Psalms 106:37 · Bible study
Psalms 106:37 Commentary: Child Sacrifice to Demons in Israel's Confession
Hebrew · 11 what the commentators say
Meaning in one sentence
Why did Israel sacrifice children to demons? Explore the Hebrew term shedim, the historical context, and the horror of idolatry.
Research Summary
- Meaning: Israel committed child sacrifice to demonic beings, a sin that climaxed their long pattern of covenant unfaithfulness.
- Key words: Shedim (H7700), “demons” or “destroyers,” used only in Deut 32:17 and here.
- Main debate: Whether shedim refers to actual personal demons or to the gods of the nations regarded as subordinate spirits. Both sides agree these entities are not Yahweh.
- Theological theme: Idolatry leads to moral blindness and the worst forms of human cruelty; confession is the only path back to grace.
- Best use: A sobering warning against spiritual compromise, and a demonstration that no sin is beyond the reach of God’s covenant mercy.
Translation Comparison
BSB Berean Standard Bible 2020
They sacrificed their sons and their daughters to demons.
WEB World English Bible 2000
Yes, they sacrificed their sons and their daughters to demons.
KJV King James Version 1769
Yea, they sacrificed their sons and their daughters unto devils,
ASV American Standard Version 1901
Yea, they sacrificed their sons and their daughters unto demons,
YLT Young's Literal Translation 1898
And they sacrifice their sons And their daughters to destroyers,
Darby Darby Bible 1890
And they sacrificed their sons and their daughters unto demons,
Douay-Rheims Douay-Rheims Bible 1899
And they sowed fields, and planted vineyards: and they yielded fruit of birth.
Translations in other languages (10 available)
Y sacrificaron sus hijos y sus hijas á los demonios;
Além disso, sacrificaram seus filhos e suas filhas a demônios,
Ils sacrifièrent leurs fils
Und sie opferten ihre Söhne und ihre Töchter den Teufeln
Daarenboven hebben zij hun zonen en hun dochteren den duivelen geofferd.
e sacrificarono i loro figliuoli e le loro figliuole ai demoni,
Albowiem dyjabłom ofiarowali synów swoich, i córki swoje,
засевают поля, насаждают виноградники, которые приносят им обильные плоды.
把 自己的兒 女 祭祀 鬼魔,
They even made offerings of their sons and their daughters to evil spirits,
Verse in Context
Original Language (Biblical Hebrew)
Old Testament · Biblical Hebrew · Psalms 106:37
Source: STEPBible TAGNT/TEHB (CC-BY 4.0). Click or tap a morphology code to see the full parsing.
Scholars' Consensus
Commentators across traditions agree that this verse records a literal practice: Israelites offered their children to beings called shedim, a Hebrew term used only here and in Deuteronomy 32:17. Adam Clarke and Barnes both note that the Septuagint and Vulgate translate it as “demons” (daimoniois; daemoniis), and Clarke specifically distinguishes the plural “demons” from “devil,” which is never plural in Scripture. The Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges explains that the Assyrian cognate shêdu referred to subordinate spirits or demi-gods, often represented as bull-colossi. Keil and Delitzsch observe that human sacrifice is the “culmination” of Canaanite abomination and that only demons, not the true God, delight in such offerings. Gill describes how sin hardened Israel step by step: first mixing with nations, then learning their ways, then serving idols, and finally sacrificing their own children. The consensus is clear: the verse confesses a real, horrific sin that flowed directly from covenant unfaithfulness.
How settled is the interpretation?
Interpretive difficulty: Medium
Main views:
- Demons as personal evil spirits: Lexical association with Deuteronomy 32:17; New Testament passages like 1 Corinthians 10:20 that explicitly link idolatry to demons.
- Demons as the gods of the nations (subordinate spirits): Cambridge Bible notes the Assyrian <em>shêdu</em> were guardian spirits, and the context of Canaanite religion shows worship of beings considered divine but not the high God.
- Destroyers (cf. YLT 'destroyers'): Gill mentions the etymology from a root meaning 'to waste and destroy,' and the Targum renders the term as 'noxious spirits.'
What is clear: It is not disputed that Israelites actually sacrificed their sons and daughters, that this was an abomination to Yahweh, and that it is presented in the psalm as the terrible fruit of assimilation to Canaanite culture.
What Scholars Agree and Debate
| Topic | Agreed | Debated |
|---|---|---|
| Nature of Shedim | The Hebrew word <em>shedim</em> refers to spiritual beings other than the true God, and Deuteronomy 32:17 identifies them as gods not known to Israel. | Some traditions (e.g., many Reformed interpreters) see them as actual evil spirits or demons; others (including some rabbinic and modern critical scholars) view them as the deified ancestors or nature spirits worshipped in Canaan, which the biblical author polemically labels as demons. |
| Extent of Child Sacrifice | Israel actually sacrificed their children; the land was polluted with innocent blood (v. 38). | Clarke notes that 'passing through the fire' to Molech did not always mean burning to death; some think it was a purification ritual. Other commentators (Gill, Keil & Delitzsch) insist that actual burning and death occurred, citing Jeremiah 7:31. |
| Theological Significance of Confession | The verse functions as part of Israel's corporate confession, acknowledging the depth of sin to magnify God's mercy (vv. 44, 46). | Catholic and Orthodox traditions read this in a penitential framework with emphasis on communal repentance; Protestant traditions often highlight the progression of sin as a warning against compromise; Evangelical and charismatic traditions may focus on the spiritual warfare dimension of sacrificing to demons. |
Historical & Cultural Context
Psalm 106 is a national confession of sin, likely composed during the Babylonian exile (Lange, Keil & Delitzsch). It traces Israel’s rebellion from Egypt through the wilderness and into Canaan. The immediate context (vv. 34, 39) describes the failure to destroy the Canaanite nations as God had commanded (Exodus 23:32, 33; Deuteronomy 7:1, 5). Instead, Israel “mixed themselves with the nations” (v. 35), intermarrying and adopting their religious customs.
Child sacrifice was practiced among the Canaanites and their neighbors, especially to the god Molech (Leviticus 18:21; 2 Kings 16:3). The phrase “pass through the fire” appears in several cross-references (Deuteronomy 18:10; 2 Kings 17:17; 21:6), and some interpreters, including Clarke, think this did not always mean burning alive, but could involve a purification ritual that still constituted a form of child sacrifice. However, the language of Psalm 106:38, “shed innocent blood”, indicates that death was the result.
The Hebrew word shedim (שדים) appears only here and in Deuteronomy 32:17. Archaeologically, the Assyrian shêdu were guardian spirits, sometimes protective but in Israel’s context understood as malevolent (Cambridge Bible). Deuteronomy 32:17 explicitly identifies them as “not God,” gods recently come up. By sacrificing to shedim, Israel was not merely worshiping powerless idols; they were entering into communion with demonic forces that opposed Yahweh. The land was defiled by blood (Numbers 35:33), and the people became unclean through spiritual prostitution (v. 39).
The Psalmist’s purpose is not to explain why, that would justify the inexcusable, but to confess the depth of Israel’s sin, setting the stage for the mercy that follows (vv. 44, 46).
Textual Notes
No significant textual variants are noted in the supplied sources for Psalm 106:37. The Hebrew text reads lashshedim (לשדים); the Septuagint renders it daimoniois (demons), the Vulgate daemoniis, and the Targum maziqia (harmful spirits). The consistency across versions suggests a stable textual tradition.
Reception History
Early church writers cited this verse to demonstrate that those who worship idols enter communion with demons, a warning against participation in pagan feasts (1 Corinthians 10:20). Augustine and later medieval commentators used it to illustrate the cumulative nature of sin. The Reformers, especially Calvin, read the Psalm as a model of corporate confession: the sin is named clearly so that mercy may be sought. In modern evangelical and charismatic contexts, the verse is sometimes invoked in discussions of spiritual warfare and territorial spirits. Across traditions, the verse has consistently been understood as a historical confession of Israel’s deepest failure and a testament to God’s willingness to forgive.
Preaching This Verse
Three-point outline
- The progression of sin. Israel moved from mixing with the nations (v. 35) to serving their idols (v. 36), then to sacrificing children to demons (v. 37). Sin rarely stays small; it escalates. Every act of compromise with the world makes the next step easier.
- The deception of idolatry. The Israelites probably thought they were worshiping gods of the land, fertility deities who demanded extreme devotion. But the Psalmist names the truth: these were demons. Human sacrifice is what demonic worship requires; the true God forbids it absolutely (Deuteronomy 12:31).
- The hope in confession. This verse is part of a longer confession. The same Psalm that names this horror also records God’s mercy: “Nevertheless he regarded their affliction, when he heard their cry” (v. 44). Naming sin honestly opens the door to forgiveness.
Five-point outline
- Failure to obey God’s command to separate from the nations (v. 34).
- Assimilation through marriage and friendship (v. 35).
- Adoption of idolatrous practices (v. 36).
- Sacrifice of children to demons (v. 37).
- Pollution of the land with innocent blood (vv. 38, 39).
Illustration hooks
- A slow drift at sea. A ship that drifts a few degrees off course will end up miles away. Israel didn’t start by sacrificing children; they started by tolerating a few neighbors. The drift was gradual, but the destination was catastrophic.
- An abusive relationship. Just as victims are often drawn in slowly, with small compromises that escalate, Israel was seduced by the nations around them. What begins as curiosity about another culture’s worship ends in the ultimate betrayal of one’s own faith and family.
- The cost of “whatever it takes.” Many people today sacrifice their relationships, health, and integrity to achieve success or security. The idol of success demands its own kind of children. Israel’s literal sacrifice is a mirror for the spiritual sacrifices we make when we serve false gods.
Questions your congregation is asking
- How could God’s chosen people fall so low? (Answer: Slowly, through seemingly small compromises.)
- What does it mean that they sacrificed to “demons” and not just idols? (Answer: Idolatry opens a door to darker spiritual realities; see 1 Corinthians 10:20.)
- Does God forgive even this? (Answer: The same Psalm ends with God remembering His covenant and showing mercy, v. 45.)
Leading a Discussion
This verse confronts us with one of the darkest moments in Israel’s history. But it is placed within a psalm of confession, a prayer that names sin not to wallow in guilt, but to lead God’s people back to His mercy. As you discuss, pay attention to both the sin and the hope that frames it.
Discussion questions
- Read Psalm 106:34, 39. What steps led Israel from the failure to destroy the nations to sacrificing their children? Which step do you think was the hardest to recognize at the time?
- The Hebrew word shedim is translated “demons.” Why does it matter that the worship objects of the Canaanites were not just false gods but actual demonic beings (Deuteronomy 32:17; 1 Corinthians 10:20)?
- Gill and other commentators describe a “hardening” process in sin. Have you experienced a situation where a small compromise led to larger ones? What was that like?
- Cross-reference Leviticus 18:21 and Deuteronomy 12:31. Why would God so strongly forbid child sacrifice? What does this tell us about His character?
- The psalm is a confession of national sin. How does public confession of sin, in church or small group, help protect against gradual idolatry?
- What are some modern “idols” that demand high costs from us, time, integrity, even relationships? How can we identify them before they demand more than we want to give?
- Psalm 106 ends with deliverance and praise (vv. 44, 48). How does the awareness of God’s mercy affect the way we read a verse like v. 37?
Word Study
The key original-language words in this verse. Select any word for its full lexicon entry — meaning, every occurrence in Scripture, and related words.
Cross-References
Source: Treasury of Scripture Knowledge (TSK, public domain)
| Leviticus 17:7 | They shall no more sacrifice their sacrifices to the goat idols, after which they play the prostitute. This shall be a statute forever to them throughout their generations.’ |
| Deuteronomy 12:30 | be careful that you are not ensnared to follow them after they are destroyed from before you, and that you not inquire after their gods, saying, “How do these nations serve their gods? I will do likewise.” |
| Deuteronomy 12:31 | You shall not do so to Yahweh your God; for every abomination to Yahweh, which he hates, they have done to their gods; for they even burn their sons and their daughters in the fire to their gods. |
| Deuteronomy 18:10 | There shall not be found with you anyone who makes his son or his daughter to pass through the fire, one who uses divination, one who tells fortunes, or an enchanter, or a sorcerer, |
| Deuteronomy 32:17 | They sacrificed to demons, not God, to gods that they didn’t know, to new gods that came up recently, which your fathers didn’t dread. |
| II Kings 16:3 | But he walked in the way of the kings of Israel, and even made his son to pass through the fire, according to the abominations of the nations whom Yahweh cast out from before the children of Israel. |
| II Kings 17:17 | They caused their sons and their daughters to pass through the fire, used divination and enchantments, and sold themselves to do that which was evil in Yahweh’s sight, to provoke him to anger. |
| II Kings 21:6 | He made his son to pass through the fire, practiced sorcery, used enchantments, and dealt with those who had familiar spirits and with wizards. He did much evil in Yahweh’s sight, to provoke him to anger. |
Interlinear and lexical data from STEPBible (CC BY 4.0). Cross-reference data from OpenBible.info (CC BY 4.0). Commentaries are public domain.
For personal reflection
Read the devotional page — prayer, application, and "for families"
What the Commentators Say
11 public-domain commentaries, condensed into plain language.
Adam Clarke's Commentary Methodist/Wesleyan 1826
Clarke points out that the Hebrew word in this verse means demons, not devils. He observes that Scripture never uses devil in the plural—there is only one devil, though there are many demons. This distinction sharpens the meaning of the pagan practice described.
Barnes' Notes on the Bible Protestant 1832
Barnes draws attention to the specific Hebrew word translated "devils," noting it appears only in this verse and Deuteronomy 32:17 and is always used for idols. He links the term directly to demons, grounding the passage's meaning in the New Testament teaching that pagan worship involves fellowship with demonic powers.
Calvin's Commentaries Reformed 1564
Calvin observes that Psalm 106 is not primarily a reproof or complaint against Israel, but a confession of sins aimed at obtaining pardon. The psalm begins with praise to encourage hope, then acknowledges that God's people repeatedly abused his kindness, making them unworthy of continued blessing—so the writer asks forgiveness.
Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges Anglican 1880
Cambridge Bible Schools notes that the word translated as "devils" in the passage actually refers to "demons," subordinate spirits or demi-gods. The Hebrew term is linked to Assyrian bull-colossi guardians, beings regarded as having power for good or evil, not the fallen angels of later Christian theology.
Geneva Bible Notes Reformed 1599
Yea, they offered their sonnes, and their daughters vnto deuils,
Gill's Exposition of the Bible Baptist 1748
Gill emphasizes the gradual hardening effect of sin, showing how the Israelites moved step by step from mixing with pagan nations to the shocking act of child sacrifice. He also notes that the word "devils" comes from a root meaning to waste and destroy, fitting these spirits as destroyers of mankind.
Jamieson-Fausset-Brown Commentary Protestant 1871
JFB notes that the Greek word behind "devils" here is actually "demons" in the Septuagint, the same term Paul uses in 1 Corinthians 10:20 when discussing sacrifices offered to evil spirits rather than to God.
Keil & Delitzsch OT Commentary Protestant 1876
Keil-Delitzsch highlight the poet's deliberate change of the Hebrew word for "sink down" instead of the usual "rot" in the primary passage, a conscious choice rather than a scribal error. They also emphasize that Israel's failure to destroy the Canaanites led directly to the worst abomination, human sacrifice, which God detests but demons delight in.
Lange's Commentary Reformed 1857
Lange treats this psalm as a carefully structured liturgical prayer of confession. Its distinctiveness lies in showing that Israel's repeated failures throughout their history completely cancel any human claim on God, leaving mercy as the only possible basis for deliverance. The confession thus begins and ends with praise, framed by the hope that God's grace is stronger than sin.
Matthew Henry's Commentary Reformed/Presbyterian 1710
Matthew Henry observes that Israel's conduct in Canaan was exactly like their behavior in the wilderness: they provoked God, yet He repeatedly delivered them. God's dealings with them consistently displayed both justice and mercy, punishing their rebellion but relenting when they cried out because He remembered His covenant.
Wesley's Explanatory Notes Methodist/Wesleyan 1754
Wesley insists that when pagans offered worship to their idols, they were not actually worshipping the true God under a different name. The spirits they thought inhabited those images were not good spirits but evil ones, meaning their religious acts were directed at devils.