Mark 6:13 · Bible study
Mark 6:13 Commentary: Why Oil? Symbol, Medicine, or Miracle?
Greek · 8 what the commentators say
Meaning in one sentence
Why did the apostles anoint the sick with oil in Mark 6:13?
Research Summary
- Meaning: Apostles healed the sick and cast out demons by Jesus’ authority, using anointing with oil as a visible, tangible act of faith.
- Key words: kai (and), connects the three actions; exeballon (imperfect: ongoing casting out); ēleiphon (imperfect: repeated anointing); arrōstous (“without strength,” the sick).
- Main debate: Was the anointing medicinal, purely symbolic, or a supernatural means of healing?
- Theological theme: The kingdom of God breaks in through physical means, words, touch, oil, as instruments of divine power.
- Best use: As a model for faith-filled, compassionate ministry that addresses both spiritual and physical needs.
Translation Comparison
BSB Berean Standard Bible 2020
They also drove out many demons and healed many of the sick, anointing them with oil.
WEB World English Bible 2000
They cast out many demons, and anointed many with oil who were sick and healed them.
KJV King James Version 1769
And they cast out many devils, and anointed with oil many that were sick, and healed them.
ASV American Standard Version 1901
And they cast out many demons, and anointed with oil many that were sick, and healed them.
YLT Young's Literal Translation 1898
and many demons they were casting out, and they were anointing with oil many infirm, and they were healing them .
Darby Darby Bible 1890
and they cast out many demons, and anointed with oil many infirm, and healed them.
Douay-Rheims Douay-Rheims Bible 1899
And they cast out many devils, and anointed with oil many that were sick, and healed them.
Translations in other languages (10 available)
Y echaban fuera muchos demonios, y ungían con aceite á muchos enfermos, y sanaban.
Eles expulsaram muitos demônios, e a muitos enfermos ungiram com azeite, e os curaram.
Ils chassaient beaucoup de démons, et ils oignaient d’ huile beaucoup de malades et les guérissaient.
und trieben viele Teufel aus und salbten viele Sieche mit Öl und machten sie gesund.
En zij wierpen vele duivelen uit, en zalfden vele kranken met olie, en maakten hen gezond.
cacciavano molti demoni, ungevano d’olio molti infermi e li guarivano.
I wyganiali wiele dyjabłów, i wiele chorych olejkiem mazali i uzdrawiali je.
изгоняли многих бесов и многих больных мазали маслом и исцеляли.
又 趕出 許多的 鬼, 用油 抹了 許多 病人, 治好他們。
And they sent out a number of evil spirits, and put oil on a great number who were ill, and made them well.
Verse in Context
Original Language (Koine Greek)
New Testament · Koine Greek · Mark 6:13
Source: STEPBible TAGNT/TEHB (CC-BY 4.0). Click or tap a morphology code to see the full parsing.
Scholars' Consensus
The commentators broadly agree that the apostles’ anointing with oil was a sign of faith through which God healed, not medicine in the modern sense. Barnes notes that anointing was common among Jews for its soothing effect, but the apostles used it “like the imposition of hands … as a sign, in expectation of imparting that aid and comfort from God which was sought.” Gill insists it was “not as a medicine; otherwise there would have been no miracle.” Wesley calls it an act that depended on “the supernatural blessing of God.” The Cambridge Bible adds that oil was “a fitting symbol and an efficient means” for miraculous cures. All highlight the three-fold connection: preaching repentance (v.12), casting out demons, and anointing with oil for healing, all manifestations of the same divine authority Jesus gave the Twelve (Mark 6:7).
How settled is the interpretation?
Interpretive difficulty: Medium
Main views:
- Medicinal view: Oil was a common first-century remedy; the apostles used it as medicine, and God healed through natural means.
- Symbolic view: Oil represented God’s comfort and blessing; it was a tangible sign of faith, not a medication.
- Supernatural means view: The oil itself had no curative power, but it functioned as a faith-filled physical medium through which God directly healed.
What is clear: The apostles healed the sick and cast out demons through the authority Jesus gave them, and anointing with oil was an integral part of that healing ministry.
What Scholars Agree and Debate
| Topic | Agreed | Debated |
|---|---|---|
| Nature of the anointing with oil | Anointing was a familiar Jewish practice for soothing the sick, and the apostles used it as a physical sign accompanying prayer for healing. | Some see it as essentially medicinal (oil as ancient medicine), others as purely symbolic (representing God's comfort), and others as a supernatural means through which God directly healed. |
| Continuation of the practice today | James 5:14-15 prescribes anointing the sick with oil in the name of the Lord. | Catholic, Orthodox, and some Anglican traditions view this as a sacrament (Extreme Unction) with grace for the dying; many Protestant traditions see it as a voluntary, faith-based act of prayer for healing, not a fixed ritual. |
| Relation to modern medicine | Healing in Scripture often involves prayer, faith, and community support. | Some emphasize that medicine and prayer work together (God working through doctors); others see anointing as a separate, miraculous avenue that should not be confused with medical treatment. |
| Apostolic uniqueness | The apostles exercised extraordinary authority as Jesus’ commissioned representatives. | Cessationists argue that miraculous healings and exorcisms were limited to the apostolic age; continuationists (including Pentecostals, charismatics, and many Catholics/Orthodox) believe these gifts continue in the Church today. |
Historical & Cultural Context
Anointing with oil was woven into Jewish daily life and religious practice. Olive oil was used for lamps, cooking, cosmetics, and as a soothing remedy for wounds. The prophet Isaiah pictures the wound that “has not been closed, nor bandaged, nor soothed with oil” (Isaiah 1:6). In Luke 10:34, the Good Samaritan pours oil and wine on the injured man’s wounds. Jewish sources, quoted by Gill, permit anointing a sick person even on the Sabbath, treating it as a medicinal act. So the apostles were drawing on a recognizable cultural practice.
Yet the context transforms it. Jesus had just given the Twelve authority over unclean spirits (Mark 6:7) and sent them out with minimal provisions, depending on the hospitality of others. Their mission was urgent and supernatural: preach repentance, cast out demons, heal the sick. The Greek verbs in verse 13 are all in the imperfect tense, έξέβαλλον, ἤλειφον, έθεράπευον, signalling repeated or ongoing action. They were casting out many demons, anointing many sick, and healing them as they moved from town to town.
In the ancient world, oil was the most common medication, but it was never a universal cure. Gill points out that “oil, though it may be useful in some cases, is not an universal medicine.” The apostles did not train as physicians; they acted on Jesus’ authority. The anointing likely served as a tangible, sensory connection between the sickness and God’s power, much as Jesus used mud and spittle when he healed the blind man (Mark 8:23). It was not the oil itself that healed, but the prayer of faith and the power of God working through the act.
This same practice reappears in James 5:14-15, where elders are instructed to anoint the sick with oil in the name of the Lord, with the promise that “the prayer of faith will heal him who is sick.” First-century readers would have understood this as a natural bridge between everyday remedies and the extraordinary power of the gospel.
Textual Notes
The supplied sources note no significant textual variants for Mark 6:13. The verse is stable across the Greek manuscript tradition, with only minor scribal variations in spelling (e.g., δαιμόνια vs. δαιμώνια) that do not affect the meaning. The three verbs, ἐξέβαλλον, ἤλειφον, ἐθεράπευον, all stand in the imperfect tense in the earliest manuscripts, supporting the sense of ongoing or repeated action.
Reception History
In the early church, anointing with oil for healing was common, reflected in the Apostolic Tradition of Hippolytus (c. AD 215) and in the sacrament of the sick. By the Middle Ages, this practice evolved into the Catholic sacrament of Extreme Unction (Anointing of the Sick), often reserved for the dying. The Reformers, particularly John Calvin, objected to what they saw as a superstitious view of the oil itself, emphasizing instead the prayer of faith. Wesley’s Notes reclaim the verse as a “standing means of healing” in the early Church, uncorrupted by later ritual. In modern charismatic renewal, Mark 6:13 and James 5:14-15 are often cited to support healing services where elders anoint and pray for the sick, while conservative evangelical traditions tend to see these verses as descriptive of a unique apostolic age. Across all traditions, the verse has been read as a picture of compassionate ministry that addresses the whole person, body, mind, and spirit.
Preaching This Verse
Three-point outline
- Authority in action. The Twelve were not sent just to talk; they demonstrated the kingdom through visible acts, casting out demons and healing the sick. Their authority came from Jesus (Mark 6:7) and was confirmed by results.
- Compassion with a sign. Anointing with oil was not magical. It was a compassionate, tangible gesture that connected the sick person to God’s healing power. It met people where they were, in their bodies, with a symbol of comfort and restoration.
- The same mission continues. The apostles’ pattern, preaching, deliverance, and prayerful healing, remains the Church’s calling. While the methods may vary, the source of power does not. James 5:14-15 extends this practice to the life of the local congregation.
Five-point outline
- Jesus authorizes the Twelve (Mark 6:7).
- They preach repentance (Mark 6:12).
- They cast out demons, victory over spiritual oppression.
- They anoint the sick with oil, a familiar symbol now charged with divine power.
- They heal them, God’s response to faith and prayer.
Illustration hooks
- The church prayer room. A pastor receives a phone call from a panicked parent whose child has a high fever. She goes to the home, opens her Bible to James 5, uncaps a small bottle of olive oil, and prays with the family. The fever breaks hours later. Was it the oil? The prayer? Both?
- The hospital bedside. A patient says, “I’ve tried every treatment. Nothing works. Could you just pray and anoint me?” The request is not for medicine but for hope made visible. The oil becomes a sign that God is present.
- The spice cabinet. Olive oil sits in every kitchen. It is common, ordinary. Yet in the apostles’ hands it became a channel of grace. Sometimes God uses the everyday things, bread, water, oil, to show that His power is not limited to the extraordinary.
Questions your congregation is asking
- Should we still anoint the sick with oil today, or was that only for the apostles?
- If someone is anointed and not healed, does that mean we lacked faith?
- How do we balance praying for supernatural healing with using modern medicine?
Leading a Discussion
This short verse sits at the climax of the apostles’ first mission. Jesus had called them, given them power, and sent them out with nothing but a staff and sandals. They came back with stories of demons fleeing and bodies restored. Anointing with oil was a bridge between ordinary life and extraordinary power. As you discuss this passage, let the text itself guide your conversation.
Discussion questions
- Read Mark 6:7-13. What does the connection between preaching, casting out demons, and healing tell us about the nature of the gospel mission?
- Why do you think the apostles used oil rather than simply laying on hands or praying? What would anointing with oil have communicated to a first-century Jewish audience?
- In your own words, was the oil itself a medicine that healed, or was it a symbol? How does the language of the passage support your view?
- How does James 5:14-15 echo what we see in Mark 6:13? Does James present this as a command for all churches or a description of first-century practice?
- Think of a time you or someone you know prayed earnestly for healing. Was there any physical action, laying on of hands, anointing, or even a medical treatment, that accompanied the prayer? How did that action help (or not)?
- If a fellow Christian today asked to be anointed with oil during prayer for healing, how would you respond? Would you be comfortable, and why?
- What does Mark 6:13 reveal about God’s heart for the sick, the oppressed, and the weak? How can we show that same compassion in our community this week?
Word Study
The key original-language words in this verse. Select any word for its full lexicon entry — meaning, every occurrence in Scripture, and related words.
Cross-References
Source: Treasury of Scripture Knowledge (TSK, public domain)
| Mark 6:7 | He called to himself the twelve, and began to send them out two by two; and he gave them authority over the unclean spirits. |
| Luke 10:17 | The seventy returned with joy, saying, “Lord, even the demons are subject to us in your name!” |
| James 5:14 | Is any among you sick? Let him call for the elders of the assembly, and let them pray over him, anointing him with oil in the name of the Lord; |
| James 5:15 | and the prayer of faith will heal him who is sick, and the Lord will raise him up. If he has committed sins, he will be forgiven. |
Interlinear and lexical data from STEPBible (CC BY 4.0). Cross-reference data from OpenBible.info (CC BY 4.0). Commentaries are public domain.
For personal reflection
Read the devotional page — prayer, application, and "for families"
What the Commentators Say
7 public-domain commentaries, condensed into plain language.
Adam Clarke's Commentary Methodist/Wesleyan 1826
Clarke distinguishes between the ordinary Jewish medicinal use of anointing oil and its role in this miraculous context. Here the oil itself had no more inherent power than the laying on of hands; it served only as a symbol of the ease, comfort, and joy they prayed God would grant the sick.
Barnes' Notes on the Bible Protestant 1832
Barnes notes that while anointing with oil was a common Jewish practice with soothing medical effects, the apostles' use went beyond mere medicine. He sees it as a symbolic sign, similar to laying on of hands or Jesus' use of clay, representing the divine comfort and help sought from God.
Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges Anglican 1880
The commentator notes that Mark alone records anointing with oil as the method for healing the sick, seeing it as a fitting symbol and practical means grounded in Jewish medicinal practice. Though not explicitly commanded, it was implied in the instruction to heal, and later confirmed by James.
Geneva Bible Notes Reformed 1599
The Geneva note clarifies that the anointing with oil was
Gill's Exposition of the Bible Baptist 1748
Gill argues that the apostles' anointing with oil was an extraordinary miraculous sign tied to their unique office, not a medicinal practice or a precedent for ongoing Church rituals. This gift confirmed their divine mission and showed their power over demons, but it belonged entirely to the apostolic age and has now ceased. He therefore sees no warrant here for modern anointing practices, including extreme unction.
Matthew Henry's Commentary Reformed/Presbyterian 1710
Henry observes that Mark specifically notes the apostles were sent out in pairs, a detail the other Gospels omit. His emphasis falls on the transition from learning to doing: having received from Christ, they must now give. Studying has its place, but the disciples are now called to put their knowledge to work for others.
Wesley's Explanatory Notes Methodist/Wesleyan 1754
Wesley insists the early Christian practice of anointing the sick was meant for physical healing, granted by God's supernatural blessing, not by the oil's natural power. He sharply distinguishes this from the later rite of extreme unction, which is applied only when life is despaired of and bears little resemblance to the biblical pattern.