GospelMount
Search Topics Scripture Prayer Resources Ebooks About Support the mission Saved articles
Jump to ▾

Psalms 78:45 · Bible study

Psalms 78:45 Commentary: Flies and Frogs

Hebrew · 10 what the commentators say

Meaning in one sentence

What do the plagues of flies and frogs reveal about God's sovereignty over Egypt? A study of Psalm 78:45 with lexical, historical, and theological insights.

Research Summary

  • Meaning: God sent two plagues against Egypt, swarms of flies and frogs, to judge and humble the empire, demonstrating his control over creation.
  • Key words: עָרֹב (arov) = swarm of flies, probably venomous; צְפַרְדֵּעַ (tsephardea) = frog; אָכַל (akal) = devour; שָׁחַת (shachat) = ruin.
  • Main debate: Whether the flies were a specific species (dog-fly, gad-fly) or a mixed swarm of harmful insects (Barnes, Gill, Cambridge).
  • Theological theme: God’s sovereignty over all creation, even the smallest creatures, and his power to judge proud nations.
  • Best use: A reminder that God’s power extends to every corner of our world, and that he can humble the powerful through the most unexpected means.

Translation Comparison

BSB Berean Standard Bible 2020

He sent swarms of flies that devoured them, and frogs that devastated them.

WEB World English Bible 2000

He sent among them swarms of flies, which devoured them; and frogs, which destroyed them.

KJV King James Version 1769

He sent divers sorts of flies among them, which devoured them; and frogs, which destroyed them.

ASV American Standard Version 1901

He sent among them swarms of flies, which devoured them; And frogs, which destroyed them.

YLT Young's Literal Translation 1898

He sendeth among them the beetle, and it consumeth them, And the frog, and it destroyeth them,

Darby Darby Bible 1890

He sent dog-flies among them, which devoured them, and frogs, which destroyed them;

Translations in other languages (9 available)
ES Reina-Valera 1909 1909

Envió entre ellos una mistura de moscas que los comían, y ranas que los destruyeron.

PT Almeida Livre 1994

Enviou entre eles variedades de moscas, que os consumiu; e rãs, que os destruíram.

FR Louis Segond 1910

Il envoya contre eux des mouches venimeuses qui les dévorèrent,

DE Luther Bibel 1912 1912

da er Ungeziefer unter sie schickte, daß sie fraß, und Frösche, die sie verderbten,

NL Statenvertaling 1637

Hij zond een vermenging van ongedierte onder hen, dat hen verteerde, en vorsen, die hen verdierven.

IT Riveduta 1927

mandò contro loro mosche velenose che li divoravano, e rane che li distruggevano;

PL Biblia Gdańska 1632

Przepuścił na nich rozmaite muchy, aby ich kąsały, i żaby, aby ich gubiły:

ZH 和合本 1919

他叫 蒼蠅 成群落在他們當中,嘬盡他們,又叫青蛙 滅了他們,

EN Bible in Basic English 1949

He sent different sorts of flies among them, poisoning their flesh; and frogs for their destruction.

Verse in Context

43 how he set his signs in Egypt, his wonders in the field of Zoan,
44 he turned their rivers into blood, and their streams, so that they could not drink.
45 He sent among them swarms of flies, which devoured them; and frogs, which destroyed them.
46 He also gave their increase to the caterpillar, and their labor to the locust.
47 He destroyed their vines with hail, their sycamore fig trees with frost.

Original Language (Biblical Hebrew)

יְשַׁלַּ֬ח ye.sha.Lach HVpi3ms H7971 he sent
בָּ/הֶ֣ם ba./Hem HR/Sp3mp H9038 among/ them
עָ֭רֹב a.ro HNcmsa H6157 a swarm of flies
וַ/יֹּאכְלֵ֑/ם va/i.yokh.Le/m Hc/Vqw3ms/Sp3mp H0398 and/ it devoured/ them
וּ֝/צְפַרְדֵּ֗עַ u./tze.far.De.a' HC/Ncfsa H6854 and/ frog[s]
וַ/תַּשְׁחִיתֵֽ/ם\׃ va./tash.chi.Te/m Hc/Vhw3fs/Sp3mp H7843 and/ it ruined/ them

Source: STEPBible TAGNT/TEHB (CC-BY 4.0). Click or tap a morphology code to see the full parsing.

Scholars' Consensus

Commentators agree that this verse recounts two of the plagues on Egypt: the fourth plague (swarms of flies) and the second plague (frogs). As Barnes notes, the word for flies, עָרֹב (arov), appears only for this plague and likely means a venomous kind of fly, perhaps the gad-fly, troubling humans and animals. Gill adds that some rabbis understood a mixture of wild beasts, while the Septuagint renders it as “dog-fly.” The frogs are plainly from Exodus 8:2-15. The psalm does not preserve the plague order; the point is that God sent these judgments through ordinary yet devastating creatures. God used the lowliest parts of his creation to humble the most powerful empire, showing his absolute sovereignty over nature and history.

How settled is the interpretation?

Interpretive difficulty: Low

What is clear: God sent swarms of flies and frogs as plagues against Egypt, and these were direct acts of judgment that demonstrated his power over creation.

What Scholars Agree and Debate

TopicAgreedDebated
Identity of the fliesBoth sides agree that the word <em>עָרֹב</em> refers to a plague of flies, distinct from the earlier insect plagues (lice, locusts).Some argue it was a single species (the dog-fly or gad-fly), citing the Septuagint and Philo. Others think it was a mixture of noxious insects, based on the Hebrew root meaning 'to mix' (Barnes, Gill).
Order of plagues in the psalmAll agree the psalm does not follow the order in Exodus.Barnes notes the psalmist is not concerned with chronology but with poetic emphasis. A minority view sees a deliberate theological reordering to highlight the scale of judgment.
Meaning of 'devoured' and 'destroyed'Both verbs (אָכַל and שָׁחַת) indicate total consumption and ruin, not just annoyance.Some commentators understand this as literal devouring of crops and food (Gill), while others see a broader devastation including disease and stench (Wesley, Cambridge).

Historical & Cultural Context

Psalm 78 is a historical psalm, written to teach coming generations about God’s mighty works and Israel’s repeated rebellion. Verses 43-51 retell the plagues as signs and wonders God performed in “the field of Zoan” (a region of Egypt). The psalmist selects specific plagues to underline God’s power over creation: rivers turned to blood (v.44), flies and frogs (v.45), caterpillars and locusts (v.46), hail and frost (v.47-48), and finally the death of the firstborn (v.51).

In Egypt, the Nile was worshipped as a god, and frogs were associated with Heqet, a goddess of fertility and birth. Frogs were sacred creatures. When God sent frogs to cover the land, it was a direct assault on a revered symbol. The fly plague struck suddenly and everywhere, infesting homes and the ground itself (Exodus 8:21-24). The Egyptians practiced elaborate purification rituals, but these insects penetrated every space, humiliating priests and people alike. Not a single magical attempt could stop them.

The psalmist’s goal is not just to list events but to demonstrate that Israel’s God controls all elements, water, land, insects, and livestock. The order of plagues in the psalm is not chronological (Barnes points out that the second plague, frogs, is mentioned after the fourth). This reordering serves the poem’s purpose of painting a vivid picture of total devastation, reminding the audience that God’s judgment is thorough and that his deliverance of Israel was no accident.

Textual Notes

The supplied sources note no significant manuscript variants for this verse. The Hebrew text is stable across the Masoretic tradition. One minor point: the KJV renders “divers sorts of flies” where other translations say “swarms of flies,” but this is a translational choice, not a textual variant.

Reception History

Throughout church history, this verse has been read as part of the great “historical psalms” (78, 105, 106) used in both Jewish and Christian liturgy to teach God’s mighty acts. Early church fathers saw the plagues as foreshadows of final judgment, with flies and frogs representing persistent evil that only God can purge (cf. Revelation 16:13). In medieval Christian iconography, the plagues were often depicted in psalters as a visual reminder of God’s power over pagan gods. More recently, liberation theologians have highlighted how God’s use of small, despised creatures resonates with the story of a poor, enslaved people being delivered by a God who works through the weak. Across traditions, the verse remains a warning against idolatry and a call to trust the God who controls nature.

Preaching This Verse

Three-point outline

  1. God sends the small to confront the strong. Flies and frogs are weak individually, but multiplied and sent by God they bring an empire to its knees. God does not need armies or earthquakes; he uses what he made to display his power.
  2. God humbles what Egypt worshipped. Frogs were sacred to Heqet, and frogs overran temples and palaces. The flies defiled every space. God proves that nothing in creation is beyond his command, and no idol can protect its worshippers.
  3. God’s judgment is precise and personal. The verbs “devoured” and “destroyed” (אָכַל and שָׁחַת) indicate total consumption and ruin. The plague was not a minor irritation; it was a dismantling of Egyptian livelihood and pride.

Five-point outline

  1. The historical context, the plagues as remembered in the psalm
  2. The specific words for flies and frogs, what they reveal about the nature of the judgment
  3. God’s sovereignty over creation, insects as instruments of divine will
  4. Human forgetfulness, why the psalmist retells these judgments
  5. Hope for God’s people, deliverance through judgment

Illustration hooks

  • Think of a time a small inconvenience, a mosquito in a bedroom, a fruit fly in a kitchen, became a major frustration. Now imagine millions, covering your food, water, and home, with no escape. That was Egypt.
  • A wealthy homeowner hires an exterminator for an ant problem; the ants keep coming. Pharaoh faced a problem that no amount of human effort could fix, the Creator himself had turned creation against him.
  • Parents recount a story from their childhood to their kids to teach a lesson. That is exactly what the psalmist does: retelling the plagues so the next generation would remember God’s power and not repeat Israel’s rebellion.

Questions your congregation is asking

  • Why does God still use suffering to get people’s attention? (Exploring judgment as warning)
  • Are the plagues “fair” to the Egyptians? (Understanding God’s justice in the Exodus)
  • If God controls everything, why does he allow evil to continue? (Connecting judgment with God’s timing)

Leading a Discussion

This verse is part of a longer song that traces Israel’s history. The singers wanted the next generation to know that God saved them, judged their enemies, and stayed faithful even when Israel was not. As you discuss, notice how the psalmist describes the plagues as God’s personal actions: “He sent.” These were not random events; they were deliberate demonstrations of who God is.

Discussion questions

  1. Read verses 43-45 aloud. What do you notice about how God is described in these plagues?
  2. The word for “flies” (עָרֹב) may mean a mixture or a swarm. Why do you think the psalmist chooses this imagery rather than naming a single insect?
  3. How would the Egyptians have felt when their sacred frogs became a curse? What does that tell you about God’s power over false religion?
  4. Verse 42 says Israel “did not remember his hand.” Why is remembering so important in Scripture? How do we help each other remember God’s works today?
  5. If God used flies and frogs to judge Egypt, what does that say about his ability to use small, ordinary things in your life to accomplish his purposes?
  6. The plagues were physical, but they also revealed spiritual realities. What spiritual “plagues” in the world today might be God’s way of calling people to turn to him?
  7. How does this verse encourage you to trust God’s sovereignty, especially when you feel powerless or overwhelmed by the world?

What the Commentators Say

9 public-domain commentaries, condensed into plain language.

Adam Clarke's Commentary Methodist/Wesleyan 1826

Clarke's comment here is a brief cross-reference rather than fresh analysis. He directs the reader to his earlier notes on the plagues of flies and frogs, where the events are already discussed at length.

Barnes' Notes on the Bible Protestant 1832

Barnes notes that the Hebrew word for this plague is simply "swarm," leaving its exact composition uncertain. He explains that ancient rabbis took it as a mixture of insects, while the Septuagint calls it a "dog-fly," and modern interpreters commonly identify it as a blood-sucking gad-fly.

Calvin's Commentaries Reformed 1564

Calvin sees this psalm as a deliberate two-sided contrast: God's tender adoption and constant care for His chosen people, and their repeated, treacherous rebellion against such a generous Father. He also highlights a distinct act of renewed grace—God's second election in choosing David to rule, showing God's goodness persisting despite human faithlessness.

Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges Anglican 1880

Cambridge Bible Schools observes that the psalmist recounts the plagues to expose Israel's ingratitude: the more God multiplied mercies, the more Israel multiplied rebellion. They also note the Hebrew word for these flies appears only in this plague account and probably refers to a specific venomous insect native to Egypt.

Geneva Bible Notes Reformed 1599

The Geneva note emphasizes that the plague of flies did not merely annoy but actually devoured the Egyptians, while the frogs brought destruction. The commentator highlights these plagues as direct, consuming judgments rather than temporary nuisances.

Gill's Exposition of the Bible Baptist 1748

Gill notes that the Hebrew word for "flies" actually means a mixture, and many Jewish interpreters take this plague to be a mixture of wild beasts, serpents, and insects. He highlights that dog-flies were particularly offensive to Egyptians because they worshipped dogs, showing God's power to use contemptible creatures against idolatry.

Keil & Delitzsch OT Commentary Protestant 1876

Keil-Delitzsch observes that God restrains His anger specifically because He takes human frailty and perishableness into account. The psalmist then selectively recounts the plagues of Egypt, omitting some similar ones, to emphasize Israel's continued ingratitude despite such overwhelming deliverance.

Matthew Henry's Commentary Reformed/Presbyterian 1710

Matthew Henry emphasizes that Israel's sin in the wilderness was not ordinary forgetfulness but a deliberate limiting of the Holy One, provoked Him despite witnessing His mighty signs in Egypt. They turned back

Wesley's Explanatory Notes Methodist/Wesleyan 1754

Wesley insists that the flies in this plague were no ordinary insects but extraordinary in their nature and capacity for harm. He applies the same reasoning to the frogs, suggesting both plagues involved supernaturally intensified creatures rather than merely natural occurrences.

Word Study

The key original-language words in this verse. Select any word for its full lexicon entry — meaning, every occurrence in Scripture, and related words.

Cross-References

Source: Treasury of Scripture Knowledge (TSK, public domain)

Exodus 8:2 If you refuse to let them go, behold, I will plague all your borders with frogs.
Exodus 8:15 But when Pharaoh saw that there was a respite, he hardened his heart, and didn’t listen to them, as Yahweh had spoken.
Exodus 8:21 Else, if you will not let my people go, behold, I will send swarms of flies on you, and on your servants, and on your people, and into your houses. The houses of the Egyptians shall be full of swarms of flies, and also the ground they are on.
Exodus 8:24 Yahweh did so; and there came grievous swarms of flies into the house of Pharaoh, and into his servants’ houses. In all the land of Egypt the land was corrupted by reason of the swarms of flies.
Psalms 105:30 Their land swarmed with frogs, even in the rooms of their kings.
Psalms 105:31 He spoke, and swarms of flies came, and lice in all their borders.
Revelation of John 16:3 The second angel poured out his bowl into the sea, and it became blood as of a dead man. Every living thing in the sea died.

Interlinear and lexical data from STEPBible (CC BY 4.0). Cross-reference data from OpenBible.info (CC BY 4.0). Commentaries are public domain.

For personal reflection

Read the devotional page — prayer, application, and "for families"

← Devotional