GospelMount
Search Topics Scripture Prayer Resources Ebooks About Support the mission Saved articles
Jump to ▾

Jeremiah 5:10 · Bible study

Jeremiah 5:10 Commentary: Judgment with Restraint

Hebrew · 11 what the commentators say

Meaning in one sentence

Why does God command destruction but forbid a full end? Jeremiah 5:10 reveals divine judgment tempered by mercy, preserving a remnant of hope.

Research Summary

  • Meaning: God commissions Babylon to devastate Judah but forbids total annihilation, preserving a remnant for future restoration.
  • Key words: 'Go up' (עֲלוּ H5927), 'destroy' (שַׁחֵתוּ H7843), 'full end' (כָלָה H3617), 'remove tendrils' (הָסִירוּ נְטִישׁוֹתֶיהָ H5189), and the negation phrase 'not' (אַל H0408 + ל֥וֹא H3808) emphasizing the boundary.
  • Main debate: Whether 'walls' (שָׁרוֹת) means literal city walls or vine rows; and whether the command addresses literal Babylonians or a more general symbolic enemy.
  • Theological theme: The coexistence of divine judgment and mercy; God's sovereignty over nations; the remnant as the vehicle of covenant hope.
  • Best use: Preaching on divine discipline, the nature of God's anger, or the theme of remnant in Scripture; also useful in lament or penitential services.

Translation Comparison

BSB Berean Standard Bible 2020

Go up through her vineyards and ravage them, but do not finish them off. Strip off her branches, for they do not belong to the LORD.

WEB World English Bible 2000

“Go up on her walls, and destroy, but don’t make a full end. Take away her branches, for they are not Yahweh’s.

KJV King James Version 1769

Go ye up upon her walls, and destroy; but make not a full end: take away her battlements; for they are not the Lord’s.

ASV American Standard Version 1901

Go ye up upon her walls, and destroy; but make not a full end: take away her branches; for they are not Jehovah’s.

YLT Young's Literal Translation 1898

Go ye up on her walls, and destroy, And a completion make not, Turn aside her branches, for they are not Jehovah's,

Darby Darby Bible 1890

Go up upon her walls, and destroy; but make not a full end; take away her battlements, for they are not Jehovah's.

Douay-Rheims Douay-Rheims Bible 1899

Scale the walls thereof, and throw them down, but do not utterly destroy: take away the branches thereof, because they are not the Lord's.

Translations in other languages (10 available)
ES Reina-Valera 1909 1909

Escalad sus muros, y destruid; mas no hagáis consumación: quitad las almenas de sus muros, porque no son de Jehová.

PT Almeida Livre 1994

Subi seus muros, e destruí; mas não destruais por completo. Tirai os ramos de seus muros, porque não pertencem ao SENHOR.

FR Louis Segond 1910

Montez sur ses murailles, et abattez,

DE Luther Bibel 1912 1912

Stürmet ihre Mauern und werfet sie um, und macht's nicht gar aus! Führet ihre Reben weg, denn sie sind nicht des HERRN;

NL Statenvertaling 1637

Beklimt haar muren, en verderft ze (doch maakt geen voleinding); doet haar spitsen weg, want zij zijn des HEEREN niet.

IT Riveduta 1927

Salite sulle sue mura e distruggete, ma non la finite del tutto; portate via i suoi tralci, perché non son dell’Eterno!

PL Biblia Gdańska 1632

Wstąpcie na mury jego, a rozwalcie je, wszakże ich do gruntu nie znoście; znieście filarzyki murów jego, gdyż nie są Pańskie.

RU Синодальный перевод 1876

Восходите на стены его и разрушайте, но не до конца; уничтожьте зубцы их, потому что они не Господни;

ZH 和合本 1919

你們要上 她葡萄園的牆 施行毀壞,但不可 毀壞 淨盡,只可除掉 她的枝子,因為 不 屬耶和華。

EN Bible in Basic English 1949

Go up against her vines and make waste; let the destruction be complete: take away her branches, for they are not the Lord's.

Verse in Context

8 They were as fed horses roaming at large. Everyone neighed after his neighbor’s wife.
9 Shouldn’t I punish them for these things?” says Yahweh. “Shouldn’t my soul be avenged on such a nation as this?
10 “Go up on her walls, and destroy, but don’t make a full end. Take away her branches, for they are not Yahweh’s.
11 For the house of Israel and the house of Judah have dealt very treacherously against me,” says Yahweh.
12 They have denied Yahweh, and said, “It is not he. Evil won’t come on us. We won’t see sword or famine.

Original Language (Biblical Hebrew)

עֲל֤וּ 'a.Lu HVqv2mp H5927 go up
בְ/שָׁרוֹתֶ֙י/הָ֙ ve./sha.ro.Tei./ha HR/Ncfpc/Sp3fs H8284 among/ vine rows/ its
וְ/שַׁחֵ֔תוּ ve./sha.Che.tu HC/Vpv2mp H7843 and/ destroy [them]
וְ/כָלָ֖ה ve./kha.Lah HC/Ncfsa H3617 and/ complete destruction
אַֽל\־ 'al- HTn H0408 may not
תַּעֲשׂ֑וּ ta.'a.Su HVqj2mp H6213 you make
הָסִ֙ירוּ֙ ha.Si.ru HVhv2mp H5493 remove
נְטִ֣ישׁוֹתֶ֔י/הָ ne.Ti.sho.Tei./ha HNcfpc/Sp3fs H5189 vine tendrils/ its
כִּ֛י ki HTc H3588 for
ל֥וֹא Lo' HTn H3808 not
לַ/יהוָ֖ה la./Yah.weh HR/Npt H3068 [belong] to/ Yahweh
הֵֽמָּה\׃ He.mah HPp3mp H1992 they

Source: STEPBible TAGNT/TEHB (CC-BY 4.0). Click or tap a morphology code to see the full parsing.

Scholars' Consensus

Commentators agree that this verse is a divine summons to the Babylonians to execute judgment on Judah, but with a critical limit. Calvin and Gill identify the addressees as the Chaldeans, God's chosen instruments of vengeance. The vineyard metaphor is widely recognized: Judah is God's vineyard (Isaiah 5:1-7), and the 'branches' or 'tendrils' (נְטִישׁוֹת, from H5189) represent the people, especially the ruling class, whose covenant unfaithfulness has severed their connection to Yahweh, making them 'not the Lord's.' The command 'but don't make a full end' (וְכָלָה אַל־תַּעֲשׂוּ) is consistently interpreted as God's restraint: He will not annihilate the nation entirely. Barnes compares this to the 'holy seed as the stump' in Isaiah 6:13. Keil & Delitzsch link it directly to Jeremiah 4:27 ('I will not make a full end'). The limitation is not a weakening of justice but the preservation of a remnant, the channel through which God's covenant promises will eventually be restored.

How settled is the interpretation?

Interpretive difficulty: Medium

Main views:

  1. Literal walls / Babylonians: Interpretation that 'walls' (שָׁרוֹת) refers to Jerusalem's fortifications and the command is directly to the Chaldean army (<em>II Kings 24:2</em>; <em>Jeremiah 52:7</em>).
  2. Vineyard metaphor / symbolic enemy: Reading 'vine rows' for walls and seeing the enemy as a general prophetic figure of judgment, consistent with <em>Isaiah 5:26</em> and <em>Jeremiah 12:10</em>.

What is clear: God commands a severe judgment on Judah, but explicitly limits it to prevent total destruction, preserving a remnant for covenant restoration.

What Scholars Agree and Debate

TopicAgreedDebated
Identity of the destroyersThe addressees are the Babylonians (Chaldeans), acting as God's instruments of judgment against Judah.Some commentators (e.g., Calvin, Gill) see a direct historical commission; others take it as a prophetic personification of general enemy forces. The cross-reference to <em>II Kings 24:2</em> supports the specific identification.
Meaning of 'walls' (שָׁרוֹת)The word refers to some structure of the vineyard, either protective walls or rows of vines.The KJV and Wesley translate 'walls' (fortifications of Jerusalem). The Cambridge Bible and Keil & Delitzsch argue for 'vine rows' based on the metaphor and a possible vowel change. The lexicon (H8284) allows both meanings, leaving the interpretation open.
Extent of the limitation 'not a full end'God preserves a remnant; the nation is not completely annihilated.Some (e.g., Barnes) see this as primarily a historical respite before the exile. Others (e.g., Calvin, Matthew Henry) read it as a theological promise underlying all judgment: God never abandons His covenant people completely.
The vineyard metaphor and the branchesJudah is God's vineyard; the branches/tendrils represent the people, especially the unfaithful elite.The Septuagint and Syriac read the clause without the negative: 'leave her foundations, for they are the Lord's.' This variant flips the command from removing branches to preserving the foundation. The majority Hebrew text retains the negative, commanding removal.

Historical & Cultural Context

Jeremiah prophesied during the final decades of the kingdom of Judah (c. 627, 586 BC), a period of deep spiritual corruption and political instability. Chapter 5 catalogues the nation's unfaithfulness: swearing falsely by Yahweh's name (v.2), refusing correction (v.3), adultery and idolatry (v.7-8), and outright denial of God's sovereignty (v.12, 'It is not he'). In this environment, God announces judgment through the prophet, using a striking rhetorical device, directly addressing the coming enemy as if in a royal commission.

The vineyard imagery would have been unmistakable to Jeremiah's audience. Isaiah 5:1-7 had already portrayed Israel as God's carefully tended vineyard that produced wild grapes. Here, the command to 'go up on her walls' (עֲלוּ בְשָׁרוֹתֶיהָ) likely refers to the walls protecting the vineyard, or possibly the vine rows themselves (the Hebrew word H8284 שָׁרָה can mean either 'wall' or 'vine-row'). The call to 'destroy' echoes Isaiah 10:5-7, where the Assyrian is the rod of God's anger. The Babylonians, the great power of the day, are now that rod.

Most remarkable is the limitation: 'but don't make a full end.' This reflects God's covenant faithfulness even in judgment. He had promised Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob that their descendants would never be utterly obliterated (Leviticus 26:44). The 'full end' motif appears repeatedly in Jeremiah (4:27; 30:11; 46:28), assuring that the surgical judgment leaves the root alive. The verses that follow (Jeremiah 5:11-18) confirm this: the enemy will consume harvest, sons, daughters, flocks, 'Nevertheless in those days, says the Lord, I will not make a full end with you' (v.18). The judgment is devastating but not final. Grace cuts the wound and sets its boundaries.

Textual Notes

The consulted sources note a significant textual variant at the phrase 'take away her branches.' The Septuagint, Syriac, and Arabic versions read 'leave her foundations (or under-props), for they are the Lord's', interpreting the verb as a positive command to preserve rather than remove. Adam Clarke and Gill mention this variant. The Targum paraphrases it as 'destroy her palaces, for the Lord has no pleasure in them.' The majority Hebrew text (Masoretic) reads with the negative, commanding removal of branches that 'are not Yahweh's.' This variant does not alter the central thrust of judgment with restraint; it shifts the object from branches to foundations, but the idea of a preserved core remains. No other significant variants are noted in the supplied sources.

Reception History

Throughout church history, this verse has been read through the lens of God's judgment tempered by mercy. Calvin used it in his commentaries to demonstrate God's sovereign control over nations and His covenant faithfulness even in wrath. Matthew Henry (18th century) applied it devotionally, emphasizing that God never forgets His covenant even when He disciplines. The Reformed tradition, following Calvin, has often seen here a type of the remnant preserved for the Church. In more recent exegesis, the verse is understood within the broader vineyard imagery of the Old Testament, connecting to the New Testament symbol of Christ as the true vine and His followers as branches that must remain in Him to bear fruit.

Preaching This Verse

Three-point outline

  1. God authorizes judgment. He commissions Babylon to act as His agent of discipline. No power moves without His permission (see Isaiah 10:5; II Kings 24:2).
  2. God limits the judgment. The command 'don't make a full end' shows that even wrath has boundaries. God's anger is never uncontrolled; He preserves a remnant for His name's sake.
  3. God removes what does not belong to Him. 'Take away her branches, for they are not Yahweh's.' Unfaithfulness severs the covenant bond. Judgment exposes what was never truly His. Yet the vine's root remains.

Five-point outline

  1. The Divine Commission, God sovereignly directs history, using nations as His servants.
  2. The Metaphor of the Vineyard, Judah's identity as God's chosen is tested by fruitfulness.
  3. The Severity of Judgment, Complete destruction of corrupt branches; nothing unholy can remain.
  4. The Restraint of Grace, 'not a full end' points to covenant mercy that outlasts human failure.
  5. The Remnant Hope, The preserved stump will one day sprout again in restoration.

Illustration hooks

  • Pruning a fruit tree. A gardener cuts away dead or barren branches so the tree can produce again. The cut feels severe, but it is limited, the root is safe. Judah needed pruning to bear fruit once more.
  • Fire that refines. A controlled burn in a forest clears out underbrush without destroying the ancient trees. God's judgment is a measured fire, not indiscriminate annihilation.
  • A coach benching a star player. Discipline is not rejection. Being set aside for a season can teach what success cannot, the connection to the team matters more than the game.

Questions your congregation is asking

  • If God is loving, why does He command destruction at all? How does the limit 'not a full end' change how we see His character?
  • How can I tell whether hardship is God's pruning or just ordinary trouble? Does every difficulty carry a divine purpose?
  • What does it mean to be a branch that belongs to the Lord? How do I know I am His and not someone who will be cut away?

Leading a Discussion

Jeremiah 5:10 drops us into a tough scene: God commanding foreign enemies to destroy His own vineyard, but with a firm limit. This verse raises hard questions about judgment, mercy, and what it means to belong to God. As you talk together, let the tension stand. Don't rush to resolve it. The Bible invites us to sit with both God's anger at sin and His unwillingness to let His people go.

Discussion questions

  1. Read the verse aloud. What is your immediate reaction to God telling the enemy to 'destroy' but not make 'a full end'? What feeling does that limitation give you?
  2. The vineyard metaphor (vine rows, branches, tendrils) runs through the Old Testament. In what ways had Judah 's branches stopped belonging to the Lord? (See Jeremiah 5:1-9 for clues.)
  3. The Hebrew word for 'branches' (נְטִישׁוֹת) means tendrils, the spreading shoots of a vine. What might it mean to 'remove' these? Who or what do you think these tendrils represent in the nation?
  4. God limits the destruction: 'don't make a full end.' In the verses that follow (Jer. 5:18) He repeats this promise. Why is restraint in judgment an essential part of God's character? How does this shape your trust in Him?
  5. Compare this verse with Psalm 78:61-62 and Isaiah 10:5-7. How does God use foreign nations as tools of discipline? Is there comfort in knowing He controls even hostile powers?
  6. What does it mean for you, personally, to be a branch that 'belongs to the Lord'? How do you cultivate that connection so that you are not cut away?
  7. Think of a situation where God seemed to bring discipline into your life. Was there a 'not a full end' moment, a boundary of grace you didn't expect? How did that change your relationship with Him?

What the Commentators Say

10 public-domain commentaries, condensed into plain language.

Adam Clarke's Commentary Methodist/Wesleyan 1826

Clarke highlights the deliberate restraint within the destruction command: the invaders are to pillage and strip Jerusalem but not annihilate it. He notes that several ancient versions read "Leave her foundations, for they are the Lord's," implying enough must survive for the nation to be reborn.

Barnes' Notes on the Bible Protestant 1832

Barnes suggests the walls in view may be vineyard walls rather than city walls, linking the passage directly to Isaiah's image of Judah as God's vineyard. He notes that while the tendrils and branches are given over to ruin, the stock itself remains, implying a remnant survives judgment.

Calvin's Commentaries Reformed 1564

Calvin highlights that God speaks directly through the prophet to command the Chaldeans as his heralds, a sharper method than ordinary teaching to shake the people out of their indifference. He notes that the command to ascend the walls exposes the Jews' false security in their fortifications. The phrase "do not make an end" is debated, but Calvin indicates some take it as God's promise to leave a remnant rather than total destruction.

Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges Anglican 1880

This commentator argues that the usual reading "her walls" is likely a copyist's error. Changing one vowel gives "vinerows," which better fits the vineyard metaphor. The term "branches" is also clarified as "tendrils" to keep the vine imagery consistent.

Geneva Bible Notes Reformed 1599

The note directs that God's judgment includes climbing the walls to destroy, but not completely. The battlements must be removed because they are not the Lord's, implying that what is not owned by God should be stripped away without total ruin.

Gill's Exposition of the Bible Baptist 1748

Gill distinguishes between the destruction of Jerusalem’s walls, which was total, and the preservation of a remnant among the people, who were spared from death for captivity. He interprets the call to take away her battlements as God disowning the people, who are compared to vine branches he no longer claims as his own.

Jamieson-Fausset-Brown Commentary Protestant 1871

JFB interprets the command in terms of a vine: Babylon is to strip away the tendrils, meaning the chief men, but spare the stem, the nation itself. The word usually rendered "battlements" is understood as "tendrils," making the judgment selective, not total destruction.

Keil & Delitzsch OT Commentary Protestant 1876

Keil-Delitzsch reads the summons to destroy as directed against the walls of God's vineyard, the theocracy, where the command to spare the vine means only spurious members are removed. They interpret

Matthew Henry's Commentary Reformed/Presbyterian 1710

Matthew Henry emphasizes that the people's sin is twofold: they have forsaken God's law and claimed the Lord is not involved in their affairs. Their punishment fits the crime—as they served foreign gods in their own land, they will serve foreign masters in a land not theirs. Yet God tempers judgment by promising not to make a full end.

Wesley's Explanatory Notes Methodist/Wesleyan 1754

Wesley identifies the call to destroy as directed at the Babylonians, whom God commissions as His executioners. They are to raze the city's battlements and all its fortifications. The reason is stark: God has disowned these people and now hands them over to judgment.

Word Study

The key original-language words in this verse. Select any word for its full lexicon entry — meaning, every occurrence in Scripture, and related words.

Cross-References

Source: Treasury of Scripture Knowledge (TSK, public domain)

II Kings 24:2 Yahweh sent against him bands of the Chaldeans, bands of the Syrians, bands of the Moabites, and bands of the children of Ammon, and sent them against Judah to destroy it, according to Yahweh’s word which he spoke by his servants the prophets.
II Kings 24:4 and also for the innocent blood that he shed; for he filled Jerusalem with innocent blood, and Yahweh would not pardon.
II Chronicles 36:17 Therefore he brought on them the king of the Chaldeans, who killed their young men with the sword in the house of their sanctuary, and had no compassion on young man or virgin, old man or infirm. He gave them all into his hand.
Psalms 78:61 and delivered his strength into captivity, his glory into the adversary’s hand.
Psalms 78:62 He also gave his people over to the sword, and was angry with his inheritance.
Isaiah 10:5 Alas Assyrian, the rod of my anger, the staff in whose hand is my indignation!
Isaiah 10:7 However, he doesn’t mean so, neither does his heart think so; but it is in his heart to destroy, and to cut off not a few nations.
Isaiah 13:1 The burden of Babylon, which Isaiah the son of Amoz saw.

Interlinear and lexical data from STEPBible (CC BY 4.0). Cross-reference data from OpenBible.info (CC BY 4.0). Commentaries are public domain.

For personal reflection

Read the devotional page — prayer, application, and "for families"

← Devotional