GospelMount
Search Topics Scripture Prayer Resources Ebooks About Support the mission Saved articles
Jump to ▾

II Samuel 8:7 · Bible study

2 Samuel 8:7 Commentary: Study, Gold Shields & David's Dedicated Spoils

Hebrew · 8 what the commentators say

Meaning in one sentence

What were the gold shields David took from Hadadezer? A close reading of 2 Samuel 8:7 with commentary, historical background, and discussion questions.

Research Summary

  • Meaning: David captures gold shields from Hadadezer’s officers and brings them to Jerusalem, demonstrating that victory spoils belong to God.
  • Key words: Shelet (shield, H7982); eved (servant, H5650); el (to/belonging to, H0413).
  • Main debate: Whether “shields” refers to actual battle shields, ornamental collars, or quivers. Most commentators favour shields.
  • Theological theme: God gives victory; His people respond by dedicating the best of their gains to Him.
  • Best use: A sermon on stewardship of success or a lesson on dedicating earthly achievements to God’s purposes.

Translation Comparison

BSB Berean Standard Bible 2020

And David took the gold shields that belonged to the officers of Hadadezer and brought them to Jerusalem.

WEB World English Bible 2000

David took the shields of gold that were on the servants of Hadadezer, and brought them to Jerusalem.

KJV King James Version 1769

And David took the shields of gold that were on the servants of Hadadezer, and brought them to Jerusalem.

ASV American Standard Version 1901

And David took the shields of gold that were on the servants of Hadadezer, and brought them to Jerusalem.

YLT Young's Literal Translation 1898

and David taketh the shields of gold which were on the servants of Hadadezer, and bringeth them to Jerusalem;

Darby Darby Bible 1890

And David took the shields of gold that were on the servants of Hadadezer, and brought them to Jerusalem.

Douay-Rheims Douay-Rheims Bible 1899

And David took the arms of gold, which the servants of Adarezer wore and brought them to Jerusalem.

Translations in other languages (10 available)
ES Reina-Valera 1909 1909

Y tomó David los escudos de oro que traían los siervos de Hadad-ezer, y llevólos á Jerusalem.

PT Almeida Livre 1994

E tomou Davi os escudos de ouro que traziam os servos de Hadadezer, e levou-os a Jerusalém.

FR Louis Segond 1910

Et David prit les boucliers d’ or qu’ avaient les serviteurs d’ Hadadézer, et les apporta à Jérusalem.

DE Luther Bibel 1912 1912

Und David nahm die goldenen Schilde, die Hadadesers Knechte gehabt hatten, und brachte sie gen Jerusalem.

NL Statenvertaling 1637

En David nam de gouden schilden die bij Hadad-ezers knechten geweest waren, en bracht ze te Jeruzalem.

IT Riveduta 1927

E Davide tolse ai servi di Hadadezer i loro scudi d’oro e li portò a Gerusalemme.

PL Biblia Gdańska 1632

Pobrał też Dawid tarcze złote, które mieli słudzy Hadadezerowi, i wniósł je do Jeruzalemu.

RU Синодальный перевод 1876

И взял Давид золотые щиты, которые были у рабов Адраазара, и принес их в Иерусалим. [Их взял потом Сусаким, царь Египетский, во время нашествия своего на Иерусалим, во дни Ровоама, сына Соломонова.]

ZH 和合本 1919

他 奪了 哈大底謝 臣僕 所拿 的金 盾牌,帶到 耶路撒冷。

EN Bible in Basic English 1949

And David took their gold body-covers from the servants of Hadadezer and took them to Jerusalem.

Verse in Context

5 When the Syrians of Damascus came to help Hadadezer king of Zobah, David struck twenty two thousand men of the Syrians.
6 Then David put garrisons in Syria of Damascus; and the Syrians became servants to David, and brought tribute. Yahweh gave victory to David wherever he went.
7 David took the shields of gold that were on the servants of Hadadezer, and brought them to Jerusalem.
8 From Betah and from Berothai, cities of Hadadezer, King David took a great quantity of bronze.
9 When Toi king of Hamath heard that David had struck all the army of Hadadezer,

Original Language (Biblical Hebrew)

וַ/יִּקַּ֣ח va/i.yi.Kach Hc/Vqw3ms H3947 and/ he took
דָּוִ֗ד da.Vid HNpm H1732 David
אֵ֚ת 'et HTo H0853 <obj.>
שִׁלְטֵ֣י shil.Tei HNcmpc H7982 [the] shields of
הַ/זָּהָ֔ב ha./za.Hav HTd/Ncmsa H2091 <the>/ gold
אֲשֶׁ֣ר 'a.Sher HTr H0834 which
הָי֔וּ ha.Yu HVqp3cp H1961 they were
אֶ֖ל 'el HR H0413 to
עַבְדֵ֣י 'av.Dei HNcmpc H5650 [the] servants of
הֲדַדְעָ֑זֶר ha.dad.'A.zer HNpm H1909 Hadadezer
וַ/יְבִיאֵ֖/ם va/y.vi.'E/m Hc/Vhw3ms/Sp3mp H0935 and/ he brought/ them
יְרוּשָׁלִָֽם\׃ ye.ru.sha.Lim HNpl H3389 Jerusalem

Source: STEPBible TAGNT/TEHB (CC-BY 4.0). Click or tap a morphology code to see the full parsing.

Scholars' Consensus

Commentators broadly agree that the “shields of gold” taken from the servants of Hadadezer were ornamental shields, likely gold-plated, carried by the king’s elite bodyguard or high officers. Adam Clarke notes the word may refer to arms, quivers, or collars, but the Hebrew term shelet (H7982) consistently means “shield” in the Old Testament (cf. Song of Solomon 4:4, 2 Kings 11:10). Keil and Delitzsch argue that “servants” denotes the vassal princes or governors of Hadadezer, while the Cambridge Bible suggests a corps comparable to Alexander the Great’s “silver-shields.” Wesley adds that the shields were likely stored in the king’s armoury rather than carried into battle. The key interpretive point, affirmed across traditions, is that David brought these valuable objects to Jerusalem, not for his own treasury, but to dedicate them to Yahweh (see 2 Samuel 8:11). The verse thus functions as part of a larger pattern: the spoils of victory belong to God.

How settled is the interpretation?

Interpretive difficulty: Low

What is clear: David captured valuable gold items from Hadadezer’s officers and brought them to Jerusalem, setting a pattern of dedicating the spoils of victory to God.

What Scholars Agree and Debate

TopicAgreedDebated
Nature of the 'shields of gold'Christians agree these were valuable, gold-adorned items taken from Hadadezer’s high-ranking men.Some read shelet as literal shields (Keil, Cambridge), others as quivers (Gill, Jarchi) or collars/bracelets (Aquila, LXX).
Who were the 'servants'?They were not ordinary soldiers but an elite group connected to the king.Some specify the king’s bodyguard (Clarke, Cambridge), others the vassal princes or governors (Keil).
Destination of the shieldsDavid brought them to Jerusalem.Whether they were immediately dedicated to the temple treasury or kept in the royal armoury until Solomon’s reign (Wesley vs. Keil). Verse 11 supports later dedication.
Septuagint addition about ShishakThe received Hebrew text (MT) does not include this note.Some scholars think the LXX addition is historically plausible (Thenius), but most reject it as a later gloss (Keil, Cambridge).

Historical & Cultural Context

Second Samuel 8 compresses years of military campaigns into a single theological summary. David had just received God’s covenant promise in chapter 7, and now the narrator shows how God gave David victory everywhere he turned (2 Samuel 8:6, 14). The war against Hadadezer king of Zobah was a major confrontation with the Aramean coalition, involving thousands of chariots and foot soldiers. Hadadezer’s “servants” were probably his chief retainers, military commanders or provincial rulers who wore or carried golden shields as marks of rank.

Bringing captured royal insignia to Jerusalem served multiple purposes. Politically, it demonstrated that the God of Israel had triumphed over the gods of Zobah. Culturally, it mirrored ancient Near Eastern practice: victors displayed the weapons and regalia of defeated kings in their capital. Religiously, David set these spoils apart for the Lord. Verse 11 explicitly states that David dedicated the silver and gold from all the nations he subdued, including these shields, to Yahweh, reserving them for the future temple. This act contrasts with Saul, who kept plunder for himself (1 Samuel 15). David’s pattern anticipates Solomon’s golden shields made for the palace (1 Kings 10:16, 17) and later looted by Shishak (1 Kings 14:26). The chronicler in 1 Chronicles 18:7, 8 adds that David also took a great quantity of bronze, from which Solomon later made the bronze sea and pillars for the temple.

Textual Notes

The consulted sources note one significant textual variant: the Septuagint adds a clause at the end of 2 Samuel 8:7 stating that Shishak king of Egypt later took these shields when he captured Jerusalem in Rehoboam’s day. Keil and Delitzsch argue this is a scribal gloss derived from 1 Kings 14:25, 28 and contradicted by the fact that David dedicated the spoils to the Lord. The Cambridge Bible agrees, calling it an “inference drawn by the Greek translator.” The Masoretic Text, Syriac, and Latin Vulgate do not contain this addition. No other significant variants are mentioned by the commentaries consulted.

Reception History

This verse has primarily been read within the larger narrative of David’s wars and his preparation for the temple. Early Christian interpreters, such as those in the Antiochene tradition, saw the gold shields as a type of the church’s spiritual armor taken from the enemy and dedicated to God. Medieval Jewish exegetes like Rashi and David Kimchi focused on the precise meaning of shelet, comparing it to the shields described in Song of Solomon. During the Reformation, Matthew Henry and the Geneva Bible emphasized David’s refusal to keep the spoils for himself, presenting him as a model of godly kingship. In modern scholarship, the verse is studied for its role in the Deuteronomistic history, showing how the narrator connects military success with religious devotion and the centralization of worship in Jerusalem.

Preaching This Verse

Three-point outline

  1. Victory belongs to God. David’s military success is framed by the repeated phrase “Yahweh gave victory to David wherever he went” (2 Samuel 8:6, 14). The gold shields are trophies of divine warfare, not personal glory.
  2. Spoils are dedicated, not hoarded. David brings the shields to Jerusalem and dedicates them to the Lord. This points forward to the temple and the truth that every blessing comes from God and should be returned to Him in worship.
  3. Earthly trophies point to a greater King. The golden shields are impressive but temporary. They were later carried away by Shishak. Only the kingdom of Christ cannot be plundered.

Five-point outline

  1. David’s campaign against Hadadezer (vv. 3, 6): God expands Israel’s borders.
  2. The capture of the gold shields (v. 7): What do they represent?
  3. Other spoils taken (v. 8): bronze, silver, gold, material for the temple.
  4. David dedicates everything to Yahweh (v. 11): a heart of consecration.
  5. The lasting lesson: Our victories, small and great, are opportunities to honor God.

Illustration hooks

  • A sports team hanging championship banners in their home arena. The shields are like banners, visible reminders of who won.
  • A museum exhibit of captured military regalia from past wars. Visitors see the trophies and think about the power of the victor.
  • A family passing down a heirloom that originally belonged to someone else, transformed into a symbol of new loyalty.

Questions your congregation is asking

  • Did David personally profit from the gold? The text says he dedicated it to God, what does that mean practically?
  • Was this war justified? The narrative presents it as God’s judgment on Israel’s enemies and the fulfillment of land promises.
  • What happened to the shields later? Shishak took them (1 Kings 14:26), but their original purpose was to honor God. That purpose stands.

Leading a Discussion

This verse sits in the middle of a war report, but it raises big questions about how we handle success. David takes valuable plunder but doesn’t keep it for himself. He brings it to Jerusalem and eventually dedicates it to God. As your group reads 2 Samuel 8:7 in context (verses 3, 12), consider what victory means for people of faith.

Discussion questions

  1. Read verses 3, 7. What impresses you about David’s military success? What role does God play in it?
  2. What are the “servants of Hadadezer”? Look at the lexical note on the Hebrew word eved (servant) and the commentary from Keil and Delitzsch. How does this shape your understanding of the shields?
  3. The text does not say “David took the gold for himself.” Why do you think the narrator mentions that he brought the shields to Jerusalem?
  4. Read verse 11. What does David do with the spoils? How does this connect to the building of the temple later (1 Chronicles 22:14, 16)?
  5. When you achieve something significant, a promotion, a financial gain, a personal victory, how can you “bring it to Jerusalem”? What would dedicated living look like for you this week?
  6. The Septuagint adds a note about Shishak taking these shields in the days of Rehoboam (see the Cambridge Bible note). What does this later history teach about the durability of earthly trophies?
  7. How does Jesus’ victory over sin and death differ from David’s military victories? What “spoils” does Christ bring to His people?

What the Commentators Say

8 public-domain commentaries, condensed into plain language.

Adam Clarke's Commentary Methodist/Wesleyan 1826

Clarke notes that the exact nature of these items is uncertain, with various translations including arms, quivers, or bracelets. He proposes they were likely costly ornaments that distinguished the Syrian elite troops, similar to the silver-shielded guard of Alexander the Great.

Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges Anglican 1880

The commentator identifies the shields as the distinctive equipment of Hadadezer's personal bodyguard, drawing a comparison to Alexander the Great's elite "silver-shields" unit. A later Greek addition to the text records that these same shields were later taken by King Shishak of Egypt.

Geneva Bible Notes Reformed 1599

And Dauid tooke the shieldes of gold that beloged to the seruants of Hadadezer, and brought them to Ierusalem.

Gill's Exposition of the Bible Baptist 1748

Gill notes that the "shields of gold" taken from Hadadezer's officers may not be literal shields at all. He records that ancient translators understood them as golden chains, bracelets, or even quivers for arrows. Whatever they were, David brought them to Jerusalem, and Gill connects them to the adornment of Solomon's sanctuary.

Keil & Delitzsch OT Commentary Protestant 1876

Keil and Delitzsch reject a Septuagint addition claiming that Shishak later carried away these golden shields. They point out that Rehoboam's shields taken by Shishak were Solomon's palace shields, not David's battle spoils. David dedicated all captured gold and silver to the Lord for the future temple.

Lange's Commentary Reformed 1857

Lange stresses that the phrase 'after this' here is a loose literary transition, not a strict chronological marker. The chapter groups David's wars thematically to show how the Lord preserved him and subdued enemies, presenting David as the theocratic instrument through whom God established His kingdom.

Matthew Henry's Commentary Reformed/Presbyterian 1710

Matthew Henry observes that God gave David rest from his enemies, and David made good use of that peace before receiving a commission to wage offensive war. David acted not out of ambition but to secure Israel's promised inheritance and avenge their wrongs, fulfilling God's entitlement to the land.

Wesley's Explanatory Notes Methodist/Wesleyan 1754

Wesley clarifies that the phrase "with the servants" means the items were entrusted to their custody in the king's armoury, not carried into the field. He argues this fits the context better than assuming the servants brought them to battle.

Word Study

The key original-language words in this verse. Select any word for its full lexicon entry — meaning, every occurrence in Scripture, and related words.

Cross-References

Source: Treasury of Scripture Knowledge (TSK, public domain)

I Kings 10:16 King Solomon made two hundred bucklers of beaten gold; six hundred shekels of gold went to one buckler.
I Kings 10:17 He made three hundred shields of beaten gold; three minas of gold went to one shield; and the king put them in the House of the Forest of Lebanon.
I Kings 14:26 and he took away the treasures of Yahweh’s house and the treasures of the king’s house. He even took away all of it, including all the gold shields which Solomon had made.
I Kings 14:27 King Rehoboam made shields of bronze in their place, and committed them to the hands of the captains of the guard, who guarded the door of the king’s house.
I Chronicles 18:7 David took the shields of gold that were on the servants of Hadadezer, and brought them to Jerusalem.
II Chronicles 9:15 King Solomon made two hundred large shields of beaten gold. Six hundred shekels of beaten gold went to one large shield.
II Chronicles 9:16 He made three hundred shields of beaten gold. Three hundred shekels of gold went to one shield. The king put them in the House of the Forest of Lebanon.

Interlinear and lexical data from STEPBible (CC BY 4.0). Cross-reference data from OpenBible.info (CC BY 4.0). Commentaries are public domain.

For personal reflection

Read the devotional page — prayer, application, and "for families"

← Devotional