Psalms 78:51 · Bible study
Psalms 78:51 Commentary: The Chief of Their Strength
Hebrew · 10 what the commentators say
Meaning in one sentence
Why does Psalm 78:51 call firstborns 'the chief of their strength' and Egypt 'the tents of Ham'? A study of the tenth plague.
Research Summary
- Meaning: God’s final plague struck Egypt’s firstborn, their greatest source of pride and hope for the future.
- Key words: rēšît (beginning, best) and ōnîm (vigour, generative power) form a Hebrew idiom for firstborn; ʾohălê-ḥām (tents of Ham) identifies Egypt by its cursed lineage.
- Main debate: None significant; agreement is nearly universal that the verse refers to the Exodus plague and uses genealogical language to underscore judgment.
- Theological theme: God’s sovereignty in judgment and deliverance; the breaking of human strength so that His redemption can shine.
- Best use: Teaching the severity of sin, the certainty of God’s justice, and the hope of rescue through the Passover lamb and Christ.
Translation Comparison
BSB Berean Standard Bible 2020
He struck all the firstborn of Egypt, the virility in the tents of Ham.
WEB World English Bible 2000
and struck all the firstborn in Egypt, the chief of their strength in the tents of Ham.
KJV King James Version 1769
And smote all the firstborn in Egypt; the chief of their strength in the tabernacles of Ham:
ASV American Standard Version 1901
And smote all the first-born in Egypt, The chief of their strength in the tents of Ham.
YLT Young's Literal Translation 1898
And He smiteth every first-born in Egypt, The first-fruit of the strong in tents of Ham.
Darby Darby Bible 1890
And he smote all the firstborn in Egypt, the first-fruits of their vigour in the tents of Ham.
Translations in other languages (9 available)
E hirió á todo primogénito en Egipto, las primicias de las fuerzas en las tiendas de Châm.
E feriu mortalmente a todo primogênito no Egito; as primícias nas forças nas tendas de Cam.
Il frappa tous les premiers-nés en Égypte,
da er alle Erstgeburt in Ägypten schlug, die Erstlinge ihrer Kraft in den Hütten Hams,
En Hij sloeg al het eerstgeborene in Egypte, het beginsel der krachten in de tenten van Cham.
Percosse tutti i primogeniti d’Egitto, le primizie del vigore nelle tende di Cham;
I pobił wszystko pierworodztwo w Egipcie, pierwiastki mocy ich w przybytkach Chamowych;
在埃及 擊殺 一切 長子,在含 的帳棚中 擊殺他們強壯 時頭生的。
He gave to destruction all the first sons of Egypt; the first-fruits of their strength in the tents of Ham;
Verse in Context
Original Language (Biblical Hebrew)
Old Testament · Biblical Hebrew · Psalms 78:51
Source: STEPBible TAGNT/TEHB (CC-BY 4.0). Click or tap a morphology code to see the full parsing.
Scholars' Consensus
Commentators across traditions agree that this verse refers to the tenth plague of Egypt, the death of the firstborn (Exodus 12:29, 30). The phrase chief of their strength is a Hebrew idiom for firstborn sons, as Barnes, Gill, and the Cambridge Bible note by cross-referencing Genesis 49:3 and Deuteronomy 21:17. The words rēšît (beginning, best) and ōnîm (vigour, generative power) together picture the firstborn as the initial fruit of a father’s strength, the heir, the pride, the one in whom the family’s future rests. Keil and Delitzsch specify rēšît ʾōnîm as “that which had sprung for the first time from manly vigour.” The tents of Ham identifies Egypt as the land of Ham’s descendants, following Genesis 10:6 where Mizraim (Egypt) is a son of Ham. The Geneva Bible, Wesley, and Matthew Henry all echo this genealogy. The verse thus presents the plague as a direct, total judgment on Egypt’s most cherished asset, breaking the nation’s strength at its root.
How settled is the interpretation?
Interpretive difficulty: Low
What is clear: The verse refers to the death of the firstborn in Egypt as the climax of the plagues, identifying Egypt as the land of Ham and the firstborn as the nation’s chief strength.
What Scholars Agree and Debate
| Topic | Agreed | Debated |
|---|---|---|
| Reference to the Exodus plague | All commentators identify this verse as the tenth plague in Egypt (Exodus 12:29, 30). | None, the connection is undisputed. |
| Meaning of 'chief of their strength' | Most understand it as a Hebrew idiom for firstborn sons, rooted in Genesis 49:3 and Deuteronomy 21:17. | A few older interpreters (e.g., some rabbinic sources) take it as referring to the 'first fruits of their vigour' in a more literal, physical sense, but the difference is minimal. |
| Identification of Egypt as 'tents of Ham' | Christians agree that this alludes to Ham as the ancestor of Egypt (Mizraim) from Genesis 10:6. | Some modern readers question whether 'Ham' carries a racial or curse connotation beyond genealogy; classical commentators see it as a reminder of Noah’s curse (Genesis 9:25) but apply it to the nation, not to any ethnic group. |
Historical & Cultural Context
Psalm 78 is a historical psalm attributed to Asaph, designed to teach the next generation about God’s mighty acts and Israel’s repeated rebellion. Verses 49, 51 compress several plagues into a poetic crescendo that peaks with the tenth. In the ancient Near East, the firstborn son carried enormous significance: he received a double inheritance, represented the family’s continuity, and in royal houses was the heir to the throne. Calling the firstborn ‘the chief of their strength’ (Hebrew rēšît ʾōnîm) draws on this cultural weight. The phrase appears first in Jacob’s blessing of Reuben (Genesis 49:3), where Reuben is called ‘the beginning of my strength.’
The designation ‘tents of Ham’ serves a double purpose. It links Egypt to the Table of Nations in Genesis 10, where Ham is the father of Mizraim (Egypt), Cush, Put, and Canaan. By this name the poet reminds his audience that Egypt belonged to a line already associated with Noah’s curse (Genesis 9:22, 25). The word ʾohălê (tents) evokes the dwelling places of a settled people, though the term is more often used for nomadic shelters; here it stresses that the plague penetrated every home, from Pharaoh’s palace to the prisoner’s cell (Exodus 12:29).
Psalm 78 was likely composed during the divided monarchy, after the northern kingdom’s fall, to explain why God had rejected Ephraim and chosen Judah and David. The plague on Egypt functions as a model of God’s power to save His people and judge their oppressors, a lesson the current generation needed to hear.
Textual Notes
The supplied sources note no significant textual variants for Psalm 78:51. The Hebrew text is stable across manuscript traditions. The only minor variation is in English translations: some render ʾohălê as “tents” (WEB, ASV, YLT, Darby), others as “tabernacles” (KJV, Geneva) or “dwellings” (implied). None of these affect meaning.
Reception History
Psalm 78:51 has been read in both Jewish and Christian liturgies as part of the Passover remembrance. Jews recall the tenth plague each Seder night, while Christians have seen in the striking of the firstborn a type of Christ, the firstborn of creation, who was struck for His people. The phrase “chief of their strength” has been cited in sermons on the fragility of human power and the sovereignty of God. Early church fathers such as Augustine connected this verse to the judgment on Pharaoh as a lesson in divine justice. In later periods, Protestant reformers like Calvin used it to illustrate the severity of God’s wrath and the necessity of faith in the Passover Lamb. The genealogy of Ham has sparked occasional debate, but the verse’s main theme has remained constant: God’s power to humble the proud and save the humble.
Preaching This Verse
Three-point outline
- God’s judgment targets what Egypt treasured most. The firstborn were the pride and future of every family. No house escaped loss. The plague shows that nothing we build or trust can withstand God’s hand.
- The phrase ‘chief of their strength’ exposes human vulnerability. The Hebrew words rēšît and ōnîm stress that even the strongest beginning can be cut short. Our strength is borrowed.
- ‘Tents of Ham’ is a theological identifier. Egypt is not just a political power; it is the nation descended from a cursed line. The naming reminds us that God’s justice operates across generations and that He remembers His covenant with Abraham (contrast verse 52).
Five-point outline
- Exodus retold: the tenth plague as the decisive blow.
- Firstborn as strength: cultural and biblical background.
- The poetry of judgment: how Psalm 78 intensifies the narrative.
- Ham’s lineage: why the poet calls Egypt by that name.
- From judgment to deliverance: verse 52 immediately contrasts with “his own people like sheep.”
Illustration hooks
- A family business founded by a father, passed to the eldest son. When that son dies, the whole enterprise collapses. The plague struck Egypt at its economic and emotional centre.
- A national leader’s untimely death can destabilise a country. The death of every firstborn in Egypt meant every household lost its future leader at once.
- Think of a tree being felled by cutting the main root. The “chief of strength” is that root; everything else withers.
Questions your congregation is asking
- Why does God sometimes strike what people love most? Is that cruel or just?
- How do we reconcile the severity of this plague with God’s love?
- What does it mean for us that Egypt is called “the tents of Ham”, does God hold nations accountable for ancient sins?
Leading a Discussion
This verse appears in a psalm that retells Israel’s history so that the next generation will not repeat the rebellion of their ancestors. The focus on the firstborn plague forces us to ask: what does God’s judgment reveal about His character, and what does deliverance teach about His grace?
Discussion questions
- Read Exodus 12:29, 30. What details does the psalm add or omit? Why do you think the poet describes the firstborn as “the chief of their strength”?
- The Hebrew word ōnîm means “vigour” or “generative power.” How does that deepen the idea of what Egypt lost?
- Look at Genesis 9:22, 25 and 10:6. Why does the psalm call Egypt “the tents of Ham”? Does this emphasise judgment, heritage, or both?
- Notice the immediate contrast in verse 52: God “led out his own people like sheep.” How does the poet use this contrast to teach about God’s purposes?
- How does this verse challenge our modern ideas about national identity and divine justice?
- If the firstborn plague points forward to Christ, the “firstborn of all creation” (Colossians 1:15), what does that connection suggest about judgment and redemption?
- In your own life, where do you place your “chief strength”, in people, plans, or in God? How does this verse invite you to trust differently?
Word Study
The key original-language words in this verse. Select any word for its full lexicon entry — meaning, every occurrence in Scripture, and related words.
Cross-References
Source: Treasury of Scripture Knowledge (TSK, public domain)
| Genesis 9:22 | Ham, the father of Canaan, saw the nakedness of his father, and told his two brothers outside. |
| Genesis 9:25 | He said, “Canaan is cursed. He will be a servant of servants to his brothers.” |
| Genesis 10:6 | The sons of Ham were: Cush, Mizraim, Put, and Canaan. |
| Genesis 49:3 | “Reuben, you are my firstborn, my might, and the beginning of my strength, excelling in dignity, and excelling in power. |
| Exodus 12:12 | For I will go through the land of Egypt in that night, and will strike all the firstborn in the land of Egypt, both man and animal. I will execute judgments against all the gods of Egypt. I am Yahweh. |
| Exodus 12:29 | At midnight, Yahweh struck all the firstborn in the land of Egypt, from the firstborn of Pharaoh who sat on his throne to the firstborn of the captive who was in the dungeon, and all the firstborn of livestock. |
| Exodus 12:30 | Pharaoh rose up in the night, he, and all his servants, and all the Egyptians; and there was a great cry in Egypt, for there was not a house where there was not one dead. |
| Exodus 13:15 | When Pharaoh stubbornly refused to let us go, Yahweh killed all the firstborn in the land of Egypt, both the firstborn of man, and the firstborn of livestock. Therefore I sacrifice to Yahweh all that opens the womb, being males; but all the firstborn of my sons I redeem.’ |
Interlinear and lexical data from STEPBible (CC BY 4.0). Cross-reference data from OpenBible.info (CC BY 4.0). Commentaries are public domain.
For personal reflection
Read the devotional page — prayer, application, and "for families"
What the Commentators Say
10 public-domain commentaries, condensed into plain language.
Barnes' Notes on the Bible Protestant 1832
Barnes draws attention to the phrase "chief of their strength," explaining that it points to the firstborn as Egypt's pride, glory, and the ones they relied on. He also notes that "the tabernacles of Ham" identifies Egypt as the dwelling place of Ham, connecting the judgment to the broader biblical geography.
Calvin's Commentaries Reformed 1564
Calvin sees this psalm as a deliberate two-sided contrast: God's tender adoption and constant care for His chosen people, and their repeated, treacherous rebellion against such a generous Father. He also highlights a distinct act of renewed grace—God's second election in choosing David to rule, showing God's goodness persisting despite human faithlessness.
Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges Anglican 1880
The commentator observes that Israel's rebellion multiplied in direct proportion to God's multiplied mercies. To expose the depth of their ingratitude, the psalmist recalls the miracles leading up to the Exodus, especially the climax in the death of Egypt's firstborn, described as the chief of their strength.
Geneva Bible Notes Reformed 1599
The Geneva Notes draw attention to the phrase "the beginning of their strength" as a description of the firstborn, meaning the chief and strongest part of Egypt. They also specify that this judgment fell "in the tabernacles of Ham," identifying Egypt as the land of Ham's descendants.
Gill's Exposition of the Bible Baptist 1748
Gill emphasizes that the plague struck every household in Egypt, from the highest prince to the lowest peasant, and even the firstborn of livestock. He also connects this judgment to the lineage of Ham, noting that the Egyptians descended from Ham's son Mizraim, so their land is called the tabernacles of Ham.
Jamieson-Fausset-Brown Commentary Protestant 1871
JFB explains that the phrase "chief of their strength" is a literal rendering of the Hebrew words for "first-fruits" or "first-born." He also notes that Ham, one of Noah's sons, gave his name through Mizraim to Egypt.
Keil & Delitzsch OT Commentary Protestant 1876
Keil and Delitzsch argue that the "angels of evil" in this verse are not wicked angels but messengers of misfortune, a grammatical construction meaning calamity-bringing angels. They see the plagues described as streams of fire, death personified as an executioner, and pestilence as a personal foe that forced Pharaoh to release Israel.
Lange's Commentary Reformed 1857
Lange reads this Psalm as a historical parable where the rejection of Ephraim and the choice of Judah reflect older tribal tensions, not the later kingdom split. He defends an early composition, likely by Asaph, arguing Ephraim represents the whole people's unfaithfulness, serving as instruction and warning for every generation.
Matthew Henry's Commentary Reformed/Presbyterian 1710
Matthew Henry emphasizes that Israel's sin in the wilderness was not ordinary forgetfulness but a deliberate limiting of the Holy One, provoked Him despite witnessing His mighty signs in Egypt. They turned back
Wesley's Explanatory Notes Methodist/Wesleyan 1754
Wesley identifies the Egyptians as the direct descendants of Ham and stresses that they inherited his curse, calling them "cursed children of a cursed parent." He draws a clear genealogical and moral line from Ham's ancient sin to the entire Egyptian people.