Judges 10:6 · Bible study
Judges 10:6 Commentary: The Full Catalogue of Idolatry
Hebrew · 10 what the commentators say
Meaning in one sentence
Why did Israel serve seven foreign pantheons? Analysis of Judges 10:6, the comprehensive list of gods, and the nature of their apostasy.
Research Summary
- Meaning: Israel's apostasy reaches its peak as they adopt the gods of all surrounding nations, completely forsaking Yahweh.
- Key words: H3254 'again' (repeated action), H5647 'served' (worship as allegiance), H5800 'forsook' (abandoned).
- Main debate: Whether the list is a later editorial expansion (Cambridge Bible) or an accurate historical record (Clarke and others).
- Theological theme: The depth of human rebellion and the patience of God who still responds to cries for deliverance.
- Best use: A warning against syncretism and a picture of God's long-suffering grace in the cycles of sin and rescue.
Translation Comparison
BSB Berean Standard Bible 2020
And again the Israelites did evil in the sight of the LORD. They served the Baals, the Ashtoreths, the gods of Aram, Sidon, and Moab, and the gods of the Ammonites and Philistines. Thus they forsook the LORD and did not serve Him.
WEB World English Bible 2000
The children of Israel again did that which was evil in Yahweh’s sight, and served the Baals, the Ashtaroth, the gods of Syria, the gods of Sidon, the gods of Moab, the gods of the children of Ammon, and the gods of the Philistines. They abandoned Yahweh, and didn’t serve him.
KJV King James Version 1769
And the children of Israel did evil again in the sight of the Lord, and served Baalim, and Ashtaroth, and the gods of Syria, and the gods of Zidon, and the gods of Moab, and the gods of the children of Ammon, and the gods of the Philistines, and forsook the Lord, and served not him.
ASV American Standard Version 1901
And the children of Israel again did that which was evil in the sight of Jehovah, and served the Baalim, and the Ashtaroth, and the gods of Syria, and the gods of Sidon, and the gods of Moab, and the gods of the children of Ammon, and the gods of the Philistines; and they forsook Jehovah, and served him not.
YLT Young's Literal Translation 1898
And the sons of Israel add to do the evil thing in the eyes of Jehovah, and serve the Baalim, and Ashtaroth, and the gods of Aram, and the gods of Zidon, and the gods of Moab, and the gods of the Bene-Ammon, and the gods of the Philistines, and forsake Jehovah, and have not served Him;
Darby Darby Bible 1890
And the children of Israel again did evil in the sight of Jehovah, and served the Baals, and the Ashtoreths, and thegods of Syria, and thegods of Zidon, and thegods of Moab, and thegods of the children of Ammon, and thegods of the Philistines; and they forsook Jehovah, and served him not.
Douay-Rheims Douay-Rheims Bible 1899
But the children of Israel, adding new sins to their old ones, did evil in the sight of the Lord, and served idols, Baalim and Astaroth, and the gods of Syria, and of Sidon, and of Moab, and of the children of Ammon, and of the Philistines: and they left the Lord, and did not serve him.
Translations in other languages (10 available)
Mas los hijos de Israel tornaron á hacer lo malo en los ojos de Jehová, y sirvieron á los Baales y á Astaroth, y á los dioses de Siria, y á los dioses de Sidón, y á los dioses de Moab, y á los dioses de los hijos de Ammón, y á los dioses de los Filisteos: y dejaron á Jehová, y no le sirvieron.
Mas os filhos de Israel voltaram a fazer o mal aos olhos do SENHOR, e serviram aos baalins e a Astarote, e aos deuses da Síria, e aos deuses de Sidom, e aos deuses de Moabe, e aos deuses dos filhos de Amom, e aos deuses dos filisteus:
Les enfants d’ Israël firent encore ce qui déplaît à l’ Éternel; ils servirent les Baals et les Astartés, les dieux de Syrie, les dieux de Sidon, les dieux de Moab, les dieux des fils d’ Ammon, et les dieux des Philistins, et ils abandonnèrent l’ Éternel et ne le servirent plus.
Aber die Kinder Israel taten fürder übel vor dem HERRN und dienten den Baalim und den Astharoth und den Göttern von Syrien und den Göttern von Sidon und den Göttern Moabs und den Göttern der Kinder Ammon und den Göttern der Philister und verließen den HERRN und dienten ihm nicht.
Toen voeren de kinderen Israels voort te doen, dat kwaad was in de ogen des HEEREN, en dienden de Baals, en Astharoth, en de goden van Syrie, en de goden van Sidon, en de goden van Moab, en de goden der kinderen Ammons, mitsgaders de goden der Filistijnen; en zij verlieten den HEERE, en dienden Hem niet.
E i figliuoli d’Israele continuarono a fare ciò ch’è male agli occhi dell’Eterno e servirono agl’idoli di Baal e di Astarte, agli dèi della Siria, agli dèi di Sidon, agli dèi di Moab, agli dèi de’ figliuoli di Ammon e agli dèi de’ Filistei; abbandonaron l’Eterno e non gli serviron più.
Lecz znowu synowie Izraelscy czynili złe przed oczyma Pańskiemi, a służąc Baalowi, i Astaratowi, i bogom Syryjskim, i bogom Sydońskim, i bogom Moabskim, i bogom synów Ammon, i nawet bogom Filistyńskim, a opuściwszy Pana, nie służyli mu.
Сыны Израилевы продолжали делать злое пред очами Господа и служили Ваалам и Астартам, и богам Арамейским, и богам Сидонским, и богам Моавитским, и богам Аммонитским, и богам Филистимским; а Господа оставили и не служили Ему.
以色列 人 又 行 耶和華 眼中 看為惡的事,去事奉 諸巴力 和 亞斯她錄,並 亞蘭 的神、 西頓 的神、 摩押 的神、 亞捫 人 的神、 非利士人 的神,離棄 耶和華,不 事奉他。
And again the children of Israel did evil in the eyes of the Lord, worshipping the Baals and Astartes, and the gods of Aram and the gods of Zidon and the gods of Moab and the gods of the children of Ammon and the gods of the Philistines; they gave up the Lord and were servants to him no longer.
Verse in Context
Original Language (Biblical Hebrew)
Old Testament · Biblical Hebrew · Judges 10:6
Source: STEPBible TAGNT/TEHB (CC-BY 4.0). Click or tap a morphology code to see the full parsing.
Scholars' Consensus
Commentators across the supplied sources agree that Judges 10:6 marks the culminating low of Israel's apostasy in the period of the judges. Matthew Henry observes that Israel 'imported deities from all countries,' while Jamieson-Fausset-Brown note this apostasy 'exceeded every former one in grossness and universality.' Gill emphasises that Israel 'wholly forsook the Lord and his worship' not even pretending to serve him alongside other gods. Adam Clarke describes them as 'universal idolaters,' taking up the deities of Syria, Sidon, Moab, Ammon, and the Philistines in addition to the Canaanite Baals and Ashtaroth. The Cambridge Bible points out that the list is 'much longer than usual' and reflects the Deuteronomistic editor's theological reading of history. There is broad agreement that this verse is not merely a repeat of earlier cycles but represents a decisive turning point: Israel abandoned Yahweh completely, leading to the simultaneous oppression by Philistines and Ammonites (Keil & Delitzsch). The pattern of sin, deliverance, and renewed rebellion reaches its darkest moment here.
How settled is the interpretation?
Interpretive difficulty: Low
What is clear: Israel's apostasy was total, embracing the gods of all surrounding nations and abandoning exclusive worship of Yahweh.
What Scholars Agree and Debate
| Topic | Agreed | Debated |
|---|---|---|
| Comprehensive nature of the list | The list shows that Israel worshipped gods of all surrounding nations, not just local Baals. | Some see it as a literary summary of all the gods Israel would ever serve; others as a specific historical moment. |
| Total abandonment vs syncretism | Israel forsook Yahweh and served other gods. | Gill argues they stopped even nominal worship; others think they may have added these gods while still claiming Yahweh (Henry). |
| Literary composition | The passage is part of the book's cyclical structure. | Cambridge Bible posits later expansions; Keil & Delitzsch treat it as integral to the narrative. |
Historical & Cultural Context
The verse lists seven distinct divine collectives: Baalim and Ashtaroth (the generic Canaanite male and female deities of fertility and storm), followed by the national gods of six neighbouring peoples. Adam Clarke identifies the gods of Syria with Bel and Saturn, of Sidon with Astarte (Ashtaroth), of Moab with Chemosh, of Ammon with Milcom, and of the Philistines with Dagon. By the era of the judges, Israel's territory in Cisjordan and Transjordan was encircled by these nations. The Transjordanian tribes (Reuben, Gad, half-Manasseh) were especially vulnerable to Syrian and Ammonite religious influence (Barnes). Sidon and the Philistine cities were coastal powers with whom Israel had ongoing trade and conflict. The list reflects Israel's failure to remain separate as commanded in Deuteronomy 7:1-5. Commentators note that the Deuteronomistic editor likely expanded an earlier shorter notice to encompass all the oppressions that follow (Cambridge Bible), tying this apostasy both to the Ammonite and Philistine pressure that dominates chapters 11-16. The mention of 'Sidon' and 'Aram' (Syria) also suggests the spread of Aramean cultic practices, which would later trouble the northern kingdom (2 Kings 16:10-12). Politically, turning to these gods may have been an attempt at diplomatic alliance through shared religion, a common ancient Near Eastern practice. Yet the text highlights that this only provoked God's anger (v.7) and led to simultaneous attack from both sides of the Jordan (Keil & Delitzsch).
Textual Notes
Supplied sources note no significant manuscript variants for this verse. The Cambridge Bible suggests the list may have been expanded by the Deuteronomistic editor, but this is a literary-critical observation, not a text-critical one. The Hebrew text is stable across traditions.
Reception History
This verse has been read in Christian tradition as a sobering catalogue of the human heart's capacity for unfaithfulness. The reformers used it to warn against syncretism and the accumulation of worldly allegiances. In homiletic tradition, it is often paired with the repeated 'again' to illustrate the bondage of sin. The comprehensive list is seen as underscoring God's righteous judgment and the depth of his mercy when the people later cry out (v.10).
Preaching This Verse
Three-point outline
- The Stubborn Cycle of Sin. The verb 'again' (יֹּסִפוּ, H3254) shows this is not a single lapse but a repeated pattern. Each generation saw God's deliverance, yet the people returned to evil.
- The Comprehensive Catalogue of Idolatry. Seven religious systems are named. Israel did not just adopt one god, they assembled the pantheons of every surrounding nation, as if security could be bought by covering all their bases.
- The Complete Forsaking. The closing phrase 'forsook Yahweh and didn't serve him' indicates total abandonment. Gill notes that earlier they had sometimes mixed worship, but now they gave up even the pretence of serving God alone.
Five-point outline
- Repetition despite grace. The cycle of sin repeats after every judge (compare Judges 2:11, 3:7, 4:1, 6:1, 13:1).
- Accumulation of false gods. The list expands steadily, from Baals and Ashtaroth to six foreign pantheons.
- Spiritual exhaustion. They stop even the external worship of Yahweh (Gill). Their hearts are fully invested elsewhere.
- Judgment on both fronts. God sells them into the hands of both Philistines and Ammonites (v.7), pressure from east and west.
- A cry that God still hears. In v.10 the people cry out, and despite his righteous anger, God responds (v.15-16).
Illustration hooks
- A person who keeps returning to a harmful habit despite multiple recoveries, adding new dependencies each time.
- The gradual acceptance of counterfeit values in a Christian's life, first a little worldliness, then more, until the first loyalty is forgotten.
- A community that replaces its original charter with borrowed ideologies until it no longer resembles its foundation.
Questions your congregation is asking
- How could Israel keep turning away after seeing God's power again and again?
- Is there a point where God says 'enough' and gives us over to our choices?
- What subtle 'gods' in our culture do we serve without realising we are abandoning Jesus?
Leading a Discussion
This verse catalogues a staggering amount of idolatry. Instead of one foreign deity, Israel adopts the pantheons of every nation around them. As you discuss, pay attention to what the list reveals about the human heart and God's patience.
Discussion questions
- What does the repeated word 'again' tell us about the pattern of Israel's history? (Observation)
- Why do you think the text lists so many specific gods? What does this range say about Israel's spiritual state? (Interpretation)
- Gill comments that Israel stopped even pretending to serve Yahweh. What is the difference between syncretism and outright abandonment? (Interpretation)
- The verse ends with 'they forsook Yahweh and didn't serve him.' What does it mean to 'forsake' God in a practical sense? (Interpretation/Application)
- In what ways might believers today accumulate 'gods', priorities, fears, pleasures, that compete with God? (Application)
- How does the surrounding context (v.7-9) show that idolatry leads to concrete consequences? (Observation/Interpretation)
- Israel later cries out and repents (v.10,15-16). What does this teach about God's willingness to hear even after prolonged rebellion? (Application)
Word Study
The key original-language words in this verse. Select any word for its full lexicon entry — meaning, every occurrence in Scripture, and related words.
Cross-References
Source: Treasury of Scripture Knowledge (TSK, public domain)
| Deuteronomy 31:16 | Yahweh said to Moses, “Behold, you shall sleep with your fathers. This people will rise up and play the prostitute after the strange gods of the land where they go to be among them, and will forsake me and break my covenant which I have made with them. |
| Deuteronomy 32:15 | But Jeshurun grew fat, and kicked. You have grown fat. You have grown thick. You have become sleek. Then he abandoned God who made him, and rejected the Rock of his salvation. |
| Judges 2:11 | The children of Israel did that which was evil in Yahweh’s sight, and served the Baals. |
| Judges 2:14 | Yahweh’s anger burned against Israel, and he delivered them into the hands of raiders who plundered them. He sold them into the hands of their enemies all around, so that they could no longer stand before their enemies. |
| Judges 3:7 | The children of Israel did that which was evil in Yahweh’s sight, and forgot Yahweh their God, and served the Baals and the Asheroth. |
| Judges 4:1 | The children of Israel again did that which was evil in Yahweh’s sight, when Ehud was dead. |
| Judges 6:1 | The children of Israel did that which was evil in Yahweh’s sight, so Yahweh delivered them into the hand of Midian seven years. |
| Judges 13:1 | The children of Israel again did that which was evil in Yahweh’s sight; and Yahweh delivered them into the hand of the Philistines forty years. |
Interlinear and lexical data from STEPBible (CC BY 4.0). Cross-reference data from OpenBible.info (CC BY 4.0). Commentaries are public domain.
For personal reflection
Read the devotional page — prayer, application, and "for families"
What the Commentators Say
10 public-domain commentaries, condensed into plain language.
Adam Clarke's Commentary Methodist/Wesleyan 1826
Clarke explains that Baalim and Ashtaroth are general terms for gods and goddesses, not single deities. He then lists the specific foreign gods Israel adopted from each surrounding nation, showing that their idolatry was universal and comprehensive, absorbing every local cult.
Barnes' Notes on the Bible Protestant 1832
Barnes notes that the Syrian tribes were not a unified kingdom until after Solomon, but their national gods were likely the same across all Aramean groups. He observes that Hebrew words for divination, magic, and idolatrous priests are of Syrian origin, showing how Syrian worship infiltrated Israel.
Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges Anglican 1880
The Cambridge Bible commentary argues that the long introduction in the middle of Judges was expanded by the Deuteronomistic editor and later hands to cover both the Ammonite and Philistine oppressions. The phrase "that year: eighteen years" is flagged as a likely textual corruption, and the final verses
Geneva Bible Notes Reformed 1599
The Geneva Notes read the long list of foreign gods in this verse as showing how completely Israel abandoned the Lord. They served every deity of every neighboring nation, leaving no room for doubt that their apostasy was total and deliberate.
Gill's Exposition of the Bible Baptist 1748
Gill notes that in this instance Israel did not merely add foreign gods alongside the Lord but completely abandoned His worship. Earlier they had pretended to serve both the Creator and other deities; now they made no pretense at all, wholly forsaking the tabernacle and neglecting every form of His service.
Jamieson-Fausset-Brown Commentary Protestant 1871
JFB singles out this period of Israel's unfaithfulness as worse than all earlier ones, not merely another repetition but a new low in how widespread and openly corrupt the idolatry had become.
Keil & Delitzsch OT Commentary Protestant 1876
Keil-Delitzsch highlight a deliberate numerical pattern: Israel served seven pagan deities, matching the seven nations from which God had previously rescued them. This shows the people's iniquity reached the same measure as God's delivering grace. They also observe that the simultaneous oppression by Ammonites and Philistines was an especially severe punishment.
Lange's Commentary Reformed 1857
Lange highlights God’s fatherly inconsistency: He first refuses to deliver Israel, but their genuine repentance and removal of idols moves Him. The phrase “His soul became too short” pictures God as a parent who cannot bear His children’s misery any longer.
Matthew Henry's Commentary Reformed/Presbyterian 1710
Henry emphasizes that Israel's sin went beyond their old idols to include every neighboring nation's gods, as if importing deities from all countries. He judges this both impious and impolitic, noting it made them contemptible even by pagan standards.
Wesley's Explanatory Notes Methodist/Wesleyan 1754
Wesley rejects Matthew Henry's claim that the goodness of God's promised land will intensify the punishment of those who perish. He argues that this reasoning fails under predestination: if some are not elected, they never had a genuine offer, and if all the elect are saved, the grant was never free to the others.