GospelMount
Search Topics Scripture Prayer Resources Ebooks About Support the mission Saved articles
Jump to ▾

Psalms 35:16 · Bible study

Psalms 35:16 Commentary: The Bitter Mockery of Table Buffoons

Hebrew · 11 what the commentators say

Meaning in one sentence

Study of Psalm 35:16's phrase 'profane mockers in feasts', a cultural practice of hired jesters, its contrast with gnashing teeth, and its use as a prophetic type of

Research Summary

  • Meaning: David’s enemies sink so low that they hire low-class jesters to mock him at banquets, then express murderous rage by gnashing their teeth.
  • Key words: Chaneph (profane, godless), la‛eg (mocker), ma‛og (cake, bun), together “mockers for a cake,” i.e., parasites.
  • Main debate: Whether the verse primarily describes David’s historical situation (Saulite courtiers) or functions as a direct prophecy of Christ’s mockery (Clarke and others).
  • Theological theme: Righteous suffering at the hands of those who once owed loyalty; the exposure of hidden malice behind social rituals.
  • Best use: Preaching on betrayal, comfort for those mocked for their faith, and connecting Old Testament lament to Christ’s passion.

Translation Comparison

BSB Berean Standard Bible 2020

Like godless jesters at a feast, they gnashed their teeth at me.

WEB World English Bible 2000

Like the profane mockers in feasts, they gnashed their teeth at me.

KJV King James Version 1769

With hypocritical mockers in feasts, they gnashed upon me with their teeth.

ASV American Standard Version 1901

Like the profane mockers in feasts, They gnashed upon me with their teeth.

YLT Young's Literal Translation 1898

With profane ones, mockers in feasts, Gnashing against me their teeth.

Darby Darby Bible 1890

With profane jesters for bread, they have gnashed their teeth against me.

Translations in other languages (9 available)
ES Reina-Valera 1909 1909

Con los lisonjeros escarnecedores truhanes, crujiendo sobre mí sus dientes.

PT Almeida Livre 1994

Entre os fingidos zombadores em festas, eles rangiam seus dentes por causa de mim.

FR Louis Segond 1910

Avec les impies, les parasites moqueurs,

DE Luther Bibel 1912 1912

Mit denen, die da heucheln und spotten um des Bauches willen, beißen sie ihre Zähne zusammen über mich.

NL Statenvertaling 1637

Onder de huichelende spotachtige tafelbroeders knersten zij over mij met hun tanden.

IT Riveduta 1927

Come profani buffoni da mensa, digrignano i denti contro di me.

PL Biblia Gdańska 1632

Z obłudnikami, z naśmiewcami, z pochlebcami zgrzytali na mię zębami swemi.

ZH 和合本 1919

他們如同席 上好嬉笑的 狂妄人 向我 咬 牙。

EN Bible in Basic English 1949

Like men of deceit they put me to shame; the voice of their wrath was loud against me.

Verse in Context

14 I behaved myself as though it had been my friend or my brother. I bowed down mourning, as one who mourns his mother.
15 But in my adversity, they rejoiced, and gathered themselves together. The attackers gathered themselves together against me, and I didn’t know it. They tore at me, and didn’t cease.
16 Like the profane mockers in feasts, they gnashed their teeth at me.
17 Lord, how long will you look on? Rescue my soul from their destruction, my precious life from the lions.
18 I will give you thanks in the great assembly. I will praise you among many people.

Original Language (Biblical Hebrew)

בְּ֭/חַנְפֵי Be./chan.fei HR/Aampc H2611 <in>/ godless [ones] of
לַעֲגֵ֣י la.'a.Gei HNcmpc H3934 mockers of
מָע֑וֹג ma.'og HNcmsa H4580 cake
חָרֹ֖ק cha.Rok HVqaa H2786 they gnashed
עָלַ֣/י 'a.La/i HR/Sp1bs H5921 towards/ me
שִׁנֵּֽי/מוֹ\׃ shi.Nei./mov HNcfdc/Sp3mp H8127 teeth/ their

Source: STEPBible TAGNT/TEHB (CC-BY 4.0). Click or tap a morphology code to see the full parsing.

Scholars' Consensus

Commentators agree that “profane mockers in feasts” refers to a known practice in the ancient Near East: low-class jesters or parasites hired to make sport at banquets in exchange for food. Barnes explains the Hebrew literally means “cake-jesters” or “table-buffoons”, people who mocked for the sake of a meal. Gill adds that the word ma‛og (“cake”) points to flatterers who earned their bread by ridiculing others. The verb “gnashed” (charak) describes a gesture of raw rage, as if the enemies intended to devour their victim (cf. Job 16:9; Ps. 37:12). The cruelty is amplified by the setting: what should be a scene of joy and community becomes a stage for hostility. Many commentators, including Adam Clarke and Matthew Henry, read the verse as prophetic of Christ’s mockery by Herod’s court and the Jewish leaders. The point of consensus is that David’s enemies stooped to hiring the lowest sort of people to humiliate him, and that gesture of gnashing teeth exposed their murderous intent.

How settled is the interpretation?

Interpretive difficulty: Medium

Main views:

  1. Historical David: The psalm’s header and context (1 Samuel 20–24) support a literal reading of David’s betrayal by Saul’s court and hired jesters.
  2. Prophetic typology of Christ: Adam Clarke and others note that ‘hypocritical mockers in feasts’ parallels Herod’s mockery of Jesus in Luke 23:11, and the gnashing teeth matches the hostile crowds.
  3. General righteous sufferer: Calvin and many modern commentators read the psalm as the prayer of any innocent person who faces undeserved hatred, applicable to believers today.

What is clear: The enemies hire low-class mockers to ridicule the righteous, and their gnashing teeth reveals murderous intent – a stark contrast to the fellowship a feast should represent.

What Scholars Agree and Debate

TopicAgreedDebated
Identity of the 'mockers'They are people of low character, likely hired parasites or flatterers who mock for personal gain (Barnes, Gill, Cambridge).Some traditions (e.g., Clarke, Matthew Henry) read the verse as prophetic of Christ’s mockery at Herod’s court; others (Calvin, Keil) see it as purely David’s historical complaint against Saul’s courtiers.
Meaning of 'feasts'The Hebrew word <em>ma‛og</em> literally means 'cake' or 'bun,' so the phrase denotes a meal context, likely a royal or sacrificial banquet.Some scholars (Poole, Geneva Notes) take it as a literal feast or sacrificial meal; others (Gill, Barnes) emphasize the 'cake' as the payment for jesters, focusing on the bought mockery rather than the festivity itself.
Gnashing teeth, literal or figurative?Gnashing teeth is a gesture of extreme anger and hostility, often associated with wanting to devour someone (cf. Job 16:9; Ps. 37:12).All traditions agree it is a symbol of rage, but disagreement exists whether it implies an imminent physical attack or is merely verbal intimidation.
Whether this verse is imprecatory (calling for judgment)Psalm 35 as a whole includes prayers for the enemies' defeat (vv. 4, 8, 26).Some Christians (e.g., Wesleyan traditions) treat these as cries for justice that Christ fulfills; others (e.g., some Reformed traditions) see them as direct imprecations that remain appropriate for believers under persecution.

Historical & Cultural Context

Psalm 35 is a lament, likely from the period when David was fleeing from King Saul. In those years David enjoyed popular support and had been a loyal servant to Saul, but the king’s jealousy turned the court against him. David’s description of the enemies in verses 11, 16 matches the historical situation in 1 Samuel: false witnesses (1 Sam. 24:9), ingratitude for past kindness, and the gathering of “the abjects”, a Hebrew word that can mean “cripples” or “vile persons” (see Poole).

The phrase “profane mockers in feasts” reflects a specific cultural institution. At royal banquets and the tables of the wealthy, it was not unusual to have professional jesters or flatterers (Greek kolakes) who entertained with jokes and sarcastic commentary in exchange for food. The Hebrew la‛egei ma‛og, “mockers of a cake”, designates these parasites. They were neither friends nor allies; they mocked anyone who could provide their next meal. David’s enemies hired or gathered alongside such people to ridicule him publicly.

The feast setting adds a layer of betrayal. In ancient Israel, sharing a meal was a sign of covenant and friendship. David remembers how he had fasted and mourned when these same people were sick (vv. 13, 14). Now they feast while he suffers, and they use the festivity as an occasion for scorn. The gnashing of teeth, a gesture often associated with wild beasts (see Ps. 37:12; Lam. 2:16), reveals that the mockery was not mere jest but a prelude to violence. The contrast could not be sharper: feasting and devouring, celebration and rage. A reader from that culture would have understood immediately how low David’s enemies had sunk.

Early Christian interpreters saw in these verses a picture of the suffering Messiah. Adam Clarke specifically connects the “hypocritical mockers” to Herod’s treatment of Jesus, putting a purple robe on him, bowing in mock homage, and ridiculing him at a feast (cf. Luke 23:11). Whether read as David’s own story or as a prophecy of Christ, the verse captures the pain of being laughed at by people who owe you nothing and hate you without cause.

Textual Notes

The consulted commentaries note no significant textual variants in Psalm 35:16. The Hebrew text is stable across manuscripts, and the major English translations differ only in how they render the idiom la‛egei ma‛og (e.g., “mockers in feasts,” “jesting parasites,” “mockers for a cake”) rather than a textual dispute.

Reception History

Early Christian writers, following the New Testament’s pattern of reading David’s psalms as pointing to Christ, saw this verse as a prophecy of the mockery Jesus endured. Augustine in his Enarrationes in Psalmos connected the gnashing teeth to the rage of the Jewish leaders at the trial. Medieval commentators like Peter Lombard reinforced this Christological reading, seeing the “profane mockers” as the soldiers who taunted Christ. The Geneva Bible (1560) notes the verse as a type of Christ’s humiliation. Adam Clarke, in the Methodist tradition, explicitly ties it to Herod’s mockery at a feast (Luke 23:11). In the Reformation, Calvin caution against allegorizing the psalm too quickly, but he still understood it as the prayer of the righteous servant, a posture later taken up by Christ. Modern interpreters, especially in evangelical and historical-critical circles, emphasize the cultural background of hired jesters while still noting the verse’s resonance with New Testament passion narratives. Lectionaries rarely assign this verse alone, but the whole psalm is read on occasions calling for lament and trust in God’s justice.

Preaching This Verse

Three-point outline

  1. The Bitter Irony of the Feast. What should be a place of joy becomes a stage for cruelty. David’s enemies turn celebration into persecution. Sermons can apply this to times when relationships that should be safe become sources of pain.
  2. The Descent into Cheap Mockery. The enemies hire low-class jesters for bread. This shows how hatred degrades the hater: they stoop to hiring anyone who will join the ridicule. True strength does not need to borrow contempt from parasites.
  3. The Gesture That Reveals the Heart. Gnashing teeth is a wordless cry of rage. It exposes the inner murder that the feast’s laughter masks. God sees past the performance to the malice within.

Five-point outline

  1. Context: David’s past kindness to these people (vv. 13, 14).
  2. Contrast: They feast while he fasts (implied by “feasts” vs. his earlier sackcloth).
  3. Company: They surround themselves with hired mockers, people who laugh for money.
  4. Cruelty: Gnashing teeth signals a desire to destroy, not just tease.
  5. Christological reading: The Son of David endured the same mockery, yet did not gnash back.

Illustration hooks

  • Lunchroom rejection. A student who once helped a classmate with homework finds that classmate now laughing with the popular crowd, pointing and whispering. The feeling of being betrayed for a place at the table.
  • Office banter gone sour. A colleague who was promoted invites the team for drinks. Another worker, passed over, makes snide comments to curry favour with the new boss. The laughter is hollow, but the teeth show.

Questions your congregation is asking

  • “Why do people who have no real grievance against me seem to enjoy my suffering?”
  • “Is it wrong to feel angry when I am mocked, even if the mockers are unimportant people?”
  • “How does Jesus’ experience of mockery help me when I am ridiculed for my faith or my character?”

Leading a Discussion

This verse sits in a psalm that swings between raw complaint and confident hope. Before you read, recall times when you felt laughed at or dismissed by people you once trusted. David does not hide his pain, but he takes it to God. Use these questions to open the passage together.

Discussion questions

  1. Read Psalm 35:11, 16. What do you learn about David’s relationship with these enemies before they turned on him? (Look especially at verses 13, 14.)
  2. The Hebrew phrase “profane mockers in feasts” literally reads “mockers of a cake.” Why do you think David highlights that his enemies hired low-class jesters? What does that say about the nature of their hatred?
  3. Gnashing teeth appears in Job 16:9, Psalm 37:12, and Lamentations 2:16. What does this action communicate about the inner state of the person doing it? How is it different from ordinary mockery?
  4. Some Christians read this verse as a prophecy of Jesus being mocked by Herod’s soldiers (Luke 23:11). Does that connection help you understand the psalm differently? Why or why not?
  5. David cries out “How long will you look on?” in verse 17. When have you felt that God was silent while others ridiculed you? How does the psalm model bringing that feeling into prayer?
  6. The psalm ends with a vow to praise God in the great congregation (verse 18). What does that decision, to praise even while asking for rescue, teach us about faith in the middle of betrayal?
  7. If someone in your group is experiencing mockery right now, what is one way you can support them without dismissing their pain or rushing to fix it?

What the Commentators Say

10 public-domain commentaries, condensed into plain language.

Adam Clarke's Commentary Methodist/Wesleyan 1826

Clarke reads this verse as a prophecy of Christ's mistreatment, particularly the hypocritical mockery Herod showed at a feast. He links the blindfolding and buffeting of Jesus to the line about being torn while unable to see who struck him.

Barnes' Notes on the Bible Protestant 1832

Barnes notes that the Hebrew phrase often translated "hypocritical mockers in feasts" literally means "cake-jesters" or "table-buffoons." These were low, profane people who acted as jesters at rich tables for free food. Job's former friends now allied with such parasites to ridicule him, adding open anger to their scorn.

Calvin's Commentaries Reformed 1564

Calvin emphasizes that David did not view everyone who opposed him as an enemy. He recognized that most people were simply misled by ignorance and the influence of those in power. Only those who knowingly and maliciously sided with Saul to gain his favor did David consider true enemies, and against them alone he called for God's judgment.

Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges Anglican 1880

The commentator highlights two details: the psalmist's persecutors are described as "mockers for a cake," meaning low entertainers who trade scurrilous jests for food, and their gnashing of teeth is a rage-filled gesture like devouring a victim. Their causeless hatred and ingratitude are what the psalmist urges God to notice.

Geneva Bible Notes Reformed 1599

With the false skoffers at bankets, gnashing their teeth against me.

Gill's Exposition of the Bible Baptist 1748

Gill highlights that the "hypocritical mockers" were flattering parasites who mocked David for a piece of bread or a meal, the Hebrew word carrying this sense. He sees a direct parallel to the Pharisees, who derided Christ on the cross as similar self-seeking scoffers.

Jamieson-Fausset-Brown Commentary Protestant 1871

JFB explains that the mockers in this verse are not random scoffers but hired entertainers, people paid to provide mockery and sport at feasts. This specific social role, supported by Proverbs 28:21, shows they were professionals employed for amusement rather than expressing genuine contempt.

Keil & Delitzsch OT Commentary Protestant 1876

Keil-Delitzsch highlights the stark contrast between David’s genuine, self-sacrificing grief and the enemies’ ingratitude. David mourned for them as for a brother or mother, but they repaid him with false witnesses and vile mockery. Even the lowest parasites ("cake-jesters") joined in gnashing their teeth at him.

Matthew Henry's Commentary Reformed/Presbyterian 1710

Henry points out that David levels two specific charges at his enemies: perjury and ingratitude. False witnesses swore things David never knew, showing how even the best person's life can be ruined by liars. Henry sees this as a type of Christ, who also faced false witnesses.

Wesley's Explanatory Notes Methodist/Wesleyan 1754

Wesley observes that these mockers did not merely insult David in passing. They deliberately fashioned themselves as buffoons and jesters, making a habit of ridiculing him in order to earn a place at the tables of powerful men. Their mockery was a calculated performance for social advantage.

Word Study

The key original-language words in this verse. Select any word for its full lexicon entry — meaning, every occurrence in Scripture, and related words.

Cross-References

Source: Treasury of Scripture Knowledge (TSK, public domain)

I Samuel 20:24 So David hid himself in the field. When the new moon had come, the king sat himself down to eat food.
I Samuel 20:42 Jonathan said to David, “Go in peace, because we have both sworn in Yahweh’s name, saying, ‘Yahweh is between me and you, and between my offspring and your offspring, forever.’” He arose and departed; and Jonathan went into the city.
Job 16:9 He has torn me in his wrath and persecuted me. He has gnashed on me with his teeth. My adversary sharpens his eyes on me.
Psalms 37:12 The wicked plots against the just, and gnashes at him with his teeth.
Isaiah 1:14 My soul hates your New Moons and your appointed feasts. They are a burden to me. I am weary of bearing them.
Isaiah 1:15 When you spread out your hands, I will hide my eyes from you. Yes, when you make many prayers, I will not hear. Your hands are full of blood.
Lamentations 2:16 All your enemies have opened their mouth wide against you. They hiss and gnash their teeth. They say, “We have swallowed her up. Certainly this is the day that we looked for. We have found it. We have seen it.”
John 18:28 They led Jesus therefore from Caiaphas into the Praetorium. It was early, and they themselves didn’t enter into the Praetorium, that they might not be defiled, but might eat the Passover.

Interlinear and lexical data from STEPBible (CC BY 4.0). Cross-reference data from OpenBible.info (CC BY 4.0). Commentaries are public domain.

For personal reflection

Read the devotional page — prayer, application, and "for families"

← Devotional