Jude 1:5 · Bible study
Jude 1:5 Commentary: Saved and Destroyed
Greek · 11 what the commentators say
Meaning in one sentence
Jude uses Israel's wilderness destruction to warn that past deliverance does not shield from judgment if faith fails. A call to persevere.
Research Summary
- Meaning: God's past deliverance does not exempt from judgment if unbelief persists. The exodus generation is a case study.
- Key words: hupomimnēskō (remind), hapax (once/once for all), to deuteron (secondly/afterward), apollumi (destroy).
- Main debate: The identity of the deliverer ('Lord,' 'Jesus,' or 'God') and the meaning of hapax ('formerly' vs 'once for all').
- Theological theme: The necessity of persevering faith; grace does not cancel the demand for trust.
- Best use: A sobering reminder for complacent believers, not to induce fear but to call to ongoing dependence on Christ.
Translation Comparison
BSB Berean Standard Bible 2020
Although you are fully aware of this, I want to remind you that after Jesus had delivered His people out of the land of Egypt, He destroyed those who did not believe.
WEB World English Bible 2000
Now I desire to remind you, though you already know this, that the Lord, having saved a people out of the land of Egypt, afterward destroyed those who didn’t believe.
KJV King James Version 1769
I will therefore put you in remembrance, though ye once knew this, how that the Lord, having saved the people out of the land of Egypt, afterward destroyed them that believed not.
ASV American Standard Version 1901
Now I desire to put you in remembrance, though ye know all things once for all, that the Lord, having saved a people out of the land of Egypt, afterward destroyed them that believed not.
YLT Young's Literal Translation 1898
and to remind you I intend, you knowing once this, that the Lord, a people out of the land of Egypt having saved, again those who did not believe did destroy;
Darby Darby Bible 1890
But I would put you in remembrance, you who once knew all things, that the Lord, having saved a people out of [the] land of Egypt, in the second place destroyed those who had not believed.
Douay-Rheims Douay-Rheims Bible 1899
I will therefore admonish you, though ye once knew all things, that Jesus, having saved the people out of the land of Egypt, did afterwards destroy them that believed not.
Translations in other languages (10 available)
Os quiero pues amonestar, ya que alguna vez habéis sabido esto, que el Señor habiendo salvado al pueblo de Egipto|strong="G1093, G0125", después destruyó á los que no creían:
Mas eu quer vos lembrar, sabendo vós tudo de uma vez por todas: que o Senhor, tendo liberto o povo para fora da terra do Egito, depois destruiu os que não creram.
Je veux vous rappeler, à vous qui savez fort bien toutes ces choses, que le Seigneur, après avoir sauvé le peuple et l’ avoir tiré du pays d’Égypte, fit ensuite périr les incrédules;
Ich will euch aber erinnern, die ihr dies ja schon wisset, daß der HERR, da er dem Volk aus Ägypten half, das andere Mal umbrachte, die da nicht glaubten.
Maar ik wil u indachtig maken, als die dit eenmaal weet, dat de Heere, het volk uit Egypteland verlost hebbende, wederom degenen, die niet geloofden, verdorven heeft.
Or voglio ricordare a voi che avete da tempo conosciuto tutto questo, che il Signore, dopo aver tratto in salvo il popolo dal paese di Egitto, fece in seguito perire quelli che non credettero,
Przetoż chcę wam przypomnieć, którzy już raz o tem wiecie, że chociaż Pan lud z ziemi Egipskiej wyswobodził, przecież potem tych, którzy nie wierzyli, potracił.
Я хочу напомнить вам, уже знающим это, что Господь, избавив народ из земли Египетской, потом неверовавших погубил,
從前主 救了 他的百姓 出 埃及 地，後來 就把那些 不 信的 滅絕了。這一切的事，你們 雖然都 知道，我卻 仍要 提醒 你們。
Now it is my purpose to put you in mind, though you once had knowledge of all these things, of how the Lord, having taken a people safely out of Egypt, later sent destruction on those who had no faith;
Verse in Context
Original Language (Koine Greek)
New Testament · Koine Greek · Jude 1:5
Source: STEPBible TAGNT/TEHB (CC-BY 4.0). Click or tap a morphology code to see the full parsing.
Scholars' Consensus
The commentators agree that Jude invokes the exodus generation as a vivid warning. God saved Israel out of Egypt, yet 'afterward destroyed them that believed not' (KJV). Barnes explains that the 'bearing of this fact' is that mere rescue does not prevent destruction if wickedness follows. Calvin stresses that those honored with great blessings must not 'glory carelessly' in grace; rather, they must 'walk watchfully in his fear.' Wesley draws the same conclusion: 'Let none therefore presume upon past mercies, as if he was now out of danger.' Gill observes that this 'shows the evil nature of unbelief' and that 'no outward privileges and profession will screen any from divine vengeance.' Matthew Henry similarly notes that the 'monuments of judgment' remind us that 'the far greater part of that very people whom he had once saved' were destroyed. All see the point: past deliverance is no guarantee of final salvation; continued faith is essential.
How settled is the interpretation?
Interpretive difficulty: Medium
Main views:
- Traditional reading: 'the Lord' as God the Father: Most English translations (KJV, WEB, ASV) follow the majority text; the exodus is consistently attributed to Yahweh in the Old Testament.
- Christological reading: 'Jesus' as the divine deliverer: Early manuscripts (P72, Codex A) read 'Jesus'; this highlights the preexistence of Christ and his identity with the God of Israel.
- Hapax as 'once for all': Vincent, Clarke, and some MSS emphasize that the readers are fully and completely knowledgeable, not just formerly aware.
What is clear: God's judgment on unbelief after deliverance is a historical warning that past grace does not exempt from future judgment if faith fails.
What Scholars Agree and Debate
| Topic | Agreed | Debated |
|---|---|---|
| Identity of 'the Lord' | God delivered Israel from Egypt; the deliverer is divine. | Some early manuscripts read 'Jesus' (BSB, Douay) or 'God.' Commentators like Gill and Jamieson-Fausset-Brown note this variant. Those who read 'Jesus' see a strong statement of Christ's deity; others maintain the traditional reading 'the Lord'. |
| Meaning of 'once' (hapax) | The readers had prior knowledge of the exodus story and its implications. | Clarke and Vincent argue for 'once for all' (fully, perfectly), while Barnes and the KJV translators render it as 'formerly.' The difference affects the force of the reminder: is Jude saying they knew it completely, or that they once knew it but may have forgotten? |
| Implication for perseverance | Unbelief after deliverance leads to judgment, so believers must not presume on past grace. | Wesley and Arminian traditions see this as evidence that truly saved believers can forfeit salvation by unbelief. Reformed traditions (Calvin, Gill) interpret it as showing that only professing believers who lacked genuine faith are destroyed, upholding the perseverance of the saints. Both sides agree God judges unbelief. |
Historical & Cultural Context
Jude writes to Christians facing false teachers who 'turn the grace of our God into indecency' (v.4). To counter their twisted gospel, he reaches back into Israel's history for a sobering pattern. The exodus generation was saved by a mighty act of God, brought out of Egypt with signs and wonders. Yet that same generation, except for Caleb and Joshua, perished in the wilderness. Numbers 14:22 records God's complaint: 'all those men who have seen my glory and my signs, which I worked in Egypt and in the wilderness, yet have tempted me these ten times.' The verdict was sealed: 'They shall surely die in the wilderness' (26:65). Psalm 106:26 repeats the oath: God 'would overthrow them in the wilderness.'
Jude calls this a 'second' fact (the Greek to deuteron): first they were saved, then they were destroyed. The sequence cuts against presumption. As Barnes notes, the apostle 'seems to have fixed his mind on this event as a second great and important fact in regard to them.' The connection between deliverance and judgment is not accidental, it is typical. The same pattern appears in 1 Corinthians 10:1-10, where Paul warns that even those baptized into Moses in the cloud and sea were overthrown because they desired evil things.
Adding to the force of the warning, many early manuscripts read 'Jesus' instead of 'the Lord' (as the BSB and Douay translate). Jamieson-Fausset-Brown and others note that this identification of Jesus with the God of the exodus is a striking assertion of Christ's deity. Jude's readers would recognize that the One who saved Israel is the same Lord Jesus who now calls them to fidelity. Past grace came from him; future judgment will also come from him.
The cultural context makes the warning even sharper. Jewish tradition held that the wilderness generation was a type of the disobedient. Jude adapts this to the church age: those who have been 'called…sanctified…and kept for Jesus Christ' (v.1) are not immune. Outward belonging, even miraculous deliverance, does not replace the inner response of faith.
Textual Notes
The consulted sources note several textual variants. The Cambridge Bible observes that the manuscripts present 'a curious variation of reading, some giving “the Lord,” some “Jesus,” and some “God.”' The BSB and Douay render 'Jesus,' while most English versions follow the reading 'Lord.' Gill also mentions the Alexandrian copy and Vulgate read 'Jesus.' Additionally, the word 'once' (Greek hapax) is textually secure, but its meaning is debated. A related variant is the inclusion of 'all things' in some manuscripts (e.g., the Cambridge Bible notes 'the better MSS. give “knew all things”'), which changes the object of knowledge. The UBS/NA text apparatus is not supplied, but the cited excerpts confirm these variations.
Reception History
This verse has served as a warning against spiritual presumption throughout church history. Early Christian catechesis used the wilderness generation as a type of baptism and the Eucharist, following Paul's lead in 1 Corinthians 10, and Jude's application reinforced that call to self-examination. Medieval interpreters, such as Bede and Thomas Aquinas, read the verse as a caution that sacramental grace does not guarantee salvation if the recipient falls into unbelief. During the Reformation, Calvin and the Reformed tradition cited Jude 1:5 to warn the visible church that outward covenant membership is no substitute for genuine faith. Wesley and the Methodist revival used the same text to urge holiness and to argue that a true believer can 'fall from grace' through persistent unbelief. In modern evangelicalism, the verse is often preached alongside Hebrews 3-4 to underscore the necessity of persevering faith against the backdrop of God's consistent pattern of judgment on unbelief.
Preaching This Verse
Three-Point Outline
- Remembrance is necessary even for the knowledgeable. Jude says he 'desires to remind' readers who 'already know' (v.5). Knowledge can grow cold. A reminder is not an insult but a rescue. The preacher can ask: What truths do we know but fail to live by?
- Salvation in the past does not guarantee safety in the future. God saved a people from Egypt; 'afterward' he destroyed the same people for unbelief. Past grace is not a talisman. It must be met with continued trust. Calvin calls this walking 'watchfully in his fear.'
- Unbelief is the specific sin that draws judgment. Those who 'did not believe' (v.5) were destroyed. The exodus deliverance produced a people who were to trust and obey. When they refused to believe God's promise about the land, they fell. The same is true for the church: faith must persist.
Five-Point Outline
- The Example: God saved Israel from Egypt (v.5a).
- The Shock: That same saved people were later destroyed (v.5b).
- The Cause: They did not believe (v.5c).
- The Principle: Grace received demands faith continued.
- The Warning: No privilege or past deliverance exempts anyone from the consequences of unbelief.
Illustration Hooks
- The high-jumper who clears the bar but lands wrong. The moment of clearance is real, but the landing matters. The exodus generation was brought safely out, they cleared the bar. But they did not finish the race.
- A patient cured of a serious disease who ignores the doctor's follow-up instructions. The cure was free and effective. But neglecting the regimen leads back to danger. Grace is free, but it asks for a response of trust and obedience.
- A soldier rescued from enemy territory who later deserts. The rescue was urgent and costly. But the rescue itself creates a new loyalty. Desertion after rescue is not just ingratitude; it is a betrayal that carries consequences.
Questions Your Congregation Is Asking
- 'Was my salvation ever real if I can lose it?'
- 'How can I know if my faith is genuine and not just a past experience?'
- 'Does this verse mean I should live in fear of losing my salvation?'
Leading a Discussion
Jude does not write to terrify but to awaken. The exodus story was well known to his readers, yet they needed to hear it again. This passage invites us to examine the gap between what we know and what we live. The warning is not that God is eager to destroy, but that unbelief is a serious danger even for those who have tasted grace.
Discussion Questions
- What does the exodus story (Exodus 12-14) teach about God's power and love? How does Jude use that story differently here?
- Why do you think Jude says he 'desires to remind' them, even though they already know? What does this tell us about human nature and the need for repetition in faith?
- The Greek word hapax can mean 'once for all' or 'formerly.' How does each meaning change the tone of the verse? (See Clarke and Vincent for support.)
- Why is 'unbelief' singled out as the cause of destruction? In what ways can unbelief show up in a believer's life today?
- How does the example of the wilderness generation connect to the false teachers Jude is opposing (v.4)? What are modern versions of 'turning grace into indecency'?
- Some early manuscripts read 'Jesus' instead of 'the Lord' in verse 5. What does this tell us about early Christian beliefs about Jesus' identity?
- How can a small group help its members 'persevere in faith' (Hebrews 3:12-14) rather than drift into unbelief? What practical steps come to mind?
Word Study
The key original-language words in this verse. Select any word for its full lexicon entry — meaning, every occurrence in Scripture, and related words.
Cross-References
Source: Treasury of Scripture Knowledge (TSK, public domain)
| Numbers 14:22 | because all those men who have seen my glory and my signs, which I worked in Egypt and in the wilderness, yet have tempted me these ten times, and have not listened to my voice; |
| Numbers 14:37 | even those men who brought up an evil report of the land, died by the plague before Yahweh. |
| Numbers 26:64 | But among these there was not a man of them who were counted by Moses and Aaron the priest, who counted the children of Israel in the wilderness of Sinai. |
| Numbers 26:65 | For Yahweh had said of them, “They shall surely die in the wilderness.” There was not a man left of them, except Caleb the son of Jephunneh, and Joshua the son of Nun. |
| Deuteronomy 2:15 | Moreover Yahweh’s hand was against them, to destroy them from the middle of the camp, until they were consumed. |
| Deuteronomy 2:16 | So, when all the men of war were consumed and dead from among the people, |
| Psalms 106:26 | Therefore he swore to them that he would overthrow them in the wilderness, |
| Romans 15:15 | But I write the more boldly to you in part as reminding you, because of the grace that was given to me by God, |
Interlinear and lexical data from STEPBible (CC BY 4.0). Cross-reference data from OpenBible.info (CC BY 4.0). Commentaries are public domain.
For personal reflection
Read the devotional page — prayer, application, and "for families"
What the Commentators Say
10 public-domain commentaries, condensed into plain language.
Adam Clarke's Commentary Methodist/Wesleyan 1826
Clarke argues that the word once in older English translations actually means "fully" or "thoroughly," not a single past moment. He shows from Hebrews and Psalms that this Greek term signals complete understanding, so Jude's readers were thoroughly instructed rather than merely reminded of something they once knew.
Barnes' Notes on the Bible Protestant 1832
Barnes highlights the deliberate contrast in Jude's argument: God saved Israel out of Egypt, then destroyed them for unbelief. The point is that outward deliverance does not guarantee final safety. Past rescue becomes irrelevant if wickedness and unbelief follow, and that same pattern threatens those who fall away.
Calvin's Commentaries Reformed 1564
Calvin observes that the apostle is not teaching anything new, only reminding believers of what they already know, in order to give his message greater weight. He warns that those who have received God's grace must not become careless, but must live watchfully in fear, because God severely punished even His own chosen people when they were unfaithful.
Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges Anglican 1880
The commentary highlights a notable textual variation in this verse: some ancient manuscripts read "Jesus" rather than "Lord" or "God" as the one who saved Israel from Egypt. This reading parallels Paul calling the wilderness rock "Christ" in 1 Corinthians 10:4, suggesting the same divine presence was at work in Israel's history.
Geneva Bible Notes Reformed 1599
The Geneva note stresses that these false teachers were no surprise to God: their condemnation was ordained long beforehand. Their specific sin was twisting the grace of God into an excuse for loose living while denying the sole lordship of Christ, exposing them as truly ungodly.
Gill's Exposition of the Bible Baptist 1748
Gill stresses that the apostle is recalling what believers already know from Scripture, not unveiling new truth. The example of Israel shows that God destroyed the unbelieving part of them despite their spectacular rescue from Egypt. Therefore no outward privilege or apparent deliverance spares anyone who lacks genuine faith.
Jamieson-Fausset-Brown Commentary Protestant 1871
JFB draws attention to the ancient manuscripts that read "Jesus" instead of "the Lord" in this verse. He sees this as showing that Christ was one with the God who saved Israel from Egypt and then destroyed those who refused to believe.
Matthew Henry's Commentary Reformed/Presbyterian 1710
Henry emphasizes that the faith Christians must earnestly defend is the original apostolic faith as first delivered to the saints, not later party distinctions or human innovations. He sees the common salvation as a sincere offer to all people, and warns that grace must not be twisted into an excuse for sin.
Vincent's Word Studies Evangelical 1887
Vincent insists the phrase does not mean the readers once knew something but later forgot. He corrects the grammar: the participle is present, and the "once" means once for all, pointing to a complete and settled knowledge they already possess.
Wesley's Explanatory Notes Methodist/Wesleyan 1754
Wesley warns against assuming that past deliverances put one beyond future judgment. He points out that God destroyed the far greater part of the very people he had once saved, making past mercies no guarantee of present safety.