Judges 1:5 · Bible study
Judges 1:5 Commentary: Who Is Adoni-Bezek?
Hebrew · 9 what the commentators say
Meaning in one sentence
Explore the identity of Adoni-Bezek in Judges 1:5. Is his name linked to a Canaanite god or to the king Adoni-Zedek? Commentary insights.
Research Summary
- Meaning: Judah and Simeon surprise the Canaanite king Adoni-Bezek at Bezek, defeating his forces as part of the post-Joshua conquest.
- Key words: Found (מָצָא, matsa), hostile encounter; struck (נָכָה, nakah), to defeat or slay decisively.
- Main debate: Whether ‘Adoni-Bezek’ is a title meaning ‘lord of Bezek’ or a theophoric name referencing a god Bezek, possibly linked to Adoni-Zedek of Jerusalem.
- Theological theme: God’s faithfulness to His promise of land, activated by Israel’s obedience and inter-tribal cooperation.
- Best use: Illustrating the intersection of divine direction and human partnership in spiritual warfare; a case study in trusting God for victory over entrenched opposition.
Translation Comparison
BSB Berean Standard Bible 2020
And there they found Adoni-bezek and fought against him, striking down the Canaanites and Perizzites.
WEB World English Bible 2000
They found Adoni-Bezek in Bezek, and they fought against him. They struck the Canaanites and the Perizzites.
KJV King James Version 1769
And they found Adoni–bezek in Bezek: and they fought against him, and they slew the Canaanites and the Perizzites.
ASV American Standard Version 1901
And they found Adoni-bezek in Bezek; and they fought against him, and they smote the Canaanites and the Perizzites.
YLT Young's Literal Translation 1898
and they find Adoni-Bezek in Bezek, and fight against him, and smite the Canaanite and the Perizzite.
Darby Darby Bible 1890
And they found Adoni-Bezek in Bezek, and fought against him, and they smote the Canaanites and the Perizzites.
Douay-Rheims Douay-Rheims Bible 1899
And they found Adonibezec in Bezec, and fought against him, and they defeated the Chanaanite, and the Pherezite.
Translations in other languages (10 available)
Y hallaron á Adoni-bezec en Bezec, y pelearon contra él: é hirieron al Cananeo y al Pherezeo.
E acharam a Adoni-Bezeque em Bezeque, e lutaram contra ele: e feriram aos cananeus e aos perizeus.
Ils trouvèrent Adoni-Bézek à Bézek; ils l’ attaquèrent, et ils battirent les Cananéens et les Phéréziens.
Und fanden den Adoni- Besek zu Besek und stritten wider ihn und schlugen die Kanaaniter und Pheresiter.
En zij vonden Adoni-Bezek te Bezek, en streden tegen hem; en zij sloegen de Kanaanieten en de Ferezieten.
E, trovato Adoni-Bezek a Bezek, l’attaccarono, e sconfissero i Cananei e i Ferezei.
Bo naleźli Adonibezeka w Bezeku, i walczyli przeciwko niemu, a porazili Chananejczyka i Ferezejczyka.
В Везеке встретились они с Адони-Везеком, сразились с ним и разбили Хананеев и Ферезеев.
又在那裡 遇見亞多尼‧比色,與他 爭戰,殺敗 迦南人 和 比利洗人。
And they came across Adoni-zedek, and made war on him; and they overcame the Canaanites and the Perizzites.
Verse in Context
Original Language (Biblical Hebrew)
Old Testament · Biblical Hebrew · Judges 1:5
Source: STEPBible TAGNT/TEHB (CC-BY 4.0). Click or tap a morphology code to see the full parsing.
Scholars' Consensus
Commentators agree that Judges 1:5 records a pivotal military encounter after Joshua's death. The tribes of Judah and Simeon, acting on God's direction, attack the Canaanite stronghold of Bezek and defeat its king Adoni-Bezek. The Hebrew verb “found” (matsa) here carries the sense of a surprise attack or hostile encounter. The mention of Canaanites and Perizzites echoes earlier summaries of the land’s inhabitants (Genesis 13:7) and signals a representative victory.
Less consensus exists on Adoni-Bezek himself. A majority of older commentators (Gill, Jamieson-Fausset-Brown) take the name as a straightforward title: “lord of Bezek.” Others, notably the Cambridge Bible, argue that Old Testament names are rarely formed from place names, so the name may originally have been Adoni-Zedek (king of Jerusalem in Joshua 10), with “Bezek” a deliberate alteration. The lexicon lists the meaning as “my lord is Besek,” leaving open the possibility that Besek was a Canaanite deity. Both sides affirm that the verse depicts a real event with theological significance: God delivering the Canaanites into Israel’s hand as promised.
How settled is the interpretation?
Interpretive difficulty: Medium
Main views:
- Historical king of Bezek: The name is taken as a title derived from his capital city; Bezek is a known location (1 Samuel 11:8).
- Textual variant of Adoni-Zedek: The pattern of Canaanite theophoric names and the LXX reading of Joshua 10 suggest a scribal alteration.
- Theophoric name referencing a god Bezek: The name may mean 'my lord is Bezek,' with Bezek as a deity otherwise unattested.
What is clear: Judah and Simeon, acting under God's direction, defeated a Canaanite coalition at Bezek and captured its king, fulfilling the divine promise of land.
What Scholars Agree and Debate
| Topic | Agreed | Debated |
|---|---|---|
| Identity of Adoni-Bezek | He was a Canaanite king defeated by Israel at Bezek as part of Judah's campaign. | Some (Gill, JFB) take the name as a geographical title, 'lord of Bezek.' Others (Cambridge Bible) argue it is a textual alteration of Adoni-Zedek, king of Jerusalem from Joshua 10, or that 'Bezek' refers to a Canaanite god. |
| Location of Bezek | Bezek was a city within the area where Judah and Simeon campaigned. | Older commentators place it near Shechem (17 miles north). Others, noting distance from Judah's territory, suggest a second Bezek near Jerusalem or identify it with Azekah. |
| Nature of the battle | The encounter resulted in a decisive Israelite victory, with the king captured and enemy forces struck down. | The verb 'found' may imply a surprise attack (Lange, Clarke) or simply a military encounter (Gill). The extent of the victory, whether it eliminated the entire Canaanite presence in that area, is not specified. |
Historical & Cultural Context
Judges 1 opens with the question “Who should go up first?” after Joshua’s death. Israel lacks a single leader; each tribe must now secure its own allotted territory. God answers by choosing Judah, the largest and most powerful tribe. Judah then allies with Simeon, whose inheritance lies within Judah’s borders (Joshua 19:1). This partnership sets the stage for the campaign at Bezek.
The location of Bezek is uncertain. Keil and Delitzsch note that the only other biblical Bezek appears in 1 Samuel 11:8, about seventeen miles northeast of Shechem. The fourth-century Onomasticon reports two villages named Bezek near Neapolis (modern Nablus). That location is far north of Judah’s territory, leading many scholars to propose a second Bezek closer to Jerusalem, possibly near Azekah (Joshua 10:10). The Cambridge Bible suggests that the original place may have been Jerusalem itself, with the name altered to avoid confusion with the earlier conquest of Adoni-Zedek.
Canaanites and Perizzites serve here as a shorthand for the indigenous population. Canaanites typically occupied the lowlands, Perizzites the hill country (Numbers 13:29; Joshua 17:15). The verb “struck” (nakah) can mean either to defeat in battle or to kill outright; in context, it refers to the ten thousand slain mentioned in verse 4. The capture of the king is singled out as the most significant outcome, preparing the narrative for the justice meted out in verses 6, 7.
The cultural background includes the practice of naming kings after patron deities. Adoni-Zedek means “(the god) Zedek is Lord,” a theophoric pattern common in Canaanite names. If Adoni-Bezek follows that pattern, it would point to a god named Bezek, otherwise unknown. The Hebrew scribes may have altered the name to distinguish this account from Joshua’s, or to give it a contemptuous etymology (“lord of scattering,” from Aramaic bəzaq). This historical uncertainty does not diminish the narrative’s central claim: God kept His promise by giving Judah victory.
Textual Notes
The Masoretic Text consistently reads “Adoni-bezek” in this verse. The Cambridge Bible notes that the Septuagint reads “Adoni-bezek” even in Joshua 10:1, 3, where the Hebrew has “Adoni-zedek.” This has led some scholars to suspect that the name in Judges 1:5 was altered from an original “Adoni-zedek” to avoid confusion with the earlier conquest or to give a contemptuous meaning (“lord of scattering,” from Aramaic bəzaq). However, the manuscript evidence for the received text is strong, and no variant reading threatens the basic narrative. The name “Adoni-bezek” stands in all major Hebrew manuscripts and early versions.
Reception History
The verse has been read primarily within the larger Judges narrative of conquest and failure. Early Jewish exegetes (e.g., the Targum) treated the name as a straightforward title. Christian commentators of the Reformation, such as Matthew Henry, focused on the lesson of divine justice foreshadowed in the capture of the king. John Calvin used the passage to illustrate God’s faithfulness to His covenant when Israel obeys. The suggestion that Adoni-Bezek might be a corruption of Adoni-Zedek emerged in critical scholarship of the nineteenth century and remains a debated point. Most interpreters, however, have accepted the verse at face value, drawing from it themes of cooperation, obedience, and the reality of spiritual conflict.
Preaching This Verse
Three-point outline
- Obedience begins with asking. After Joshua’s death, Israel inquired of the Lord (v.1). They did not assume. The victory at Bezek flows from that posture of dependence.
- Partnership multiplies strength. Judah invited Simeon to share the campaign. Their alliance made the attack effective; no tribe worked alone.
- God delivers what He promises. The text credits Yahweh with handing the Canaanites over. Human effort is real but secondary. The outcome belongs to God.
Five-point outline
- Divine direction. God chooses Judah to go first (v.2). Leadership comes by God’s appointment, not human ambition.
- Brotherly cooperation. Judah says, “Come up with me.” Simeon agrees. Unity across tribal lines models the body of Christ.
- Unexpected encounter. They “found” Adoni-Bezek, a term suggesting a surprise meeting. God often positions His people precisely where the enemy is.
- Dealing with the enemy. The strike against Canaanites and Perizzites is decisive. Spiritual opposition requires a single-minded blow, not half-measures.
- One king’s defeat foreshadows all others. Adoni-Bezek’s downfall (vv.6-7) shows that God’s justice is impartial and sure. Local victories build toward ultimate victory.
Illustration hooks
- Teamwork across differences. Two departments in a church (youth and outreach) share resources for a community project; the synergy accomplishes more than each could alone.
- The unknown battlefield. A family moves to a new city and discovers that the very challenge they feared is already where God has placed them. Bezek may be unknown to us, but known to God.
- A name that hides a god. A rival company claims authority based on a prestigious founder; in reality, the founder is an outdated symbol. The enemy’s boast is hollow before the true Lord.
Questions your congregation is asking
- Does God still lead His people into “battles” today, or was that only for the Old Testament?
- Why does the Bible record the names of defeated kings? What do we learn from them?
- What does it mean to “find” an enemy? Is that a military term, or can it apply to spiritual challenges we stumble upon?
Leading a Discussion
Judges 1:5 is a short verse with big implications. It sits at the start of Israel’s effort to settle the land, showing how God honors His promises when His people take initiative. The verse also introduces Adoni-Bezek, a king whose name carries a question mark: is he simply a local lord, or does his name link him to a Canaanite god? Use these questions to guide your group through the details and then to the heart of what this passage says about God’s faithfulness.
Discussion questions
- What does the word “found” suggest about how this battle began? (Look at the Hebrew range: to meet, to encounter, to attack unexpectedly.)
- Why do you think the text specifies both Canaanites and Perizzites? What does that tell you about the opposition Judah faced?
- The name Adoni-Bezek can mean “lord of Bezek” or “my lord is Bezek.” How does the possibility of a god named Bezek change how you read this victory?
- If Adoni-Bezek is the same person as Adoni-Zedek in Joshua 10, what does that say about the completeness of the earlier conquest? Is this a failure or a continuation?
- What role does the alliance between Judah and Simeon play in this success? Why does God often work through partnership rather than lone individuals?
- How does this verse encourage you to trust God’s leading in your own “post-Joshua” moments, times when a leader is gone and you must step forward?
- In what ways do you need to “go up” against a challenge in your life? What would it look like to do that in partnership with others and in dependence on God’s direction?
Word Study
The key original-language words in this verse. Select any word for its full lexicon entry — meaning, every occurrence in Scripture, and related words.
Interlinear and lexical data from STEPBible (CC BY 4.0). Commentaries are public domain.
For personal reflection
Read the devotional page — prayer, application, and "for families"
What the Commentators Say
9 public-domain commentaries, condensed into plain language.
Adam Clarke's Commentary Methodist/Wesleyan 1826
Clarke observes that the Hebrew word for "found" in this verse can mean a hostile attack or surprise encounter. He describes Adoni-bezek as a tribal chieftain, comparing him to clan leaders among the Scottish Highlanders, and notes uncertainty about the location of Bezek.
Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges Anglican 1880
The Cambridge Bible Schools commentary argues that Adoni-bezek is likely a scribal error for Adoni-zedek, the king of Jerusalem in Joshua. Hebrew names are never formed from place names, and a god named Bezek is unknown. The scribes probably altered the name to distinguish the narratives or to give it a contemptuous meaning.
Geneva Bible Notes Reformed 1599
And they founde Adoni-bezek in Bezek: and they fought against him, and slewe the Canaanites, and the Perizzites.
Gill's Exposition of the Bible Baptist 1748
Gill clarifies that the Israelites did not capture Adonibezek elsewhere and bring him to Bezek; he was already in the city when they attacked. The battle and slaughter of the Canaanites and Perizzites, numbering ten thousand, occurred there as part of that same engagement.
Jamieson-Fausset-Brown Commentary Protestant 1871
JFB argues that the Israelites' mutilation of Adoni-bezek was not random cruelty but an act of retributive justice. The Canaanite king himself recognized this, as his own conscience connected his past atrocities to the punishment he now received.
Keil & Delitzsch OT Commentary Protestant 1876
Keil and Delitzsch argue that Adoni-bezek likely attacked from the north, forcing Judah and Simeon to engage him before they could take their own tribal lands. They see the "seventy kings" as a round number and exaggerated, since Joshua conquered only thirty-one. The mutilation was just retribution, as the king himself acknowledged.
Lange's Commentary Reformed 1857
Lange argues that Bezek is not a city but a name for a desert region whose dazzling brightness gave Adoni-bezek his title, meaning "my god is brightness." This king actually ruled Jerusalem, which explains why Judah and Simeon stormed it only after defeating him, burning it without settling it since it belonged to Benjamin.
Matthew Henry's Commentary Reformed/Presbyterian 1710
Matthew Henry observes that the judges came from eight different tribes, spreading honor around until it finally settled in Judah. He notes that Eli and Samuel, though judges, fall outside this book because they were of Levi. The years of servitude under foreign oppressors are included within the years of the judges themselves.
Wesley's Explanatory Notes Methodist/Wesleyan 1754
Wesley rejects Matthew Henry's claim that the goodness of God's promised land will intensify the punishment of those who perish. He argues that this reasoning fails under predestination: if some are not elected, they never had a genuine offer, and if all the elect are saved, the grant was never free to the others.