GospelMount
Search Topics Scripture Prayer Resources Ebooks About Support the mission Saved articles
Jump to ▾

I Corinthians 15:33 · Bible study

1 Corinthians 15:33 Commentary: Evil Companionships and the Resurrection

Greek · 11 what the commentators say

Meaning in one sentence

Paul warns the Corinthians that bad company corrupts character, quoting the pagan poet Menander to press his argument for the resurrection against

Research Summary

  • Meaning: Intimate association with those who deny the resurrection and its moral implications gradually destroys Christian character.
  • Key words: ὁμιλίαι (companionships, not just speech); φθείρουσιν (present tense, ongoing corruption); ἤθη χρηστά (virtuous habits or character).
  • Main debate: Whether the quote is directly from Menander or a common proverb; both views agree Paul uses pagan literature to support a biblical truth.
  • Theological theme: The resurrection is not just a future hope, it demands a present transformation, including careful choice of associations.
  • Best use: Preaching on the moral implications of doctrine; teaching on Christian discernment in relationships.

Translation Comparison

BSB Berean Standard Bible 2020

Do not be deceived: “Bad company corrupts good character.”

WEB World English Bible 2000

Don’t be deceived! “Evil companionships corrupt good morals.”

KJV King James Version 1769

Be not deceived: evil communications corrupt good manners.

ASV American Standard Version 1901

Be not deceived: Evil companionships corrupt good morals.

YLT Young's Literal Translation 1898

Be not led astray; evil communications corrupt good manners;

Darby Darby Bible 1890

Be not deceived: evil communications corrupt good manners.

Douay-Rheims Douay-Rheims Bible 1899

Be not seduced: Evil communications corrupt good manners.

Translations in other languages (10 available)
ES Reina-Valera 1909 1909

No erréis: las malas conversaciones corrompen las buenas costumbres.

PT Almeida Livre 1994

Não erreis. As más companhias corrompem os bons costumes.

FR Louis Segond 1910

Ne vous y trompez pas: les mauvaises compagnies corrompent les bonnes mœurs.

DE Luther Bibel 1912 1912

Lasset euch nicht verführen! Böse Geschwätze verderben gute Sitten.

NL Statenvertaling 1637

Dwaalt niet, kwade samensprekingen verderven goede zeden.

IT Riveduta 1927

Non v’ingannate: le cattive compagnie corrompono i buoni costumi.

PL Biblia Gdańska 1632

Nie błądźcież; złe rozmowy psują dobre obyczaje.

RU Синодальный перевод 1876

Не обманывайтесь: худые сообщества развращают добрые нравы.

ZH 和合本 1919

你們不 要自欺;濫 交 是敗壞 善 行。

EN Bible in Basic English 1949

Do not be tricked by false words: evil company does damage to good behaviour.

Verse in Context

31 I affirm, by the boasting in you which I have in Christ Jesus our Lord, I die daily.
32 If I fought with animals at Ephesus for human purposes, what does it profit me? If the dead are not raised, then “let’s eat and drink, for tomorrow we die.”
33 Don’t be deceived! “Evil companionships corrupt good morals.”
34 Wake up righteously and don’t sin, for some have no knowledge of God. I say this to your shame.
35 But someone will say, “How are the dead raised?” and, “With what kind of body do they come?”

Original Language (Koine Greek)

μὴ mē PRT-N G3361 Not
πλανᾶσθε· planasthe V-PPM-2P G4105 do be misled:
φθείρουσιν phtheirousin V-PAI-3P G5351 Do corrupt
ἤθη ēthē N-APN G2239 morals
χρηστὰ chrēsta A-APN G5543 good
ὁμιλίαι homiliai N-NPF G3657 companionships
κακαί. kakai A-NPF G2556 bad.

Source: STEPBible TAGNT/TEHB (CC-BY 4.0). Click or tap a morphology code to see the full parsing.

Scholars' Consensus

Commentators across traditions agree that Paul here warns believers against self-deception regarding the company they keep. The immediate context is his argument for the resurrection: those who deny it often live as though bodily pleasure is all that matters (v. 32: “let’s eat and drink, for tomorrow we die”). Barnes and Gill both note that Paul is cautioning the Corinthians not to be misled by false teachers whose smooth arguments about the resurrection mask a corrupting influence. The proverb “Evil companionships corrupt good morals” is taken from the comic poet Menander (Barnes, Calvin, Cambridge Bible). Vincent’s Word Studies stresses that the Greek word translated “communications” in the KJV is ὁμιλίαι (companionships, intimate association), not mere speech. The verb “corrupt” (φθείρουσιν) is present active indicative, describing a continuous, ongoing effect: bad company consistently erodes moral character. Wesley adds that “discourse contrary to faith, hope, or love, naturally tends to destroy all holiness.” The shared point is clear: close contact with those who deny the resurrection is spiritually dangerous.

How settled is the interpretation?

Interpretive difficulty: Low

What is clear: Paul warns that close association with people who deny the resurrection and its moral implications will erode Christian character, and he uses a widely known pagan proverb to make the point.

What Scholars Agree and Debate

TopicAgreedDebated
Source of the quoteCommentators agree Paul is quoting (or referencing) the Greek poet Menander, specifically from his lost comedy Thais.Some (like Barnes) say Menander was the origin; others note the sentiment appears in Aeschylus and other Greek writers, so it may have been a common proverb that Menander popularized. The disagreement is about whether Paul intended to cite a specific author or to use a well-known proverb.
Meaning of 'evil communications'All agree the Greek word homiliai means companionship, association, or converse, not merely spoken words.Older translations (KJV, ASV) used 'communications,' which some readers take to mean only speech. Modern translations prefer 'company' or 'companionships' (WEB, BSB). The debate is about which English word best captures the relational element.
Connection to the resurrection argumentThe verse is part of Paul's argument against those who deny the resurrection; it warns that associating with such people corrupts morals.Some see the warning as a general moral principle applied to this context; others see it as specifically targeting libertine believers who used the denial of the resurrection as an excuse for sinful living. Both sides agree the warning is tied to the doctrine of the resurrection.

Historical & Cultural Context

Paul writes to a church in Corinth, a wealthy port city notorious for its moral license. In the Greco-Roman world, elite philosophers often dismissed the bodily resurrection as nonsense, the body was seen as a prison for the soul. Some Corinthian believers, influenced by such views, may have argued that since there is no future for the body, physical indulgence is harmless. Paul has already quoted the Epicurean slogan “let’s eat and drink, for tomorrow we die” (v. 32) to expose the logical outcome of denying the resurrection.

The proverb Paul cites in verse 33 was widely known. Menander (c. 342, 291 BC) was Athens’ most celebrated comic playwright; his line from the lost comedy Thais had passed into common speech. By quoting a pagan source, Paul does not endorse Menander’s worldview but uses a maxim his readers already respected (Calvin, Gill). The phrase “evil communications” in older translations (KJV, ASV) obscures the fact that ὁμιλίαι means companionships, the company itself, not just the talk. The rabbis had a similar proverb about dry logs burning a green one (Clarke). Paul thus reinforces a truth accessible by natural wisdom: people become like those with whom they closely associate.

The verse stands as a hinge between doctrinal argument and moral exhortation. Having argued that the resurrection is certain, Paul now applies it: you cannot live as if the body doesn’t matter while associating with those who treat it as disposable. The danger is not casual contact but sustained, intimate fellowship with those whose beliefs and practices undermine the faith.

Textual Notes

Consulted sources note no significant textual variants for 1 Corinthians 15:33. The verse appears uniformly in the manuscript tradition. The only minor variation is the presence or absence of adding “Be not deceived” as a separate sentence; the earliest witnesses (P46, Sinaiticus, Vaticanus) all support the reading as it stands.

Reception History

This verse has been widely used in Christian moral teaching as a warning against keeping company with the ungodly. Early church fathers such as John Chrysostom cited it in homilies on friendship and moral influence. During the Reformation, Calvin used it to argue against unnecessary familiarity with false teachers (referencing Basil’s Oration to the Young). In Protestant and Catholic catechesis, the verse has often been applied to marriage between believers and unbelievers (drawing on 2 Corinthians 6:14). The phrase “evil communications corrupt good manners” became a popular English proverb in its own right, appearing in literature from Shakespeare to modern sermons. In contemporary use, the verse is frequently cited in discussions about peer pressure among youth and the importance of choosing friends wisely.

Preaching This Verse

Three-point outline

  1. The deception: Paul begins with a command, “Don’t be deceived.” The present tense (μὴ πλανᾶσθε) implies an ongoing state: “stop letting yourselves be led astray.” The deception comes from those who deny the resurrection and then reason that bodily pleasure is the only good (v. 32).
  2. The danger: “Evil companionships corrupt good morals.” The word for “corrupt” (φθείρω) can mean to destroy, spoil, or rot. Bad company works like yeast: a little contact leavens the whole lump (1 Corinthians 5:6). The Greek proverb from Menander says it bluntly: close, regular association with the ungodly will corrode even a sincere faith.
  3. The wake-up call: In verse 34 Paul follows up: “Wake up righteously and don’t sin.” The warning about companionships is not a passive observation, it demands action. We are responsible for the company we keep and the beliefs we allow to influence us.

Five-point outline

  1. Context: Paul is defending the resurrection against deniers (vv. 12, 19). Denying it leads to a “let us eat and drink” mentality (v. 32).
  2. Deception: The Corinthians are in danger of being misled by smooth arguments that downplay the resurrection’s moral implications.
  3. Company: The key term ὁμιλίαι means fellowship, companionship, not just casual talk. It’s the people you walk with, spend time with, and learn from.
  4. Corruption: The present tense “corrupt” shows ongoing process: character is shaped slowly by repeated exposure. Good morals (ἤθη χρηστά) refer to habits and character that are useful and virtuous.
  5. Cure: “Awake to righteousness” (v. 34), stop numbly drifting with the culture. Paul calls for intentional, clear-headed living in the light of the resurrection.

Illustration hooks

  • The proverbial “slow boil” of a frog in water: you don’t notice the danger until it’s too late. That’s how bad company works, gradually.
  • A piece of fruit stored with a rotten one: within days, the good fruit spoils. Contact transfers decay.
  • An athlete who trains seriously but starts hanging out with teammates who mock discipline. Over weeks, the training fades. Character is caught, not taught.

Questions your congregation is asking

  • How do I know when a friendship is corrupting my faith without isolating me from unbelievers?
  • Does this verse mean Christians should avoid all non-Christians, or only those who actively promote sin and error?
  • My spouse/child/best friend is not a believer, what does “evil companionships” mean for family ties?

Leading a Discussion

This verse comes in the middle of Paul’s great resurrection chapter (1 Corinthians 15). He has argued that if there is no resurrection, then Christian faith is empty and we should just live for pleasure. But then he pivots to a sharp warning: “Don’t be deceived; evil companionships corrupt good morals.” The Corinthians were surrounded by people who denied the resurrection and lived accordingly. Paul quotes a pagan poet to drive home a truth that even the world knows: you become like the people you love. As a group, discuss how this fits into Paul’s larger argument, and what it means for our own associations.

Discussion questions

  1. Read 1 Corinthians 15:29, 34. What is the logical flow from Paul’s question about baptism for the dead (v. 29) to his warning about evil company (v. 33)?
  2. Paul quotes a line from Menander, a pagan playwright. Why do you think he uses a non-biblical source here? What does that teach us about truth found outside Scripture?
  3. The Greek word ὁμιλίαι (translated “companionships” in the WEB) means close association or fellowship. How is this different from simply “being around” non-Christians at work or school?
  4. Verse 34 says “some have no knowledge of God.” In what ways does a denial of the resurrection reflect a deeper ignorance of God’s power and character?
  5. Think of a time when a friendship or group slowly changed your attitudes or habits for the worse. What was the tipping point where you realized you needed to change?
  6. How can believers maintain strong friendships with those who hold different beliefs while still guarding their own faith and morals? Where is the line?
  7. Paul’s answer is not just to avoid bad company but to “awake to righteousness” (v. 34). What does active righteousness look like in your daily life?

What the Commentators Say

10 public-domain commentaries, condensed into plain language.

Adam Clarke's Commentary Methodist/Wesleyan 1826

Clarke warns that even a believer strong in faith can be gradually corrupted by bad company, not just through direct sin but through weakening doubt. He illustrates this with a rabbinic proverb: two dry logs will burn a green log, so evil companions will eventually corrupt good morals.

Barnes' Notes on the Bible Protestant 1832

Barnes warns that the danger comes not only from direct arguments but from the subtle, silent influence of close companionship with those who hold false views. Familiarity with error dulls alarm and corrupts both belief and conduct. Paul quotes the Greek poet Menander to show that even their own writers understood this truth.

Calvin's Commentaries Reformed 1564

Calvin warns that curiosity disguised as spiritual inquiry can corrupt true faith. He observes that Paul quotes a pagan poet's proverb precisely because familiar sayings penetrate the mind more deeply than unfamiliar doctrine, making the warning against bad company more effective for Greek readers.

Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges Anglican 1880

Paul's line comes from a play by the Greek poet Menander, showing his familiarity with classical literature. This use of a secular source mirrors similar quotations in Acts and Titus, suggesting Paul was intentionally drawing on familiar cultural touchstones to make his point.

Geneva Bible Notes Reformed 1599

Be not deceiued: euill speakings corrupt good maners.

Gill's Exposition of the Bible Baptist 1748

Gill highlights that Paul quotes the pagan poet Menander to show that the danger of corrupting company is recognized even by natural reason. Paul does this not to display his learning, but because the Corinthians valued such authors, making the warning more persuasive to them.

Jamieson-Fausset-Brown Commentary Protestant 1871

JFB identifies the saying as a quotation from the poet Menander, used by Paul to warn the Corinthians. "Evil communications" means associating with those who deny the resurrection, and "good manners" refers to being pliant in principles. Intimacy with profligate society threatened to corrupt the Corinthians' moral foundations.

Matthew Henry's Commentary Reformed/Presbyterian 1710

Henry emphasizes that Christ's resurrection is not an isolated miracle but the firstfruits of the harvest, meaning his rising guarantees and patterns the resurrection of all who belong to him. Because death came through one man, Adam, life also comes through one man, Christ, and believers will be raised in their proper order at his coming.

Vincent's Word Studies Evangelical 1887

Vincent notes that "communications" is a poor translation of the Greek word, which literally means "companionships" or "company." He identifies the statement about evil company corrupting good manners as an iambic line, either a common proverb or a direct quote from the poet Menander.

Wesley's Explanatory Notes Methodist/Wesleyan 1754

Wesley warns that corrupting discourse is not harmless talk but speech opposed to faith, hope, or love. Such conversation steadily erodes holiness, which is why Paul counters an Epicurean saying with a line from the poet Menander.

Word Study

The key original-language words in this verse. Select any word for its full lexicon entry — meaning, every occurrence in Scripture, and related words.

Cross-References

Source: Treasury of Scripture Knowledge (TSK, public domain)

Proverbs 9:6 Leave your simple ways, and live. Walk in the way of understanding.”
Proverbs 13:20 One who walks with wise men grows wise, but a companion of fools suffers harm.
Matthew 24:4 Jesus answered them, “Be careful that no one leads you astray.
Matthew 24:11 Many false prophets will arise and will lead many astray.
Matthew 24:24 For false christs and false prophets will arise, and they will show great signs and wonders, so as to lead astray, if possible, even the chosen ones.
I Corinthians 5:6 Your boasting is not good. Don’t you know that a little yeast leavens the whole lump?
I Corinthians 6:9 Or don’t you know that the unrighteous will not inherit God’s Kingdom? Don’t be deceived. Neither the sexually immoral, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor male prostitutes, nor homosexuals,
Galatians 6:7 Don’t be deceived. God is not mocked, for whatever a man sows, that he will also reap.

Interlinear and lexical data from STEPBible (CC BY 4.0). Cross-reference data from OpenBible.info (CC BY 4.0). Commentaries are public domain.

For personal reflection

Read the devotional page — prayer, application, and "for families"

← Devotional