Jeremiah 23:1 · Bible study
Jeremiah 23:1 Commentary: Woe to the Shepherds
Hebrew · 11 what the commentators say
Meaning in one sentence
Jeremiah 23:1 study: who are the 'shepherds' God condemns? Original Hebrew analysis, historical context, and the promise of restoration.
Research Summary
- Meaning: God pronounces judgment on Israel's rulers for destroying and scattering his people; then promises restoration through a righteous king from David's line.
- Key words: 'Woe' (hoy H1945), a lament or judgment cry; 'shepherds' (ro'im H7462), used for civil rulers; 'destroy' (meabbedim H0006, Piel participle), actively causing to perish or stray; 'scatter' (mefitim H6327), dispersing the flock.
- Main debate: Whether 'shepherds' includes only civil rulers (kings, princes) or also religious leaders (priests, prophets). Most commentators limit it to civil rulers, with a separate woe for priests and prophets beginning in verse 9.
- Theological theme: Divine ownership of God's people and accountability of delegated leaders. God does not abandon his flock but will judge unfaithful shepherds and ultimately provide the perfect Shepherd-Messiah.
- Best use: A foundational text for teaching on leadership as trust, for warning against the abuse of authority, and for pointing to Christ as the true Shepherd who gathers and protects.
Translation Comparison
BSB Berean Standard Bible 2020
“Woe to the shepherds who destroy and scatter the sheep of My pasture!” declares the LORD.
WEB World English Bible 2000
“Woe to the shepherds who destroy and scatter the sheep of my pasture!” says Yahweh.
KJV King James Version 1769
Woe be unto the pastors that destroy and scatter the sheep of my pasture! saith the Lord.
ASV American Standard Version 1901
Woe unto the shepherds that destroy and scatter the sheep of my pasture! saith Jehovah.
YLT Young's Literal Translation 1898
Woe to shepherds destroying, And scattering the flock of My pasture, An affirmation of Jehovah.
Darby Darby Bible 1890
Woe unto the shepherds that destroy and scatter the sheep of my pasture! saith Jehovah.
Douay-Rheims Douay-Rheims Bible 1899
Woe to the pastors, that destroy and tear the sheep of my pasture, saith the Lord.
Translations in other languages (10 available)
¡ AY de los pastores que desperdician y derraman las ovejas de mi majada! dice Jehová.
Ai dos pastores que destroem e dispersam as ovelhas de meu rebanho!, Diz o SENHOR.
Malheur aux pasteurs qui détruisent et dispersent
Weh euch Hirten, die ihr die Herde meiner Weide umbringet und zerstreuet! spricht der HERR.
Wee den herderen, die de schapen Mijner weide ombrengen en verstrooien! spreekt de HEERE.
Guai ai pastori che distruggono e disperdono il gregge del mio pascolo! dice l’Eterno.
Biada pasterzom gubiącym i rozpraszającym trzodę pastwiska mego! mówi Pan.
Горе пастырям, которые губят и разгоняют овец паствы Моей! говорит Господь.
耶和華 說:「那些殘害、趕散 我草場 之羊 的牧人 有禍了!」
A curse is on the keepers who are causing the destruction and loss of the sheep of my field, says the Lord.
Verse in Context
Original Language (Biblical Hebrew)
Old Testament · Biblical Hebrew · Jeremiah 23:1
Source: STEPBible TAGNT/TEHB (CC-BY 4.0). Click or tap a morphology code to see the full parsing.
Scholars' Consensus
Commentators across traditions agree that the 'shepherds' in this verse are Israel's rulers, political leaders, not primarily religious figures. Barnes clarifies that the Hebrew term ro'im refers to civil rulers, as in Jeremiah 2:8. Gill adds that 'pastors' here are kings and princes, since priests and prophets are addressed separately in verse 9. Clarke includes 'kings, princes, priests, and prophets' as those whose conduct brought desolation. Keil and Delitzsch note that the noun appears without an article, making the woe a general denunciation against all evil shepherds before being applied specifically to Judah's rulers in verse 2. The flock belongs to God ('sheep of my pasture'), not to the leaders, a point Calvin emphasizes: they boast of a name while acting as destroyers. The consensus is clear: God holds these appointed leaders directly accountable for scattering and destroying the people entrusted to them.
How settled is the interpretation?
Interpretive difficulty: Medium
Main views:
- Civil rulers only: Jeremiah 2:8 distinguishes 'rulers' from 'priests' and 'prophets'; Jeremiah 23:9 begins a separate oracle against prophets and priests, suggesting verse 1 targets kings and princes.
- Both civil and religious leaders: The term 'shepherds' is used broadly for all leaders in the Old Testament (e.g., Ezekiel 34); the woe is generic until specified in verse 2, and the context includes both political and spiritual failures.
What is clear: God holds Israel's leaders accountable for scattering and destroying his flock, and he promises to gather the remnant and raise up a righteous shepherd from David's line.
What Scholars Agree and Debate
| Topic | Agreed | Debated |
|---|---|---|
| Identity of the shepherds | The shepherds are leaders of Israel, those with authority over the people. | Catholic and Protestant interpreters largely agree they are primarily civil rulers (kings, princes), though some include priests and prophets. The Orthodox tradition also sees them as all who hold authority. The main debate is whether the term extends to religious leaders here or is narrowed to political figures; Jeremiah 23:9 then introduces a separate oracle against prophets and priests. |
| Application to later church leaders | The verse warns against any leader who misuses their position to harm those under their care. | Some Christian traditions (especially Reformed) apply this directly to pastors and elders, seeing them as 'shepherds' in a new covenant context. Others caution that the original referent is kings, so the application to church leaders is typological or analogical rather than direct. The verse has been used historically to critique corrupt clergy across denominations. |
| Nature of the woe (hoy) | It is a divine pronouncement of judgment and lament, not merely an expression of sorrow. | A minority of older interpreters (e.g., the Septuagint and Syriac) render it as an exclamation 'Oh!' rather than denunciation. Most commentators follow the Vulgate and Targum in reading it as a judgment oracle. Calvin notes the original can be read either way but decides the context requires a denunciation. |
| The flock as 'sheep of my pasture' | The people belong to God, not the rulers; leaders are accountable to God for how they treat the people. | There is no significant debate on this point across traditions. The phrase emphasizes God's ownership and care, making the shepherds' betrayal even more grievous. It also links to the covenantal relationship between God and Israel. |
| Relationship to the promise of the Branch (v. 5-6) | The woe leads directly to a messianic promise: God will raise a righteous king from David who will truly shepherd his people. | Christians universally see this as a prophecy of Jesus Christ. Jewish interpretation applies it to a future righteous king from David's line, not necessarily a divine figure. The debate is over whether the 'Branch' is fulfilled in Christ alone or awaits a future political restoration. |
Historical & Cultural Context
Jeremiah ministered during Judah's final decades (roughly 627, 586 BC), under the reigns of Josiah, Jehoahaz, Jehoiakim, Jehoiachin, and Zedekiah. The 'shepherd' metaphor for rulers was standard in the ancient Near East, kings were expected to protect, guide, and provide for their people, as a shepherd does for sheep. But in Jeremiah’s day, the kings and nobles of Judah had done the opposite: they led the nation into idolatry, ignored the covenant, and pursued self-interest at the people's expense. The result was political chaos, military defeat, and ultimately the Babylonian exile, which scattered the people across foreign lands.
The phrase 'sheep of my pasture' stresses that the flock belongs to God, not to the rulers. They were trustees, not owners. When they 'destroyed and scattered' the flock, they betrayed a divine trust. This is not merely bad governance; it is rebellion against God himself. The woe formula (hoy) in Hebrew begins a funeral cry or judgment oracle, signaling that disaster is certain. The surrounding context (Jeremiah 22, 23) names specific kings, Jehoiakim and Coniah, as examples of failed shepherds, but the indictment extends to the entire leadership class.
God's response in the following verses (23:2, 4) shows both judgment and restoration: he will 'visit' (punish) the shepherds and then gather the remnant and raise up new shepherds, culminating in the 'righteous Branch' from David (23:5). The historical moment is one of imminent collapse, yet the promise looks far beyond it to a future king who will truly shepherd God's people.
Textual Notes
The consulted sources note no significant textual variants for Jeremiah 23:1. The Hebrew text is stable across manuscripts, with the key terms, hoy (woe), ro'im (shepherds), meabbedim (destroying), mefitim (scattering), and mar'iti (my pasture), appearing consistently. The Septuagint renders the opening as a lament rather than a direct woe, but the meaning remains the same.
Reception History
From the early church, Jeremiah 23:1, 4 was read as a warning to Christian leaders not to abuse their trust. Fathers like John Chrysostom applied the 'shepherd' image to bishops and presbyters, urging them to care for the flock rather than exploit it. In the medieval period, the verse was cited in sermons on pastoral responsibility and in canons against simony and clerical corruption. The Reformers, Luther, Calvin, and others, used the text to call both civil magistrates and church ministers to account, arguing that all authority comes from God and is answerable to him. In modern preaching, the verse has been employed to critique abusive leadership in both church and state, and to point to Christ as the true Shepherd who gathers the scattered. Across traditions, the passage has been sung in hymns of lament and hope, most notably in Charles Wesley's 'Jesus, Shepherd of the Sheep.'
Preaching This Verse
Three-Point Outline
- The Leaders’ Failure: Shepherds appointed by God were to protect the flock, but instead they destroyed and scattered it. Their sin is not just incompetence, it is betrayal of a sacred trust.
- The Flock’s Owner: The sheep are God's own, 'my pasture.' Leaders are accountable to him. The woe belongs to any who harm what God loves.
- The Remedy: God himself will gather the remnant and raise up a true Shepherd, the righteous Branch from David. Divine judgment opens the door to divine restoration.
Five-Point Outline
- The Woe and the Shepherds: 'Pastors' cover all levels of leadership, kings, princes, judges, priests. No one in authority escapes God's notice.
- The Charge: They destroyed and scattered. Their actions actively harmed the flock, rather than caring for it.
- The Ownership: 'Sheep of my pasture', the people are God's possession. Leaders serve at his pleasure and answer to him.
- The Accountability: God visits evil on the evildoers. The same verb 'visit' (paqad) used for their neglect becomes the word for divine judgment.
- The Horizon of Hope: Out of judgment comes gathering. Verse 3 to 5 opens toward the Messiah, the perfect Shepherd who will reign with justice.
Illustration Hooks
- Think of a trusted employee who embezzles company funds meant for payroll. The betrayal goes beyond theft, it breaks trust with every worker relying on that paycheck. So Israel's shepherds took what was meant for the flock.
- A playground supervisor who bullies the children instead of protecting them. The outrage is magnified because the supervisor was given authority to care. God's anger burns hottest against those who misuse power over the vulnerable.
- In modern life, we see leaders, political, corporate, even church, who serve themselves first. This verse challenges every person in authority to ask: Am I feeding the flock or feeding off it?
Questions Your Congregation Is Asking
- How do I know if my leaders, pastors, teachers, officials, are true shepherds or false ones?
- This verse sounds harsh about leaders. Does God still hold leaders accountable today, or is that just for ancient Israel?
- If I have been hurt by a leader in the church, does God care? Where is the justice for the scattered sheep?
Leading a Discussion
This verse opens a short but powerful passage in which God confronts the leaders of his people for their failure. As you read and discuss, notice how God speaks in his own name ('says Yahweh') and how the indictment leads directly to a promise of restoration. The group should consider both the gravity of leadership and the hope God extends even in judgment.
Discussion Questions
- Read Jeremiah 23:1 aloud. Who do you picture when you hear 'shepherds'? Why might God use that image for leaders?
- The Hebrew word hoy begins a cry of woe. What tone does this set for the verse? How does it make you feel about the subject?
- Look at the phrase 'sheep of my pasture.' What does it mean that the flock belongs to God, not the shepherds? How does that change how we think about leadership?
- What specific things did these shepherds do wrong? (Consider the words 'destroy' and 'scatter.') How does verse 2 expand the charge?
- If God 'visits' (judges) the shepherds for their evil doings, what does that tell us about God’s character and his commitment to his flock?
- Skip ahead to verses 3, 5. How does God respond to the failure? What does this reveal about his purposes even in judgment?
- In your own life or community, where have you seen leaders who either fed the flock or scattered it? How does this passage shape your prayers for those in authority today?
Word Study
The key original-language words in this verse. Select any word for its full lexicon entry — meaning, every occurrence in Scripture, and related words.
Cross-References
Source: Treasury of Scripture Knowledge (TSK, public domain)
| Isaiah 56:9 | All you animals of the field, come to devour, all you animals in the forest. |
| Isaiah 56:12 | “Come,” they say, “I will get wine, and we will fill ourselves with strong drink; and tomorrow will be as today, great beyond measure.” |
| Jeremiah 2:8 | The priests didn’t say, ‘Where is Yahweh?’ and those who handle the law didn’t know me. The rulers also transgressed against me, and the prophets prophesied by Baal and followed things that do not profit. |
| Jeremiah 2:26 | As the thief is ashamed when he is found, so the house of Israel is ashamed— they, their kings, their princes, their priests, and their prophets, |
| Jeremiah 10:21 | For the shepherds have become brutish, and have not inquired of Yahweh. Therefore they have not prospered, and all their flocks have scattered. |
| Jeremiah 12:10 | Many shepherds have destroyed my vineyard. They have trodden my portion under foot. They have made my pleasant portion a desolate wilderness. |
| Jeremiah 22:22 | The wind will feed all your shepherds, and your lovers will go into captivity. Surely then you will be ashamed and confounded for all your wickedness. |
| Jeremiah 23:2 | Therefore Yahweh, the God of Israel, says against the shepherds who feed my people: “You have scattered my flock, driven them away, and have not visited them. Behold, I will visit on you the evil of your doings,” says Yahweh. |
Interlinear and lexical data from STEPBible (CC BY 4.0). Cross-reference data from OpenBible.info (CC BY 4.0). Commentaries are public domain.
For personal reflection
Read the devotional page — prayer, application, and "for families"
What the Commentators Say
9 public-domain commentaries, condensed into plain language.
Adam Clarke's Commentary Methodist/Wesleyan 1826
Clarke notes that the "pastors" denounced here include kings, princes, priests, and prophets, not only religious shepherds. Their corrupt leadership and evil example have brought ruin on the people. The woe is a curse on all who misled God's flock.
Barnes' Notes on the Bible Protestant 1832
Barnes clarifies that the "pastors" in this verse are civil rulers, not religious leaders. He then stresses that the people are God's own flock, pastured by Him. The rulers hold no ownership over them; the people belong to God alone.
Calvin's Commentaries Reformed 1564
Calvin warns that God's promises of restoration belong only to the elect, not to hypocrites who falsely claim them. He stresses that hypocrites, especially leaders, flatter themselves by applying these promises to their own situation, when in fact they have excluded themselves through impiety. The elect may be few and despised, but the promises are for them alone.
Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges Anglican 1880
This commentary identifies the "shepherds" as righteous rulers like princes and judges serving under an ideal king. It suggests Jeremiah refrained from directly attacking Zedekiah because he saw him as merely a weak tool in the hands of such shepherds.
Geneva Bible Notes Reformed 1599
The Geneva Notes pronounce a direct woe from God against pastors who harm and scatter His flock. The emphasis falls on divine ownership: the sheep belong to the Lord, so mistreating them is an offense against God Himself, not merely a failure of human leadership.
Gill's Exposition of the Bible Baptist 1748
Gill argues that the "pastors" here are civil rulers like kings and princes, not priests or prophets. Their sin was especially severe because God had entrusted His own people to their care, yet they led them into idolatry and caused their scattering into exile.
Jamieson-Fausset-Brown Commentary Protestant 1871
JFB notes that this chapter forms the epilogue to Jeremiah's earlier denunciations of four wicked kings. It presents a sharp contrast: those rulers will be superseded by a righteous King who will reign over the again united peoples, Israel and Judah.
Keil & Delitzsch OT Commentary Protestant 1876
Keil-Delitzsch notes that the woe on evil shepherds is a general condemnation, then applied specifically to Judah's rulers. They emphasize that when God says "I have driven them," this does not cancel the shepherds' guilt; God used their wickedness to bring judgment, but He alone will gather the remnant and raise up a righteous Branch from David.
Wesley's Explanatory Notes Methodist/Wesleyan 1754
Wesley explains that "childless" here may mean either that all this man's children died before him, or that none of his children ever sat on Judah's throne or held any ruling position there. The word carries a political as well as a personal meaning.