Isaiah 5:7 · Bible study
Isaiah 5:7 Commentary: Wordplay of Justice & Outcry
Hebrew · 11 what the commentators say
Meaning in one sentence
Examine the Hebrew wordplay (mishpat/mispach, tsedaqah/tseaqah) in Isaiah 5:7 that reveals Israel's failure to produce justice and the resulting outcry.
Research Summary
- Meaning: God’s covenant people, for all their privilege, produced violence and oppression instead of the justice He sought.
- Key words: mishpat (justice), mispach (bloodshed/oppression), tsedaqah (righteousness), tseaqah (cry of distress).
- Main debate: None substantial; the transparent wordplay and applied parable enjoy near-universal interpretive agreement.
- Theological theme: Covenant responsibility; God’s judgment begins with His own household; divine disappointment over human sin.
- Best use: A call to self-examination for any community that claims to belong to God, especially regarding social justice and care for the vulnerable.
Translation Comparison
BSB Berean Standard Bible 2020
For the vineyard of the LORD of Hosts is the house of Israel, and the men of Judah are the plant of His delight. He looked for justice, but saw bloodshed; for righteousness, but heard a cry of distress.
WEB World English Bible 2000
For the vineyard of Yahweh of Armies is the house of Israel, and the men of Judah his pleasant plant. He looked for justice, but behold, oppression, for righteousness, but behold, a cry of distress.
KJV King James Version 1769
For the vineyard of the Lord of hosts is the house of Israel, and the men of Judah his pleasant plant: and he looked for judgment, but behold oppression; for righteousness, but behold a cry.
ASV American Standard Version 1901
For the vineyard of Jehovah of hosts is the house of Israel, and the men of Judah his pleasant plant: and he looked for justice, but, behold, oppression; for righteousness, but, behold, a cry.
YLT Young's Literal Translation 1898
Because the vineyard of Jehovah of Hosts Is the house of Israel, And the man of Judah His pleasant plant, And He waiteth for judgment, and lo, oppression, For righteousness, and lo, a cry.
Darby Darby Bible 1890
For the vineyard of Jehovah of hosts is the house of Israel, and the men of Judah the plant of his delight: and he looked for justice, and behold, blood-shedding; for righteousness, and behold, a cry.
Douay-Rheims Douay-Rheims Bible 1899
For the vineyard of the Lord of hosts is the house of Israel: and the man of Juda, his pleasant plant: and I looked that he should do judgment, and behold iniquity: and do justice, and behold a cry.
Translations in other languages (10 available)
Ciertamente la viña de Jehová de los ejércitos es la casa de Israel, y los hombres de Judá planta suya deleitosa. Esperaba juicio, y he aquí vileza; justicia, y he aquí clamor.
Porque a vinha do SENHOR dos exércitos é a casa de Israel, e os homens de Judá são suas plantas agradáveis; porém ele esperava juízo, e eis aqui opressão; ele esperava justiça, e eis aqui clamor.
La vigne de l’ Éternel des armées, c’ est la maison d’ Israël,
Des HERRN Zebaoth Weinberg aber ist das Haus Israel, und die Männer Juda' s seine Pflanzung, daran er Lust hatte. Er wartete auf Recht, siehe, so ist's Schinderei, auf Gerechtigkeit, siehe, so ist's Klage.
Want de wijngaard van den HEERE der heirscharen is het huis van Israel, en de mannen van Juda zijn een plant Zijner verlustigingen; en Hij heeft gewacht naar recht, maar ziet, het is schurftheid, naar gerechtigheid, maar ziet, het is geschreeuw.
Or la vigna dell’Eterno degli eserciti è la casa d’Israele, e gli uomini di Giuda son la piantagione ch’era la sua delizia; ei s’era aspettato rettitudine, ed ecco spargimento di sangue; giustizia, ed ecco grida d’angoscia!
Winnica zaiste Pana zastępów jest dom Izraelski, a mąż Judzki szczepieniem jego rozkosznem. Oczekiwał sądu, a oto uciśnienie; oczekiwał sprawiedliwości, a oto krzyk.
Виноградник Господа Саваофа есть дом Израилев, и мужи Иуды - любимое насаждение Его. И ждал Он правосудия, но вот - кровопролитие; ждал правды, и вот - вопль.
萬軍 之耶和華 的葡萄園 就是 以色列 家;他所喜愛的 樹 就是猶大 人。他指望的 是公平,誰知倒有暴虐(或譯:倒流人血);指望的是公義, 誰知倒有冤聲。
For the vine-garden of the Lord of armies is the people of Israel, and the men of Judah are the plant of his delight: and he was looking for upright judging, and there was blood; for righteousness, and there was a cry for help.
Verse in Context
Original Language (Biblical Hebrew)
Old Testament · Biblical Hebrew · Isaiah 5:7
Source: STEPBible TAGNT/TEHB (CC-BY 4.0). Click or tap a morphology code to see the full parsing.
Scholars' Consensus
Commentators across traditions agree this verse is the hinge of Isaiah’s Vineyard Song, the moment the parable becomes indictment. As Adam Clarke and Barnes both note, the Hebrew pun is unmissable: God waited for mishpat (justice) and found mispach (bloodshed/oppression); He looked for tsedaqah (righteousness) but heard tseaqah (a cry of distress). The wordplay is not ornamental; it is prosecutorial. Calvin stresses that the verse accuses the whole nation and every individual, no one can escape. Keil and Delitzsch explain that the explanatory “for” (ki) does not justify God’s actions but opens the epimythion, the moral of the story. The vineyard is no longer a figure; it is “the house of Israel” and “the men of Judah,” the objects of God’s costly love who have yielded only wild fruit. Nothing in the vineyard’s story was accidental, the deception was willful.
How settled is the interpretation?
Interpretive difficulty: Low
What is clear: God expected justice and righteousness from His people but found oppression and outcry—a failure exposed by unmistakable Hebrew wordplay.
What Scholars Agree and Debate
| Topic | Agreed | Debated |
|---|---|---|
| Translation of מִשְׂפָּח (<em>mispach</em>) | All agree it is a rare word referring to violence or oppression, deliberately paired with <em>mishpat</em> (justice). | English versions choose either 'bloodshed' (BSB, Darby) or 'oppression' (WEB, KJV, ASV), reflecting the semantic range from specific murder to general injustice. |
| Meaning of the wordplay | Every major commentary highlights the paronomasia as central to the verse's rhetorical punch, God's expectation is shattered by a sound-alike opposite. | Minor differences: some emphasize judicial corruption (Gill, Barnes), others the broader societal collapse (Keil, Delitzsch). |
| The 'cry' (צְעָקָה) | All see it as the outcry of the oppressed, invoking the Exodus tradition (Exod 2:23) and the blood of Abel (Gen 4:10). | Some focus on it as a cry for justice (Calvin), others as a noise of anarchy and clamor (Barnes, JFB). |
| Identity of the vineyard | Verse 7 plainly identifies it as Israel (the ten tribes) and Judah (the southern kingdom). | No real debate; some commentators note the particular focus on Judah because Isaiah prophesied in Jerusalem (Keil), but all accept the whole nation. |
Historical & Cultural Context
Isaiah 5:7 stands at the climax of a carefully constructed lawsuit, or rib, between God and His people. The prophet adopts the role of a minstrel, singing a “love song” about a friend’s vineyard (vv. 1-2). The audience, inhabitants of Jerusalem and men of Judah, would recognize the agricultural imagery: a vineyard on a fertile hillside was a symbol of prosperity and divine blessing. God had “fenced it, gathered out the stones, planted choice vines, built a tower and a winepress.” Every detail echoes Israel’s history: the exodus from Egypt (clearing the land of hostile nations), the giving of the Law (the hedge of protection), and the temple (the tower and winepress).
The indictment comes only after the audience has condemned the vineyard (v. 3-4). Jesus later uses a similar technique in the parable of the wicked tenants (Matthew 21:33-45). The “cry” in verse 7 deliberately recalls the outcry of the oppressed in Egypt (Exodus 2:23-24; 3:7). In covenant law, that cry was supposed to trigger divine justice on behalf of the poor (Exodus 22:21-27). But here, the cry comes from the oppressed within Israel itself, a damning reversal. The prophet’s audience is left with no excuse: they have judged themselves, and the sentence matches the crime.
Textual Notes
The supplied sources note no significant textual variants for Isaiah 5:7. The Hebrew text is well-established, and the wordplay (משפט/משפח, צדקה/צעקה) is uniformly attested across manuscripts.
Reception History
From the early church onward, this verse has been read as a divine indictment against unfaithfulness within the covenant community. Origen and other allegorists saw the vineyard as the synagogue and the ‘pleasant plant’ as Christ, but the literal-prophetic thrust remained strong. In the Reformation, Calvin and Luther used it to warn that external membership in the visible church guarantees nothing, God requires fruits of justice. The verse has also been a cornerstone of modern social justice preaching, particularly in movements addressing poverty and systemic oppression. Across traditions, Isaiah 5:7 continues to challenge any community that claims God’s favor while neglecting the poor.
Preaching This Verse
Three-point outline
- God’s Investment: The vineyard represents the covenant community, chosen and lavishly cared for (v. 1-2; compare Psalm 80:8-16).
- God’s Expectation: He waits for mishpat (justice) and tsedaqah (righteousness), the fruits of a faithful covenant partner.
- Human Output: Instead of justice, bloodshed; instead of righteousness, a cry of distress. The wordplay shatters any illusion that religious privilege produces holy living.
Five-point outline
- The Contrast: “Vineyard of Yahweh of Armies” vs. “wild grapes” (v. 2, 4).
- The Disclosure: Verse 7 reveals the vineyard’s identity, God’s own people.
- The Double Failure: Justice becomes oppression; righteousness becomes cry.
- The Harvest of Sin: Oppression creates victims whose cries reach heaven (see Genesis 4:10).
- The Inescapable Verdict: Judgment is not arbitrary; it is the natural outcome of rejected goodness.
Illustration hooks
- A farmer plants an orchard, irrigates, prunes, and waits for peaches. Instead, the trees produce only rotten fruit. He walks row after row, finding no good fruit, only bruised and spoiled peaches. This is God’s search of Israel.
- Imagine a judge who appoints a panel of officials to uphold justice. When he reviews the records, he finds that each official has used his position to extort bribes, and the poor citizens have been left with no recourse but to cry out. The judge’s expectation of fairness is replaced by the noise of complaint.
- A couple invests all their resources into raising a child with love and education. When the child becomes an adult, they discover that he has turned to corrupt business practices, cheating the vulnerable. Their hope for integrity becomes a cry of grief.
Questions your congregation is asking
- “Does God expect perfection from His people, or is He mercifully understanding of our failures?”
- “How do we know if our ‘fruit’ is wild grapes? What are the signs that we are missing God’s intention?”
- “If the church is God’s vineyard today, how do we avoid the same judgment Isaiah pronounced?”
Leading a Discussion
In small groups, read Isaiah 5:1-7 aloud. Notice how the song draws listeners in before confronting them. Verse 7 is the punchline: God’s chosen people failed to become a just and righteous community. The wordplay between justice/oppression and righteousness/cry is the key to understanding the depth of the failure. Discuss how privilege without responsibility turns into betrayal.
Discussion questions
- Read verses 1-2. What specific acts of care did the vineyard owner perform? In what ways has God cared for Israel, and for us?
- Verse 2 ends with “wild grapes.” What might wild grapes represent in your own life or church community?
- Look at the Hebrew word pairings: mishpat (justice) becomes mispach (bloodshed); tsedaqah (righteousness) becomes tseaqah (cry). Why is it important that these words sound so similar?
- God “looked for” justice and righteousness. What does this tell us about God’s active desire for His people?
- Who is crying in verse 7? How does this cry echo the cries in Exodus 2-3 and Genesis 4?
- If the church is God’s vineyard today, what “fruits” of justice and righteousness should be present? Where do we fall short?
- How does this passage invite us to examine our own lives for the gap between profession and practice? What step could you take this week to produce fruit that matches God’s expectation?
Word Study
The key original-language words in this verse. Select any word for its full lexicon entry — meaning, every occurrence in Scripture, and related words.
Cross-References
Source: Treasury of Scripture Knowledge (TSK, public domain)
| Genesis 4:10 | Yahweh said, “What have you done? The voice of your brother’s blood cries to me from the ground. |
| Exodus 2:23 | In the course of those many days, the king of Egypt died, and the children of Israel sighed because of the bondage, and they cried, and their cry came up to God because of the bondage. |
| Exodus 2:24 | God heard their groaning, and God remembered his covenant with Abraham, with Isaac, and with Jacob. |
| Exodus 3:7 | Yahweh said, “I have surely seen the affliction of my people who are in Egypt, and have heard their cry because of their taskmasters, for I know their sorrows. |
| Exodus 22:21 | “You shall not wrong an alien or oppress him, for you were aliens in the land of Egypt. |
| Exodus 22:22 | “You shall not take advantage of any widow or fatherless child. |
| Exodus 22:27 | for that is his only covering, it is his garment for his skin. What would he sleep in? It will happen, when he cries to me, that I will hear, for I am gracious. |
| Deuteronomy 15:9 | Beware that there not be a wicked thought in your heart, saying, “The seventh year, the year of release, is at hand,” and your eye be evil against your poor brother and you give him nothing; and he cry to Yahweh against you, and it be sin to you. |
Interlinear and lexical data from STEPBible (CC BY 4.0). Cross-reference data from OpenBible.info (CC BY 4.0). Commentaries are public domain.
For personal reflection
Read the devotional page — prayer, application, and "for families"
What the Commentators Say
11 public-domain commentaries, condensed into plain language.
Adam Clarke's Commentary Methodist/Wesleyan 1826
Clarke points out a deliberate wordplay in the original Hebrew: the prophet expected mishpat (judgment) but found mishpach (oppression), and tsedakah (righteousness) instead heard tseakah (a cry for help). He notes that this kind of paronomasia is a feature Isaiah especially uses.
Barnes' Notes on the Bible Protestant 1832
Barnes draws attention to a deliberate Hebrew wordplay in the passage: God looked for judgment and found bloodshed; He looked for righteousness and heard a clamor instead. This verbal contrast underscores the bitter gap between what God expected from His people and what He actually received.
Calvin's Commentaries Reformed 1564
Calvin stresses that the vineyard represents the whole nation, and the plants are each individual. No one can escape the charge of ingratitude, because God's blessings were obvious to all. He then applies this to believers today: we are branches grafted into Christ, and God expects fruit from his care.
Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges Anglican 1880
Isaiah presents his parable as a song about a friend's vineyard, drawing in his audience before they realize they are pronouncing judgment on themselves. The force of the application rests on untranslatable Hebrew wordplay: God looked for justice (mishpat) but found bloodshed (mispach), for righteousness (tsedaqah) but heard a cry of the oppressed (tse'aqah).
Geneva Bible Notes Reformed 1599
The Geneva Notes emphasize the stark contrast between what God expected from his vineyard, Israel and Judah, and what he found. He looked for justice but saw oppression; he expected righteousness but heard
Gill's Exposition of the Bible Baptist 1748
Gill identifies the vineyard as the ten tribes of Israel and the pleasant plant as the two tribes of Judah and Benjamin. He interprets the oppression God found as a moral scab, like leprosy, and the cry as the sound of the poor being mistreated. This literal explanation ends the song's parable.
Jamieson-Fausset-Brown Commentary Protestant 1871
JFB highlights the devastating wordplay hidden in the original Hebrew: God looked for mishpat, justice, but found only mispat, bloodshed; He looked for tsedaqua, righteousness, and heard instead tseaqua, the cry of the oppressed. The vineyard is no mere farm—it is God's chosen people, and their failure is a catastrophic reversal of what He had every right to expect.
Keil & Delitzsch OT Commentary Protestant 1876
Keil-Delitzsch argue that the Hebrew word mishpach in the vineyard parable does not mean bloodshed or leprosy, as others suggest. They insist it means forcible seizure of another's property, creating a deliberate wordplay where the Lord expected justice but found its opposite. This reading frames the entire prophecy as a critique of covetousness as the root of all evil.
Lange's Commentary Reformed 1857
Lange emphasizes the deliberate artistry in Isaiah's opening: the prophet pretends to sing a cheerful vineyard song, only to expose a bitter irony. Every hopeful detail—the fertile hill, the careful planting, the watchtower—makes the vineyard's wild grapes more shocking. The real point is that Israel, not a literal vineyard, has disappointed God completely.
Matthew Henry's Commentary Reformed/Presbyterian 1710
Matthew Henry highlights that God here uses a poetic song, not just plain reasoning, to awaken sinners. He sees this song as given to honor Christ, God’s beloved Son and the Lord of the vineyard. The prophet sings it for Christ’s honor, as the Old Testament prophets were friends of the bridegroom.
Wesley's Explanatory Notes Methodist/Wesleyan 1754
Wesley draws a sharp contrast: the one described as pleasant was once a delight to God, but now a cry rises from the oppressed. That cry goes out to men for help and to God for vengeance, marking a complete reversal in divine favor.