Benjamin, in divers places, were five and twenty thousand fighting men, most valiant for war.
Translations in other languages (10 available)
Así todos los que de Benjamín murieron aquel día, fueron veinticinco|strong="H6242, H2568" mil hombres que sacaban espada, todos ellos hombres de guerra.
Assim todos os que de Benjamim morreram aquele dia, foram vinte e cinco mil homens que tiravam espada, todos eles homens de guerra.
Le nombre total des Benjamites qui périrent ce jour-là fut de vingt-cinq mille hommes tirant l’ épée, tous vaillants.
Und also fielen des Tages von Benjamin fünfundzwanzigtausend Mann, die das Schwert führten und alle streitbare Männer waren.
Alzo waren allen, die op die dag van Benjamin vielen, vijf en twintig duizend mannen, die het zwaard uittrokken; die allen waren strijdbare mannen.
Così, il numero totale de’ Beniaminiti che caddero quel giorno fu di venticinquemila, atti a trar la spada, tutta gente di valore.
A tak było wszystkich, którzy polegli z Benjamina dnia onego, dwadzieścia i pięć tysięcy mężów walecznych, wszystko mężów dużych.
Всех же сынов Вениаминовых, павших в тот день, было двадцать пять тысяч человек, обнажавших меч, и все они были мужи сильные.
那 日 便雅憫 死了的 共 有 二萬 五 千 人, 都是 拿 刀 的勇 士。
So twenty-five thousand of the swordsmen of Benjamin came to their end that day, all strong men of war.
Verse in Context
Original Language (Biblical Hebrew)
Old Testament · Biblical Hebrew · Judges 20:46
Source: STEPBible TAGNT/TEHB (CC-BY 4.0). Click or tap a morphology code to see the full parsing.
Scholars' Consensus
Commentators agree this verse summarizes the Benjamite casualties on the third and final day of battle, giving a round number (25,000) while omitting the additional hundred recorded in Judges 20:35. Gill explains the hundred are left out for the sake of a round number, a common Hebrew idiom. Both Gill and Jamieson-Fausset-Brown also note that a thousand Benjamites likely fell on the first two days of fighting, bringing the total of Benjamin's full army (26,700, v. 15) into harmony. The phrase 'men of valor' (אַנְשֵׁי־חַיִל, anshei chayil) appears three times in the casualty lists (vv. 44, 46), underscoring the tragic waste of skilled warriors within the covenant community. The verse functions as a sober summary: sin's within-family war destroys what is strongest.
How settled is the interpretation?
Interpretive difficulty: Medium
Main views:
- Rounding explanation: The 100 is omitted for narrative conciseness, a common Hebrew numerical practice (Gill, JFB).
- Source-critical explanation: Verses 44-46 are an editorial summary combining two sources, producing a slightly different total from verse 35 (Cambridge Bible).
- Harmonization with two-day losses: The missing 1,100 men fell on the first two days; the third day’s total in v. 46 is only for that final battle (Barnes).
What is clear: The tribe of Benjamin suffered the loss of 25,000 competent swordsmen on the third day of battle—a devastating judgment that left the tribe nearly extinct.
What Scholars Agree and Debate
| Topic | Agreed | Debated |
|---|---|---|
| Numerical discrepancy with Judges 20:35 | Both verses refer to the same third day of battle. The number 25,000 is a summary figure. | Some explain the omission of one hundred as a common Hebrew rounding idiom (Gill, JFB); others see it as a sign that these verses come from different sources (Cambridge Bible). |
| The missing 1,100 men | Benjamin originally had 26,700 swordsmen (20:15). The 25,000 plus 600 survivors account for 25,600; 1,100 are unaccounted for in the third day’s number. | Many commentators assign them to losses on the first two days (Barnes, Gill) or to those killed when Israel returned to destroy the cities (Jarchi, cited by Gill). |
| The meaning of 'men of valor' | The phrase highlights that these were skilled, experienced warriors, not raw recruits. | Some see it as underscoring the tragedy, the best were lost; others see it as emphasizing that human strength is no defense against divine judgment. |
| Morality of near-annihilation | The event illustrates the catastrophic consequences of sin within the covenant community and God’s justice. | Some traditions view it as a direct command from God through Phinehas (20:28); others read it as a cautionary narrative showing how civil war spirals out of control. |
Historical & Cultural Context
The verse sits at the climax of Israel's first civil war, triggered by the gang rape and murder of a Levite's concubine in Gibeah (Judges 19). After the Benjamites refused to surrender the perpetrators, Israel assembled a coalition army of 400,000 and attacked. Benjamin mustered 26,700 swordsmen, figures typical for Iron-Age tribal levies. The first two days ended in Benjaminite victories, but on the third day Israel used an ambush to rout the tribe. The battlefield stretched from Gibeah to the wilderness. Casualties are reported in three groups (vv. 44-45): 18,000 in open battle, 5,000 on the highways, 2,000 at Gidom, totaling the 25,000 of our verse. The 600 survivors fled to the rock of Rimmon, leaving Benjamin nearly exterminated. The number 25,000 may reflect a summary style common in ancient Near Eastern battle accounts, where precise numbers (25,100) are rounded for narrative effect (Barnes, Gill). The repeated designation 'men who drew the sword' and 'men of valor' stresses that these were trained soldiers, not conscripts, the loss of an entire warrior class. This literary emphasis highlights the scale of tragedy: God's judgment on a tribe that shielded evil took its best.
Textual Notes
The consulted sources note no significant textual variants for the number 25,000 in verse 46. The discrepancy with 25,100 in verse 35 is a matter of literary style, not manuscript divergence.
Reception History
Jewish commentators such as Jarchi and Abarbinel (cited by Gill) offered harmonizing explanations for the missing thousand, attributing them to the sack of Benjaminite cities (v. 48). Early Christian readers saw the civil war as a sobering example of the consequences of tolerating evil within the Church. Throughout church history, the passage has been used homiletically to warn against moral compromise and to illustrate the severity of God’s judgment on sin, while noting the remnant that points to grace. Most exegetes from the Reformation onward have debated the numerical discrepancy but agreed on the core lesson: sin destroys even the strong.
Preaching This Verse
Three-point outline
- The final tally of judgment. The round number 25,000 emphasizes completeness, every capable fighter who remained in the field fell. Sin’s wages are exacted to the full.
- The tragedy of wasted strength. Three times the text calls them “men of valor.” The best of Benjamin lies dead, not in a foreign war but in a brother-against-brother conflict. Sin corrupts what God created for good.
- The remnant of grace. Though the tribe is shattered, 600 escape to the rock of Rimmon (v. 47). Judgment is severe, but not final. The line continues, and from it will come Saul, Israel’s first king, and the apostle Paul.
Five-point outline
- The context: a civil war born of moral corruption. The Gibeah atrocity (ch. 19) and the tribe’s refusal to act exposed sin within the covenant community.
- The numbers: what the tally shows. 25,000 swordsmen, not all of Benjamin’s men, but almost all. The missing 1,100 (Gill) fell on earlier days or in the subsequent city-burning (v. 48).
- The phrase: “men of valor.” The Hebrew anshei chayil denotes proven warriors. Their strength could not save them when God withdrew protection.
- The contrast: Israel’s victory, Benjamin’s ruin. The same God who gave Israel the victory also allowed this devastation, a warning that no tribe is indispensable to His purposes.
- The hope: six hundred at Rimmon. Even in judgment, God preserves a remnant. The story does not end in total annihilation; grace survives the sword.
Illustration hooks
- A battlefield after a civil war, neighbors and relatives lying dead together, the cost of a dispute that no one won.
- An obituary listing the finest officers of a small town lost on the same day, a sudden hole in the community’s leadership.
- A church split that leaves both sides wounded and depleted, stunning outsiders who wonder how Christians could treat each other this way.
Questions your congregation is asking
- Why would God allow such slaughter among His own people? Sin in the camp brings judgment, even on the “better” side (Israel suffered losses too, vv. 21, 25, 39).
- Does this mean God rejected Benjamin forever? No, the remnant at Rimmon shows preservation. Later, Benjamin is restored as a tribe and gives Israel its first king.
- How should we apply a passage like this today? It calls the church to take sin seriously within its own fellowship, not to tolerate evil for the sake of unity.
Leading a Discussion
This verse marks the tragic high-water mark of a civil war that erupted because God’s people tolerated and then defended a heinous crime. Read verses 44-46 together, then discuss.
Discussion questions
- Observation: What numbers appear in verses 44-46? How does the repetition of “men of valor” affect the tone of the report?
- Interpretation: Why do you think the author gives us three different casualty figures (18,000, 5,000, 2,000) and then a round total of 25,000? What might the hundred omitted (cf. 20:35) represent?
- Connection: How does this passage reflect the cause-and-effect of sin described throughout Judges (e.g., “everyone did what was right in his own eyes,” 17:6)?
- Application: Where do we see similar dynamics in Christian communities today, a failure to address sin leading to devastating division?
- Grace: Six hundred escaped (v. 47). Even in severe judgment, God leaves a remnant. How does that shape our view of His character?
- Warning: Israel executed judgment on a brother tribe. What safeguards must the church have so that discipline does not become vengeance?
- Hope: How does the story of Benjamin’s recovery (later in Scripture) encourage us about God’s willingness to restore broken lives and communities?
Word Study
The key original-language words in this verse. Select any word for its full lexicon entry — meaning, every occurrence in Scripture, and related words.
Cross-References
Source: Treasury of Scripture Knowledge (TSK, public domain)
| Judges 20:15 | The children of Benjamin were counted on that day out of the cities twenty-six thousand men who drew the sword, in addition to the inhabitants of Gibeah, who were counted seven hundred chosen men. |
| Judges 20:35 | Yahweh struck Benjamin before Israel; and the children of Israel destroyed of Benjamin that day twenty-five thousand one hundred men. All these drew the sword. |
Interlinear and lexical data from STEPBible (CC BY 4.0). Cross-reference data from OpenBible.info (CC BY 4.0). Commentaries are public domain.
For personal reflection
Read the devotional page — prayer, application, and "for families"
What the Commentators Say
7 public-domain commentaries, condensed into plain language.
Barnes' Notes on the Bible Protestant 1832
Barnes points out that the casualty numbers appear inconsistent until one realizes they count only the third day of battle. The 25,100 slain Benjamites recorded in the summary match the detailed breakdown given for that single day, while losses from the first two days and other factors explain the remaining unaccounted men.
Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges Anglican 1880
The Cambridge Bible notes that this verse is an editorial addition, not a primary narrative source. Its total comes from combining figures in verses 44 and 45, which differs from the total given in verse 35.
Geneva Bible Notes Reformed 1599
The Geneva note emphasizes that the 25,000 Benjaminites killed were exclusively fighting men who drew the sword, highlighting the complete destruction of their entire military force in a single day.
Gill's Exposition of the Bible Baptist 1748
Gill reconciles the tally of 25,100 with the round number 25,000, explaining that such rounding was common. He notes that all who fell were fighting men of valor, and considers a rabbinic tradition that the missing thousand died in earlier battles more credible than the alternative.
Jamieson-Fausset-Brown Commentary Protestant 1871
JFB notes that the 25,000 Benjamites killed on the third day is a round number and only accounts for that single battle. To reach the full total recorded earlier, roughly a thousand must have fallen during the two previous engagements.
Lange's Commentary Reformed 1857
Lange reads the battle as a carefully planned tactical operation centered on the Hebrew word "ma'areh," the exposed or accessible slope of Gibeah where the ambush struck. Benjamin's overconfidence in earlier victories blinds them until it is too late, and their destruction becomes total because even the inhabitants of cities they flee through rise up against them.
Wesley's Explanatory Notes Methodist/Wesleyan 1754
Wesley rejects Matthew Henry's claim that the goodness of God's promised land will intensify the punishment of those who perish. He argues that this reasoning fails under predestination: if some are not elected, they never had a genuine offer, and if all the elect are saved, the grant was never free to the others.