Romans 6:15 · Bible study
Romans 6:15 Commentary: Grace Frees from Sin, Not for Sin
Greek · 9 what the commentators say
Meaning in one sentence
Why Paul strongly rejects the idea that living under grace permits sin. The meaning of 'not under law but under grace' and its call to holy living.
Research Summary
- Meaning: Paul forcefully rejects the idea that grace gives believers license to sin.
- Key words: hamartēsōmen (shall we sin, aorist subjunctive, implying a contemplated action); mē genoito (may it never be, optative of emphatic denial).
- Main debate: Whether “not under law” means freedom from all moral obligation or freedom from the law’s condemning power.
- Theological theme: Grace does not abolish righteousness; it enables it.
- Best use: A clarifying text for teaching on sanctification, the purpose of grace, and the Christian’s relationship to the law.
Translation Comparison
BSB Berean Standard Bible 2020
What then? Shall we sin because we are not under law, but under grace? Certainly not!
WEB World English Bible 2000
What then? Shall we sin because we are not under law but under grace? May it never be!
KJV King James Version 1769
What then? shall we sin, because we are not under the law, but under grace? God forbid.
ASV American Standard Version 1901
What then? shall we sin, because we are not under law, but under grace? God forbid.
YLT Young's Literal Translation 1898
What then? shall we sin because we are not under law but under grace? let it not be!
Darby Darby Bible 1890
What then? should we sin because we are not under law but under grace? Far be the thought.
Douay-Rheims Douay-Rheims Bible 1899
What then? Shall we sin, because we are not under the law, but under grace? God forbid!
Translations in other languages (10 available)
¿ Pues qué? ¿ Pecaremos, porque no estamos bajo de la ley, sino bajo de la gracia? En ninguna manera.
Então, quê? Pecaremos, já que não estamos sob a Lei, mas sob a graça? De maneira nenhuma!
Quoi donc! Pécherions-nous, parce que nous sommes, non sous la loi, mais sous la grâce? Loin de là!
Wie nun? Sollen wir sündigen, dieweil wir nicht unter dem Gesetz, sondern unter der Gnade sind? Das sei ferne!
Wat dan? Zullen wij zondigen, omdat wij niet zijn onder de wet, maar onder de genade? Dat zij verre.
Che dunque? Peccheremo noi perché non siamo sotto la legge ma sotto la grazia? Così non sia.
Cóż tedy? Będziemyż grzeszyli, żeśmy nie pod zakonem, ale pod łaską? Nie daj tego Boże!
Что же? станем ли грешить, потому что мы не под законом, а под благодатью? Никак.
這卻 怎麼樣呢? 我們在恩典 之下,不 在律法 之下,就可以犯罪嗎?斷乎不可!
What then? are we to go on in sin because we are not under law but under grace? Let it not be so.
Verse in Context
Original Language (Koine Greek)
New Testament · Koine Greek · Romans 6:15
Source: STEPBible TAGNT/TEHB (CC-BY 4.0). Click or tap a morphology code to see the full parsing.
Scholars' Consensus
Commentators across traditions agree that Romans 6:15 answers a dangerous misunderstanding. Paul has just declared believers are “not under law, but under grace” (v. 14). An objector might conclude that if the law no longer condemns, then sin carries no real consequence, so why not sin freely? Barnes calls this a consequence “drawn by many professing Christians” and one Paul must guard against. Calvin notes that the flesh always objects to the mysteries of God, thinking grace removes moral restraint. Gill says the objector mistakenly thinks freedom from the law’s curse means freedom from all obligation to obey. The phrase “God forbid” (or “May it never be”, Greek mē genoito) is Paul’s strongest denial, also used in Romans 6:2. All the sources agree: being under grace does not make sin permissible; rather, grace breaks sin’s power and enables a new kind of obedience.
How settled is the interpretation?
Interpretive difficulty: Low
What is clear: Paul categorically rejects the idea that being under grace gives permission to sin; this is the shared, certain core of the text, affirmed across all Christian traditions.
What Scholars Agree and Debate
| Topic | Agreed | Debated |
|---|---|---|
| Meaning of 'not under law' | All traditions agree that Christians are no longer under the law as a system of condemnation or as a means of salvation. | Some (Reformed, Lutheran) stress release from the law's curse; others (Wesleyan, Anabaptist) stress that the moral law remains a guide for holy living, though not as a covenant of works. |
| Does grace encourage sin? | All Christian traditions reject the idea that grace gives license to sin. | The debate is pastoral: how strongly to warn against presumption versus how strongly to emphasize freedom. Some traditions emphasize the danger of antinomianism, others emphasize the believer's security. |
| The role of the law in Christian life | Christians agree that the law's ceremonial aspects are fulfilled in Christ and its moral core reflects God's character. | Catholic and Orthodox teach that grace empowers fulfillment of the law; some Protestant traditions (e.g., Lutheran) distinguish between the law's use in civil life, for revealing sin, and as a guide for believers. |
| Ongoing obligation to obey | All affirm that Christians are called to grow in holiness. | Whether this growth is a necessary evidence of salvation or a post-justification work that can be resisted without losing salvation differs across traditions. |
Historical & Cultural Context
Paul wrote Romans to a mixed church of Jewish and Gentile believers in Rome. The phrase “under law” (Greek hupo nomon) carried deep resonance for Jewish Christians. For them, the Mosaic law was God’s gift, defining covenant identity and moral boundaries. To say they were no longer “under law” sounded like abandoning the very commands that separated Israel from pagan immorality. Paul had to show that freedom from the law’s condemnation did not mean freedom from righteousness.
Gentile believers, meanwhile, came from a Greco-Roman world where patrons offered charis (grace or favor) to clients, but such favor always came with expectations of loyalty and service. Paul’s argument uses the image of slavery (vv. 16, 23) to make the point concrete: everyone serves a master. The question is which master.
Paul employs diatribe, a common rhetorical style, where he raises an opponent’s objection and then demolishes it. The objection in v. 15 echoes the one in v. 1: “Shall we continue in sin, that grace may abound?” In both cases Paul answers with the same horrified refusal (mē genoito). The surrounding context, verses 17, 18 about becoming “obedient from the heart” and “free from sin”, shows that Paul sees grace as the engine of transformation, not permission to remain unchanged.
Textual Notes
The consulted sources note no significant textual variants for Romans 6:15. The Greek text is stable across the major manuscripts (𝔓46, Sinaiticus, Vaticanus, Alexandrinus). The only minor variation is the presence or absence of the article before “law” (νόμον without article in most critical editions; some late manuscripts insert the article), but the meaning is unaffected.
Reception History
Romans 6:15 has been a key text in debates about law and grace throughout church history. In the early church, Augustine used it against Pelagius, arguing that grace does not remove the need for obedience but supplies the power for it. During the Reformation, Luther and Calvin cited the verse to defend justification by faith against charges of antinomianism. In the 18th century, John Wesley found in this passage support for his teaching on Christian perfection, that freedom from sin’s dominion is both present reality and ongoing call. The verse has also appeared in hymns of sanctification, including Charles Wesley’s “O for a Heart to Praise My God.” Its consistent message across traditions: grace is not a cover for sin but the foundation for a transformed life.
Preaching This Verse
Three-point outline
- The wrong question: “Shall we sin because we are not under law but under grace?” This question assumes that law is the only restraint on sin. But Paul has already argued that sin’s dominion is broken not by law but by union with Christ (v. 14).
- The strong refusal: “May it never be!” Paul treats the suggestion as absurd. Grace does not produce lawlessness; it produces gratitude, and gratitude changes how we live.
- The better logic: Verses 16, 19 show that everyone is a servant. Being freed from sin’s ownership does not mean no master, it means a new Master. Grace brings us into the service of righteousness.
Five-point outline
- Paul restates the objection from v. 1 in fresh words (v. 15a).
- He answers with the same shock: “God forbid” (v. 15b).
- He appeals to common sense: you become the slave of whoever you obey (v. 16).
- He reminds them of their past: you were slaves of sin, but now you have become “obedient from the heart” (vv. 17, 18).
- He calls them to present their members as servants of righteousness (v. 19).
Illustration hooks
- A person who receives a life-saving organ transplant does not then abuse their body. The gift changes how they treat themselves.
- A debt forgiven in full does not make the debtor go back to reckless spending. Gratitude should produce wiser choices.
- Children who know they are loved unconditionally are not free to run into traffic. True love sets boundaries for our good.
Questions your congregation is asking
- If I am saved by grace, why does obedience still matter?
- Doesn’t focusing on grace make people careless about sin?
- How do I know if I am truly living under grace or just taking it for granted?
Leading a Discussion
This verse cuts to the heart of a common worry: Does grace make holiness optional? Paul’s answer is a firm “No.” But his reason is not fear, it is freedom. Grace does not leave us in our old life; it moves us into a new one. Before you discuss, ask someone to read Romans 6:15, 19 aloud. Then work through these questions together.
Discussion questions
- Why might someone think that being “not under law” means being free to sin? Have you ever heard that argument used?
- What does Paul’s strong reaction (“May it never be!”) tell you about how serious this misunderstanding is?
- Look at verse 16. What does it mean that “you are the servants of whomever you obey”? How does that apply to small, daily choices?
- In verse 17, Paul thanks God that believers “became obedient from the heart.” What is the difference between obeying from the heart and obeying out of fear?
- How does the contrast between “slaves of sin” and “servants of righteousness” help us understand what grace actually does?
- Why do you think Paul speaks “in human terms because of the weakness of your flesh” (v. 19)? What does that admit about our struggle?
- How can this passage help someone who worries they are using grace as an excuse for sin?
Word Study
The key original-language words in this verse. Select any word for its full lexicon entry — meaning, every occurrence in Scripture, and related words.
Cross-References
Source: Treasury of Scripture Knowledge (TSK, public domain)
| Romans 3:9 | What then? Are we better than they? No, in no way. For we previously warned both Jews and Greeks that they are all under sin. |
| Romans 6:1 | What shall we say then? Shall we continue in sin, that grace may abound? |
| Romans 6:2 | May it never be! We who died to sin, how could we live in it any longer? |
| I Corinthians 9:20 | To the Jews I became as a Jew, that I might gain Jews; to those who are under the law, as under the law, that I might gain those who are under the law; |
| I Corinthians 9:21 | to those who are without law, as without law (not being without law toward God, but under law toward Christ), that I might win those who are without law. |
| II Corinthians 7:1 | Having therefore these promises, beloved, let’s cleanse ourselves from all defilement of flesh and spirit, perfecting holiness in the fear of God. |
| Galatians 2:17 | But if while we sought to be justified in Christ, we ourselves also were found sinners, is Christ a servant of sin? Certainly not! |
| Galatians 2:18 | For if I build up again those things which I destroyed, I prove myself a law-breaker. |
Interlinear and lexical data from STEPBible (CC BY 4.0). Cross-reference data from OpenBible.info (CC BY 4.0). Commentaries are public domain.
For personal reflection
Read the devotional page — prayer, application, and "for families"
What the Commentators Say
6 public-domain commentaries, condensed into plain language.
Adam Clarke's Commentary Methodist/Wesleyan 1826
Clarke insists that the Gospel's full provision for pardon is no reason to sin. Being under grace, not law, means our cleansing from sin is freely available, but that makes sinning even more unthinkable, not less. Grace does not give license.
Barnes' Notes on the Bible Protestant 1832
Barnes notes that some professing Christians genuinely draw the conclusion that being under grace rather than law frees them to sin, since grace pardons sin anyway. He sees Paul's strong rebuttal as necessary precisely because this reasoning is not hypothetical—it actually occurs and must be guarded against.
Calvin's Commentaries Reformed 1564
Calvin clarifies that when Paul speaks of the law being abrogated, it is not the moral precepts that are removed, but only the curse to which all people without grace are subject. The law's righteous standard remains, as Christ confirms and does not abolish it.
Geneva Bible Notes Reformed 1599
What then? shall we sinne, because we are not vnder the Law, but vnder grace? God forbid.
Gill's Exposition of the Bible Baptist 1748
Gill argues that the phrase "under the law" does not mean freedom from all moral obligation. Believers remain bound to obey the law as a rule of conduct from Christ, though not under its curse, and grace itself powerfully motivates holiness rather than sin.
Jamieson-Fausset-Brown Commentary Protestant 1871
JFB treats Paul's rhetorical question as an appeal to basic common sense rather than deep revelation. The apostle expects believers to see the obvious truth without further explanation. For JFB, this is a dictate of rational understanding that any honest person can grasp.