GospelMount
Search Topics Scripture Prayer Resources Ebooks About Support the mission Saved articles
Jump to ▾

John 9:7 · Bible study

John 9:7 Commentary: Study: The Pool of Siloam and the Sent One

Greek · 11 what the commentators say

Meaning in one sentence

Examine why Jesus sent the blind man to wash in the Pool of Siloam, whose name 'Sent' reveals Jesus’ identity as the one sent by God.

Research Summary

  • Meaning: Jesus sends a blind man to wash in a pool named “Sent,” and the man returns seeing, revealing Jesus as the One God sent to bring light.
  • Key words: hupage (go, present imperative, immediate command), nipsai (wash yourself, aorist middle imperative), apestalmenos (Sent, perfect passive participle, emphasizing a completed sending).
  • Main debate: Does the name “Sent” point directly to the Messiah (Wesley, Vincent) or primarily serve as a test of obedience (Barnes, Calvin)? Both views agree John highlights the name for a reason.
  • Theological theme: The healing is a sign (sēmeion) that Jesus is the Light of the World and the Sent One of the Father; faith is expressed through obedient action.
  • Best use: A model of simple obedience, a christological revelation, and a bridge to discuss how Jesus opens spiritual eyes today.

Translation Comparison

BSB Berean Standard Bible 2020

Then He told him, “Go, wash in the Pool of Siloam” (which means “Sent”). So the man went and washed, and came back seeing.

WEB World English Bible 2000

and said to him, “Go, wash in the pool of Siloam” (which means “Sent”). So he went away, washed, and came back seeing.

KJV King James Version 1769

And said unto him, Go, wash in the pool of Siloam, (which is by interpretation, Sent.) He went his way therefore, and washed, and came seeing.

ASV American Standard Version 1901

and said unto him, Go, wash in the pool of Siloam (which is by interpretation, Sent). He went away therefore, and washed, and came seeing.

YLT Young's Literal Translation 1898

`Go away, wash at the pool of Siloam,' which is, interpreted, Sent. He went away, therefore, and did wash, and came seeing;

Darby Darby Bible 1890

And he said to him, Go, wash in the pool of Siloam, which is interpreted, Sent. He went therefore and washed, and came seeing.

Douay-Rheims Douay-Rheims Bible 1899

And said to him: Go, wash in the pool of Siloe, which is interpreted, Sent. He went therefore and washed: and he came seeing.

Translations in other languages (10 available)
ES Reina-Valera 1909 1909

Y díjole|strong="G2036, G0846": Ve, lávate en el estanque de Siloé ( que significa, si lo interpretares, Enviado). Y fué entonces, y lavóse, y volvió viendo.

PT Almeida Livre 1994

E disse-lhe: Vai, lava-te no tanque de Siloé (que se traduz Enviado). Foi pois, e lavou-se; e voltou vendo.

FR Louis Segond 1910

et lui dit: Va, et lave-toi au réservoir de Siloé ( nom qui signifie envoyé). Il y alla, se lava, et s’ en retourna voyant clair.

DE Luther Bibel 1912 1912

und sprach zu ihm: Gehe hin zu dem Teich Siloah ( das ist verdolmetscht: gesandt) und wasche dich! Da ging er hin und wusch sich und kam sehend.

NL Statenvertaling 1637

En zeide tot hem: Ga heen, was u in het badwater Siloam (hetwelk overgezet wordt: uitgezonden). Hij dan ging heen en wies zich, en kwam ziende.

IT Riveduta 1927

e gli disse: Va’, làvati nella vasca di Siloe (che significa: mandato). Egli dunque andò e si lavò, e tornò che ci vedeva.

PL Biblia Gdańska 1632

I rzekł mu: Idź, umyj się w sadzawce Syloe, co się wykłada posłany. Poszedł tedy i umył się, i przyszedł widząc.

RU Синодальный перевод 1876

и сказал ему: пойди, умойся в купальне Силоам, что значит: посланный. Он пошел и умылся, и пришел зрячим.

ZH 和合本 1919

對他 說:「你往西羅亞 池子 裡 去 洗。」(西羅亞翻出來 就是「奉差遣」。) 他去 一洗, 回頭 就看見了。

EN Bible in Basic English 1949

And said to him, Go and make yourself clean in the bath of Siloam (the sense of the name is, Sent). So he went away and, after washing, came back able to see.

Verse in Context

5 While I am in the world, I am the light of the world.”
6 When he had said this, he spat on the ground, made mud with the saliva, anointed the blind man’s eyes with the mud,
7 and said to him, “Go, wash in the pool of Siloam” (which means “Sent”). So he went away, washed, and came back seeing.
8 Therefore the neighbors and those who saw that he was blind before said, “Isn’t this he who sat and begged?”
9 Others were saying, “It is he.” Still others were saying, “He looks like him.” He said, “I am he.”

Original Language (Koine Greek)

καὶ kai CONJ G2532 And
εἶπεν eipen V-2AAI-3S G2036 He said
αὐτῷ· autō P-DSM G0846 to him;
ὕπαγε hupage V-PAM-2S G5217 do go
νίψαι nipsai V-AMM-2S G3538 do wash yourself
εἰς eis PREP G1519 in
τὴν tēn T-ASF G3588 the
κολυμβήθραν kolumbēthran N-ASF G2861 pool
τοῦ tou T-GSM G3588 <the>
Σιλωάμ Silōam N-GSM-L G4611 of Siloam
ὃ ho R-NSN G3739 which
ἑρμηνεύεται hermēneuetai V-PPI-3S G2059 means
ἀπεσταλμένος. apestalmenos V-RPP-NSM G0649 Sent.
ἀπῆλθεν apēlthen V-2AAI-3S G0565 He went
οὖν oun CONJ G3767 therefore
καὶ kai CONJ G2532 and
ἐνίψατο enipsato V-AMI-3S G3538 washed
καὶ kai CONJ G2532 and
ἦλθεν ēlthen V-2AAI-3S G2064 came [back]
βλέπων.¶ blepōn V-PAP-NSM G0991 seeing.

Source: STEPBible TAGNT/TEHB (CC-BY 4.0). Click or tap a morphology code to see the full parsing.

Scholars' Consensus

Commentators broadly agree this verse is not about the pool’s water having medicinal power. The clay and washing are a test of the man’s faith and obedience, echoing Naaman’s cleansing in the Jordan (2 Kings 5:10, 14). Barnes, Calvin, and Matthew Henry each make this point: the act made no physical sense to a blind man, yet he obeyed. John’s parenthetical note, ‘which means Sent’, is the key. The Greek verb hermeneutai (‘is interpreted’) shows John is giving the meaning of the Hebrew name. The passive participle apestalmenos (‘Sent’) is a perfect passive, emphasizing a completed sending with ongoing effect. Wesley and Vincent (citing Milligan and Moulton) see a direct pointer to Jesus as the Sent One from the Father. Calvin is more cautious, suggesting the pool’s name rebukes the Jews who despised ‘the waters of Shiloah that go softly’ (Isaiah 8:6). Barnes similarly warns against reading Shiloh (Gen 49:10) into Siloam, since the roots differ. Still, the shared conviction is that John deliberately records the name’s meaning so readers connect the pool to Jesus’ mission: He is the one God sent to open blind eyes.

How settled is the interpretation?

Interpretive difficulty: Medium

Main views:

  1. Typological / Christological view: John’s parenthetical translation of Siloam as ‘Sent’ (ō hē apostalmenos) links the pool to Jesus as the Sent One; supported by John 9:4 and the wider Gospel theme of sending.
  2. Obedience / faith-testing view: The pool had no physical efficacy; the command simply tests the man’s faith, similar to Naaman (2 Kings 5:10–14); the name is an additional detail but not the main point.

What is clear: Jesus deliberately chose the Pool of Siloam, and John records its name to underscore that Jesus is the One sent by the Father to open blind eyes—physically and spiritually.

What Scholars Agree and Debate

TopicAgreedDebated
The purpose of sending to SiloamThe pool had no inherent healing power; the act was a test of the man’s faith and obedience.Some emphasize the test aspect (Barnes, Calvin) while others emphasize the symbolic meaning of the name pointing to Jesus (Wesley, Vincent, Milligan and Moulton).
The meaning of 'Sent' (Siloam)The word derives from the Hebrew shalach and is correctly interpreted as 'Sent' by John.Some early interpretations linked Siloam to Shiloh (Gen 49:10) as the Messiah, but Barnes and others correct this, showing the roots are different. The debate is whether John intended a direct messianic reference or simply noted the etymology for literary effect.
Role of the Sabbath in the healingThe healing occurred on the Sabbath (John 9:14), and making clay was considered work, which provoked the Pharisees.No major debate among the supplied commentaries; all note the Sabbath controversy as a narrative element that accelerates the conflict.
Typological significance of the clay and spittleThe use of clay and spittle is a symbolic action that highlights Jesus’ creative power, evoking the creation of man from dust.Some allegorize the spittle as the Word and clay as human nature (early fathers), while Calvin and others dismiss such allegory as 'more ingenious than solid' and see a simpler didactic purpose.

Historical & Cultural Context

The Pool of Siloam lay at the southeastern edge of Jerusalem, in the Tyropoeon Valley near the junction with the Kidron Valley. Nehemiah 3:15 calls it ‘the pool of Shelah’ and locates it by the king’s garden. Water came from the Gihon Spring through a tunnel cut under the City of David, likely Hezekiah’s tunnel (2 Chronicles 32:30). This water supply was precious during sieges, and the pool was a gathering point for residents. In Isaiah 8:6, the prophet contrasts ‘the waters of Shiloah that go softly’ with the raging Euphrates, using the quiet stream as a symbol of God’s patient presence among a rebellious people. At the Feast of Tabernacles, priests drew water from Siloam and poured it on the altar as a reminder of God’s provision in the wilderness (John 7:37, 39). The name itself comes from the Hebrew verb shalach, ‘to send.’ Whether it referred to the water being ‘sent’ through the tunnel or seen as a gift sent from God is debated, but the idea of sending was embedded in local speech.

Blindness in first-century Judea often meant a life of begging, as the man’s neighbors testify (John 9:8). He would have known every step of his usual routes but could never have seen the pool. Jesus sent him on a journey through crowded streets, led by others or groping his way. The fact that Jesus performed this healing on the Sabbath (John 9:14) added tension, as making clay was considered work. The pool’s location outside the city center may have created a public spectacle, drawing attention to the miracle. All of this, the pool’s name, its quiet waters, its use in worship, and the risk of the journey, makes the command a rich, layered act.

Textual Notes

The supplied sources note no significant textual variants for this verse. The wording is stable across manuscripts. The only small variant is in the placement of the parenthetical ‘which means Sent’, some early manuscripts (e.g., the Western text) slightly alter the word order, but the meaning is unchanged. None of the consulted commentators indicate any text-critical issue that affects interpretation.

Reception History

From the early centuries, Christian readers saw in Siloam a type of baptism, a washing commanded by Christ that brings sight. John Chrysostom (late 4th century) preached on the obedience of the blind man as a model for catechumens. During the Reformation, Calvin interpreted the pool primarily as a test of faith and a rebuke to those who despised God’s quiet ways (Isaiah 8:6). Wesley, in the 18th century, explicitly linked the name ‘Sent’ to the Messiah, calling the pool ‘a type of the Messiah who was sent of God.’ In modern evangelical commentary, the emphasis falls on the man’s obedient action as an example of faith in action, while the name remains a key Christological clue. Across traditions, the verse has been sung in hymns of spiritual illumination and used in sermons on trusting God’s methods even when they seem ordinary.

Preaching This Verse

Three-Point Outline

  1. The God who sends, Jesus sends the blind man to a pool named ‘Sent,’ showing that He is the Sent One of the Father (John 9:4; 8:42). The healing comes not from the water but from the One who commanded it.
  2. Obedience with no roadmap, The blind man cannot see the pool, yet he goes. His trust mirrors Naaman’s (2 Kings 5:10, 14) and becomes the channel for God’s power. Faith acts before it understands.
  3. From darkness to light, The physical healing points to spiritual illumination. ‘Came back seeing’ (blepōn, present participle, continuous sight) is a picture of what Jesus does for every soul: He gives lasting light (John 8:12).

Five-Point Outline

  1. Jesus takes the initiative, He sees the man, not the other way around (v. 1). Grace seeks us before we seek it.
  2. The means are ordinary, Spit, dirt, water. God often uses humble, everyday things to accomplish His greatest works.
  3. The command requires trust, Washing his face in a known pool makes no medical sense. The man must believe the speaker more than his own logic.
  4. The name bears witness, John pauses to translate Siloam as ‘Sent.’ The pool is a signpost: look past the water to the Sender.
  5. The man becomes a witness, He returns seeing, and his testimony begins immediately (v. 11). A changed life is the most compelling sermon.

Illustration Hooks

  • Following GPS into a dead end, When a navigation app sends you down a road that seems wrong, you trust it or you get lost. The blind man followed directions that appeared pointless.
  • A child’s trust in a parent’s medicine, Kids don’t understand why bitter syrup helps, but they take it because the one who gives it loves them. The man did not understand the clay or the pool, but he trusted Jesus.
  • Learning a new route in the dark, People who lose sight must memorize footsteps and handholds. The blind man risked a new path on the word of a stranger he could not see.

Questions Your Congregation Is Asking

  • “Why does God sometimes ask me to do something that seems irrational before He acts?”
  • “Is my faith strong enough to obey even when I cannot see the outcome?”
  • “How can I recognize that Jesus is the ‘Sent One’ when everything around me feels ordinary?”

Leading a Discussion

This small-group guide invites members to walk through the blind man’s journey, from sitting in darkness to coming home seeing. The pool of Siloam is more than a location; its name echoes through the whole Gospel as a declaration that Jesus is the One whom God has sent.

Discussion Questions

  1. Read John 9:1, 7. What stands out to you about how Jesus initiates the encounter? Why does He not wait for the man to ask for healing?
  2. The man had been blind from birth. How might his lifelong condition have shaped his view of God and of himself? (See Exodus 4:11 and Psalm 146:8.)
  3. Jesus makes mud with spit and sends the man to wash. Put yourself in the man’s place. What thoughts or doubts might have come to mind as he set off?
  4. Compare this story with Naaman’s in 2 Kings 5:10, 14. What similarities and differences do you see in the commands and the responses?
  5. John notes that Siloam means ‘Sent.’ How does this name connect to Jesus’ own description of Himself in this chapter (v. 4) and throughout the Gospel (John 3:17; 8:42)?
  6. The man went, washed, and “came back seeing.” In what area of your life might God be asking you to take a step of trust before you see the result?
  7. The man’s healing provoked conflict with the Pharisees (vv. 13, 16). How does obedience to Christ sometimes create tension with the expectations of others?

What the Commentators Say

10 public-domain commentaries, condensed into plain language.

Adam Clarke's Commentary Methodist/Wesleyan 1826

Clarke notes that Siloam means Sent, from the Hebrew word for sending. He dismisses as unsubstantial the idea that the pool was a type of Christ as the Sent of God. Clarke also highlights a rabbinic distinction between two pools, emphasizing Jesus sent the man to the specific one named Shiloah, not Shelach.

Barnes' Notes on the Bible Protestant 1832

Barnes stresses that the pool water had no power in itself to heal; Christ sent the blind man there simply to test his obedience. He also corrects a past misstep, noting that the word Siloam does not refer to the Messiah (Shiloh) but comes from a different root meaning sent.

Calvin's Commentaries Reformed 1564

Calvin rejects allegorical readings that see the clay and spittle as symbols of Christ's two natures. He argues Christ used clay simply to show he has the same power over the body that the Father had when forming man from dust at creation. The pool of Siloam, he suggests, rebukes the Jews for failing to recognize God's power at work right before them.

Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges Anglican 1880

The pool's name, Siloam, means "Sent," and John sees this as more than coincidence — it points to Christ, the One sent from the Father. The washing itself was a deliberate test of the man's faith, like Naaman's, making obedience part of the healing.

Geneva Bible Notes Reformed 1599

The Geneva note highlights that the pool's name, Siloam, means "Sent." This is not merely geographical detail: the blind man is sent to wash in a place whose very name points to Christ as the One sent from the Father, making the healing a sign of his divine mission.

Gill's Exposition of the Bible Baptist 1748

Gill notes that Siloam means sent, a name the evangelist uses to point to Christ

Jamieson-Fausset-Brown Commentary Protestant 1871

JFB draws attention to the pool's name, Siloam, meaning "sent," and notes that the evangelist intentionally records this because it points to Christ himself as the One sent by the Father. The symbolic action of washing thus mirrors the deeper reality of what Jesus alone provides.

Matthew Henry's Commentary Reformed/Presbyterian 1710

Though the Jews had just mistreated Him, Jesus did not let their hostility stop Him from doing good to them. Henry notes that healing this man who had been a public burden was an act of kindness to the whole community, showing Christ's generous and persistent goodwill even when He was slighted.

Vincent's Word Studies Evangelical 1887

Vincent highlights that the pool's name means "sent," and many expositors see this as pointing to Jesus Himself, who was sent from God to open blind eyes. By sending the man to wash in this particular pool, Jesus keeps the focus on His own identity throughout the healing.

Wesley's Explanatory Notes Methodist/Wesleyan 1754

Wesley sees the public nature of the command as intentional, drawing a crowd to witness the miracle. He notes that Siloam means Sent and was a type of the Messiah who was sent of God. The blind man's obedient response, without arguing about the means, brought the blessing.

Word Study

The key original-language words in this verse. Select any word for its full lexicon entry — meaning, every occurrence in Scripture, and related words.

Cross-References

Source: Treasury of Scripture Knowledge (TSK, public domain)

Exodus 4:11 Yahweh said to him, “Who made man’s mouth? Or who makes one mute, or deaf, or seeing, or blind? Isn’t it I, Yahweh?
II Kings 5:10 Elisha sent a messenger to him, saying, “Go and wash in the Jordan seven times, and your flesh shall come again to you, and you shall be clean.”
II Kings 5:14 Then went he down and dipped himself seven times in the Jordan, according to the saying of the man of God; and his flesh was restored like the flesh of a little child, and he was clean.
Nehemiah 3:15 Shallun the son of Colhozeh, the ruler of the district of Mizpah, repaired the spring gate. He built it, covered it, and set up its doors, its bolts, and its bars; and he repaired the wall of the pool of Shelah by the king’s garden, even to the stairs that go down from David’s city.
Psalms 146:8 Yahweh opens the eyes of the blind. Yahweh raises up those who are bowed down. Yahweh loves the righteous.
Isaiah 8:6 “Because this people has refused the waters of Shiloah that go softly, and rejoice in Rezin and Remaliah’s son;
Isaiah 29:18 In that day, the deaf will hear the words of the book, and the eyes of the blind will see out of obscurity and out of darkness.
Isaiah 29:19 The humble also will increase their joy in Yahweh, and the poor among men will rejoice in the Holy One of Israel.

Interlinear and lexical data from STEPBible (CC BY 4.0). Cross-reference data from OpenBible.info (CC BY 4.0). Commentaries are public domain.

For personal reflection

Read the devotional page — prayer, application, and "for families"

← Devotional