Lamentations 5:6 · Bible study
Lamentations 5:6 Commentary: The Shame of Begging Former Enemies for Bread
Hebrew · 11 what the commentators say
Meaning in one sentence
What does 'given our hand to the Egyptians and Assyrians' mean? Study the idiom, desperation, and shame in Lamentations 5:6 with commentary analysis.
Research Summary
- Meaning: An admission of desperate submission: the people begged or surrendered to former enemies to get food.
- Key words: “Gave the hand” (natanu yad), an idiom for submission, supplication, or alliance; “to be satisfied” (lisboa), the verb for being sated, here ironic, as they get only enough to survive.
- Main debate: Does “give the hand” emphasize a beggar’s plea (Calvin), political submission (Barnes), or a formal covenant (Clarke, Gill)? All agree on desperation.
- Theological theme: The cost of trusting foreign powers instead of God (Isaiah 30-31), and the public shame that follows covenant disobedience (Deuteronomy 28:48).
- Best use: A text for confession and lament, especially in seasons of hardship or exile, reminding believers that shame can be spoken honestly before God.
Translation Comparison
BSB Berean Standard Bible 2020
We submitted to Egypt and Assyria to get enough bread.
WEB World English Bible 2000
We have given our hands to the Egyptians, and to the Assyrians, to be satisfied with bread.
KJV King James Version 1769
We have given the hand to the Egyptians, and to the Assyrians, to be satisfied with bread.
ASV American Standard Version 1901
We have given the hand to the Egyptians, And to the Assyrians, to be satisfied with bread.
YLT Young's Literal Translation 1898
To Egypt we have given a hand, To Asshur, to be satisfied with bread.
Darby Darby Bible 1890
We have given the hand to Egypt, [and] to Asshur, to be satisfied with bread.
Douay-Rheims Douay-Rheims Bible 1899
We have given our hand to Egypt, and to the Assyrians, that we might be satisfied with bread.
Translations in other languages (10 available)
Al Egipcio y al Asirio dimos la mano, para saciarnos de pan.
Nós nos rendemos aos egípcios e aos assírios para nos saciarmos de pão.
Nous avons tendu la main vers l’Égypte, vers l’Assyrie,
Wir haben uns müssen Ägypten und Assur ergeben, auf daß wir Brot satt zu essen haben.
Wij hebben den Egyptenaar de hand gegeven, en den Assyrier, om met brood verzadigd te worden.
Abbiam teso la mano verso l’Egitto e verso l’Assiria, per saziarci di pane.
Egipczykom podajemy rękę i Assyryjczykom, żebyśmy się nasycili chleba.
Протягиваем руку к Египтянам, к Ассириянам, чтобы насытиться хлебом.
我們投降 埃及人 和亞述人,為要得糧 吃飽。
We have given our hands to the Egyptians and to the Assyrians so that we might have enough bread.
Verse in Context
Original Language (Biblical Hebrew)
Old Testament · Biblical Hebrew · Lamentations 5:6
Source: STEPBible TAGNT/TEHB (CC-BY 4.0). Click or tap a morphology code to see the full parsing.
Scholars' Consensus
The commentators agree that the phrase “we have given our hand to the Egyptians and to the Assyrians” is an idiom of submission, driven by extreme hunger. Calvin explains that the people “were so distressed by want, that they begged bread.” He notes that the gesture, extending the hand, is what beggars do, and that being forced to do this to Egypt and Assyria, their long-time enemies, adds a bitter layer of disgrace. Barnes adds that “to give the hand means to submit oneself,” and that with the destruction of their nation, “the sole care that remained was the desire for personal preservation.” Gill sees the same idiom standing for supplication, covenant, or subjection. The common thread is that famine crushed every shred of national pride, driving the people to do the unthinkable: seek help from those who had once oppressed them.
How settled is the interpretation?
Interpretive difficulty: Medium
Main views:
- Literal beggar’s plea: Calvin and some others interpret 'give the hand' as extending the hand like a beggar, focusing on the physical act of asking for bread.
- Political submission or treaty: Gill, Clarke, and Barnes see the idiom as a sign of political surrender or alliance, grounded in the covenant-making gesture (e.g., 2 Kings 10:15).
What is clear: The verse describes a desperate act of seeking survival from former enemies, driven by famine, and the shame of that act is laid before God in prayer.
What Scholars Agree and Debate
| Topic | Agreed | Debated |
|---|---|---|
| Meaning of 'give the hand' | It indicates a desperate act of submission or supplication, driven by famine. | Some commentators focus on a humble begging gesture (Calvin); others stress a formal act of political surrender or treaty (Clarke, Gill). The text allows both readings. |
| Reference to Assyria | Assyria represents the traditional enemy of Israel, even though their empire had fallen by the time of Lamentations. | Some argue the name is anachronistic, standing for the Chaldean (Babylonian) empire that succeeded Assyria (Jamieson-Fausset-Brown). Others accept it as a natural reference to past oppressors (Barnes, Cambridge). |
| Theological significance of seeking help from enemies | This act shows the depth of human desperation and the failure of trusting God alone. | Reformed interpreters stress the covenant curse (Deuteronomy 28) as the direct cause; Wesleyan and Methodist voices (Clarke) emphasize the practical misery and the people's repentance. |
Historical & Cultural Context
Lamentations 5 was written in the shadow of Jerusalem’s fall in 586 BC. The city was destroyed, the temple burned, and many were killed or exiled. The rest of the chapter describes orphans, forced labor, and people paying for water and wood. Into this chaos comes verse 6: an admission that hunger has pushed them to submit to Egypt and Assyria.
Egypt and Assyria were ancient enemies of Israel and Judah. Prophets like Isaiah (Is 30:1, 31:1) and Jeremiah (Jer 2:18) had warned against trusting these powers for help. Yet now the people do more than trust: they “give the hand,” a gesture that in the ancient Near East signaled surrender or a plea for mercy (see II Kings 10:15, where Jehonadab gives Jehu his hand as a sign of alliance, and Jer 50:15, where Babylon “gives her hand” in defeat). The Cambridge Bible notes that Assyria had already fallen to Babylon, but their name survives here as the “traditional foes” of Israel, Egypt being the other great oppressor. For the exiles and those left in the land, the desperation was so complete that they would turn to any source for bread, even nations whose names were shorthand for cruelty and idolatry.
The cultural shame is nearly unbearable. To seek food from those who once enslaved your ancestors (Egypt) and destroyed your northern kingdom (Assyria) was to confess that God’s promise of a fruitful land had been revoked. Calvin writes that this was “a disgrace and reproach the most bitter,” and that God had every right to turn their pride into this public humiliation.
Textual Notes
The consulted sources note no significant textual variants for Lamentations 5:6. The Cambridge Bible mentions that Ball proposed eliminating both proper names (“Egyptians” and “Assyrians”) and reading “To adversaries we submitted,” as well as transposing this verse with verse 5, but these suggestions are based on metrical speculation rather than manuscript evidence. The Masoretic Text is stable, and the idiom “give the hand” appears consistently across ancient witnesses.
Reception History
From the Reformation onward, this verse has been read as a raw confession of national and spiritual failure. Calvin (1564) used it to warn against trusting human alliances over God’s provision, calling the need to beg from enemies a “disgrace and reproach.” Matthew Henry (1710) saw the verse as part of the people’s “pouring out their complaint to God” in prayer, not just as complaint but as a step toward restoration. In Wesley’s Explanatory Notes (1754), the focus was on the loss of kingly and fatherly protection. Across traditions, the verse has been used in liturgical settings of lament, especially during Advent and Lent, where communities identify with the shame of exile and the cry for deliverance.
Preaching This Verse
Three-point outline
- Desperation drives us to unfitting alliances. The people gave their hand to Egypt and Assyria, former enemies, for bread. Famine erased every boundary of loyalty or memory.
- Shame reveals the cost of sin. What they once did in faith (making covenants without God) they now do in need (begging from the same powers). The disgrace is part of God’s discipline.
- God hears the confession of the humbled. The prayer of Lamentations 5 is not a complaint only, it is a turn toward God, naming the very places of shame (see Lam 5:21).
Five-point outline
- The gesture. “Giving the hand” is an act of submission, sometimes a pledge, sometimes a beggar’s plea (Calvin).
- The recipients. Egypt and Assyria, the very empires that had enslaved and scattered them.
- The motive. Not political gain, but bread. Basic survival.
- The result. The shame that the people are willing to describe aloud, owning their condition before God.
- The theology. God’s covenant curses (Deut 28:48) had come true: “You will serve your enemies in hunger, thirst, nakedness, and lack of everything.”
Illustration hooks
- Having to ask a person who wronged you for a job or a loan, just to feed your family.
- Seeing a former rival at a food bank and feeling the mix of gratitude and humiliation.
- Neighbors who fled conflict and now line up for aid at a border crossing, side by side with people from the nation that bombed their town.
Questions your congregation is asking
- “Is it wrong to accept help from people who have hurt me or my people?”
- “How do I deal with the shame of having to depend on others when I used to be self-sufficient?”
- “Does God hear prayers that are basically a list of complaints about my suffering?”
Leading a Discussion
This verse sits inside a long prayer of lament. The people are not hiding their shame; they are bringing it directly to God. Before you begin, ask the group to think of a time when they had to ask for help from someone they would never have chosen to ask.
Discussion questions
- Read Lamentations 5:6. What do you think “given our hand” meant in the culture of ancient Israel? Why is it significant that they mention both Egypt and Assyria?
- Compare this verse with Jeremiah 2:18, where God asks, “What do you gain by going to Egypt… or to Assyria?” How does that earlier rebuke make the present situation even more painful?
- The motivation in this verse is “to be satisfied with bread.” Why do you think the text emphasizes basic food rather than political freedom or military aid?
- In verses 1-10, the people describe orphans, widows, and forced labor. Why do they list these specific hardships before confessing their own actions in verse 6?
- Does the act of begging from enemies show repentance or just desperation? What clues does the rest of the chapter give you (see vv. 16, 19-22)?
- Calvin says the phrase means “they begged bread,” and that it was “a disgrace and reproach.” Why would a loving God allow his people to be publicly ashamed like this?
- How can a church today help people who are so desperate that they are considering unwise or degrading choices just to get by?
Word Study
The key original-language words in this verse. Select any word for its full lexicon entry — meaning, every occurrence in Scripture, and related words.
Cross-References
Source: Treasury of Scripture Knowledge (TSK, public domain)
| Genesis 24:2 | Abraham said to his servant, the elder of his house, who ruled over all that he had, “Please put your hand under my thigh. |
| II Kings 10:15 | When he had departed from there, he met Jehonadab the son of Rechab coming to meet him. He greeted him, and said to him, “Is your heart right, as my heart is with your heart?” Jehonadab answered, “It is.” “If it is, give me your hand.” He gave him his hand; and he took him up to him into the chariot. |
| Isaiah 30:1 | “Woe to the rebellious children”, says Yahweh, “who take counsel, but not from me; and who make an alliance, but not with my Spirit, that they may add sin to sin; |
| Isaiah 30:6 | The burden of the animals of the South. Through the land of trouble and anguish, of the lioness and the lion, the viper and fiery flying serpent, they carry their riches on the shoulders of young donkeys, and their treasures on the humps of camels, to an unprofitable people. |
| Isaiah 31:1 | Woe to those who go down to Egypt for help, and rely on horses, and trust in chariots because they are many, and in horsemen because they are very strong, but they don’t look to the Holy One of Israel, and they don’t seek Yahweh! |
| Isaiah 31:3 | Now the Egyptians are men, and not God; and their horses flesh, and not spirit. When Yahweh stretches out his hand, both he who helps shall stumble, and he who is helped shall fall, and they all shall be consumed together. |
| Isaiah 57:9 | You went to the king with oil, increased your perfumes, sent your ambassadors far off, and degraded yourself even to Sheol. |
| Jeremiah 2:18 | Now what do you gain by going to Egypt, to drink the waters of the Shihor? Or why do you go on the way to Assyria, to drink the waters of the River? |
Interlinear and lexical data from STEPBible (CC BY 4.0). Cross-reference data from OpenBible.info (CC BY 4.0). Commentaries are public domain.
For personal reflection
Read the devotional page — prayer, application, and "for families"
What the Commentators Say
11 public-domain commentaries, condensed into plain language.
Adam Clarke's Commentary Methodist/Wesleyan 1826
Clarke explains that "giving the hand to the Egyptians" means seeking alliances with them and the Assyrians, entering into covenants just to obtain life's necessities. The image conveys desperation: either actively seeking foreign help or being forced to submit to whichever nation they now live among for survival.
Barnes' Notes on the Bible Protestant 1832
Barnes explains that Jeremiah's phrase "giving the hand" signifies total submission. With their national existence crushed by Babylon, the people lost all patriotic feeling. Their sole remaining care was personal preservation, making them ready to submit to the yoke of either Egypt or Assyria.
Calvin's Commentaries Reformed 1564
Calvin focuses on the degrading image of begging for bread, specifically the phrase "give the hand." He argues the people were reduced to begging from former enemies, the Egyptians and Assyrians, which was a bitter disgrace. This humiliation was the just reward for their unfaithfulness, since God had promised them a fertile land.
Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges Anglican 1880
The commentator points out that the reference to Assyria in this verse is likely an anachronism. By the time this was written, Babylon had already replaced Assyria as the ruling empire. The name "Assyria" persists here as a traditional designation for Israel's longstanding enemies, not as a precise political reference.
Geneva Bible Notes Reformed 1599
The Geneva note highlights the shame of Israel's desperation: they submitted to Egypt and Assyria, former enemies, just to get enough bread. This confession lays bare how low God's people had sunk, forced to beg from those who had once oppressed them.
Gill's Exposition of the Bible Baptist 1748
Gill reads the phrase "given our hand" as a sign of desperate submission: the Jews turned to Egypt and Assyria for food, either begging, making treaties, or acknowledging their subjection. For him, this exposes their practical reliance on enemy nations during the siege and captivity, not a mere gesture of friendship.
Jamieson-Fausset-Brown Commentary Protestant 1871
given . . . hand to —in token of submission (see on Jer 50:15 ). to . . . Egyptians —at the death of Josiah ( 2 Chr 36:3 ; 2 Chr 36:4 ). Assyrians —that is, the Chaldeans who occupied the empire which Assyria had held. So Jer 2:18 . to be satisfied with bread — ( De 28:48 ).
Keil & Delitzsch OT Commentary Protestant 1876
Keil-Delitzsch reads Lamentations 5 as a general description of national disgrace and oppression, not as a record of specific historical events. They insist the metaphors of orphanhood and widowhood are comparisons for being unprotected, and that buying water and wood refers to paying heavy duties under enemy control, not literal purchases during a siege or in exile. They reject readings that limit
Lange's Commentary Reformed 1857
Lange argues that this final chapter is not prose but poetry of the highest order, marked by parallelisms of thought, deliberate assonance, and almost metrical rhythm. He treats the people as a concrete multitude speaking in first person plural, not as an idealised female figure, and counts the twenty-two verses as integral to the poem's unity rather than a loose supplement.
Matthew Henry's Commentary Reformed/Presbyterian 1710
Matthew Henry notes that the people are not crying out about future fears but about present, tangible suffering. They bring before God evils already upon them, not imagined ones — what was long threatened has now arrived. Their grief is poured out as a real complaint, not a vague anxiety.
Wesley's Explanatory Notes Methodist/Wesleyan 1754
Wesley identifies a twofold loss: the community is without a king and without God's fatherly protection. He brings special attention to the resulting plight of orphaned children, left without any earthly parent.