Proverbs 27:26 · Bible study
Proverbs 27:26 Commentary: Diligent Herding Yields Clothing and Land
Hebrew · 8 what the commentators say
Meaning in one sentence
Lambs provide clothing; goats fund a field, this proverb links diligent care of livestock to both daily needs and long-term investment, revealing God’s provision through
Research Summary
- Meaning: Diligent care of livestock yields both immediate necessities (clothing) and long‑term assets (land).
- Key words: Lambs (kevasim), clothing (levush), goats (attudim), price (mechir).
- Main debate: Minimal; most agree this is straightforward wisdom on work and stewardship. Some question whether it is purely practical or also carries symbolic weight.
- Theological theme: God’s provision through diligent human labor within the rhythms of creation.
- Best use: A sermon or study on the dignity of work, faithful stewardship, and trusting God’s ordinary means.
Translation Comparison
BSB Berean Standard Bible 2020
the lambs will provide you with clothing, and the goats with the price of a field.
WEB World English Bible 2000
The lambs are for your clothing, and the goats are the price of a field.
KJV King James Version 1769
The lambs are for thy clothing, and the goats are the price of the field.
ASV American Standard Version 1901
The lambs are for thy clothing, And the goats are the price of the field;
YLT Young's Literal Translation 1898
Lambs are for thy clothing, And the price of the field are he-goats,
Darby Darby Bible 1890
The lambs are for thy clothing, and the goats are the price of a field;
Douay-Rheims Douay-Rheims Bible 1899
Lambs are for thy clothing: and kids for the price of the field.
Translations in other languages (10 available)
Los corderos para tus vestidos, y los cabritos para el precio del campo:
Os cordeiros serão para tuas roupas, e os bodes para o preço do campo;
Les agneaux sont pour te vêtir,
Die Lämmer kleiden dich und die Böcke geben dir das Geld, einen Acker zu kaufen.
De lammeren zullen zijn tot uw kleding, en de bokken de prijs des velds.
Gli agnelli ti dànno da vestire, i becchi di che comprarti un campo,
Owce będą na szaty twoje, a nagrodą polną kozły.
Овцы - на одежду тебе, и козлы - на покупку поля.
羊羔 之毛是為你作衣服;山羊 是為作田地 的價值,
The lambs are for your clothing, and the he-goats make the value of a field:
Verse in Context
Original Language (Biblical Hebrew)
Old Testament · Biblical Hebrew · Proverbs 27:26
Source: STEPBible TAGNT/TEHB (CC-BY 4.0). Click or tap a morphology code to see the full parsing.
Scholars' Consensus
Commentators generally agree that Proverbs 27:26 presents a practical benefit of diligent shepherding. Matthew Henry observes that the verse is part of a larger call to know the state of your flocks, because riches are temporary (v. 24). The lambs provide wool for clothing, a daily necessity, while the goats, when sold, yield the price of a field, a long-term asset. Barnes notes that the passage contrasts the perishable nature of money with the enduring security of land and livestock that pass through generations. Gill adds that wool keeps one decent, warm, and comfortable, while the sale of goats provides funds to purchase more fields. Keil and Delitzsch see a regular cycle of hay, grass, and harvest that rewards the careful farmer. The overarching message grounds daily work in God’s provision and invites trust in the ordinary means He gives.
How settled is the interpretation?
Interpretive difficulty: Low
What is clear: The verse teaches that diligent care of livestock yields both immediate necessities (clothing) and capital for land, reflecting the principle that faithful work in one’s calling is a means of God’s provision.
What Scholars Agree and Debate
| Topic | Agreed | Debated |
|---|---|---|
| Scope of the proverb | Christians agree that the proverb encourages diligence in tending one's livelihood. | Some hold it applies specifically to agrarian work; others read it as a general principle for any lawful calling. |
| Human effort vs. divine provision | All affirm that God is the ultimate source of the harvest and increase. | Traditions with a strong emphasis on grace caution against human merit; those emphasizing cooperation highlight the partnership between labor and blessing. |
| What constitutes lasting wealth | Material riches are temporary; the land (or other permanent assets) is more stable. | Some traditions focus on land as a type of enduring possession; others point to spiritual treasures as the truly lasting wealth. |
Historical & Cultural Context
Ancient Israel’s economy was built on agriculture and livestock. Sheep and goats were central to daily life. Lambs’ wool was spun into clothing (Job 31:20), providing warmth and covering. Goats were even more versatile: their hair was used for tent cloth and sacks, their milk nourished families (v. 27), and their sale raised cash for major purchases, like a field. The phrase “price of a field” reflects a barter or market economy where livestock served as currency.
The surrounding poem (Prov 27:23, 27) is, according to Keil and Delitzsch, a “Mashal-ode” that praises the pastoral life over the uncertainties of commerce. It lists the regular appearance of hay and tender grass, reminding the farmer that the land provides in its season. This cyclical abundance, paired with diligent care, yields both clothing and capital for land, short-term needs and long-term investment. Poole notes that even kings like Solomon and Uzziah practiced husbandry, showing that this wisdom was not limited to peasants. The passage elevates the dignity of manual work and careful stewardship.
Textual Notes
The supplied commentaries and sources note no significant textual variants for Proverbs 27:26. The Hebrew text is stable across manuscripts, and the variety in English translations (e.g., “the price of a field” vs. “the price of the field”) reflects stylistic choice rather than manuscript disagreement.
Reception History
Across church history, Proverbs 27:26 has been read primarily as practical wisdom for those who work the land. Early Christian moralists cited it alongside other farming proverbs to teach diligence and stewardship. The Reformers, particularly Luther and Calvin, appealed to this verse to affirm the dignity of everyday labor: God’s call is not limited to clergy but includes the shepherd, the farmer, and the tradesman. In agrarian societies, it was a favorite text for harvest sermons and a reminder that God provides through the ordinary cycle of seasons and work. Modern readers often find in it a biblical model of economic stewardship, balancing immediate needs with long‑term investment, and a corrective to either idleness or greed.
Preaching This Verse
Three‑point outline
- Daily provision from the flock. Lambs give wool for clothing, the most basic need. God meets us in the ordinary yield of our labor.
- Long‑term investment through the herd. Goats, sold or traded, purchase a field. Diligence not only covers today but builds for tomorrow.
- Faithful work as God’s ordinary means. The cycle of seasons (v. 25) and the livestock’s yield come from God’s design. Our part is careful attention; His part is the increase.
Five‑point outline
- Know your resources. “Know well the state of your flocks” (v. 23).
- Remember that money can vanish. “Riches are not for ever” (v. 24).
- Recognize the season’s rhythm. The grass appears, the hay is gathered (v. 25), work with the time God gives.
- Receive God’s provision in the yield. Lambs for clothing, goats for land (v. 26).
- Extend that provision to others. Goats’ milk nourishes family and servants (v. 27).
Illustration hooks
- The farmer’s two‑fold harvest: A shepherd in any era watches his flock for both daily wool and periodic sales that let him expand. The same principle applies to a person who budgets for both groceries and savings.
- The small business owner: A baker sells bread (daily need) and uses profits to upgrade her oven (long‑term asset). Diligence in the present builds future capacity.
- Parents teaching children: Children learn that chores yield both immediate rewards (pocket money for snacks) and longer‑term goals (saving for a bike). Proverbs 27:26 models that two‑tiered wisdom.
Questions your congregation is asking
- “If God provides, why do I have to work so hard?”
- “How do I balance urgent needs today with saving for the future?”
- “Does this proverb only apply to farmers, or does it connect to my job?”
Leading a Discussion
Proverbs 27:26 sits within a short poem that urges careful management of livestock. It draws a direct line from daily diligence to both immediate necessities (clothing) and lasting assets (land). The passage invites us to consider how faithful work in our own callings becomes a channel of God’s provision, for today and for the years ahead.
Discussion questions
- What do the lambs and goats represent in this picture of agricultural life? How does the pairing of clothing and land capture two levels of provision?
- Read verses 23, 24. Why does the writer warn that “riches are not for ever” and “the crown does not endure”? How does that warning frame the value of land and livestock?
- The cyclical harvest of hay and grass (v. 25) suggests both God’s faithfulness and the need for human effort. How do you see those two strands working together in your own work?
- In what ways can small, steady acts of diligence, like knowing the state of your flocks, yield both daily bread and long‑term security?
- How might this proverb challenge a culture that prizes quick wealth or passive reliance on inheritance? Where do you feel that tension most strongly?
- Can you think of a time when faithful attention to your work produced an unexpected “field” (an opportunity, a resource, a relationship) that outlasted the immediate effort?
- What is one practical step you could take this week to “know well the state” of the resources, time, money, skills, entrusted to you?
Word Study
The key original-language words in this verse. Select any word for its full lexicon entry — meaning, every occurrence in Scripture, and related words.
Cross-References
Source: Treasury of Scripture Knowledge (TSK, public domain)
| Job 31:20 | if his heart hasn’t blessed me, if he hasn’t been warmed with my sheep’s fleece; |
Interlinear and lexical data from STEPBible (CC BY 4.0). Cross-reference data from OpenBible.info (CC BY 4.0). Commentaries are public domain.
For personal reflection
Read the devotional page — prayer, application, and "for families"
What the Commentators Say
7 public-domain commentaries, condensed into plain language.
Adam Clarke's Commentary Methodist/Wesleyan 1826
Clarke notes that the phrase refers to sheep’s wool used to make clothes. This resource provides protection and warmth for those who own it.
Barnes' Notes on the Bible Protestant 1832
Barnes notes that the farmer’s steady harvest replaces wealth which can be stolen or lost. He also says the earth gives new growth each season showing that true lasting value comes from God’s faithful provision.
Geneva Bible Notes Reformed 1599
The note highlights the practical provision God makes through the flock: lambs supply wool for clothing, while goats sold for their value provide the means to purchase land. This straightforward observation underscores the material blessings that come from faithful stewardship of livestock.
Gill's Exposition of the Bible Baptist 1748
Gill takes these lines as a practical argument for diligence in shepherding by listing the direct benefits: lambs provide wool for warm clothing, and goats can be sold to buy more land or other necessities of life. The profit itself is the encouragement.
Keil & Delitzsch OT Commentary Protestant 1876
Keil-Delitzsch highlights a deliberate contrast: wealth and high status offer no lasting security, but careful cattle husbandry provides steady provisions. As hay is cut and new grass grows, the flock continually supplies clothing, land, and milk. Rural industry renews itself, sustaining the household reliably through each season.
Matthew Henry's Commentary Reformed/Presbyterian 1710
Henry notes that the master’s own eye makes the flocks fat. He says the master must inspect them with his own eyes rather than leave care to others.
Wesley's Explanatory Notes Methodist/Wesleyan 1754
Wesley notes a practical economic distinction between goats and sheep: goats could be sold to pay rent or buy fields, while sheep provided a more steady, ongoing profit that the owner would not want to give up. Goats were the more expendable animal.