Matthew 10:10 · Bible study
Matthew 10:10 Commentary: The Laborer Is Worthy of His Food
Greek · 11 what the commentators say
Meaning in one sentence
Examine Jesus’ command to travel light and the principle of provision: the worker deserves support. Historical context, textual notes, and lasting significance.
Research Summary
- Meaning: Jesus commands absolute trust, promising that gospel workers will receive food from those they serve.
- Key words: Pēra (bag), a leathern provisions pouch; axios (worthy), of equal weight or merit; trophē (food), nourishment, sustenance.
- Main debate: Whether the restriction on provisions was a temporary first‑mission rule or a permanent pattern for all who preach the gospel.
- Theological theme: God’s providence through human generosity and the dignity of those who work in God’s harvest.
- Best use: A foundational text for the biblical case that churches should materially support their teachers and missionaries.
Translation Comparison
BSB Berean Standard Bible 2020
Take no bag for the road, or second tunic, or sandals, or staff; for the worker is worthy of his provisions.
WEB World English Bible 2000
Take no bag for your journey, neither two coats, nor sandals, nor staff: for the laborer is worthy of his food.
KJV King James Version 1769
Nor scrip for your journey, neither two coats, neither shoes, nor yet staves: for the workman is worthy of his meat.
ASV American Standard Version 1901
no wallet for your journey, neither two coats, nor shoes, nor staff: for the laborer is worthy of his food.
YLT Young's Literal Translation 1898
nor scrip for the way, nor two coats, nor sandals, nor staff--for the workman is worthy of his nourishment.
Darby Darby Bible 1890
nor scrip for the way, nor two body coats, nor sandals, nor a staff: for the workman is worthy of his nourishment.
Douay-Rheims Douay-Rheims Bible 1899
Nor scrip for your journey, nor two coats, nor shoes, nor a staff; for the workman is worthy of his meat.
Translations in other languages (10 available)
Ni alforja para el camino, ni dos ropas de vestir, ni zapatos, ni bordón; porque el obrero digno es de su alimento.
Nem bolsas para o caminho, nem duas túnicas, nem sandálias, nem bordão extra ; pois o trabalhador é digno de seu alimento.
ni sac pour le voyage, ni deux tuniques, ni souliers, ni bâton; car l’ ouvrier mérite sa nourriture.
auch keine Tasche zur Wegfahrt, auch nicht zwei Röcke, keine Schuhe, auch keinen Stecken. Denn ein Arbeiter ist seiner Speise wert.
Noch male tot den weg, noch twee rokken, noch schoenen, noch staf; want de arbeider is zijn voedsel waardig.
né di sacca da viaggio, né di due tuniche, né di calzari, né di bastone, perché l’operaio è degno del suo nutrimento.
Ani taistry na drogę, ani dwóch sukien, ani butów, ani laski; albowiem godzien jest robotnik żywności swojej.
ни сумы на дорогу, ни двух одежд, ни обуви, ни посоха, ибо трудящийся достоин пропитания.
行路 不要 帶口袋;不要 帶兩件 褂子,也不要 帶鞋 和 柺杖。因為 工人 得 飲食 是應當的。
Take no bag for your journey and do not take two coats or shoes or a stick: for the workman has a right to his food.
Verse in Context
Original Language (Koine Greek)
New Testament · Koine Greek · Matthew 10:10
Source: STEPBible TAGNT/TEHB (CC-BY 4.0). Click or tap a morphology code to see the full parsing.
Scholars' Consensus
Commentators widely agree that this verse teaches dependence on God and affirms the right of gospel workers to material support. The command to take no extra provisions, no bag, second tunic, sandals, or staff, aims to free the apostles from worry and to let God provide through those who receive their message. Calvin notes that Jesus answered the disciples’ potential anxiety about hunger by assuring them that they would not starve; the laborer is worthy of his food. Barnes and Gill emphasize that the prohibition does not forbid normal wear but only superfluous preparation. The phrase “the workman is worthy of his food” is universally treated as a general principle: those who work in God’s harvest deserve to be supported by it. Paul later cites this principle as Scripture (1 Tim 5:18; 1 Cor 9:14). The apparent tension with Mark 6:8 (where a staff is allowed) is resolved by most commentators, including Wesley, JFB, and the Cambridge Bible, by noting that Matthew forbids acquiring a staff specially, not using one already in hand.
How settled is the interpretation?
Interpretive difficulty: Medium
Main views:
- Temporary first‑mission rule: The restricted scope (only Israel), the short duration, and Jesus’ later instruction in Luke 22:35–36 to now take purse and bag suggest a change.
- Permanent pattern of faith: Paul applies the principle universally (1 Cor 9:14; Gal 6:6; 1 Tim 5:18), and the “laborer is worthy” maxim is cited as a standing truth.
What is clear: The worker deserves material support; God provides for those who serve him, often through the generosity of his people.
What Scholars Agree and Debate
| Topic | Agreed | Debated |
|---|---|---|
| Scope of the command | The immediate context was a short‑term mission to the lost sheep of Israel. | Some Christians read this as a literal rule for all missions (especially among groups that practice itinerant poverty), while others see it as a temporary strategy later modified (Luke 22:35, 36). |
| The staff contradiction | All agree that Matthew and Mark can be harmonized; the core teaching is not in conflict. | Matthew’s “nor a staff” (singular) is taken by many to mean “do not acquire an extra staff,” while Mark allows the one already in hand. A minority see a genuine textual variant (plural “staves” in some manuscripts). |
| “Worthy”, earned or gifted? | The laborer has a right to food; support is not charity but an obligation. | Catholic tradition emphasizes the dignity of the calling; Reformed traditions stress God’s ordination of means; both uphold the principle. |
| What “food” covers | At minimum, daily nourishment; the context of a first‑century journey. | Some extend it to all necessary support (housing, healthcare, etc.), citing the parallel in Luke 10:7 (wages, not just food). |
Historical & Cultural Context
First-century Judea was a land of subsistence farmers, shepherds, and small traders. A traveler’s equipment was minimal: a tunic (the basic garment worn next to the skin), sandals on the feet, and a staff for walking. The “scrip” or pēra (G4082) was a leathern pouch hung from the neck or belt, used by shepherds and travelers to carry a day’s food (see 1 Sam 17:40, where David puts his stones in a shepherd’s bag). Jesus tells the Twelve not to take any of these extras, not even a second tunic for changing, or a staff for defense. The repeated Greek word mēde (“nor”) creates a litany of renunciation: pack nothing.
The historical backdrop is crucial. Jesus sent the apostles only to “the lost sheep of the house of Israel” (v. 6), a limited mission of urgency. The harvest was plentiful, the laborers few (9:37). Clarke comments that the instruction was meant to make the apostles “like men in haste, eager to begin the important work.” The command to travel light also protected them from being mistaken for wandering Cynic philosophers, who sometimes carried a begging bag. Instead, Jesus wanted his messengers to trust that hospitable households would provide for them (v. 11). This was not a general rejection of possessions but a contextual discipline for a specific, short-term campaign. The principle would later be broadened (Luke 22:35, 36) and applied by Paul to all who preach the gospel (1 Cor 9:14). The mission’s rapid success confirms that God sustained his workers through the generosity of ordinary people.
Textual Notes
The Greek New Testament (NA28) reads rhabdon (“staff,” singular). However, a significant number of manuscripts (C E F G K L M P S V, ninety‑three others) read rhabdous (“staves,” plural). Clarke and the KJV follow the plural reading, which they argue removes the apparent contradiction with Mark 6:8 (where a single staff is permitted). Most modern editors, including the UBS committee, accept the singular as original, noting that the plural likely arose from scribal harmonization to the plural items in the list. No variant affects the overall sense: the apostles were not to take extra or superfluous equipment.
Reception History
Early Christians applied this verse practically. The Didache (c. AD 120) uses it to regulate travelling apostles: they may stay only one or two days and must work for their keep; if they ask for money, they are false prophets. In the medieval period, the verse was often cited to support the right of clergy to receive tithes and offerings. The Reformers, including Calvin, saw it as a divine warrant for paying ministers. In the modern missionary movement, figures like Hudson Taylor invoked the principle to rely on God alone for support, trusting that the “laborer is worthy” would move God’s people to give. Across traditions, the verse has been a touchstone for the conviction that those who give their lives to the gospel should not lack what they need.
Preaching This Verse
Three-point outline
- Travel light. Jesus strips his apostles of anything that would slow them down or tempt them to rely on themselves. The prohibition covers money (v. 9), bag, extra clothing, footwear, and weapons. It is a lesson in radical trust.
- Trust God’s provision. The command is not a test of endurance but a promise. The workers will be fed because they are worthy of their food. God works through the welcome of others.
- Live by the principle. The maxim “the laborer is worthy of his food” becomes a cornerstone of Christian ministry. Paul uses it to argue that those who preach the gospel should get their living from the gospel (1 Cor 9:14).
Five-point outline
- Context of urgent mission, Jesus sends the Twelve to Israel only, with no time for packing.
- What is forbidden: money, bag, second tunic, sandals (extra pair), staff (as a weapon or second walking stick).
- The deeper lesson: dependence on God and the hospitality of God’s people.
- The principle: the worker deserves material support, a divine right, not a favor.
- Extension in church history: the Didache (c. AD 120) applies this to travelling apostles, limiting their stay and forbidding them to ask for money.
Illustration hooks
- The first-time missionary. A young couple moves to a new city with one suitcase. They trust that God will provide through the church, and they find that people feed them, house them, and even buy them winter coats.
- The short-term team. A youth group goes on a week-long outreach with only a sleeping bag and a change of clothes. The experience of depending on hosts teaches them more about God’s care than any sermon.
Questions your congregation is asking
- Does Jesus expect us to give up all planning and preparation for ministry?
- How do we support missionaries without making them feel like beggars?
- Does this passage mean pastors should never ask for a raise?
Leading a Discussion
This passage challenges our instinct to be self-sufficient. Jesus did not send the apostles out vulnerable just to test them, he sent them with a promise. As you work through these questions, notice both the urgency of the mission and the generosity of the Giver.
Discussion questions
- Read Matthew 10:5, 10. List everything Jesus told the apostles not to take. Why these specific items?
- What does the phrase “the workman is worthy of his food” tell us about how God views those who serve him?
- Compare this passage with Mark 6:8, 9, where a staff is allowed. How would you explain the difference to someone who thinks the Bible contradicts itself?
- Jesus says “freely you received, so freely give” (v. 8). How does generosity toward others connect to trusting God for your own needs?
- Should Christians today follow these instructions literally, or is this a timeless principle applied differently? What evidence from the rest of the New Testament supports your view?
- In what situations might our church be tempted to rely on resources rather than on God’s provision through relationships?
- How can we better support those who work among us, pastors, missionaries, teachers, in a way that honors the principle of this verse?
Word Study
The key original-language words in this verse. Select any word for its full lexicon entry — meaning, every occurrence in Scripture, and related words.
Cross-References
Source: Treasury of Scripture Knowledge (TSK, public domain)
| I Samuel 9:7 | Then Saul said to his servant, “But behold, if we go, what should we bring the man? For the bread is spent in our sacks, and there is not a present to bring to the man of God. What do we have?” |
| I Samuel 17:40 | He took his staff in his hand, and chose for himself five smooth stones out of the brook, and put them in the pouch of his shepherd’s bag which he had. His sling was in his hand; and he came near to the Philistine. |
| Luke 3:11 | He answered them, “He who has two coats, let him give to him who has none. He who has food, let him do likewise.” |
| Luke 10:7 | Remain in that same house, eating and drinking the things they give, for the laborer is worthy of his wages. Don’t go from house to house. |
| Luke 10:12 | I tell you, it will be more tolerable in that day for Sodom than for that city. |
| I Corinthians 9:4 | Have we no right to eat and to drink? |
| I Corinthians 9:14 | Even so the Lord ordained that those who proclaim the Good News should live from the Good News. |
| Galatians 6:6 | But let him who is taught in the word share all good things with him who teaches. |
Interlinear and lexical data from STEPBible (CC BY 4.0). Cross-reference data from OpenBible.info (CC BY 4.0). Commentaries are public domain.
For personal reflection
Read the devotional page — prayer, application, and "for families"
What the Commentators Say
10 public-domain commentaries, condensed into plain language.
Adam Clarke's Commentary Methodist/Wesleyan 1826
Clarke focuses on the textual variant between "staff" and "staves," arguing Jesus forbids carrying multiple staffs for defense, not a single walking stick. The point is total dependence: ministers go defenseless, relying on God's provision and protection, and should be in urgent haste to rescue perishing souls.
Barnes' Notes on the Bible Protestant 1832
Barnes resolves the apparent contradiction between Matthew and Mark by focusing on the core instruction: the apostles were to go just as they were, trusting Providence rather than spending time making preparations. Those who already had staves could take them, but those without were not to procure them.
Calvin's Commentaries Reformed 1564
Calvin notes that Christ's statement about laborers being worthy of food addresses the disciples' fear of traveling without provisions. He calls them laborers not as ordinary ministers but as heralds of a fuller doctrine, sent only to prepare the Jews for the Gospel itself.
Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges Anglican 1880
The commentary clarifies the specific items Jesus forbids the apostles to carry: a scrip (a wallet like David's), two tunics, and sandals. It notes that even the philosopher Socrates wore only one tunic and went without sandals, emphasizing a life of bare necessities.
Geneva Bible Notes Reformed 1599
The core point of the Geneva note is that the command to carry no supplies rests on a divine principle of provision: a worker deserves his food. Therefore the disciples need not worry about lacking essentials, because those who receive the gospel are responsible for supporting those who bring it.
Gill's Exposition of the Bible Baptist 1748
Gill focuses on the specific Jewish distinctions in these instructions, like the difference between shoes and sandals and the allowance of one staff but not multiple. He then argues that Christ's command not to take provisions actually establishes the minister's right to be supported by the people, since the workman deserves his food.
Jamieson-Fausset-Brown Commentary Protestant 1871
JFB argues
Lange's Commentary Reformed 1857
Lange stresses that Christ's restriction to Jewish territory was a temporary strategy, not a permanent rule. He argues that the disciples already leaned toward a universal mission, so the prohibition was needed to first establish the kingdom in Israel before reaching the whole world.
Vincent's Word Studies Evangelical 1887
Vincent draws on the early church manual known as the Didache to show that the principle of a workman deserving his support was taken literally. The document instructs believers to receive apostles briefly and provide for true teachers with firstfruits, just as a hired worker earns his keep.
Wesley's Explanatory Notes Methodist/Wesleyan 1754
Wesley resolves the apparent conflict between Matthew and Mark by explaining that Jesus forbade procuring a staff, not using one already in hand. He also notes that the promise of maintenance covers all basic needs the disciples were told not to carry for themselves.