Matthew 27:48 · Bible study
Matthew 27:48 Commentary: Vinegar on the Cross, Mercy or Mockery?
Greek · 10 what the commentators say
Meaning in one sentence
Was the vinegar offered to Jesus on the cross a cruel mockery or an act of mercy? Examine the text, grammar, and fulfillment of Psalm 69:21.
Research Summary
- Meaning: A bystander offers Jesus sour wine on a sponge, fulfilling Psalm 69:21 and revealing the interplay of human motive and divine sovereignty.
- Key words: εὐθέως (immediately, showing urgency); ὄξος (sour wine, the soldiers' drink); ἐπότιζεν (imperfect tense, “was in the act of giving,” cut short by the crowd).
- Main debate: Whether the vinegar was offered in mockery (Gill, Henry) or in mercy (Clarke, Wesley), and whether the bystander was a soldier or a Jewish servant.
- Theological theme: Jesus' full humanity (he thirsts) and God's sovereign plan that uses even mixed motives to accomplish the Scriptures.
- Best use: Lenten or Good Friday meditation on suffering, prophecy, and the hidden providence of God in the darkest hours.
Translation Comparison
BSB Berean Standard Bible 2020
One of them quickly ran and brought a sponge. He filled it with sour wine, put it on a reed, and held it up for Jesus to drink.
WEB World English Bible 2000
Immediately one of them ran and took a sponge, filled it with vinegar, put it on a reed, and gave him a drink.
KJV King James Version 1769
And straightway one of them ran, and took a spunge, and filled it with vinegar, and put it on a reed, and gave him to drink.
ASV American Standard Version 1901
And straightway one of them ran, and took a sponge, and filled it with vinegar, and put it on a reed, and gave him to drink.
YLT Young's Literal Translation 1898
and immediately, one of them having run, and having taken a spunge, having filled it with vinegar, and having put it on a reed, was giving him to drink,
Darby Darby Bible 1890
And immediately one of them running and getting a sponge, having filled [it] with vinegar and fixed [it] on a reed, gave him to drink.
Douay-Rheims Douay-Rheims Bible 1899
And immediately one of them running took a sponge and filled it with vinegar and put it on a reed and gave him to drink.
Translations in other languages (10 available)
Y luego, corriendo uno de ellos, tomó una esponja, y la hinchió de vinagre, y poniéndola en una caña, dábale de beber.
Logo um deles correu e tomou uma esponja. Então a encheu de vinagre, colocou-a em uma cana, e lhe dava de beber.
Et aussitôt l’ un d’ eux courut prendre une éponge, qu’ il remplit de vinaigre, et, l’ ayant fixée à un roseau, il lui donna à boire.
Und alsbald lief einer unter ihnen, nahm einen Schwamm und füllte ihn mit Essig und steckte ihn an ein Rohr und tränkte ihn.
En terstond een van hen toe lopende, nam een spons, en die met edik gevuld hebbende, stak ze op een rietstok, en gaf Hem te drinken.
E subito un di loro corse a prendere una spugna; e inzuppatala d’aceto e postala in cima ad una canna, gli die’ da bere.
A zarazem bieżawszy jeden z nich, wziął gąbkę, i napełnił ją octem, a włożywszy na trzcinę, dał mu pić.
И тотчас побежал один из них, взял губку, наполнил уксусом и, наложив на трость, давал Ему пить;
內中 有一個人 趕緊 跑去, 拿 海絨 蘸滿了 醋, 綁在 葦子上,送給他 喝。
And straight away one of them went quickly, and took a sponge, and made it full of bitter wine, and put it on a rod and gave him drink.
Verse in Context
Original Language (Koine Greek)
New Testament · Koine Greek · Matthew 27:48
Source: STEPBible TAGNT/TEHB (CC-BY 4.0). Click or tap a morphology code to see the full parsing.
Scholars' Consensus
Commentators agree on the basic facts: immediately after Jesus cried out in thirst (John 19:28), one of the bystanders ran, took a sponge, filled it with sour wine, the posca that Roman soldiers drank, put it on a reed (John calls it hyssop, John 19:29), and held it to Jesus' mouth. The action fulfills Psalm 69:21, a passage that points to the Messiah's suffering.
What divides interpreters is the motive. Adam Clarke says the drink was given “in mercy, to alleviate his sufferings.” John Wesley agrees, calling it a “friendly design” so Jesus might not die before Elijah came. Matthew Henry sees it as part of the mocking, and John Gill explicitly says it was done “in contempt of him, and to mock him.” Vincent's Word Studies notes the imperfect tense of epotizen, “was in the act of giving”, and adds that the bystanders immediately stopped him, shouting “Let be!” That interruption makes the intent ambiguous. Whatever the human motive, all agree that God was working through it to complete the Scripture.
How settled is the interpretation?
Interpretive difficulty: Medium
Main views:
- Mockery view: The surrounding context of derision (Matthew 27:39–44), the earlier refusal of drugged wine (v. 34), and Gill’s reading that the vinegar was offered 'in contempt of him, and to mock him.'
- Mercy view: Jesus’ explicit cry 'I thirst' (John 19:28), Wesley’s note that the drink had a 'friendly design,' and Clarke’s statement that it was done 'in mercy to alleviate his sufferings.'
What is clear: One thing is certain: Jesus received sour wine while on the cross, fulfilling Psalm 69:21, and this act marked the final moments before he declared his work finished and gave up his spirit.
What Scholars Agree and Debate
| Topic | Agreed | Debated |
|---|---|---|
| Motive for offering the vinegar | All agree the drink was sour wine (posca), the common beverage of Roman soldiers, and that the act fulfilled Psalm 69:21. | Some see it as mockery (Gill, Henry), arguing that it continued the derision of the crowd. Others see it as mercy (Clarke, Wesley), suggesting the bystander wanted to relieve Jesus' thirst or keep him alive to see Elijah. |
| Identity of the person who gave the drink | All agree it was 'one of them', someone among the bystanders at the cross (Matthew 27:47). | Some traditions identify him as a Roman soldier (based on the vinegar being soldier's rations), while others see a Jewish servant or sympathizer who ran to get the sponge. |
| Connection to the Elijah misunderstanding | All note that the cry 'Eli, Eli' was misheard as a call to Elijah, prompting the bystanders to wait and watch. | Some argue the vinegar was offered to give Jesus strength to stay alive until Elijah came (Wesley); others say it was a cruel prolongation of suffering so they could see if Elijah would rescue him (Gill). |
| Relation to the earlier drink refusal (Matthew 27:34) | Both drinks contained wine, but the earlier was mixed with gall (a narcotic) and refused; the later was sour wine and accepted. | Some say Jesus refused the narcotic to remain conscious and in control, then accepted the vinegar to fulfill Scripture. Others see no deliberate choice, just different offers at different times. |
Historical & Cultural Context
By the time of Jesus, crucifixion was known to cause agonizing thirst. Soldiers on duty carried a small flask of posca, water mixed with sour wine, to stay hydrated. A vessel of this drink sat near the cross (John 19:29), easily accessible to bystanders. When Jesus said “I thirst,” someone acted quickly. The sponge, a common household item (used for washing or drinking), had to be fixed to a reed or hyssop stalk because Jesus was elevated on the cross; a cup could not reach his lips.
Earlier in the day, soldiers had offered Jesus wine mixed with gall, a narcotic meant to dull pain. He refused it (Matthew 27:34). That drink was intended to stupefy. But vinegar, sour wine, was not a painkiller; it was an everyday drink. By accepting it now, Jesus remained clear-headed, conscious to the end.
The immediate context is key. Jesus had just cried “My God, my God, why have you forsaken me?” Some bystanders misunderstood, thinking he called for Elijah (v. 47). In Jewish tradition, Elijah was expected to come to the aid of the righteous. The offer of vinegar may have been an act of mockery (“Let’s see if Elijah comes”) or a crude mercy to keep him alive long enough for Elijah to arrive. Either way, the gospel writers present the moment as a quiet fulfillment of Psalm 69:21: “In my thirst, they gave me vinegar to drink.” God’s sovereign plan moved forward even through confused and mixed motives.
Textual Notes
The supplied commentaries and lexical data note no significant textual variants for Matthew 27:48. The verse appears consistently in all major Greek manuscripts and early translations. The wording is stable across the tradition, with only minor differences in word order (e.g., the KJV and ASV use “straightway” for εὐθέως). The cross-reference to John 19:29 affirms that the sponge was placed on hyssop, which Matthew calls a reed, a detail that is complementary rather than contradictory.
Reception History
Early church writers read this verse primarily as the fulfillment of Psalm 69:21, seeing in the vinegar a sign of Christ’s true humanity and the bitterness of his suffering. The sponge and reed were sometimes allegorized: the sponge as the symbolic Church soaking up the bitterness of the world, the reed as the fragile instrument of salvation. Medieval piety focused on the thirst of Christ as a model of spiritual longing and as an invitation to offer “the drink of compassion” to the suffering. Reformation commentators debated the bystander’s intent: Calvin saw it as possibly repeated mockery, while Wesley emphasized its friendly character. In modern scholarship, attention falls on the cultural practice of offering posca to soldiers and the way the evangelists wove the moment into their larger scriptural tapestry.
Preaching This Verse
Three-Point Outline
- The Thirst of Christ. Jesus’ request for a drink reveals his full humanity. He was not a phantom suffering. He knew physical need. John 19:28 makes explicit that he said “I thirst” to fulfill Scripture.
- The Ambiguity of Human Response. Was the vinegar offered in cruelty or compassion? The text lets both possibilities stand. This tension forces us to examine our own motives when we respond to someone in pain.
- The Sovereignty of God over Mixed Motives. Psalm 69:21 is fulfilled regardless of the bystander’s intent. God uses even our muddled, even our cruel actions to accomplish his purposes. On the cross, nothing was out of control.
Five-Point Outline
- The Runner. “Immediately one of them ran”, there is urgency. Someone hears the cry and moves.
- The Sponge. A simple, porous object becomes the means of reaching the sufferer. Often God uses ordinary things.
- The Vinegar. Sour wine, the drink of soldiers. It is not refreshing, but it is wet. It symbolizes both the bitterness of the moment and the fulfilment of prophecy.
- The Reed. A stalk of hyssop, likely, linking this moment to Passover (Exodus 12:22). Jesus, the Passover Lamb, is given drink on the very plant used to apply blood to doorposts.
- The Drink. Jesus receives it. Immediately after, he says “It is finished” (John 19:30) and dies. This is not a defeat; it is the completion of his mission.
Illustration Hooks
- A neighbor brings a meal to a family in grief, but the meal comes with strings attached, an expectation of control. The action looks kind, but the motive is mixed.
- In a hospital waiting room, someone mishears a patient’s name and brings the wrong person a drink. The kindness lands awkwardly, yet it still meets a need.
- A person in crisis says “I need help” and the response is either genuine support or a chance to show off. The same action can contain both mercy and mockery.
Questions Your Congregation Is Asking
- Why did Jesus refuse the drugged wine earlier but accept the vinegar now? Was he changing his mind about suffering?
- If Jesus felt forsaken by God, did the drink help or was it just another cruelty?
- Does this story mean we should suffer without seeking relief, or is it okay to accept help when it comes?
Leading a Discussion
This verse occurs at the hinge of the crucifixion, just after Jesus cries out in abandonment and just before he dies. The bystander’s action of offering vinegar can be read as either kindness or cruelty, but whatever the motive, Scripture is being fulfilled. As you discuss, pay attention to the details the gospel writers chose to include. They saw something redemptive in this small, strange act.
Discussion Questions
- Read Matthew 27:45, 50 aloud. What words or actions stand out to you in the sequence?
- One of the bystanders ran to get vinegar. What might have motivated him? What clues does the text give about his intentions?
- Compare this moment with Matthew 27:34, where Jesus refuses wine mixed with gall. Why do you think he accepts the vinegar now but refused the earlier drink?
- Psalm 69:21 is quoted in the background: “They gave me vinegar to drink.” Does knowing this prophecy change how you interpret the bystander’s action? In what way?
- Have you ever been misunderstood when you tried to help someone, or have you ever misjudged someone else’s help? How did that feel?
- What does this verse tell us about Jesus’ humanity? How does it affect the way you think about God entering our suffering?
- If God can work through a confused or even cruel act to fulfill Scripture, what hope does that give you for your own imperfect efforts to follow him?
Word Study
The key original-language words in this verse. Select any word for its full lexicon entry — meaning, every occurrence in Scripture, and related words.
Cross-References
Source: Treasury of Scripture Knowledge (TSK, public domain)
| Psalms 69:21 | They also gave me poison for my food. In my thirst, they gave me vinegar to drink. |
| Matthew 27:34 | they gave him sour wine to drink mixed with gall. When he had tasted it, he would not drink. |
| Luke 23:36 | The soldiers also mocked him, coming to him and offering him vinegar, |
| John 19:29 | Now a vessel full of vinegar was set there; so they put a sponge full of the vinegar on hyssop, and held it at his mouth. |
| John 19:30 | When Jesus therefore had received the vinegar, he said, “It is finished!” Then he bowed his head and gave up his spirit. |
Interlinear and lexical data from STEPBible (CC BY 4.0). Cross-reference data from OpenBible.info (CC BY 4.0). Commentaries are public domain.
For personal reflection
Read the devotional page — prayer, application, and "for families"
What the Commentators Say
8 public-domain commentaries, condensed into plain language.
Adam Clarke's Commentary Methodist/Wesleyan 1826
Clarke emphasizes that the sponge placed on a stalk of hyssop was an act of mercy, intended to alleviate Christ’s suffering rather than add to it. He notes that the hyssop stalk, larger than commonly imagined, made it possible to reach Jesus’ lips.
Barnes' Notes on the Bible Protestant 1832
Barnes clarifies that the vinegar offered to Jesus was not a pain-numbing drink like the earlier wine mixed with myrrh. It was the ordinary sour wine Roman soldiers drank, given in response to Jesus’s cry of thirst. The sponge fastened to a hyssop stalk made it possible to reach his elevated mouth.
Calvin's Commentaries Reformed 1564
Calvin suggests the vinegar was offered to Jesus more than once, not just at the end. He thinks it may have been given in a cup before Jesus was lifted onto the cross, and then again with a sponge while he was hanging there.
Geneva Bible Notes Reformed 1599
And straightway one of them ran, and tooke a spondge, and filled it with vineger, and put it on a reede, and gaue him to drinke.
Gill's Exposition of the Bible Baptist 1748
Gill argues this act was not intended to revive Jesus or hasten his death, as some suppose, but to mock him. The vinegar was offered in contempt, precisely because Jesus had said he was thirsty.
Lange's Commentary Reformed 1857
Lange treats the crucifixion as the divinely ordained transformation of the old world's deepest curse into its greatest blessing. He sees the darkness, the rent veil, and the opened graves as signs that Christ's death simultaneously judged the old order and launched the new creation, turning the place of execution into the gateway of redemption.
Vincent's Word Studies Evangelical 1887
Vincent notes the drink was posca, the sour wine Roman soldiers commonly drank. The Greek tense shows Jesus was in the very act of receiving it when bystanders intervened shouting, "Stop!" They wanted to see if Elijah would rescue him instead.
Wesley's Explanatory Notes Methodist/Wesleyan 1754
Wesley notes that vinegar mixed with water was the ordinary drink of Roman soldiers, so the offer to Jesus was not an act of mockery. He suggests it was done with a friendly intention, to keep Jesus alive until Elijah came, as the bystanders expected.