Leviticus 19:26 · Bible study
Leviticus 19:26 Commentary: Blood and Occult Prohibitions Linked
Hebrew · 9 what the commentators say
Meaning in one sentence
Why does Leviticus link eating blood with sorcery? Explore the pagan context and God's call to holiness.
Research Summary
- Meaning: Israel must not eat blood (tied to pagan spirit-communion) nor practice divination; both seek control and knowledge apart from God.
- Key words: nachash (enchantment/divination, possibly serpent-related); onan (observing times/cloud-divination). Both verbs are Piel imperfect, indicating habitual or intensive practice.
- Main debate: Whether the blood prohibition refers to eating improperly bled meat, or specifically to a pagan ritual of eating flesh over collected blood to contact spirits.
- Theological theme: Holiness as total dependence on God; rejecting all sources of spiritual power that compete with His revealed word and providence.
- Best use: Equip believers to discern hidden ‘enchantments’ in popular culture, horoscopes, lucky charms, superstitious habits, and to trust in God’s guidance through Scripture, prayer, and His Spirit.
Translation Comparison
BSB Berean Standard Bible 2020
You must not eat anything with blood still in it. You must not practice divination or sorcery.
WEB World English Bible 2000
“‘You shall not eat any meat with the blood still in it. You shall not use enchantments, nor practice sorcery.
KJV King James Version 1769
Ye shall not eat any thing with the blood: neither shall ye use enchantment, nor observe times.
ASV American Standard Version 1901
Ye shall not eat anything with the blood: neither shall ye use enchantments, nor practise augury.
YLT Young's Literal Translation 1898
`Ye do not eat with the blood; ye do not enchant, nor observe clouds.
Darby Darby Bible 1890
Ye shall eat nothing with the blood. — Ye shall not practise enchantment, nor use auguries.
Douay-Rheims Douay-Rheims Bible 1899
You shall not eat with blood. You shall not divine nor observe dreams.
Translations in other languages (10 available)
No comeréis cosa alguna con sangre. No seréis agoreros, ni adivinaréis.
Não comereis coisa alguma com sangue. Não sereis encantadores, nem fareis adivinhações.
Vous ne mangerez rien avec du sang. Vous n’observerez ni les serpents ni les nuages pour en tirer des pronostics.
Ihr sollt nichts vom Blut essen. Ihr sollt nicht auf Vogelgeschrei achten noch Tage wählen.
Gij zult niets met het bloed eten. Gij zult op geen vogelgeschrei acht geven, noch guichelarij plegen.
Non mangerete nulla che contenga sangue. Non praticherete alcuna sorta di divinazione o di magia.
Nie jedzcie nic ze krwią. Nie bawcie się wieszczbami, ani czarami.
Не ешьте с кровью; не ворожите и не гадайте.
「你們不可 吃 帶 血的物;不可 用法術,也不可 觀兆。
Nothing may be used for food with its blood in it; you may not make use of strange arts, or go in search of signs and wonders.
Verse in Context
Original Language (Biblical Hebrew)
Old Testament · Biblical Hebrew · Leviticus 19:26
Source: STEPBible TAGNT/TEHB (CC-BY 4.0). Click or tap a morphology code to see the full parsing.
Scholars' Consensus
Commentators across traditions agree that this verse groups two prohibitions that share roots in pagan religious practice. The ban on eating blood (see also Leviticus 17:10, 14) is not merely a dietary rule; as Gill explains, it may refer to the idolatrous custom of eating flesh over blood to commune with demons and gain secret knowledge. The second prohibition, against enchantments (nachash, possibly divination by serpents) and observing times (onan, likely reading omens from clouds or lucky days), forbids the same spiritual posture: seeking guidance from powers other than Yahweh. Barnes notes that both may be connected to magical or idolatrous rites. The Cambridge Bible points out that the LXX reads “upon the mountains” for “with the blood,” linking the first clause to idolatrous mountain feasts (cf. Ezekiel 18:6, 22:9).
At issue is a heart that turns away from God’s provision and word. As Jamieson-Fausset-Brown states, such superstitions imply “a want of faith in the being, or of reliance on the providence of God.” The verse stands within a holiness code that calls Israel to be distinct from surrounding nations, trusting the Lord rather than occult techniques for direction or blessing.
How settled is the interpretation?
Interpretive difficulty: Medium
Main views:
- Literal dietary law: The blood prohibition simply reinforces Leviticus 17; 'enchantments' forbids all forms of divination, as in Deuteronomy 18:10. The link is a general call to holiness, not a specific ritual connection.
- Pagan ritual of blood-divination: Based on Gill and Maimonides, 'eating with blood' may refer to a Zabian custom where blood was collected in a pit to feed demons, after which the eaters sought oracles. This directly ties the two prohibitions together as two sides of the same occult practice.
- Temporary cultural prohibition: Some view the blood law as part of Israel’s temporary ceremonial system, abrogated in the New Covenant. The occult prohibition, however, remains because it concerns the heart’s allegiance.
What is clear: All traditions agree that God forbids His people from seeking hidden knowledge or power through any means other than trusting Him, and that blood—representing life—is not to be consumed because it belongs to the Lord for atonement.
What Scholars Agree and Debate
| Topic | Agreed | Debated |
|---|---|---|
| Purpose of the blood prohibition | All traditions agree that eating blood was forbidden because blood represents life and belongs to God for atonement (Lev 17:11). | Some interpreters (Gill, Barnes) say the specific context here targets a pagan ritual, eating over blood to gain occult knowledge. Others (Wesley, JFB) see it as a simple extension of the general dietary law against consuming blood. |
| Meaning of 'enchantments' and 'observe times' | All agree these refer to divinatory practices seeking hidden knowledge or favorable outcomes apart from God. | The exact methods are unclear: serpent divination (Clarke), cloud omens (JFB, Aben Ezra), lucky days (Jarchi), or a general catch-all for soothsaying. Commentators differ on which specific practice the words denote. |
| Why the two prohibitions are linked | Both are forbidden as part of pagan worship and a lack of trust in Yahweh. | Gill strongly connects the blood prohibition to a Zabian ritual for communing with spirits to obtain divination; others (Barnes, Cambridge) see a looser association: both were pagan customs forbidden for the same reason, distinctness from the nations. |
| Continuing application for Christians | The principle, reject occult practices and trust God, is affirmed across traditions (e.g., Wesley’s strong warning against fortune-telling and charms). | Whether the specific blood prohibition still binds Gentile Christians is debated. The apostolic decree (Acts 15) retains it, but many Protestant traditions see it as a temporary accommodation for Jewish, Gentile unity, while Catholic and Orthodox traditions often maintain it as a disciplinary rule. |
Historical & Cultural Context
Leviticus 19 is part of what scholars call the Holiness Code (chapters 17, 26), a collection of laws urging Israel to be holy because Yahweh is holy. The prohibitions in verse 26 appear in a cluster of commands against practices common among the Canaanites and Egyptians.
Eating meat with blood was forbidden in itself because “the life of the flesh is in the blood” (Leviticus 17:11). Blood belonged to God for atonement. Yet the prohibition here carries an additional weight. Gill cites Maimonides on the Zabians, a pagan sect who believed blood was food for demons. They would slaughter an animal, collect the blood in a pit, and eat the flesh around it, hoping to gain friendship with spirits and power to predict the future. Eating blood thus became a ritual of divination, a way to summon forbidden knowledge.
The words translated “enchantments” and “observe times” are just as embedded in ancient occult practice. Nachash (from the root for serpent) likely refers to divination through snakes (Clarke, JFB) or to general fortune-telling by signs. Onan (linked to clouds or eye) meant reading omens from cloud formations or distinguishing lucky from unlucky days (Jarchi, quoted in Gill). Both were standard tools of pagan soothsayers in the ancient Near East. Deuteronomy 18:10, 12 later groups divination, sorcery, and interpreting omens together as practices abhorrent to God.
By placing these two commands side by side, the text exposes a shared logic: Israel must not seek hidden knowledge or control over the future through any means except trusting Yahweh. The same heart that would manipulate blood for spiritual gain is the heart that consults the stars, the entrails, or the flight of birds. Both are a refusal of the Lord’s authority and care.
Textual Notes
The consulted sources note only one significant textual variant. The LXX (Septuagint) reads “upon the mountains” instead of “with the blood” (Cambridge Bible). This reading likely reflects an assimilation to Ezekiel 18:6, 22:9, which speak of eating upon mountains (a phrase for idolatrous feasts). The Masoretic Text is preserved in all Hebrew manuscripts, and no other major variations are cited by the supplied sources. The Hebrew verbs for “practice divination” (tenachashu) and “practice soothsaying” (teonenunu) are consistently stable across versions.
Reception History
In Jewish tradition, this verse was read as a core prohibition against both improper slaughter (eating blood) and all forms of divination. The Talmud (b. Sanhedrin 65a, 66a) discusses the types of enchantment forbidden, including various forms of fortune-telling. The early church, facing Greco-Roman occult practices, saw the verse as a model for purity. The apostolic decree (Acts 15:28, 29) retained the prohibition on blood for Gentile believers, reinforcing the link between dietary holiness and separation from pagan spirituality.
During the Reformation, commentators such as Calvin and Wesley applied the second prohibition directly to Christians: “observe times” became a warning against superstitious regard for days, hours, or seasons. Wesley called fortune-telling and charms “an intolerable affront to the Lord Jesus.” In modern times, the verse has been used by many Christian teachers to address astrology, horoscopes, and New Age practices, arguing that any search for guidance outside God’s Word and Spirit repeats the error of ancient Israel.
Preaching This Verse
Three-point outline
- Blood belongs to God alone. The prohibition against eating blood is not hygiene but theology, life and atonement are God’s domain (Leviticus 17:11). Pagans used blood to bargain with spirits; Israel must not bargain with God. Instead, they receive life as a gift.
- The occult trades in half-truths and fear. Enchantments and time-observing promise a shortcut to guidance. But they bypass prayer, prophecy, and trust in God’s providence. Such practices reveal a heart that doubts, “Is God really enough?”
- Holiness means being distinct in everyday choices. The verse sits among laws about farming, tattoos, and sexual ethics. Following God touches what we eat and what we consult, both the physical and the spiritual must submit to Him.
Five-point outline
- Exposition: The rule against eating blood (its background in Leviticus 17 and Canaanite practice).
- Exposition: The rule against divination and soothsaying (the specific terms and their meanings).
- Connection: Why these two belong together, both are attempts to access the spiritual realm without God.
- Application: What forms of “blood eating” and “divination” exist today? Not literal, but the same heart, turning to horoscopes, fortune telling, or even “lucky” rituals for control.
- Gospel: In Christ, we have all the guidance we need. He is the Word, the Light, and the final revelation. We do not need to seek omens because we have a Shepherd.
Illustration hooks
- Lucky socks. An athlete who always wears the same socks before a game “to win.” That impulse, trusting a charm over hard work or God’s sovereignty, is the same impulse as ancient cloud-reading.
- Horoscope check. A believer who glances at their horoscope “for fun” but secretly wants reassurance about the day ahead. The verse calls us to ask God directly instead of glancing at stars.
- Bargaining with God. “If I give up X, God will give me Y.” That transactional spirit echoes eating blood to manipulate the gods. Grace is free; we do not have to trade.
Questions your congregation is asking
- “Is it a sin to read a horoscope if I don’t believe in it?”
- “Aren’t these Old Testament rules obsolete for Christians? Does Acts 15 apply here?”
- “What about using superstitions like knocking on wood or throwing salt over a shoulder, is that forbidden?”
Leading a Discussion
This verse sits in a chapter full of “You shall not” commands, but each one is a fence around something precious: the holiness of life, the uniqueness of God, the dependence of His people. The two prohibitions, blood and occult, touch on a single root: a heart that looks for power and knowledge anywhere but in God. As you read Leviticus 19:26 together, let the text search your group’s assumptions. Where do you turn when you need guidance? Where does your culture tell you to turn? How does Christ’s full revelation change the way we seek His will?
Discussion questions
- Observation: What two things does this verse forbid? What words for occult practices appear in the passage and in the cross-references (Deuteronomy 18:10, 12)?
- Interpretation: Look at Leviticus 17:10, 14, which is a longer explanation of the blood prohibition. Why does God say blood is special?
- Interpretation: The word for “enchantments” is nachash, which shares a root with “serpent.” Why might that word be chosen? (Consider the serpent’s role in Genesis 3, offering knowledge apart from God.)
- Connection: The verse links a dietary rule with a spiritual one. What does this tell us about how God views all of life, including what we eat and what we consult?
- Application: In your own words, what would be the modern equivalent of “using enchantments” or “observing times”? Are there practices in your life or community that have the same shape?
- Application: The book of Acts (15:28, 29) tells Gentile believers to abstain from blood and from sexual immorality, as well as from things strangled and from idols. How does the apostolic decree show that this principle still matters for New Covenant believers?
- Gospel hope: If we have turned to other sources for guidance (a horoscope, a feeling, a lucky ritual), how does Jesus offer us something better than a method, He offers Himself as the Way, the Truth, and the Life?
Word Study
The key original-language words in this verse. Select any word for its full lexicon entry — meaning, every occurrence in Scripture, and related words.
Cross-References
Source: Treasury of Scripture Knowledge (TSK, public domain)
| Exodus 7:11 | Then Pharaoh also called for the wise men and the sorcerers. They also, the magicians of Egypt, did the same thing with their enchantments. |
| Exodus 8:7 | The magicians did the same thing with their enchantments, and brought up frogs on the land of Egypt. |
| Leviticus 3:17 | “‘It shall be a perpetual statute throughout your generations in all your dwellings, that you shall eat neither fat nor blood.’” |
| Leviticus 7:26 | You shall not eat any blood, whether it is of bird or of animal, in any of your dwellings. |
| Leviticus 17:10 | “‘Any man of the house of Israel, or of the strangers who live as foreigners among them, who eats any kind of blood, I will set my face against that soul who eats blood, and will cut him off from among his people. |
| Leviticus 17:14 | For as to the life of all flesh, its blood is with its life. Therefore I said to the children of Israel, “You shall not eat the blood of any kind of flesh; for the life of all flesh is its blood. Whoever eats it shall be cut off.” |
| Deuteronomy 12:23 | Only be sure that you don’t eat the blood; for the blood is the life. You shall not eat the life with the meat. |
| Deuteronomy 18:10 | There shall not be found with you anyone who makes his son or his daughter to pass through the fire, one who uses divination, one who tells fortunes, or an enchanter, or a sorcerer, |
Interlinear and lexical data from STEPBible (CC BY 4.0). Cross-reference data from OpenBible.info (CC BY 4.0). Commentaries are public domain.
For personal reflection
Read the devotional page — prayer, application, and "for families"
What the Commentators Say
9 public-domain commentaries, condensed into plain language.
Adam Clarke's Commentary Methodist/Wesleyan 1826
Clarke examines the Hebrew words behind "enchantment" and "observing times," suggesting the first might refer to divination by serpents and the second to reading omens in clouds or bird flight. He admits that the exact meanings of these prohibited practices are uncertain.
Barnes' Notes on the Bible Protestant 1832
Barnes reads these laws as responses to specific pagan customs, many tied to magic, idolatry, or mourning rites. He suggests the prohibitions on hair-cutting, beard-marring, cuttings, and tattoos each likely target known practices among neighboring cultures, such as honoring a deity or marking grief. Any voluntary disfigurement, he adds, is an outrage against God's workmanship.
Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges Anglican 1880
The commentator traces the original meaning of the forbidden practices to specific methods of divination. The command against enchantments refers to hydromancy, or divination by water. The Hebrew verb for augury likely meant to hum or whisper, describing the low murmuring sounds diviners made.
Geneva Bible Notes Reformed 1599
Ye shall not eat the flesh with the blood, ye shall not vse witchcraft, nor obserue times.
Gill's Exposition of the Bible Baptist 1748
Gill notes that Jewish interpreters offered several explanations for not eating anything with the blood, but he follows Maimonides in connecting it to a Zabian idolatrous practice of eating flesh around blood to commune with demons. He then defines enchantment and observing times as various forms of pagan divination and superstition.
Jamieson-Fausset-Brown Commentary Protestant 1871
JFB identifies two forbidden practices: divination by serpents, an early form of enchantment, and observing clouds to predict good or bad fortune. He says such deep-rooted superstitions were prohibited because they imply a lack of faith in God's providence.
Lange's Commentary Reformed 1857
Lange sees this chapter as the most complete summary of the law, a contrast to the heathen practices described just before it. Every command, from family duties to fair trade, flows from the repeated refrain "I am Jehovah," grounding all human conduct in God's own holy character.
Matthew Henry's Commentary Reformed/Presbyterian 1710
Henry reads the command against mixing kinds as a call to honor the order of creation. Because God made each creature after its kind, humans should not seek to combine what God separated. The prohibition targets the desire for unnatural mixtures, which he calls monsters.
Wesley's Explanatory Notes Methodist/Wesleyan 1754
Wesley argues that for Christians, consulting fortune-tellers, using charms, or superstitiously observing lucky days is far worse than it was under the Old Testament. Because Christ has already destroyed the devil's works, turning to such practices is a direct insult to the Lord Jesus and a disgrace to the Christian name.