Psalms 35:12 · Bible study
Psalms 35:12 Commentary: Bereavement of Soul
Hebrew · 10 what the commentators say
Meaning in one sentence
Psalm 35:12: David's cry over evil repaid for good, leading to soul-bereavement. Its meaning, messianic foreshadowing, and comfort for the suffering.
Research Summary
- Meaning: David's enemies repay his kindness with evil, leaving his soul in a state of bereavement, complete desolation and loss of support.
- Key words: shekhol (bereavement, loss of children); nephesh (soul, self, life); ye shallemuni (they repay, ongoing action).
- Main debate: Whether the verse is narrowly historical (David's flight from Saul) or broadly typological (foreshadowing Christ's unjust rejection).
- Theological theme: Innocent suffering; ingratitude as a form of evil; God as the judge who sees and will ultimately vindicate the righteous.
- Best use: Comfort for those betrayed, a language for lament, and a bridge to the New Testament picture of Christ who also suffered wrongfully.
Translation Comparison
BSB Berean Standard Bible 2020
They repay me evil for good, to the bereavement of my soul.
WEB World English Bible 2000
They reward me evil for good, to the bereaving of my soul.
KJV King James Version 1769
They rewarded me evil for good to the spoiling of my soul.
ASV American Standard Version 1901
They reward me evil for good, Tothe bereaving of my soul.
YLT Young's Literal Translation 1898
They pay me evil for good, bereaving my soul,
Darby Darby Bible 1890
They reward me evil for good, [to] the bereavement of my soul.
Douay-Rheims Douay-Rheims Bible 1899
Let not the foot of pride come to me, and let not the hand of the sinner move me.
Translations in other languages (10 available)
Volviéronme mal por bien, para abatir á mi alma.
Ele retribuem o bem com o mal, desolando a minha alma.
Ils me rendent le mal pour le bien:
Sie tun mir Arges um Gutes, mich in Herzeleid zu bringen.
Zij vergelden mij kwaad voor goed, de beroving mijner ziel.
Mi rendono male per bene; derelitta è l’anima mia.
Oddawają mi złem za dobre, chcąc mię pozbawić duszy mojej,
да не наступит на меня нога гордыни, и рука грешника да не изгонит меня:
他們向我以惡 報善,使我的靈魂 孤苦。
They gave me back evil for good, troubling my soul.
Verse in Context
Original Language (Biblical Hebrew)
Old Testament · Biblical Hebrew · Psalms 35:12
Source: STEPBible TAGNT/TEHB (CC-BY 4.0). Click or tap a morphology code to see the full parsing.
Scholars' Consensus
Commentators across traditions agree that this verse describes a profound experience of ingratitude. David, who had done good to his enemies, saving Saul from Goliath, serving his court, showing kindness to allies, now finds himself rewarded with evil. The Hebrew verb ye shallemuni (imperfect, Hiphil) indicates this is an ongoing pattern: "they keep repaying me." The key word shekhol (bereavement) is used in Hebrew for the loss of children, a desolation that strips life of purpose and companionship. Cambridge Bible notes it "makes him feel as desolate as the childless mother." Keil and Delitzsch render the clause as a substantive one: "bereavement is to my soul", his condition is that of being forsaken. Barnes adds that the word means "the being forsaken, or abandoned." The effect is not merely emotional; it touches the very core of his being (nephesh: life, self, soul). This sets the stage for the stark contrast in verses 13, 14, where David recalls the tender sympathy he showed when they were sick. His present isolation cuts all the deeper because of the intimacy he once offered. Most interpreters see this as a picture of innocent suffering, a theme that would find its fullest expression in the Messiah, the righteous one betrayed by those he came to save.
How settled is the interpretation?
Interpretive difficulty: Medium
Main views:
- Historical-literal: David's flight from Saul: Cross-references to 1 Samuel 19–22; David's specific lament about false witnesses (v.11). The 'bereavement' refers to being cut off from friends and family.
- Typological-messianic: prefiguring Christ's rejection: Matthew Henry and Gill's parallels to Jesus' trial and crucifixion; the 'evil for good' pattern seen in the Gospels (John 15:25).
- General: righteous sufferer in any age: The psalm's lack of unique historical markers makes it adaptable; the themes of ingratitude and desolation apply to the faithful in any persecution.
What is clear: The core experience — being repaid with evil for good, resulting in profound desolation — is presented as an injustice that the psalmist brings before God, trusting in divine vindication.
What Scholars Agree and Debate
| Topic | Agreed | Debated |
|---|---|---|
| Historical setting | The psalm is attributed to David during his persecution by Saul and his court. The ingratitude matches Saul's confession in 1 Samuel 24:17. | Some read the entire psalm as a specific event; others see it as a literary lament usable by any righteous sufferer. |
| Messianic interpretation | David is a type of Christ in his innocence and suffering. Many early and Reformation interpreters saw Christ in this verse. | Evangelical and Catholic traditions often find direct prophecy; others caution that the primary referent is David, with Christ being a secondary fulfilment. |
| Imprecatory tone | David calls for God's righteous judgment on his enemies, not personal revenge. | Some Christians find imprecatory psalms difficult to reconcile with Jesus' command to love enemies; others argue they express a legitimate cry for justice. |
| Meaning of 'soul' (nephesh) | The word refers to the whole person, not just an immaterial spirit. | Some traditions (e.g., some Pentecostals) see a stronger reference to emotional/vital life; others emphasize the physical sense of 'life' being endangered. |
Historical & Cultural Context
Psalm 35 is attributed to David during his flight from King Saul. The surrounding verses (8, 11) describe a man under attack from false witnesses and hidden nets. In the ancient Near Eastern court system, false testimony could cost a man his life, David had been declared a traitor (1 Samuel 22:13, 14). The loyalty he had shown to Saul and the nation now counted for nothing.
The phrase "to the bereaving of my soul" taps into the deepest social wound of the ancient world: loss of children and family. In a culture where one's identity and security were bound to lineage, bereavement meant being left without support, without heirs, without a future. David uses that word to describe the condition of his soul. He feels as stripped and vulnerable as a person who has lost every child.
Keil and Delitzsch detail David's real losses: his parents had to flee to Moab, his wife Michal was taken from him, his friend Jonathan was removed, and the courtiers who once sought his friendship became hostile. Verse 13, 14 shows that David had gone far beyond mere courtesy, he had worn sackcloth, fasted, and prayed for these very enemies as if they were his own flesh. "My prayer returned into my own bosom" probably means that his intercession, instead of reaching heaven, came back to him unfulfilled (Lange suggests the picture of a bowed head, the prayer seeming to drop back onto his chest). The ingratitude is therefore not just a social slight; it is a betrayal of love.
This historical setting makes the psalm a model for anyone who has shown kindness and been met with hostility. David does not merely vent; he brings the injustice to God, trusting that the righteous Judge sees and will act. The psalm moves from lament to imprecation to confidence, a full circle of faith.
Textual Notes
The consulted sources note no significant textual variants for Psalm 35:12. The Hebrew text is stable across manuscripts. The differences in English translations (WEB "bereaving of my soul"; KJV "spoiling of my soul"; BSB "bereavement of my soul") reflect interpretive choices for the Hebrew shekhol, not a variant in the underlying text. The Greek Septuagint (χήρωσιν, 'bereavement') supports the same sense. The Masoretic reading is secure.
Reception History
The early church read this verse in light of Christ's rejection. Matthew Henry notes that David's experience of false witnesses and ingratitude was "typical, and had its accomplishment in the Son of David." John Gill explicitly connects the evil-for-good reward to Jesus' crucifixion: "For all the good he did to the Jews... was rewarded with reproaches and persecutions." Augustine, in his expositions of the Psalms, saw this as the cry of Christ in his passion, the innocent sufferer betrayed by his own. The image of "bereavement" resonated with medieval monastic spirituality, where the sense of being stripped of every comfort was seen as participation in Christ's desolation. Calvin, while focusing on David's historical situation, acknowledged the pattern as a model for the faithful who are hated without cause. In modern applications, the verse is often used in prayers for those experiencing betrayal, a scriptural language for a hurt that feels like losing a child.
Preaching This Verse
Three-point outline
- Ungrateful Rewards: David's experience of evil for good reveals the depth of human sin, we often repay kindness with cruelty, especially when the kindness challenges our status or conscience.
- Bereavement of Soul: The word shekhol (bereavement) captures total desolation. Not just disappointment, but the feeling of being orphaned, stripped of every human support. This is what happens when trusted relationships collapse.
- The Innocent Sufferer: David's unjust treatment points forward to Christ, who also received evil for good (John 15:25). For the believer, suffering for doing right is not a sign of God's absence but of sharing in the pattern of the cross.
Five-point outline
- What was done: Evil repaid for good (v.12a). The verb is present tense, this is happening now.
- What it cost: Bereavement of soul (v.12b). The Hebrew shekhol is the word for childlessness, absolute loss.
- How David acted: He had walked in love when they were sick (vv.13, 14). Sackcloth, fasting, prayer. This makes their ingratitude worse.
- How God sees: The surrounding psalm (vv.9, 10, 17, 18) shows David turning to the Lord, trusting that God sees the injustice.
- How it ends: Deliverance comes through the righteous Judge (vv.23, 28). The final note is praise, not bitterness.
Illustration hooks
- A parent who sacrifices for a child only to be betrayed by that child in adulthood. The parent understands "bereavement of soul."
- An employee who goes above and beyond for a company, then is laid off without thanks. The sense of betrayal, not just losing the job, but losing the relationship.
- A friend who steps in during a crisis, and later that friend spreads your private story as gossip. The feeling of being "orphaned" by someone you trusted.
Questions your congregation is asking
- Why do people repay my kindness with harm?
- Is it wrong to feel devastated when someone I helped turns on me?
- How can I keep trusting God when the people I trusted let me down?
Leading a Discussion
This verse lands in a raw place, the experience of being hurt by the very people you helped. David doesn't hide his pain; he names it as "bereavement." In small group, let the honesty of the psalm give permission to speak honestly about your own experiences of ingratitude and betrayal.
Discussion questions
- Read Psalm 35:12 aloud. What feelings does this verse stir? Have you ever felt that someone repaid your good with evil?
- The Hebrew word shekhol means the loss of children, complete desolation. Why does David use such strong language? What does it tell us about the severity of his pain?
- Look at verses 13, 14. How does David's past kindness to these same enemies make the betrayal worse? What does that reveal about love and vulnerability?
- How does David respond in the rest of the psalm? Where does he turn with his pain? What does that teach us about handling betrayal?
- Some Christians see a foreshadowing of Jesus in this verse (evil repaid for good, leading to death). How does that change how you read the psalm? Does it give comfort or challenge?
- When you have been mistreated, what helps you keep from becoming bitter? How can community support someone experiencing this kind of bereavement?
- What one step could you take this week to entrust an injustice to God rather than carry it alone?
Word Study
The key original-language words in this verse. Select any word for its full lexicon entry — meaning, every occurrence in Scripture, and related words.
Cross-References
Source: Treasury of Scripture Knowledge (TSK, public domain)
| I Samuel 19:4 | Jonathan spoke good of David to Saul his father, and said to him, “Don’t let the king sin against his servant, against David; because he has not sinned against you, and because his works have been very good toward you; |
| I Samuel 19:5 | for he put his life in his hand and struck the Philistine, and Yahweh worked a great victory for all Israel. You saw it and rejoiced. Why then will you sin against innocent blood, to kill David without a cause?” |
| I Samuel 19:15 | Saul sent the messengers to see David, saying, “Bring him up to me in the bed, that I may kill him.” |
| I Samuel 20:31 | For as long as the son of Jesse lives on the earth, you will not be established, nor will your kingdom. Therefore now send and bring him to me, for he shall surely die!” |
| I Samuel 20:33 | Saul cast his spear at him to strike him. By this Jonathan knew that his father was determined to put David to death. |
| I Samuel 22:13 | Saul said to him, “Why have you conspired against me, you and the son of Jesse, in that you have given him bread, and a sword, and have inquired of God for him, that he should rise against me, to lie in wait, as it is today?” |
| I Samuel 22:14 | Then Ahimelech answered the king, and said, “Who among all your servants is so faithful as David, who is the king’s son-in-law, captain of your body guard, and honored in your house? |
| Psalms 38:20 | They who give evil for good are also adversaries to me, because I follow what is good. |
Interlinear and lexical data from STEPBible (CC BY 4.0). Cross-reference data from OpenBible.info (CC BY 4.0). Commentaries are public domain.
For personal reflection
Read the devotional page — prayer, application, and "for families"
What the Commentators Say
8 public-domain commentaries, condensed into plain language.
Adam Clarke's Commentary Methodist/Wesleyan 1826
Clarke argues that the phrase "to the spoiling of my soul" actually means "to destroy my life." He insists the Hebrew word nephesh should be translated as "life" in many places where English versions use "soul."
Barnes' Notes on the Bible Protestant 1832
Barnes explains that "rewarded me evil for good" means they repaid evil instead of good. The Hebrew word behind "spoiling of my soul" indicates being forsaken or abandoned, showing that this treatment left the psalmist deserted by everyone he might have trusted.
Calvin's Commentaries Reformed 1564
Calvin emphasizes that David did not view everyone who opposed him as an enemy. He recognized that most people were simply misled by ignorance and the influence of those in power. Only those who knowingly and maliciously sided with Saul to gain his favor did David consider true enemies, and against them alone he called for God's judgment.
Geneva Bible Notes Reformed 1599
They rewarded me euill for good, to haue spoyled my soule.
Gill's Exposition of the Bible Baptist 1748
Gill reads the verse as a prophecy of Christ: the same ingratitude David faced from Saul—rewarding his heroic service with persecution—would be shown to Jesus after all His healing and preaching. He adds that "spoiling of my soul" means being stripped of comfort and peace, left desolate like an orphan.
Jamieson-Fausset-Brown Commentary Protestant 1871
JFB highlights the striking paradox that even after receiving evil in return for good, the speaker still shows tender sympathy for those who afflicted him. The word "spoiling" literally means "bereavement," so the usual grief gestures are used figuratively to express his sorrow over their suffering.
Keil & Delitzsch OT Commentary Protestant 1876
Keil-Delitzsch highlights the stark contrast between David’s genuine, self-sacrificing grief and the enemies’ ingratitude. David mourned for them as for a brother or mother, but they repaid him with false witnesses and vile mockery. Even the lowest parasites ("cake-jesters") joined in gnashing their teeth at him.
Matthew Henry's Commentary Reformed/Presbyterian 1710
Henry points out that David levels two specific charges at his enemies: perjury and ingratitude. False witnesses swore things David never knew, showing how even the best person's life can be ruined by liars. Henry sees this as a type of Christ, who also faced false witnesses.