Luke 16:14 · Bible study
Luke 16:14 Commentary: Scoffing at the Kingdom
Greek · 10 what the commentators say
Meaning in one sentence
Why religious leaders who loved money scoffed at Jesus. Greek word study of φιλάργυροι and ἐξεμυκτήριζον, and its meaning for faith today.
Research Summary
- Meaning: The Pharisees, who were lovers of money, heard Jesus’ teaching and openly mocked Him.
- Key words: φιλάργυροι (philarguroi, lovers of money); ἐξεμυκτήριζον (exemuktērizon, they turned up the nose in contempt).
- Main debate: Was their mockery due to defense of their wealth, or social disdain for Jesus’ poverty? Commentators lean toward both.
- Theological theme: Love of money is incompatible with authentic discipleship; it can blind even the most religious to the Kingdom of God.
- Best use: A text for self-examination on greed, for warnings against religious hypocrisy, and for reminding the church that our treasure reveals our true master.
Translation Comparison
BSB Berean Standard Bible 2020
The Pharisees, who were lovers of money, heard all of this and were scoffing at Jesus.
WEB World English Bible 2000
The Pharisees, who were lovers of money, also heard all these things, and they scoffed at him.
KJV King James Version 1769
And the Pharisees also, who were covetous, heard all these things: and they derided him.
ASV American Standard Version 1901
And the Pharisees, who were lovers of money, heard all these things; and they scoffed at him.
YLT Young's Literal Translation 1898
And also the Pharisees, being lovers of money, were hearing all these things, and were deriding him,
Darby Darby Bible 1890
And the Pharisees also, who were covetous, heard all these things, and mocked him.
Douay-Rheims Douay-Rheims Bible 1899
Now the Pharisees, who were covetous, heard all these things: and they derided him.
Translations in other languages (10 available)
Y oían también todas estas cosas los Fariseos, los cuales eran avaros, y se burlaban de él.
E os fariseus também ouviram todas estas coisas, eles que eram avarentos. E zombaram dele.
Les pharisiens, qui étaient avares, écoutaient aussi tout cela, et ils se moquaient de lui.
Das alles hörten die Pharisäer auch, und waren geizig, und spotteten sein.
En al deze dingen hoorden ook de Farizeen, die geldgierig waren, en zij beschimpten Hem.
Or i Farisei, che amavano il danaro, udivano tutte queste cose e si facean beffe di lui.
A słuchali tego wszystkiego i Faryzeuszowie, którzy byli łakomi, i naśmiewali się z niego.
Слышали все это и фарисеи, которые были сребролюбивы, и они смеялись над Ним.
法利賽人 是 貪愛錢財的;他們聽見 這 一切話,就 嗤笑 耶穌。
And the Pharisees, who had a great love of money, hearing these things, were making sport of him.
Verse in Context
Original Language (Koine Greek)
New Testament · Koine Greek · Luke 16:14
Source: STEPBible TAGNT/TEHB (CC-BY 4.0). Click or tap a morphology code to see the full parsing.
Scholars' Consensus
Commentators across traditions agree that Luke 16:14 exposes the deepest fault line between Jesus and the religious establishment. The Pharisees are identified by a striking compound descriptive phrase, φιλάργυροι (philarguroi), lovers of money. This charge is not the usual word for covetousness (πλεονέκτης) but emphasizes a love, a desire, for silver and gold. The verb ἐξεμυκτήριζον is equally vivid: it means ‘to turn up the nose at someone,’ a gesture of open contempt. The imperfect tense of both hearing (Ἤκουον) and scoffing (ἐξεμυκτήριζον) suggests a sustained posture. As Calvin notes, they rejected Christ’s teaching because it seemed absurd to their covetous hearts. Barnes adds that their derision was aimed at a doctrine that exposed their service to mammon as hollow. The consensus: their mockery was not a reasoned rebuttal but a reflexive sneer against teaching that threatened their treasure.
How settled is the interpretation?
Interpretive difficulty: Medium
Main views:
- Derision as defense of status: The Pharisees saw wealth as God’s blessing and service to mammon as normal; Jesus’ teaching threatened their worldview and social standing, so they mocked him (Calvin, Barnes).
- Derision as religious self-justification: The Pharisees maintained a pious reputation while loving money; mockery was a way to dismiss the accuser and preserve their self-image (Clarke, Gill).
- Derision as social contempt: They looked down on Jesus and his followers as poor and uneducated, so any teaching from such a source was treated with ridicule (Cambridge Bible).
What is clear: The Pharisees loved money, heard Jesus’ call to single loyalty to God, and responded with open contempt—revealing that love of wealth can coexist with religious leadership and still resist the Kingdom.
What Scholars Agree and Debate
| Topic | Agreed | Debated |
|---|---|---|
| Character of the Pharisees | All traditions accept Jesus’ assessment that the Pharisees were lovers of money. This is consistent with New Testament critiques and extrabiblical evidence of priestly and rabbinic greed. | Some see this as a specific sin that defined this group; others view it as a more universal human tendency that the Pharisees embodied in their time. |
| Reason for scoffing | The mockery was a direct response to Jesus’ teaching about serving God versus mammon (Luke 16:13). | Calvin and Barnes argue the Pharisees rejected the doctrine itself because it contradicted their deep-seated belief that wealth was a blessing. The Cambridge Bible and Clarke suggest they also looked down on Jesus for His poverty and humble followers. |
| Significance of their religious status | The fact that religious leaders scoffed at Jesus shows that external piety can coexist with a heart opposed to God’s values. | Some traditions emphasize that the Pharisees represent fallen humanity’s love of self-justification; others focus on the specific trap of wealth for those in religious leadership. |
Historical & Cultural Context
To understand this verse, we need to see the Pharisees in their setting. They were a strict religious sect known for tithing, Sabbath observance, and devotion to oral tradition. Yet the New Testament and even Jewish sources (Talmudic references) accuse them of greed, devouring widows’ houses (Matthew 23:14). Jesus had just finished the parable of the unjust steward and the declaration that no one can serve God and mammon (Luke 16:13). This teaching struck directly at their source of identity and security. Wealth, in much of Second Temple Judaism, was seen as a sign of God’s favor. The Pharisees likely saw themselves as both pious and prosperous, evidence of God’s blessing. Jesus called that entire worldview into question.
The Greek verb ἐξεμυκτήριζον carries the literal meaning of “to turn up the nose.” It was an insult of extreme contempt, reserved for someone considered beneath serious debate. Horace’s Latin phrase naso adunco suspendere (to hang on a hooked nose) captures the gesture. The imperfect tense indicates they kept mocking as Jesus continued speaking. Their scoffing was not a one-time outburst but a sustained posture of dismissal.
Historically, this moment marks a turning point. Up to this point, some Pharisees had engaged Jesus in debate. Here, they move from argument to open ridicule. The charge “lovers of money” frames their response not as intellectual disagreement but as a heart-level rebellion against the Kingdom’s demands.
Textual Notes
The consulted sources note no significant textual variants for Luke 16:14. The Greek text is stable across major manuscript families, with only minor orthographic variations in the verb ἐξεμυκτήριζον (some manuscripts spell it with a sigma). None affect the meaning.
Reception History
From the earliest centuries, this verse has been used to warn believers against greed and hypocrisy. Early Christian writers frequently cited the Pharisees as cautionary examples: people who knew the Scriptures yet loved money more. During the Reformation, Calvin and others highlighted the verse to argue that salvation cannot coexist with a heart set on wealth. In modern preaching, Luke 16:14 often appears in sermons on stewardship and the dangers of the prosperity gospel. The image of religious leaders “turning up their nose” at Jesus remains a sobering reminder that the deepest opposition to the Kingdom can come from within the household of faith.
Preaching This Verse
Three-Point Outline
- Their Identity: The Pharisees are described as φιλάργυροι, lovers of money. Luke identifies them not by their office but by their ruling passion.
- Their Reaction: They heard and “turned up the nose.” The imperfect tense shows a steady stream of contempt. Their wealth made Jesus’ teaching seem laughable.
- The Conflict: Love of money and loyalty to God are incompatible. The scoffing reveals which master they had chosen.
Five-Point Outline
- Exposed by the text: Jesus calls them what they are: φιλάργυροι. A rare word, used only here and 2 Timothy 3:2.
- Self-justification: As Jesus says in the next verse, they “justify yourselves in the sight of men.” They maintained a pious reputation while serving mammon.
- Open disdain: Their mockery was physical and public, nose in the air. They wanted to shame Jesus into silence.
- Spiritual blindness: They could not see that their greed made them enemies of God. As Jeremiah wrote, “Everyone is given to covetousness” (Jeremiah 6:13).
- The coming collision: This scoffing leads directly into the parable of the rich man and Lazarus (Luke 16:19, 31), a stark picture of judgment on those who trust in wealth.
Illustration Hooks
- The calculator in the offering plate: A church leader who gives just enough to keep a good reputation but resents any call to generosity. The eyes reveal the sneer when sacrifice is mentioned.
- “God blessed me financially”: The temptation to treat wealth as proof of spiritual favor. When someone suggests that riches can be a barrier to following Jesus, the response is not to listen but to dismiss, just like the Pharisees.
- The budget meeting: A church board that spends more on building maintenance than on the poor. The conversation about “return on investment” sounds wise until stacked against Jesus’ words about laying up treasure in heaven.
Questions Your Congregation Is Asking
- Does God want me to be poor? How do I honor God with money without loving it?
- How can I tell if I am a “lover of money”? Is there a test?
- Is it wrong to enjoy financial security, or to want more for my family?
Leading a Discussion
This verse cuts to the heart of a struggle most believers know: the pull of money and the call of Christ. The Pharisees were not irreligious; they were deeply religious, and yet their love of money made them mock the Son of God. Use this passage to help your group search their own hearts in a gracious, honest way.
Discussion Questions
- Read Luke 16:14 aloud. What does the Greek word φιλάργυροι tell you about the Pharisees’ character? How is it different from simply saying “they were covetous”?
- Why do you think they responded with mockery instead of reflection? What does that reveal about the condition of their hearts?
- Look back at Jesus’ teaching in verses 10, 13. Which statement do you think provoked them most? Why?
- Jesus says in verse 15, “That which is exalted among men is an abomination in the sight of God.” How does this apply to the way wealth is often admired both inside and outside the church?
- In what ways might we today “justify ourselves” while secretly loving money? Are there areas in your own life where the line between stewardship and love of money blurs?
- What does the cross-reference to Psalm 119:51 (“The arrogant mock me excessively, but I don’t swerve from your law”) teach us about how Jesus might have responded internally to their scoffing?
- What practical steps can your group take together to guard against the scoffing spirit of the Pharisees? How can we cultivate a heart that treasures Christ more than treasure?
Word Study
The key original-language words in this verse. Select any word for its full lexicon entry — meaning, every occurrence in Scripture, and related words.
Cross-References
Source: Treasury of Scripture Knowledge (TSK, public domain)
| Psalms 35:15 | But in my adversity, they rejoiced, and gathered themselves together. The attackers gathered themselves together against me, and I didn’t know it. They tore at me, and didn’t cease. |
| Psalms 35:16 | Like the profane mockers in feasts, they gnashed their teeth at me. |
| Psalms 119:51 | The arrogant mock me excessively, but I don’t swerve from your law. |
| Isaiah 53:3 | He was despised and rejected by men, a man of suffering and acquainted with disease. He was despised as one from whom men hide their face; and we didn’t respect him. |
| Isaiah 56:11 | Yes, the dogs are greedy. They can never have enough. They are shepherds who can’t understand. They have all turned to their own way, each one to his gain, from every quarter. |
| Jeremiah 6:13 | “For from their least even to their greatest, everyone is given to covetousness. From the prophet even to the priest, everyone deals falsely. |
| Jeremiah 8:10 | Therefore I will give their wives to others and their fields to those who will possess them. For everyone from the least even to the greatest is given to covetousness; from the prophet even to the priest everyone deals falsely. |
| Jeremiah 20:7 | Yahweh, you have persuaded me, and I was persuaded. You are stronger than I, and have prevailed. I have become a laughingstock all day. Everyone mocks me. |
Interlinear and lexical data from STEPBible (CC BY 4.0). Cross-reference data from OpenBible.info (CC BY 4.0). Commentaries are public domain.
For personal reflection
Read the devotional page — prayer, application, and "for families"
What the Commentators Say
10 public-domain commentaries, condensed into plain language.
Adam Clarke's Commentary Methodist/Wesleyan 1826
Adam Clarke draws attention to the literal force of the Greek word, which pictures the Pharisees turning up their noses in contempt. Their mockery came from being wedded to money; they considered Jesus foolish for teaching that spiritual and eternal things outweigh all the riches in the universe. Clarke observes that countless people still share that same sentiment.
Barnes' Notes on the Bible Protestant 1832
Barnes traces the Pharisees' mockery directly to their greed: they scorned Jesus because his teaching exposed their love of money as incompatible with genuine devotion. He then draws a careful distinction: not everything people admire is abhorrent to God, but the outward displays of righteousness that hide a corrupt heart are an abomination.
Calvin's Commentaries Reformed 1564
Calvin argues the Pharisees mocked Jesus not because his teaching was plain, but because their greed made his words about wealth sound like mad nonsense. A covetous person instinctively dismisses any talk of despising riches or giving to the poor as foolish, no matter how clearly it is stated.
Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges Anglican 1880
The commentator highlights the open insolence of the Pharisees' mockery, aimed at Jesus' poverty and humble followers. They found it absurd to think wealth could hinder religion, since they themselves were both rich and devout. This marks a daring opposition that grew as Jesus' ministry neared its end.
Geneva Bible Notes Reformed 1599
All these thinges heard the Pharises also which were couetous, and they scoffed at him.
Gill's Exposition of the Bible Baptist 1748
Gill notes that the Pharisees sneered at Jesus, literally lifting their noses at him in contempt. Confident in their own security and wealth, they rejected his teaching on stewardship and the coming account for their use of worldly riches.
Jamieson-Fausset-Brown Commentary Protestant 1871
covetous . . . derided him —sneered at Him; their master sin being too plainly struck at for them to relish. But it was easier to run down than to refute such teaching.
Lange's Commentary Reformed 1857
Lange argues that "every man presseth into it" describes hostile assault against the kingdom, not eager entrance. He sees the rich man's sin as omission, not cruelty—neglecting to help Lazarus was enough to condemn him. This interpretation directly rebukes the Pharisees' self-justifying pride.
Matthew Henry's Commentary Reformed/Presbyterian 1710
Henry highlights the sharp contrast between worldly and spiritual wisdom: the unjust steward shrewdly secured his earthly future, yet believers often fail to show similar foresight for their eternal one. He uses the parable to rebuke the "children of light" for not being as prudent with eternal treasures as the worldly are with temporary wealth.
Vincent's Word Studies Evangelical 1887
Vincent draws attention to the exact Greek words behind these two sins: the first is literally "lovers of money," not the usual term for covetousness, and the second means "to turn up the nose at" someone, a vivid physical gesture of contempt. His point is that the original language pictures both a misplaced affection and a sneering ridicule.