GospelMount
Search Topics Scripture Prayer Resources Ebooks About Support the mission Saved articles
Jump to ▾

I Corinthians 11:27 · Bible study

1 Corinthians 11:27 Commentary: What Does 'Unworthily' Mean?

Greek · 11 what the commentators say

Meaning in one sentence

Discover what it means to partake unworthily and be guilty of Christ's body and blood. Pastoral clarity on self-examination and reverence at the Lord's Table.

Research Summary

  • Meaning: Partaking in an irreverent manner makes one liable for profaning Christ's body and blood.
  • Key words: anaxiōs (adverb: unworthily, i.e. in an improper manner); enochos (guilty/liable to punishment).
  • Main debate: Whether “unworthily” refers to the receiver’s character or the manner of reception; the adverb favors manner.
  • Theological theme: The Supper demands reverence and self-examination; careless participation provokes divine discipline.
  • Best use: Instructing believers to approach communion with faith, repentance, and awareness of Christ’s sacrifice.

Translation Comparison

BSB Berean Standard Bible 2020

Therefore, whoever eats the bread or drinks the cup of the Lord in an unworthy manner will be guilty of sinning against the body and blood of the Lord.

WEB World English Bible 2000

Therefore whoever eats this bread or drinks the Lord’s cup in a way unworthy of the Lord will be guilty of the body and the blood of the Lord.

KJV King James Version 1769

Wherefore whosoever shall eat this bread, and drink this cup of the Lord, unworthily, shall be guilty of the body and blood of the Lord.

ASV American Standard Version 1901

Wherefore whosoever shall eat the bread or drink the cup of the Lord in an unworthy manner, shall be guilty of the body and the blood of the Lord.

YLT Young's Literal Translation 1898

so that whoever may eat this bread or may drink the cup of the Lord unworthily, guilty he shall be of the body and blood of the Lord:

Darby Darby Bible 1890

So that whosoever shall eat the bread, or drink the cup of the Lord, unworthily, shall be guilty in respect of the body and of the blood of the Lord.

Douay-Rheims Douay-Rheims Bible 1899

Therefore, whosoever shall eat this bread, or drink the chalice of the Lord unworthily, shall be guilty of the body and of the blood of the Lord.

Translations in other languages (10 available)
ES Reina-Valera 1909 1909

De manera que, cualquiera que comiere este pan ó bebiere esta copa del Señor indignamente, será culpado del cuerpo y de la sangre del Señor.

PT Almeida Livre 1994

Portanto quem comer deste pão, ou beber deste copo do Senhor indignamente, será culpado do corpo e do sangue do Senhor.

FR Louis Segond 1910

C’ est pourquoi celui qui mangera le pain ou boira la coupe du Seigneur indignement, sera coupable envers le corps et le sang du Seigneur.

DE Luther Bibel 1912 1912

Welcher nun unwürdig von diesem Brot isset oder von dem Kelch des HERRN trinket, der ist schuldig an dem Leib und Blut des HERRN.

NL Statenvertaling 1637

Zo dan, wie onwaardiglijk dit brood eet, of den drinkbeker des Heeren drinkt, die zal schuldig zijn aan het lichaam en bloed des Heeren.

IT Riveduta 1927

Perciò, chiunque mangerà il pane o berrà del calice del Signore indegnamente, sarà colpevole verso il corpo ed il sangue del Signore.

PL Biblia Gdańska 1632

A tak, kto by jadł ten chleb, albo pił ten kielich Pański niegodnie, będzie winien ciała i krwi Pańskiej.

RU Синодальный перевод 1876

Посему, кто будет есть хлеб сей или пить чашу Господню недостойно, виновен будет против Тела и Крови Господней.

ZH 和合本 1919

所以,無論何人,不按理 吃 主的餅, 喝 主 的杯,就是干 犯 主的身、 主 的血了。

EN Bible in Basic English 1949

If, then, anyone takes the bread or the cup of the Lord in the wrong spirit, he will be responsible for the body and blood of the Lord.

Verse in Context

25 In the same way he also took the cup after supper, saying, “This cup is the new covenant in my blood. Do this, as often as you drink, in memory of me.”
26 For as often as you eat this bread and drink this cup, you proclaim the Lord’s death until he comes.
27 Therefore whoever eats this bread or drinks the Lord’s cup in a way unworthy of the Lord will be guilty of the body and the blood of the Lord.
28 But let a man examine himself, and so let him eat of the bread and drink of the cup.
29 For he who eats and drinks in an unworthy way eats and drinks judgment to himself if he doesn’t discern the Lord’s body.

Original Language (Koine Greek)

Ὥστε Hōste CONJ G5620 Therefore
ὃς hos R-NSM G3739 who[ever]
ἂν an PRT G0302 maybe
ἐσθίῃ esthiē V-PAS-3S G2068 may eat
τὸν ton T-ASM G3588 <the>
ἄρτον arton N-ASM G0740 bread
τοῦτον touton D-ASM G3778 this
ἢ ē CONJ G2228 or
πίνῃ pinē V-PAS-3S G4095 may drink
τὸ to T-ASN G3588 the
ποτήριον potērion N-ASN G4221 cup
τοῦ tou T-GSM G3588 of the
κυρίου kuriou N-GSM-T G2962 Lord
ἀναξίως anaxiōs ADV G0371 unworthily
τοῦ tou T-GSM G3588 of the -
κυρίου, kuriou N-GSM-T G2962 Lord
ἔνοχος enochos A-NSM G1777 guilty
ἔσται estai V-FDI-3S G1510 will be
τοῦ tou T-GSN G3588 of the
σώματος sōmatos N-GSN G4983 body
καὶ kai CONJ G2532 and
τοῦ tou T-GSN G3588 of the
αἵματος aimatos N-GSN G0129 blood
τοῦ tou T-GSM G3588 of the
κυρίου. kuriou N-GSM-T G2962 Lord.

Source: STEPBible TAGNT/TEHB (CC-BY 4.0). Click or tap a morphology code to see the full parsing.

Scholars' Consensus

Commentators across traditions agree that Paul draws a conclusion from the institution narrative (vv. 23, 26): the Supper is a solemn proclamation of Christ's death, so irreverent participation carries serious consequences. The key term “unworthily” (anaxiōs) is an adverb, not an adjective. Barnes, JFB, and Poole all stress that it describes the manner of partaking, not the personal worthiness of the communicant. Any person, however unworthy in themselves, can receive in a worthy manner if they come with faith and repentance.

The phrase “guilty of the body and blood of the Lord” (enochos… sōmatos kai haimatos) means liable to punishment for profaning the sacred emblems. Vincent notes the forensic sense of enochos as “held in a bond to punishment.” Calvin and Wesley understand the threatened judgment as temporal chastening (weakness, sickness, death in v. 30) rather than eternal damnation. Clarke adds another nuance: treating the bread and cup with contempt aligns the offender with those who crucified Christ. The shared core is that communion is not to be taken lightly; it demands discernment of the Lord’s body.

How settled is the interpretation?

Interpretive difficulty: Medium

Main views:

  1. Manner vs. person view: The adverb <em>anaxiōs</em> modifies the action, not the actor (Barnes, JFB, Poole). The context of Corinthian abuses supports this.
  2. Guilt as sharing in crucifixion: Clarke and Theophylact compare Hebrews 6:6 – the irreverent communicant is aligned with those who put Christ to death.
  3. Judgment as temporal vs. eternal: Calvin, Wesley, and Poole point to verses 30–32 where judgment (κρίμα) results in weakness, sickness, and death, but is distinguished from final condemnation with the world.

What is clear: Paul calls for self-examination before communion and warns that an irreverent attitude toward the Supper invites divine discipline, but he does not call the faithful to stay away.

What Scholars Agree and Debate

TopicAgreedDebated
Meaning of 'unworthily'The adverb <em>anaxiōs</em> points to the manner of receiving, not the personal worthiness of the communicant.Some traditions (e.g., Gill) emphasize that unregenerate persons are inherently unworthy, while others (Barnes, JFB, Poole) stress that any believer can receive worthily if they examine themselves.
Meaning of 'guilty of the body and blood'It indicates being liable for mishandling the sacred emblems that represent Christ's sacrifice.Clarke and Theophylact see it as sharing the guilt of crucifying Christ; Vincent and Thayer see it as subject to punishment. Both views appear in the supplied sources.
Nature of the threatened judgmentPaul links unworthy participation to judgment (v. 29) and notes that some Corinthians have already suffered physical consequences.Calvin, Wesley, and Poole interpret this as temporal chastening (weakness, sickness, death) to prevent final condemnation. Others in later traditions have read it as risking eternal loss, though the supplied sources from the Reformation and post-Reformation almost all favor temporal judgment.
Textual variant: 'or' vs 'and' (ἢ vs καί)Both conjunctions connect eating bread and drinking the cup in the act of communion.The older manuscripts read 'or' (ἢ), which Cambridge and JFB adopt. The KJV follows a later tradition reading 'and' (καί). Roman Catholic apologists used 'or' to argue that receiving the cup is not obligatory for the laity; Protestants note that Paul's point is about disorder in either element, not about withholding the cup.

Historical & Cultural Context

The Corinthians had turned the Lord’s Supper into a disorderly feast. Lange explains that the early church often celebrated the Supper in private homes, connected to a common meal called an Agape (love-feast). Wealthy believers brought abundant food and drink, while the poor had little. Paul describes one person going hungry and another getting drunk (v. 21). The Supper became a place of division rather than unity. This is the immediate background for “unworthily”: dividing the church, ignoring the poor, treating the sacred meal as an ordinary banquet.

Paul’s solution is to recenter the Supper on its institution. He quotes Christ’s words over the bread and cup, making explicit that the bread represents the body broken for them and the cup is the new covenant in his blood. To eat and drink without honoring that meaning is to fail to “discern the Lord’s body” (v. 29). The language echoes Old Testament warnings about holy things. Numbers 9:13 requires purification before Passover; Leviticus 10:1, 3 shows Nadab and Abihu struck down for offering “strange fire.” The Corinthians were treating the Lord’s table as common. Paul insists that the Supper is a proclamation of the Lord’s death until he comes (v. 26), and any participation that denies that proclamation is unworthy.

The phrase “guilty of the body and blood” carries judicial weight. In Roman law, enochos described someone subject to a penalty. The Corinthians were already experiencing judgment in the form of sickness and death (v. 30). Paul wants them to see that the Supper itself is not the cause of judgment; their irreverent attitude is. Self-examination (v. 28) is the remedy. By discerning the body and blood, recognizing Christ’s sacrificial presence, they could partake without guilt. This historical context shows that Paul’s warning was not a general barrier to all believers but a correction of specific abuses.

Textual Notes

The most significant textual variant in verse 27 is the conjunction between “eat this bread” and “drink the Lord’s cup.” The majority of early manuscripts (including p⁴⁶, Sinaiticus, Vaticanus) read ἢ (“or”), while a later Byzantine tradition reads καί (“and”). The WEB, ASV, BSB, and YLT follow “or”; the KJV follows “and.” The variant does not change the basic meaning, Paul is condemning irreverence in either element, but it did become entangled in disputes over communion in one kind (the Roman Catholic practice of withholding the cup from the laity). Commentators such as JFB and Cambridge argue that the apostle’s point is that unworthy conduct with respect to either element makes one guilty of the body and blood (the phrase uses “and” at the end of the verse). No other significant variants are noted in the supplied sources.

Reception History

From as early as the patristic period, this verse was used to enforce the discipline of the sanctuary. The Didache and later canon law required that the unbaptized and those under public penance depart before the Eucharist. In the medieval West, the verse was cited to support the practice of withholding the cup from the laity (the “one kind” controversy), as well as to insist on purity before communion. The Reformation brought a major shift: Luther, Calvin, and the Anglican reformers emphasized that the manner of receiving, not personal worthiness, was in view. The Westminster Larger Catechism (Q. 172, 177) used the passage to encourage frequent communion after self-examination. In the 19th century, Barnes and others fought against the “unworthiness” scruple that kept devout but timid Christians away from the Table. Today, 1 Corinthians 11:27 remains a key text in teaching that communion is a serious act requiring reverence and faith, not a test of moral perfection. It has also been a comfort: Paul does not command abstention but self-examination, followed by eating and drinking.

Preaching This Verse

Three-point outline

  1. The danger of careless communion. “Unworthily” is an adverb describing how you take the Supper: with irreverence, distraction, or disregard for its meaning. The Corinthians treated it as a common meal; we can treat it as a rushed ritual.
  2. The seriousness of profaning Christ’s body and blood. To be “guilty of the body and blood” means you have mishandled what belongs to Christ. You align yourself with those who dishonor his sacrifice. This is not a light thing.
  3. The remedy: self-examination and discernment. Paul does not say “stay away.” He says examine yourself (v. 28). Come with faith, repentance, and awareness of what the bread and cup represent. That is worthy participation.

Five-point outline

  1. Paul’s therefore: the Supper is a proclamation of Christ’s death (vv. 23, 26).
  2. Unworthy manner defined: “not discerning the Lord’s body” (v. 29).
  3. The guilt: liable to punishment for profaning holy things.
  4. The judgment: temporal chastening, not final condemnation (v. 32).
  5. The call: examine yourself, then eat and drink with reverence.

Illustration hooks

  • A wedding toast: Imagine someone at a wedding reception scrolling through their phone during the toast, then casually drinking the champagne. The act itself is fine; the attitude dishonors the moment. That is “unworthily.”
  • A gift of fine china: If a friend gives you an heirloom dinner set, but you use it for messy takeout without gratitude or care, you have treated the gift with contempt. The Supper is a gift of Christ’s presence; handle it with honor.
  • Checking the weather during a funeral: A funeral is a time to honor the deceased. Checking the forecast and complaining about parking would be out of place. The Supper is a time to “proclaim the Lord’s death until he comes.” Distracted participation misses the point.

Questions your congregation is asking

  • “I always feel unworthy to take communion. Am I supposed to stay away until I’m better?”
  • “What if I take communion and then remember a sin I didn’t confess? Am I now guilty?”
  • “Is the sickness and death in verse 30 still happening today? Should we expect physical consequences for taking communion carelessly?”

Leading a Discussion

Paul’s warning in 1 Corinthians 11:27 has caused both healthy reverence and unnecessary fear. This passage is not meant to keep believers from the Table but to help them approach it with the right heart. In your group, work through these questions to understand what “unworthily” means and how it applies to your own practice.

Discussion questions

  1. Read verses 23, 26. According to Paul, what is the purpose of the Lord’s Supper? How does that purpose determine the right way to participate?
  2. What does the adverb “unworthily” tell us about the nature of the problem? (See Barnes and JFB on the word being an adverb, not an adjective.)
  3. Look at verse 29. How does “not discerning the Lord’s body” define what “unworthily” means? What does it mean to discern the body?
  4. The phrase “guilty of the body and blood” can be understood in two ways: (a) liable to punishment for profaning the elements, or (b) sharing in the guilt of crucifying Christ afresh. Which reading do you find more compelling from the text? Why?
  5. Verses 30, 32 talk about weakness, sickness, and death as judgment. How does that fit with what Paul says about being “chastened by the Lord” so we are not condemned with the world? Does this change how you think about suffering in your church?
  6. Paul says to “examine yourself” before eating and drinking. What does that examination look like practically? How can it be a healthy practice rather than a source of anxiety?
  7. How does this passage help you approach communion with greater gratitude and reverence? What is one thing you will do differently the next time your church celebrates the Lord’s Supper?

What the Commentators Say

11 public-domain commentaries, condensed into plain language.

Adam Clarke's Commentary Methodist/Wesleyan 1826

Clarke argues that eating and drinking unworthily means receiving the Lord's Supper as a mere historical commemoration, not as a sacrificial offering for sin. The Corinthians treated it like the Passover, missing that Christ's body and blood were truly given for salvation. Those who deny or ignore this sacrifice make themselves guilty of Christ's death alongside His crucifiers.

Barnes' Notes on the Bible Protestant 1832

Barnes insists that "unworthily" is an adverb, not an adjective, so it describes the manner of partaking, not the participant's personal fitness. He also argues that being "guilty of the body and blood" means treating the symbols with such contempt as to share the guilt of Christ's murderers.

Calvin's Commentaries Reformed 1564

Calvin argues that Paul moves from the specific Corinthian abuse to a general statement: any profaning of the Supper brings God's punishment. He distinguishes degrees of unworthiness, from open contempt to simple irreverence, each receiving proportionate judgment. Even lesser carelessness, he warns, is a punishable fault.

Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges Anglican 1880

The commentary notes that some Protestant translators softened the word "or" in this verse, fearing it would support withholding the cup from laypeople. Calvin rendered it boldly, and Estius clarifies that receiving unworthily means not merely distraction but an irreverent spirit lacking faith, making one liable for profaning Christ's body and blood.

Geneva Bible Notes Reformed 1599

The Geneva note stresses that receiving the Lord's Supper unworthily makes someone guilty of Christ's body and blood itself, not merely of a ritual misstep. Such a person is treated as sharing responsibility for the Lord's death.

Gill's Exposition of the Bible Baptist 1748

Gill clarifies that being guilty of the body and blood of the Lord does not mean sharing in the actual crucifixion like Judas or the Jews. Instead, unworthy reception dishonours the ordinance that represents Christ's body and blood, and that dishonour reflects onto Christ himself. No one is naturally worthy, but Christ makes some worthy through grace.

Jamieson-Fausset-Brown Commentary Protestant 1871

JFB notes that the original Greek may read "eat and drink" or "eat or drink," but argues the meaning is the same: unworthy conduct in either element makes one guilty of Christ's body and blood together. Partaking of only one element disobeys Christ's command to receive both, so any improper use of either violates true communion.

Lange's Commentary Reformed 1857

Lange grounds the Corinthian abuse in their turning the communal love-feast into private suppers, each eating his own without sharing. This made it impossible to truly celebrate the Lord's Supper, which is a proclamation

Matthew Henry's Commentary Reformed/Presbyterian 1710

Matthew Henry highlights that Paul did not learn the Lord's Supper from the other apostles but received it directly from Christ by revelation. He then passed it on exactly as he received it, adding nothing and leaving nothing out.

Vincent's Word Studies Evangelical 1887

Vincent defines "unworthily" as a failure to discern the Lord's body in the Supper. He notes that "guilty" carries a legal sense, drawing on how the same Greek word appears in other New Testament passages about sin and judgment.

Wesley's Explanatory Notes Methodist/Wesleyan 1754

Wesley defines "unworthily" as the manner of receiving, not the person's state — an irreverent attitude that ignores Christ and the purpose He appointed. Such a person is guilty of profaning the sacred representation of the Lord's body and blood.

Word Study

The key original-language words in this verse. Select any word for its full lexicon entry — meaning, every occurrence in Scripture, and related words.

Cross-References

Source: Treasury of Scripture Knowledge (TSK, public domain)

Leviticus 10:1 Nadab and Abihu, the sons of Aaron, each took his censer, and put fire in it, and laid incense on it, and offered strange fire before Yahweh, which he had not commanded them.
Leviticus 10:3 Then Moses said to Aaron, “This is what Yahweh spoke of, saying, ‘I will show myself holy to those who come near me, and before all the people I will be glorified.’” Aaron held his peace.
Numbers 9:10 “Say to the children of Israel, ‘If any man of you or of your generations is unclean by reason of a dead body, or is on a journey far away, he shall still keep the Passover to Yahweh.
Numbers 9:13 But the man who is clean, and is not on a journey, and fails to keep the Passover, that soul shall be cut off from his people. Because he didn’t offer the offering of Yahweh in its appointed season, that man shall bear his sin.
II Chronicles 30:18 For a multitude of the people, even many of Ephraim, Manasseh, Issachar, and Zebulun, had not cleansed themselves, yet they ate the Passover other than the way it is written. For Hezekiah had prayed for them, saying, “May the good Yahweh pardon everyone
II Chronicles 30:20 Yahweh listened to Hezekiah, and healed the people.
Matthew 22:11 “But when the king came in to see the guests, he saw there a man who didn’t have on wedding clothing,
John 6:51 I am the living bread which came down out of heaven. If anyone eats of this bread, he will live forever. Yes, the bread which I will give for the life of the world is my flesh.”

Interlinear and lexical data from STEPBible (CC BY 4.0). Cross-reference data from OpenBible.info (CC BY 4.0). Commentaries are public domain.

For personal reflection

Read the devotional page — prayer, application, and "for families"

← Devotional