GospelMount
Search Topics Scripture Prayer Resources Ebooks About Support the mission Saved articles
Jump to ▾

Matthew 16:23 · Bible study

Matthew 16:23 Commentary: Behind the Rebuke, Satan, Stumbling Block, and God's Plan

Greek · 11 what the commentators say

Meaning in one sentence

Explore why Jesus rebukes Peter as 'Satan' and a 'stumbling block' after his confession, revealing the clash between human thinking and God's redemptive plan.

Research Summary

  • Meaning: Jesus rebukes Peter for opposing God's plan of suffering, calling him an adversary and obstacle.
  • Key words: σατανᾶ (Satan/adversary), σκάνδαλον (stumbling block), φρονεῖς (you set your mind).
  • Main debate: Whether Jesus called Peter the devil or used "Satan" as a general term for adversary.
  • Theological theme: The clash between human wisdom and God's redemptive purpose; the danger of well-meaning opposition.
  • Best use: Pastoral teaching on spiritual discernment, the cost of discipleship, and the primacy of the cross.

Translation Comparison

BSB Berean Standard Bible 2020

But Jesus turned and said to Peter, “Get behind Me, Satan! You are a stumbling block to Me. For you do not have in mind the things of God, but the things of men.”

WEB World English Bible 2000

But he turned and said to Peter, “Get behind me, Satan! You are a stumbling block to me, for you are not setting your mind on the things of God, but on the things of men.”

KJV King James Version 1769

But he turned, and said unto Peter, Get thee behind me, Satan: thou art an offence unto me: for thou savourest not the things that be of God, but those that be of men.

ASV American Standard Version 1901

But he turned, and said unto Peter, Get thee behind me, Satan: thou art a stumbling-block unto me: for thou mindest not the things of God, but the things of men.

YLT Young's Literal Translation 1898

and he having turned, said to Peter, `Get thee behind me, adversary! thou art a stumbling-block to me, for thou dost not mind the things of God, but the things of men.'

Darby Darby Bible 1890

But turning round, he said to Peter, Get away behind me, Satan; thou art an offence to me, for thy mind is not on the things that are of God, but on the things that are of men.

Douay-Rheims Douay-Rheims Bible 1899

Who turning, said to Peter: Go behind me, Satan, thou art a scandal unto me: because thou savourest not the things that are of God, but the things that are of men.

Translations in other languages (10 available)
ES Reina-Valera 1909 1909

Entonces él, volviéndose, dijo á Pedro: Quítate de delante de mí, Satanás; me eres escándalo; porque no entiendes lo que es de Dios sino lo que es de los hombres.

PT Almeida Livre 1994

Mas ele se virou, e disse a Pedro: Para trás de mim, Satanás! Tu és um obstáculo, porque não compreendes as coisas de Deus, mas sim as humanas.

FR Louis Segond 1910

Mais Jésus, se retournant, dit à Pierre: Arrière de moi, Satan! tu m’ es en scandale; car tes pensées ne sont pas les pensées de Dieu, mais celles des hommes.

DE Luther Bibel 1912 1912

Aber er wandte sich um und sprach zu Petrus: Hebe dich, Satan, von mir! du bist mir ärgerlich; denn du meinst nicht was göttlich, sondern was menschlich ist.

NL Statenvertaling 1637

Maar Hij, Zich omkerende, zeide tot Petrus: Ga weg achter Mij, satanas! gij zijt Mij een aanstoot, want gij verzint niet de dingen, die Gods zijn, maar die der mensen zijn.

IT Riveduta 1927

Ma Gesù, rivoltosi, disse a Pietro: Vattene via da me, Satana; tu mi sei di scandalo. Tu non hai il senso delle cose di Dio, ma delle cose degli uomini.

PL Biblia Gdańska 1632

A on obróciwszy się, rzekł Piotrowi: Idź ode mnie, szatanie! jesteś mi zgorszeniem; albowiem nie pojmujesz tego, co jest Bożego, ale co jest ludzkiego.

RU Синодальный перевод 1876

Он же, обратившись, сказал Петру: отойди от Меня, сатана! ты Мне соблазн! потому что думаешь не о том, что Божие, но что человеческое.

ZH 和合本 1919

耶穌轉過來,對彼得 說:「撒但,退 我 後邊去吧!你是 絆 我腳的;因為 你不 體貼 神 的意思,只 體貼人的意思。」

EN Bible in Basic English 1949

But he, turning to Peter, said, Get out of my way, Satan: you are a danger to me because your mind is not on the things of God, but on the things of men.

Verse in Context

21 From that time, Jesus began to show his disciples that he must go to Jerusalem and suffer many things from the elders, chief priests, and scribes, and be killed, and the third day be raised up.
22 Peter took him aside and began to rebuke him, saying, “Far be it from you, Lord! This will never be done to you.”
23 But he turned and said to Peter, “Get behind me, Satan! You are a stumbling block to me, for you are not setting your mind on the things of God, but on the things of men.”
24 Then Jesus said to his disciples, “If anyone desires to come after me, let him deny himself, take up his cross, and follow me.
25 For whoever desires to save his life will lose it, and whoever will lose his life for my sake will find it.

Original Language (Koine Greek)

Ὁ Ho T-NSM G3588 <the>
δὲ de CONJ G1161 And
στραφεὶς strapheis V-2APP-NSM G4762 having turned
εἶπεν eipen V-2AAI-3S G2036 He said
τῷ tō T-DSM G3588 <the>
Πέτρῳ· Petrō N-DSM-P G4074 to Peter;
ὕπαγε hupage V-PAM-2S G5217 do go
ὀπίσω opisō PREP G3694 behind
μου mou P-1GS G3165 Me
σατανᾶ, satana N-VSM-T G4567 Satan!
σκάνδαλον skandalon N-NSN G4625 A stumbling block
εἶ ei V-PAI-2S G1510 you are
ἐμοῦ, emou S-1SGSN G1473 to me,
ὅτι hoti CONJ G3754 For
οὐ ou PRT-N G3756 not
φρονεῖς phroneis V-PAI-2S G5426 your thoughts are of
τὰ ta T-APN G3588 those
τοῦ tou T-GSM G3588 <the>
θεοῦ theou N-GSM-T G2316 of God
ἀλλὰ alla CONJ G0235 but
τὰ ta T-APN G3588 [of] the [things]
τῶν tōn T-GPM G3588 <the>
ἀνθρώπων.¶ anthrōpōn N-GPM G0444 of men.

Source: STEPBible TAGNT/TEHB (CC-BY 4.0). Click or tap a morphology code to see the full parsing.

Scholars' Consensus

Commentators across traditions agree that Jesus' severe rebuke stems from Peter's unwitting role as a tempter. Vincent's Word Studies notes that the aorist participle στραφεὶς ('having turned') indicates Jesus turned away from Peter, not toward him, a gesture of repudiation. The word 'Satan' (σατανᾶ) literally means 'adversary,' and as Calvin argues, Jesus applies the term because Peter's advice echoes the devil's temptation to avoid the cross (see Matt 4:10). The noun 'stumbling block' (σκάνδαλον) is explained by Barnes and the Cambridge Bible as an obstacle in the path: Peter is like a stone that does not belong in the road Jesus must travel. The present active verb φρονεῖς ('you set your mind') contrasts two realms: the things of God (τοῦ θεοῦ) and the things of men (τῶν ἀνθρώπων). The consensus holds that Peter's confession of Christ (v.16) was divinely revealed, but his subsequent rebuke came from human reasoning that could not accept a suffering Messiah.

How settled is the interpretation?

Interpretive difficulty: Medium

Main views:

  1. Satan as Adversary (generic): Barnes and Clarke note the Hebrew word satan means adversary; Jesus is calling Peter an opponent, not the devil.
  2. Satan as the Devil (literal): Calvin and Wesley argue Jesus directly identifies Peter's words as satanic, using the same phrase as in the temptation narrative.

What is clear: The rebuke is a strong warning against any attempt to divert Jesus from the path of suffering, revealing the fundamental conflict between human thinking and God's redemptive will.

What Scholars Agree and Debate

TopicAgreedDebated
Meaning of 'Satan' in this contextAll agree the term indicates opposition to Jesus' mission.Some (Barnes, Clarke) argue it is used generically as 'adversary,' not directly identifying Peter with the devil. Others (Calvin, Wesley) see it as a direct reference to the devil working through Peter.
The significance of σκάνδαλον (stumbling block)All agree it refers to an obstacle that hinders Jesus' path to the cross.Some emphasize the semantic range of 'trap trigger' (Thayer), while others focus on its use as 'offence' (KJV) or 'road-block' (Vincent, Cambridge).
Peter's state of mindAll agree Peter was genuinely concerned for Jesus but misguided.Some see it as a temporary lapse (Barnes, Matthew Henry), while others see it as revealing the deep corruption of human nature even in believers (Gill, Wesley).
The appropriateness of Jesus' responseAll agree the rebuke was necessary and proportional.Some traditions (Reformed) stress the absolute necessity of opposing any deviation from God's will; others (Wesleyan/Arminian) emphasize the grace that follows rebuke, as Peter is later restored.

Historical & Cultural Context

Peter's confession that Jesus is 'the Christ, the Son of the living God' (Matt 16:16) had just been commended. But when Jesus begins to speak plainly of his coming suffering and death (v.21), Peter takes him aside to rebuke him (v.22). The Greek verb ἐπιτιμᾶν ('rebuke') is strong; as Barnes notes, Peter earnestly entreats Jesus, saying 'Be it far from thee, Lord' (ἵλεώς σοι, literally 'God be merciful to you'). This reflects the entrenched Jewish expectation of a triumphant Messiah who would restore Israel's political fortunes. As Matthew Henry explains, the disciples were not yet prepared for a suffering Savior, and Jesus reveals the truth gradually.

Peter's interjection seems to him an act of love, but it functions as a satanic temptation to bypass the cross, exactly the same device used by the devil in Matthew 4. The phrase 'Get behind me, Satan' (ὕπαγε ὀπίσω μου, σατανᾶ) is verbatim from Jesus' response to the tempter (Matt 4:10). Culturally, the title 'Satan' (שָׂטָן) in Hebrew thought is the accuser or adversary, as seen in Zechariah 3:1 where Satan stands to accuse Joshua the high priest. Jesus redefines the path of Messiahship in terms of the cross, not political conquest. This moment marks a turning point: from now on, the disciples must learn that following Christ means taking up their own crosses (v.24). The sharp contrast between Peter as the 'rock' (v.18) and as a 'stumbling block' (v.23) highlights the fragility of human devotion when it collides with God's purposes.

Textual Notes

The consulted sources note no significant textual variants for Matthew 16:23. The Greek text is stable across major manuscript traditions, with no material differences affecting interpretation.

Reception History

From the Reformation era onward, commentators such as Calvin, Matthew Henry, and Wesley have stressed that Peter's rebuke is a satanic temptation to avoid the cross, linking this passage with Jesus' wilderness temptation. The verse has also been a key text for understanding the tension between human loyalty and divine purpose. Wesley in particular drew attention to the phrase 'favour thyself' as a satanic lure. In modern preaching, Matthew 16:23 serves as a caution against well-intentioned but misguided counsel and as a reminder of the centrality of the cross in Christian discipleship.

Preaching This Verse

Three-Point Outline

  1. The Rebuke: "Get behind me, Satan." Jesus identifies Peter's loving opposition as the same temptation He faced in the wilderness. The word "Satan" (adversary) reveals that even sincere affection can be weaponized against God's purposes.
  2. The Stumbling Block: "You are a stumbling block to me." The Greek skandalon refers to a trigger-stick in a trap or a stone in the path. Peter, who was called "rock" (Petros), now becomes a stone of stumbling. Good intentions are not enough; they must align with God's design.
  3. The Divided Mind: "You do not set your mind on the things of God, but on the things of men." The verb phroneō (φρονέω) means to think, to be intent on, to have a mindset. Peter's mindset is earthbound. Jesus calls for a fundamental reorientation toward the cross.

Five-Point Outline

  1. The Context of Confession, Peter's high confession (v.16) shows divine revelation; his rebuke shows human weakness.
  2. The Temptation Repeated, Jesus' words echo His victory over Satan in Matthew 4. Peter becomes the mouthpiece of the same temptation: avoid suffering.
  3. The Word σκάνδαλον, Not mere offense, but an active obstruction placed in the path of the cross.
  4. The Antithesis of φρονεῖς, To "mind" the things of God means to embrace the Messiah's path. To "mind" human things is to reject it.
  5. The Disciple's Call, This rebuke leads directly into Jesus' call to self-denial and cross-bearing (v.24). Peter's failure is a teachable moment for all disciples.

Illustration Hooks

  • The Good Friend's Bad Advice: A Christian is called to a mission field in a dangerous region. A well-meaning friend says, "Don't be reckless; God wouldn't want you to suffer." The friend becomes an obstacle to the calling.
  • The Parent Who Protects Too Much: A young adult senses a call to full-time ministry but a parent objects, fearing financial insecurity. The parent's love unintentionally blocks God's plan.
  • The Comfortable Pew: A congregation resists change or outreach because it disrupts their comfort. The church becomes its own stumbling block to the gospel.

Questions Your Congregation Is Asking

  • "Does this mean Peter was possessed by a demon?" (No, but he was used by the same adversary who tempted Jesus.)
  • "Is it wrong to have human concerns about suffering?" (It is natural, but those concerns must yield to God's revealed will.)
  • "When does loving advice become a satanic temptation?" (When it contradicts the clear path of obedience that God has set before us.)

Leading a Discussion

Peter had just declared Jesus as the Christ. But moments later, he becomes a stumbling block. This passage forces us to examine our own mindsets: are we setting our thoughts on God's purposes or on human expectations?

Discussion Questions

  1. What do you notice about the sequence of events from v.16 to v.23? How does Peter's change in posture strike you?
  2. Why do you think Jesus uses the same words he spoke to the devil in Matthew 4? What does that imply about Peter's counsel?
  3. The Greek word skandalon means a trigger in a trap or a stone in the road. How does this image help you understand Peter's role here?
  4. Verse 23 says Peter "did not have in mind the things of God." In what ways do our good intentions sometimes blind us to God's larger plan?
  5. How can we discern the difference between appropriate concern for others and a concern that actually hinders God's work?
  6. Jesus says "Get behind me." How does this phrase shape our understanding of discipleship, following, not leading?
  7. This passage leads directly to the call to take up our cross. How does the rebuke here prepare us for the cost of following Christ?

What the Commentators Say

10 public-domain commentaries, condensed into plain language.

Adam Clarke's Commentary Methodist/Wesleyan 1826

Clarke clarifies that Jesus did not call Peter the devil. The literal translation of "Satan" is "adversary," and "offense" means a stumbling-block. Peter's loving but misguided plea was an obstacle to Christ's mission, not an evil intention.

Barnes' Notes on the Bible Protestant 1832

Barnes stresses that when Jesus called Peter "Satan," He used the word in its literal sense meaning an adversary or one who opposes a plan. Jesus was not calling Peter the devil but rebuking him for interfering with God’s purpose by trying to prevent His death.

Calvin's Commentaries Reformed 1564

Calvin dismisses the common idea that "behind" in "Get thee behind me" means Peter should follow rather than lead. For him, the Greek simply means "withdraw," and Christ thrusts Peter away because his human reasoning opposes God's plan. The real danger is clinging to our own wisdom instead of submitting to what the Lord approves.

Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges Anglican 1880

The commentator notes that Peter is treated as the tempter when he argues for an earthly kingdom, receiving the same rebuke as Satan. The Greek word behind "savourest" carries the sense of political partisanship, meaning Peter is siding with man rather than God.

Geneva Bible Notes Reformed 1599

The note highlights that Peter’s well-meaning objection was satanic because it elevated human priorities over God’s redemptive will. His desire to protect Christ from suffering made him a stumbling block, showing that any opposition to God’s purpose is demonic.

Gill's Exposition of the Bible Baptist 1748

Gill argues that when Christ called Peter "Satan," He meant the corruption of human nature, a meaning familiar from Jewish teaching. Christ rebuked Peter publicly and sharply because nothing offended Him more than any attempt to turn Him from His suffering and death for salvation.

Jamieson-Fausset-Brown Commentary Protestant 1871

JFB highlights the startling speed with which Peter, moments after being called a rock, becomes a stumbling block. Jesus detects in his words the same satanic lure that came from the Tempter, aiming to turn Him from the cross. Peter's human thinking, though well-meaning, directly opposes God's redemptive plan.

Lange's Commentary Reformed 1857

Lange highlights that Peter’s rapid fall from bold confessor to stumbling block shows how quickly Satan exploits spiritual triumph. Jesus’ harsh rebuke targets not Peter personally but the satanic influence working through him to oppose the cross. Peter momentarily becomes an unconscious adversary, resisting God’

Vincent's Word Studies Evangelical 1887

Vincent notes that when Jesus turned to Peter, He turned away from him, not toward him. The word for offense here means a stone misplaced in the road—Peter is not merely offensive but an obstacle in Jesus’ path. And “savorest” describes a mindset or taste, not what Peter feels but what his thoughts are flavored by: human interests, not God’s.

Wesley's Explanatory Notes Methodist/Wesleyan 1754

Wesley highlights that Jesus' unusually sharp rebuke to Peter was aimed at his pride after receiving praise. Calling Peter "Satan" identifies him as an enemy hindering Christ's redemptive work by urging self-preservation. Wesley concludes that any counsel

Word Study

The key original-language words in this verse. Select any word for its full lexicon entry — meaning, every occurrence in Scripture, and related words.

Cross-References

Source: Treasury of Scripture Knowledge (TSK, public domain)

Genesis 3:1 Now the serpent was more subtle than any animal of the field which Yahweh God had made. He said to the woman, “Has God really said, ‘You shall not eat of any tree of the garden’?”
Genesis 3:6 When the woman saw that the tree was good for food, and that it was a delight to the eyes, and that the tree was to be desired to make one wise, she took some of its fruit, and ate. Then she gave some to her husband with her, and he ate it, too.
Genesis 3:17 To Adam he said, “Because you have listened to your wife’s voice, and have eaten from the tree, about which I commanded you, saying, ‘You shall not eat of it,’ the ground is cursed for your sake. You will eat from it with much labor all the days of your life.
II Samuel 19:22 David said, “What have I to do with you, you sons of Zeruiah, that you should be adversaries to me today? Shall any man be put to death today in Israel? For don’t I know that I am king over Israel today?”
I Chronicles 21:1 Satan stood up against Israel, and moved David to take a census of Israel.
Isaiah 8:14 He will be a sanctuary, but for both houses of Israel, he will be a stumbling stone and a rock that makes them fall. For the people of Jerusalem, he will be a trap and a snare.
Zechariah 3:1 He showed me Joshua the high priest standing before Yahweh’s angel, and Satan standing at his right hand to be his adversary.
Zechariah 3:2 Yahweh said to Satan, “Yahweh rebuke you, Satan! Yes, Yahweh who has chosen Jerusalem rebuke you! Isn’t this a burning stick plucked out of the fire?”

Interlinear and lexical data from STEPBible (CC BY 4.0). Cross-reference data from OpenBible.info (CC BY 4.0). Commentaries are public domain.

For personal reflection

Read the devotional page — prayer, application, and "for families"

← Devotional