Luke 14:1-6 · Bible study
Luke 14:1-6 Commentary: Why Jesus Accepts a Trap on the Sabbath
Greek · 11 what the commentators say
Meaning in one sentence
Jesus heals a man with dropsy on the Sabbath while being watched. Study the Greek, historical trap, and the mercy that silences critics.
Research Summary
- Meaning: Jesus heals a man with dropsy on the Sabbath while being watched by hostile Pharisees, then silences them by appealing to their own practice of rescuing a son or ox from a well on the Sabbath.
- Key words: Paratēreō (watching suspiciously); hudrōpikos (dropsy); exestin (it is lawful); huios (son) vs onos (ass) as the likely original reading.
- Main debate: Whether the dropsical man was planted by the Pharisees or came on his own seeking healing; the best textual reading of ‘son or ox’ vs ‘ass or ox’.
- Theological theme: Works of mercy and compassion do not violate Sabbath rest; human need takes priority over ceremonial restrictions.
- Best use: To teach Jesus' authority over the Sabbath, the hypocrisy of rule-keeping without love, and the courage to do good even under hostile scrutiny.
Translation Comparison
BSB Berean Standard Bible 2020
1One Sabbath, Jesus went to eat in the home of a leading Pharisee, and those in attendance were watching Him closely.
2Right there before Him was a man with dropsy.
3So Jesus asked the experts in the law and the Pharisees, “Is it lawful to heal on the Sabbath or not?”
4But they remained silent. Then Jesus took hold of the man, healed him, and sent him on his way.
5And He asked them, “Which of you whose son or ox falls into a pit on the Sabbath day will not immediately pull him out?”
6And they were unable to answer these questions.
WEB World English Bible 2000
1When he went into the house of one of the rulers of the Pharisees on a Sabbath to eat bread, they were watching him.
2Behold, a certain man who had dropsy was in front of him.
3Jesus, answering, spoke to the lawyers and Pharisees, saying, “Is it lawful to heal on the Sabbath?”
4But they were silent. He took him, and healed him, and let him go.
5He answered them, “Which of you, if your son or an ox fell into a well, wouldn’t immediately pull him out on a Sabbath day?”
6They couldn’t answer him regarding these things.
KJV King James Version 1769
1And it came to pass, as he went into the house of one of the chief Pharisees to eat bread on the sabbath day, that they watched him.
2And, behold, there was a certain man before him which had the dropsy.
3And Jesus answering spake unto the lawyers and Pharisees, saying, Is it lawful to heal on the sabbath day?
4And they held their peace. And he took him, and healed him, and let him go;
5And answered them, saying, Which of you shall have an ass or an ox fallen into a pit, and will not straightway pull him out on the sabbath day?
6And they could not answer him again to these things.
ASV American Standard Version 1901
1And it came to pass, when he went into the house of one of the rulers of the Pharisees on a sabbath to eat bread, that they were watching him.
2And behold, there was before him a certain man that had the dropsy.
3And Jesus answering spake unto the lawyers and Pharisees, saying, Is it lawful to heal on the sabbath, or not?
4But they held their peace. And he took him, and healed him, and let him go.
5And he said unto them, Which of you shall have an ass or an ox fallen into a well, and will not straightway draw him up on a sabbath day?
6And they could not answer again unto these things.
YLT Young's Literal Translation 1898
1And it came to pass, on his going into the house of a certain one of the chiefs of the Pharisees, on a sabbath, to eat bread, that they were watching him,
2and lo, there was a certain dropsical man before him;
3and Jesus answering spake to the lawyers and Pharisees, saying, `Is it lawful on the sabbath-day to heal?'
4and they were silent, and having taken hold of him , he healed him, and let him go;
5and answering them he said, `Of which of you shall an ass or ox fall into a pit, and he will not immediately draw it up on the sabbath-day?'
6and they were not able to answer him again unto these things.
Darby Darby Bible 1890
1And it came to pass, as he went into the house of one of the rulers, [who was] of the Pharisees, to eat bread on [the] sabbath, that they were watching him.
2And behold, there was a certain dropsical [man] before him.
3And Jesus answering spoke unto the doctors of the law and Pharisees, saying, Is it lawful to heal on the sabbath?
4But they were silent. And taking him he healed him and let him go.
5And answering he said to them, Of which of you shall an ass or ox fall into a well, that he does not straightway pull him up on the sabbath day?
6And they were not able to answer him to these things.
Douay-Rheims Douay-Rheims Bible 1899
1And it came to pass, when Jesus went into the house of one of the Pharisees, on the sabbath day, that they watched him.
2And behold, there was a certain man before him that had the dropsy.
3And Jesus answering, spoke to the lawyers and Pharisees, saying: Is it lawful to heal on the sabbath day?
4But they held their peace. But he taking him, healed him and sent him away.
5And answering them, he said: Which of you shall have an ass or an ox fall into a pit and will not immediately draw him out, on the sabbath day?
6And they could not answer him to these things.
Verse in Context
Original Language (Koine Greek)
New Testament · Koine Greek · Luke 14:1
Source: STEPBible TAGNT/TEHB (CC-BY 4.0). Click or tap a morphology code to see the full parsing.
Scholars' Consensus
Commentators across traditions agree that Luke 14:1-6 presents a deliberate confrontation. Jesus is invited to a Sabbath meal by a ruling Pharisee, and the scene is set intentionally. Vincent's Word Studies notes the force of the Greek paratēroumenoi, they were intensely watching Him, the prefix para suggesting a suspicious, hostile observation. The man with dropsy (hudrōpikos, a term found in medical literature) appears before Jesus, and both Clarke and Barnes argue he was probably placed there as bait. Jesus responds not to their words but to their thoughts, asking the assembled lawyers and Pharisees if it is lawful to heal on the Sabbath. They are silent, a silence that Cambridge Bible calls 'splenitic pride and obstinacy.' He heals the man, then uses their own practice of rescuing a son or an ox from a well on the Sabbath to show the logical absurdity of their position. They cannot reply. The consensus is clear: Jesus accepts the invitation to expose their hypocrisy and to declare that mercy and the restoration of human life are always lawful, even on God's holy day.
How settled is the interpretation?
Interpretive difficulty: Medium
Main views:
- Plantation theory: The Pharisees were watching Jesus (v.1) and the man with dropsy appears suddenly in a private home. Clarke and Barnes argue this was a trap.
- Spontaneous healing: Wesley suggests the man may have come of his own accord, seeking a cure. The text does not say he was placed there.
- Textual reading of v.5: The phrase 'son or ox' vs 'ass or ox' affects the parallelism but does not change the central argument. Both readings uphold mercy over Sabbath.
What is clear: Jesus healed a man with dropsy on the Sabbath, and His opponents could not answer His reasoning about rescuing a person from a well.
What Scholars Agree and Debate
| Topic | Agreed | Debated |
|---|---|---|
| Identity of the dropsical man | All commentators note that the man was sick and that Jesus healed him. There is no question his condition was real. | Clarke and Barnes argue he was deliberately placed by the Pharisees as bait. Wesley suggests he may have come in genuine hope of a cure, and others note the text does not explicitly state collusion. |
| Textual reading of verse 5: 'son or ox' vs 'ass or ox' | The core argument is the same: if an animal can be rescued on the Sabbath, so can a human. The principle of mercy overrides Sabbath restrictions. | Many early manuscripts and the Cambridge Bible prefer 'son or an ox' (huios), which makes the comparison more direct and poignant. Later scribes changed it to 'ass' (onos), possibly to harmonize with Matthew 12:11. Bible versions vary accordingly. |
| Why Jesus accepted the invitation | Jesus knew He was being watched. He did not shy away from the confrontation. | Calvin sees this as Jesus correcting superstitious Sabbath observance and protecting Himself against slander. Others, like Matthew Henry, emphasize Jesus' willingness to do good wherever He went, regardless of the risk. |
| What the silence of the Pharisees means | They were unable to answer because their own traditions condemned them. | Cambridge Bible calls it 'splenitic pride and obstinacy', stubborn refusal to be convinced. Barnes sees it as a strategic silence: they couldn't say healing was unlawful without contradicting themselves. |
| Status of the Sabbath in Christian teaching | The Sabbath or Lord's Day is a gift for rest and worship. Mercy is always appropriate on it. | Some Christians argue this passage releases believers from any Sabbath observance entirely; others see it as affirming the Sabbath’s true purpose. Both views point to Jesus' Lord-ship over the day. |
Historical & Cultural Context
Luke 14:1 places Jesus in the home of 'one of the rulers of the Pharisees.' The Greek word archontōn denotes a member of the Sanhedrin or a local synagogue ruler. This was no ordinary private meal, it was a high-stakes dinner with the religious elite. The phrase 'on the Sabbath to eat bread' (v.1) reflects a common custom: after synagogue, families and guests would share a festive meal. But here, the atmosphere was tense. The verb paratēreō (v.1) means 'to watch closely, to spy on,' often with hostile intent (Psalm 37:32 uses the same idea: 'The wicked watch the righteous, and seek to kill him'). Jesus knew He was being set up.
The man with dropsy (hudrōpikos, from hydōr 'water' and ōps 'face') suffered from severe edema, a condition that caused labored breathing and swelling. Clarke notes that the Pharisees likely brought him to the house, knowing Jesus would be moved with compassion. In Jewish law, healing on the Sabbath was generally prohibited unless the condition was life-threatening. Dropsy could become critical quickly, but the rabbis often debated the threshold of danger. Jesus cuts through the casuistry. He asks simply: 'Is it lawful to heal on the Sabbath?' (v.3). The alternative reading of v.5 is significant: the better manuscripts read 'a son or an ox,' not 'an ass or an ox' (Cambridge Bible). This makes the argument even sharper, a son, not just an animal, takes precedence over Sabbath restrictions. Jesus asserts that mercy is not a violation of rest but its highest expression.
Textual Notes
The primary textual issue in this passage occurs in Luke 14:5. The standard reading in most English versions is 'an ass or an ox,' following the Textus Receptus and many Byzantine manuscripts. However, the earlier Alexandrian and Western manuscripts (including Codex Sinaiticus and Codex Vaticanus) read 'a son or an ox' (huios e bous). The Cambridge Bible notes that 'the unquestionable reading if we are to follow the MSS. is a son or an ox,' adding that the strangeness of the collocation ('a son, nay even an ox') led scribes to substitute 'ass' (onos) or 'sheep' (probaton). The meaning is not drastically different, either way Jesus argues from rescue of an animal to rescue of a human, but the original likely heightened the point by pairing a family member with a farm animal. No other significant variants are mentioned in the supplied sources.
Reception History
From the early church, this story was read as a demonstration of Jesus' authority over the Sabbath and His prioritization of mercy over ritual. Church fathers like Irenaeus and Chrysostom appealed to such passages to argue that the Sabbath was made for humanity, not humanity for the Sabbath. During the Reformation, Calvin used Luke 14:1-6 to argue against what he called 'superstitious observance,' insisting that neither the works of God nor the duties of charity violate Sabbath rest. In the Wesleyan tradition, Adam Clarke emphasized the malicious set-up by the Pharisees and Jesus' fearless response. Across traditions, the passage has been a key text for discussions about Sabbath observance, Christian liberty, and the place of compassionate action on days set apart for worship. In modern pastoral settings, it challenges legalism and invites believers to ask what it means to 'do good' on the Lord's Day.
Preaching This Verse
Three-Point Outline
- Jesus enters hostile territory with open eyes. He knows He is watched, but He does not avoid the conflict. He goes to the table to bear witness to the truth.
- Silence is a verdict. The Pharisees could not answer Jesus' question because their own traditions condemned them. Their silence was an admission that their objections had no basis.
- The Sabbath is for rescue, not restriction. If you would pull a child or an ox from a well on the Sabbath, how much more should you heal a suffering human being? Mercy is the point of the Lord's Day.
Five-Point Outline
- The Setting: Jesus accepts an invitation from a ruling Pharisee on a Sabbath, a meal meant to be a trap.
- The Victim: A man with dropsy is placed before Him, a living argument in flesh and water.
- The Counter-Question: Jesus asks the lawyers and Pharisees, “Is it lawful to heal on the Sabbath?” They cannot answer honestly without condemning themselves.
- The Healing: Jesus takes the man (the verb epilabomenos implies a firm, compassionate grasp), heals him, and lets him go. He meets the real need.
- The Argument from Consistency: If you rescue an animal on the Sabbath, and you do, then rescuing a person is even more lawful. They have no reply.
Illustration Hooks
- A parent who rushes a child to the emergency room on a Sunday morning, missing church, to save a life. Was that a violation of the Sabbath, or its fulfillment?
- An employee who stops work to help a colleague having a heart attack, even though it means breaking a rule. The rule was made for people, not people for the rule.
- In an age of 'cancel culture,' many people are watched and trapped for their words. Jesus models courage: He walks into the spotlight and speaks the truth anyway.
Questions Your Congregation Is Asking
- Did Jesus break the Sabbath, and if so, why did the religious leaders not just say so?
- I know God wants me to help people, but what if helping someone breaks one of my church's rules or traditions?
- Why would Jesus eat with people who were plotting against Him? Doesn’t that seem dangerous or unwise?
Leading a Discussion
This scene shows us a Jesus who does not retreat from hard conversations. He accepts a dinner invitation from a powerful Pharisee who intends to destroy Him. Over bread, He heals a man and then dismantles the logic of His accusers. As you talk through these questions, notice both Jesus' courage and His mercy. He could have stayed away, but He went, because people needed Him.
Discussion Questions
- Read Luke 14:1-6 together. What kind of welcome do you think Jesus expected when He walked into that house?
- The text says the Pharisees 'were watching him.' What does the Greek word paratēreō (used in verse 1) tell us about their attitude?
- Why do you think the lawyers and Pharisees were silent when Jesus asked if it was lawful to heal on the Sabbath?
- Jesus heals the man and then asks about pulling a son or an ox from a well. What does this comparison reveal about the Pharisees' own practices?
- How does this passage challenge our tendency to prioritize religious rules over human need?
- Jesus accepted an invitation from someone who was trying to trap Him. Have you ever been in a situation where you had to choose between safety and doing good?
- What does this story teach us about the purpose of the Sabbath, for today?
Word Study
The key original-language words in this verse. Select any word for its full lexicon entry — meaning, every occurrence in Scripture, and related words.
Cross-References
Source: Treasury of Scripture Knowledge (TSK, public domain)
| Psalms 37:32 | The wicked watch the righteous, and seek to kill him. |
| Psalms 41:6 | If he comes to see me, he speaks falsehood. His heart gathers iniquity to itself. When he goes abroad, he tells it. |
| Psalms 62:4 | They fully intend to throw him down from his lofty place. They delight in lies. They bless with their mouth, but they curse inwardly. Selah. |
| Psalms 64:5 | They encourage themselves in evil plans. They talk about laying snares secretly. They say, “Who will see them?” |
| Psalms 64:6 | They plot injustice, saying, “We have made a perfect plan!” Surely man’s mind and heart are cunning. |
| Proverbs 23:7 | for as he thinks about the cost, so he is. “Eat and drink!” he says to you, but his heart is not with you. |
| Isaiah 29:20 | For the ruthless is brought to nothing, and the scoffer ceases, and all those who are alert to do evil are cut off— |
| Isaiah 29:21 | who cause a person to be indicted by a word, and lay a snare for one who reproves in the gate, and who deprive the innocent of justice with false testimony. |
Interlinear and lexical data from STEPBible (CC BY 4.0). Cross-reference data from OpenBible.info (CC BY 4.0). Commentaries are public domain.
For personal reflection
Read the devotional page — prayer, application, and "for families"
What the Commentators Say
10 public-domain commentaries, condensed into plain language.
Adam Clarke's Commentary Methodist/Wesleyan 1826
Clarke suggests the Pharisee deliberately brought the dropsical man to the meal, knowing Jesus would heal him, so they could accuse Him of breaking the Sabbath. This reveals the host's deep malice and perfidy, not genuine concern for the law.
Barnes' Notes on the Bible Protestant 1832
Barnes points out that Jesus first asked the Pharisees whether healing was lawful on the Sabbath, forcing them to go silent. Because they raised no objection before the healing, they could not accuse him afterward. Barnes also stresses that Jesus dined on the Sabbath only to do good, not for feasting.
Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges Anglican 1880
The Cambridge Bible notes highlight the elaborate plot: the Pharisees placed the man with dropsy before Jesus as a deliberate trap, using his misery as a tool to force a Sabbath healing and gain grounds for accusation. The commentary also defends the original reading "a son or an ox," arguing the harder text is correct.
Geneva Bible Notes Reformed 1599
The Geneva notes highlight the Pharisees' inconsistency: they would rescue an animal on the Sabbath but objected to healing a person. Christ's response exposes their hypocrisy and affirms that works of mercy are lawful on the Sabbath, aligning with God's original intent.
Gill's Exposition of the Bible Baptist 1748
Gill emphasizes that the Pharisees invited Jesus to this Sabbath meal not out of respect but to trap him, watching for a pretext to accuse him. He notes that Jewish tradition made the Sabbath a lavish feasting day but permitted healing only when life was in danger, which the man with dropsy certainly was. The Pharisees' silence showed their own rules now trapped them.
Jamieson-Fausset-Brown Commentary Protestant 1871
JFB observes that the man with dropsy was not a dinner guest but arrived before the meal, likely in hope of a cure, though he did not directly ask for it. This unspoken expectation sets the stage for Jesus to address the Pharisees' hearts.
Lange's Commentary Reformed 1857
Lange reads the healing of the dropsical man as a trap set by the Pharisee, who placed the sick man there hoping Jesus would fail. Jesus answers not their words but their unspoken malice, laying a question that exposes their hard hearts. He then performs the miracle before teaching on true humility.
Matthew Henry's Commentary Reformed/Presbyterian 1710
Henry notes that Jesus accepted a Sabbath dinner invitation from a hostile Pharisee, not avoiding the company of enemies or sinners. He sees this as an example of using even necessary meals as occasions to do good, with Sabbath refreshment kept simple and directed toward God.
Vincent's Word Studies Evangelical 1887
Vincent draws attention to the precise Greek wording: the phrase for "watched" implies they were actively and continuously observing. He notes "dropsical" is a standard medical term, and clarifies that "pit" means a well, not a fountain, while "pull out" more accurately means to pull up.
Wesley's Explanatory Notes Methodist/Wesleyan 1754
Wesley clarifies that Jesus' words about not being seen again do not promise a future appearance. Instead, when calamities drive the people to desperation, they will long for the Messiah and eagerly welcome anyone who claims that role. Jesus then replies to the unspoken thoughts rising in their hearts.