I Corinthians 4:13 · Bible study
1 Corinthians 4:13 Commentary: Filth of the World, Offscouring of All
Greek · 11 what the commentators say
Meaning in one sentence
Paul calls himself 'the filth of the world.' Is he describing social contempt or alluding to a pagan scapegoat sacrifice? The context and commentary examined.
Research Summary
- Meaning: Paul describes the apostles as the most despised refuse, possibly alluding to pagan scapegoat sacrifices.
- Key words: perikatharmata (garbage), peripsēma (scrapings), dusphēmeō (slander), parakaleō (entreat).
- Main debate: Does Paul intend a sacrificial allusion to pagan expiatory victims, or only social contempt?
- Theological theme: The humiliation of apostolic ministry mirrors Christ’s own self-giving identification with the unclean.
- Best use: A passage for times when believers face dishonour, reminding us that our response should be gentle entreaty, not retaliation.
Translation Comparison
BSB Berean Standard Bible 2020
when we are slandered, we answer gently. Up to this moment we have become the scum of the earth, the refuse of the world.
WEB World English Bible 2000
Being defamed, we entreat. We are made as the filth of the world, the dirt wiped off by all, even until now.
KJV King James Version 1769
Being defamed, we intreat: we are made as the filth of the world, and are the offscouring of all things unto this day.
ASV American Standard Version 1901
being defamed, we entreat: we are made as the filth of the world, the offscouring of all things, even until now.
YLT Young's Literal Translation 1898
being spoken evil of, we entreat; as filth of the world we did become--of all things an offscouring--till now.
Darby Darby Bible 1890
insulted, we entreat: we are become as [the] offscouring of the world, [the] refuse of all, until now.
Douay-Rheims Douay-Rheims Bible 1899
We are blasphemed: and we entreat. We are made as the refuse of this world, the offscouring of all, even until now.
Translations in other languages (10 available)
Somos blasfemados, y rogamos: hemos venido á ser como la hez del mundo, el desecho de todos hasta ahora.
Somos blasfemados, e respondemos humildemente; somos feitos como a escória do mundo, e como o lixo de todos, até agora.
calomniés, nous parlons avec bonté; nous sommes devenus comme les balayures du monde, le rebut de tous, jusqu’ à maintenant.
wir sind stets wie ein Fluch der Welt und ein Fegopfer aller Leute.
Wij worden gelasterd, en wij bidden; wij zijn geworden als uitvaagsels der wereld en aller afschrapsel tot nu toe.
siamo diventati e siam tuttora come la spazzatura del mondo, come il rifiuto di tutti.
Gdy nam złorzeczą, modlimy się za nich: staliśmy się jako śmieci tego świata i jako omieciny u wszystkich, aż dotąd.
хулят нас, мы молим; мы как сор для мира, как прах, всеми попираемый доныне.
被人毀謗,我們就善勸。直到 如今,人還把我們看 作 世界 上的污穢,萬物 中的渣滓。
When evil things are said about us we give gentle answers: we are made as the unclean things of the world, as that for which no one has any use, even till now.
Verse in Context
Original Language (Koine Greek)
New Testament · Koine Greek · I Corinthians 4:13
Source: STEPBible TAGNT/TEHB (CC-BY 4.0). Click or tap a morphology code to see the full parsing.
Scholars' Consensus
Commentators agree that Paul uses the strongest possible Greek terms for contemptible refuse. The words perikatharmata and peripsēma, each occurring only here in the New Testament, carry the basic sense of dirt scraped off or swept away. Several commentators note that these same terms were used in pagan Greek culture for human scapegoats, worthless individuals sacrificed in times of plague or famine, with the cry “Be our offscouring” (Clarke, Calvin, Cambridge). Barnes, however, cautions that Paul may simply mean “filth” without the sacrificial overtones; the point is the apostles’ extreme dishonor. Either way, the passage contrasts sharply with the Corinthians’ pride. Paul does not retaliate: “Being defamed, we entreat.” This combination of disgrace and gentle response defines apostolic ministry. The pastoral takeaway: following Christ often means accepting contempt, but answering with blessing.
How settled is the interpretation?
Interpretive difficulty: Medium
Main views:
- Social contempt only: Barnes argues Paul simply means the apostles are regarded as worthless dirt; the pagan scapegoat connection is not certain.
- Sacrificial scapegoat allusion: Clarke, Calvin, Cambridge and Wesley see a direct allusion to pagan expiatory victims, adding vicarious undertones to Paul's sufferings.
- Combined: contempt with redemptive echo: The two Greek words carry both literal and ritual meanings; Paul may use the stronger pagan imagery to deepen the contrast with Corinthian pride and hint at Christ-like substitution.
What is clear: Paul describes the apostles as being treated as the most despicable refuse, and he responds with entreaty rather than retaliation, modeling the way of Christ.
What Scholars Agree and Debate
| Topic | Agreed | Debated |
|---|---|---|
| Meaning of perikatharmata and peripsēma | Both words denote refuse or dirt, used metaphorically for contemptible people. | Whether Paul alludes to pagan expiatory victims (Clarke, Calvin, Cambridge) or simply uses terms of scorn (Barnes). |
| Paul's response to slander | Paul responds with entreaty (parakaleō) rather than retaliation. | Whether 'entreat' means praying to God for persecutors (Gill, Grotius) or gently appealing to the slanderers (Barnes, Estius). |
| The 'even until now' clause | Paul emphasizes the ongoing nature of this suffering, not a past event. | No significant difference; all see it as stressing present humiliation. |
| Apostolic suffering as model for believers | Paul contrasts apostles' suffering with Corinthian pride to teach humility. | Whether ordinary Christians should expect the same degree of contempt (some say general, others unique to apostolic office). |
| The sacrificial overtones and their theology | The words can carry expiatory connotations in Greek religious contexts. | Whether Paul intentionally evokes the scapegoat ritual (Clarke, Calvin) or merely borrows a term of abuse (Barnes). |
Historical & Cultural Context
The two Greek words Paul uses, perikatharmata and peripsēma, had a specific cultural resonance in the Greco-Roman world. Adam Clarke describes an ancient practice: when plague or famine struck, a worthless person was chosen from the dregs of society, maintained at public expense for a year, then led out crowned with flowers. After heaping curses on his head and whipping him seven times, he was burned alive, and his ashes were thrown into the sea while the people chanted “Be our propitiation” (peripsēma hēmōn ginou). Such victims were called perikatharmata or katharmata, purifications. Calvin notes that the preposition peri (“around”) in peripsēma might refer to the victim being led through the streets to collect the community’s evil. Paul thus draws on a vivid pagan custom his Corinthian readers would recognise.
But he also echoes the Old Testament. Lamentations 3:45 says, “You have made us an off-scouring and refuse in the middle of the peoples.” The apostles are not alone; God’s people have often been treated as garbage by the world. The immediate context in 1 Corinthians sharpens the irony: the Corinthians view themselves as reigning as kings (4:8), while Paul and the other apostles are “made a spectacle” (4:9), hungry, beaten, homeless (4:11). The phrase “even until now” (Greek heōs arti) stresses the ongoing, present reality of this dishonour, not a temporary setback but a sustained condition of apostolic life. And in that condition, the apostles follow Christ’s own pattern: “When he was reviled, he did not revile in return” (1 Peter 2:23).
Textual Notes
The consulted sources note no significant textual variants for this verse. The Greek text is stable across the manuscript tradition.
Reception History
Ignatius of Antioch, writing to the Ephesians around AD 110, used the same word peripsēma of himself: “I am your offscouring” (Ephesians 8), showing that early Christians read Paul’s language as expressing devoted suffering for others. Vincent’s Word Studies notes that by the mid-third century “peripsēma sou” had become a formal compliment of humility. Jerome marvelled at Paul’s vehemence, saying “his words seem to be those of a simple man… but whithersoever you look, there are thunderbolts.” Dante, in the Purgatorio, pictured Paul with a sword so sharp it caused terror. The verse has also been used in Holy Week liturgies to echo Christ’s own rejection and cleansing of the world.
Preaching This Verse
Three-point outline
- The Scorn of the World, Paul uses the most degrading terms available: the filth of the earth, the scrapings of all things. The apostles are treated like the scapegoats of pagan ritual, expendable, accursed, thrown away. This is not hyperbole; it is the cost of faithful gospel ministry.
- The Gentleness of Grace, “Being defamed, we entreat.” The Greek parakaloumen can mean “we console” or “we appeal gently.” Rather than answering evil for evil, the apostles respond with entreaty, either praying to God for their slanderers or softening their accusers with kind words (Gill, Grotius). This is the way of the cross.
- The Present Hour of Trial, “Even until now.” Paul refuses to spiritualise his suffering into a past event. The present tense matters: the church lives between Christ’s first and second coming, and that interval is marked by the world’s hostility and the faithful’s endurance.
Five-point outline
- The Setting: Corinthian Pride, The Corinthians think they are already reigning (4:8). Paul deflates their arrogance by describing the actual condition of the apostles.
- The Vocabulary of Contempt, Perikatharmata (garbage) and peripsēma (scrapings) were technical terms for both household filth and expiatory sacrifices. Paul loads his language with cultural shock.
- The Context: Pagan and Jewish Roots, Clarke and Calvin cite the heathen custom of casting a victim into the sea. Lamentations 3:45 gives the Jewish side: God’s people as offscouring. Paul stands in both traditions.
- The Response: Entreaty, Slander meets not retaliation but appeal. The apostles imitate Christ, who prayed for his executioners. This is the character of gospel servants.
- The Application: For All Believers, While Paul speaks specifically as an apostle, the underlying pattern, accepting dishonour for Christ’s sake, extends to every disciple who carries the cross.
Illustration hooks
- A hospital orderly who cleans bedpans and deals with the most unpleasant waste. Society overlooks that work, but it is essential. The apostles are like that worker: they handle what the world discards.
- A public figure who is “cancelled” or mocked online for holding an unpopular conviction. Friends fall away; influencers call for boycotts. The apostle’s experience of being the “offscouring of all” is eerily modern.
- The scapegoat ritual known in many cultures: a person or animal loaded with the community’s sins and driven away. Paul sees his suffering as bearing the world’s contempt so that others might be cleansed.
Questions your congregation is asking
- Why would God allow his most faithful servants to be treated like garbage?
- How do I respond when my reputation is ruined because of my faith?
- Is there a limit to how much dishonour I should accept? When do I speak up?
Leading a Discussion
Paul’s words in verse 13 shock his readers. He uses vocabulary that would have made a Corinthian wince: the apostles are the scrapings of the world, the dirt wiped off after a cleaning. And yet Paul does not complain or fight back. He entreats. This small group guide helps you explore the tension between the world’s contempt and the Christian response.
Discussion questions
- Read the verse aloud in two or three translations. What words stand out as most offensive? Why do you think Paul chose them?
- The Greek terms perikatharmata and peripsēma could refer to household sweepings or to human victims in pagan expiatory rites. How does each meaning change the way you hear the verse?
- Why does Paul feel the need to include “even until now” (or “unto this day”)? What does the present tense add to the description?
- Paul contrasts the Corinthians’ self-image (“you are wise, strong, honored” in v.10) with his own condition. What point is he making about pride and humility?
- Look at the response: “being defamed, we entreat.” The Greek parakaloumen can mean “we console” or “we appeal gently.” How does this reflect Jesus’ teaching in Matthew 5:44? What would it look like to practice this in your daily life?
- Have you ever been treated as “offscouring” because of your faith? How did you respond? Is there a door for entreaty even in that situation?
- The passage ends without resolution, Paul does not say the suffering stops. How does this shape your understanding of the Christian life as a long obedience in the same direction?
Word Study
The key original-language words in this verse. Select any word for its full lexicon entry — meaning, every occurrence in Scripture, and related words.
Cross-References
Source: Treasury of Scripture Knowledge (TSK, public domain)
| Lamentations 3:45 | You have made us an off-scouring and refuse in the middle of the peoples. |
| Acts 22:22 | They listened to him until he said that; then they lifted up their voice and said, “Rid the earth of this fellow, for he isn’t fit to live!” |
Interlinear and lexical data from STEPBible (CC BY 4.0). Cross-reference data from OpenBible.info (CC BY 4.0). Commentaries are public domain.
For personal reflection
Read the devotional page — prayer, application, and "for families"
What the Commentators Say
9 public-domain commentaries, condensed into plain language.
Adam Clarke's Commentary Methodist/Wesleyan 1826
Clarke explains that the Greek words Paul uses, translated as "filth" and "offscouring," were technical terms for a pagan sacrificial ritual. During public calamities, heathens would select a despised person as a public expiation, maintain them for a year, then burn them alive and throw their ashes into the sea while saying, "Be thou our propitiation."
Barnes' Notes on the Bible Protestant 1832
Barnes explains that the Greek words for "filth" and "off-scouring" literally mean what is scraped off in cleaning, terms used for society's most despised people, even expiatory victims. He interprets "we entreat" as the apostles pleading with their abusers to repent, not merely praying to God. The passage shows the apostles were seen as the world's ultimate refuse.
Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges Anglican 1880
The Cambridge Bible notes point out that the Greek words Paul uses for "filth" and "offscouring" carry a double meaning: they refer both to what is wiped away as refuse and to an expiatory sacrifice offered up to save others. Paul presents himself as like such a sacrifice, enduring contempt so that through his suffering many may gain Christ.
Geneva Bible Notes Reformed 1599
The Geneva notes draw attention to the apostles' humble response when they are cursed and treated as the world's garbage. Instead of retaliating, they pray, showing a Christlike patience that becomes their defining mark even to the present time.
Gill's Exposition of the Bible Baptist 1748
Gill explains that the apostles responded to slander not with retaliation but with prayer or gentle appeal, following Christ's example. He notes that calling them "the filth of the world" echoes pagan purification rituals where a despised victim was sacrificed to remove a community's contagion. This degrading treatment proved they were far from reigning as kings, rebuking the Corinthians' proud delusion.
Jamieson-Fausset-Brown Commentary Protestant 1871
JFB notes two possible meanings for "we entreat" when defamed: either praying to God for the defamers, or offering a gentle reply. The term "filth" refers to refuse or rubbish swept away, and Paul's phrase "of all things" intensifies this, meaning universal rejection, not merely by the world.
Matthew Henry's Commentary Reformed/Presbyterian 1710
Matthew Henry points out that any difference between believers comes from God, not from themselves. Since every gift is received, boasting about it wrongly takes credit that belongs to God alone. This turns all abilities into debts of gratitude that should humble rather than feed pride, especially for ministers who fuel divisions by forgetting this.
Vincent's Word Studies Evangelical 1887
Vincent highlights the depth of Paul's Greek terms for "filth" and "offscouring," connecting them to an ancient Athenian custom where worthless persons were sacrificed as scapegoats during disaster. He notes the irony: Paul, the apostle, willingly takes the place of society's refuse for the sake of others.
Wesley's Explanatory Notes Methodist/Wesleyan 1754
Wesley notes that the terms "filth" and "offscouring" were not casual insults but specific names given to wretched victims chosen among heathens as expiatory sacrifices to the infernal gods. Such people were loaded with curses and injuries on their way to the altar, and the apostles were treated exactly that way.