John 9:40 · Bible study
John 9:40 Commentary: The Pharisees' Indignant Question
Greek · 9 what the commentators say
Meaning in one sentence
Why the Pharisees reacted with anger to Jesus' claim about spiritual blindness, and what it reveals about their self-perception and condemnation.
Research Summary
- Meaning: The Pharisees angrily reject Jesus’ implication that they are spiritually blind, revealing their pride and self-righteousness.
- Key words: mē (μή), expects a “no”; tuphloi (τυφλοί), both physical and spiritual blindness; kai (καί), “also,” emphatically including themselves.
- Main debate: Was their question genuinely inquisitive or purely sarcastic? Commentators (Calvin, Gill) unanimously view it as indignant and defensive.
- Theological theme: Spiritual blindness is not lack of information but refusal to acknowledge need for Christ.
- Best use: Preaching on humility, grace, and the danger of religious pride; small-group examination of hidden self-sufficiency.
Translation Comparison
BSB Berean Standard Bible 2020
Some of the Pharisees who were with Him heard this, and they asked Him, “Are we blind too?”
WEB World English Bible 2000
Those of the Pharisees who were with him heard these things, and said to him, “Are we also blind?”
KJV King James Version 1769
And some of the Pharisees which were with him heard these words, and said unto him, Are we blind also?
ASV American Standard Version 1901
Those of the Pharisees who were with him heard these things, and said unto him, Are we also blind?
YLT Young's Literal Translation 1898
And those of the Pharisees who were with him heard these things, and they said to him, `Are we also blind?'
Darby Darby Bible 1890
And [some] of the Pharisees who were with him heard these things, and they said to him, Are we blind also?
Douay-Rheims Douay-Rheims Bible 1899
And some of the Pharisees, who were with him, heard: and they said unto him: Are we also blind?
Translations in other languages (10 available)
Y ciertos de los Fariseos que estaban con él oyeron esto, y dijéronle|strong="G2036, G0846": ¿ Somos nosotros también ciegos?
E ouviram isto alguns dos fariseus, que estavam com ele; e lhe disseram: Também nós somos cegos?
Quelques pharisiens qui étaient avec lui, ayant entendu ces paroles, lui dirent: Nous aussi, sommes-nous aveugles?
Und solches hörten etliche der Pharisäer, die bei ihm waren, und sprachen zu ihm: Sind wir denn auch blind?
En dit hoorden enigen uit de Farizeen, die bij Hem waren, en zeiden tot Hem: Zijn wij dan ook blind?
E quelli de’ Farisei che eran con lui udirono queste cose e gli dissero: Siamo ciechi anche noi?
I usłyszeli to niektórzy z Faryzeuszów, którzy byli z nim, i rzekli mu: Izali i my ślepymi jesteśmy?
Услышав это, некоторые из фарисеев, бывших с Ним, сказали Ему: неужели и мы слепы?
同 他 在那裡 的法利賽人 聽見 這話,就 說:「難道 我們 也 瞎了眼嗎?」
These words came to the ears of the Pharisees who were with him and they said to him, Are we, then, blind?
Verse in Context
Original Language (Koine Greek)
New Testament · Koine Greek · John 9:40
Source: STEPBible TAGNT/TEHB (CC-BY 4.0). Click or tap a morphology code to see the full parsing.
Scholars' Consensus
Commentators across traditions agree that the Pharisees understood Jesus to be speaking of spiritual blindness, not physical sight. Their question “Are we also blind?” was not a genuine inquiry but an indignant rejection. Calvin describes it as “haughty contempt of the grace of Christ accompanied by mockery.” Gill notes they perceived the affront to their status as “wise, learned, and knowing men.” The Greek particle mē (μή) expects a negative answer: “We are surely not blind, are we?” The word “also” (καί) is emphatic, they refuse to be lumped with the ignorant. Vincent points out that “the we is emphatic.” So the consensus is clear: the Pharisees’ pride prevented them from admitting their need, and Jesus’ response in verse 41 confirms that this very claim to sight keeps them in sin.
How settled is the interpretation?
Interpretive difficulty: Low
What is clear: The Pharisees understood Jesus’ words as a charge of spiritual blindness, reacted with indignation, and Jesus’ response shows that their claim to sight leaves them in sin.
What Scholars Agree and Debate
| Topic | Agreed | Debated |
|---|---|---|
| The identity of these Pharisees | They were some Pharisees who were ‘with him’, in his company, listening. | Calvin sees them as less hostile, still open to listen but proud; Gill says they were watching him to take advantage. Both agree they ultimately reject Jesus’ point. |
| Tone of the question | The question is not sincere inquiry but indignation. | Calvin emphasizes haughty contempt and mockery; Matthew Henry stresses the affront to their status as teachers. The disagreement is a matter of degree, not kind. |
| Culpability for spiritual blindness | They are guilty because they claim to see. | No significant debate; the text is clear that their sin remains due to their refusal to admit blindness. |
Historical & Cultural Context
This verse sits near the end of John chapter 9, a long narrative about Jesus healing a man born blind. The Pharisees had interrogated the healed man and his parents, then excommunicated the man for confessing Jesus as the Christ (John 9:34). Jesus later finds the man and reveals himself as the Son of Man (v. 35, 38). Then Jesus declares, “I came into this world for judgment, that those who don’t see may see; and that those who see may become blind” (v. 39). Some Pharisees were still nearby, perhaps lingering to watch Jesus or to catch him in something he might say (Luke 11:54).
These Pharisees saw themselves as the spiritual guides of the nation. They studied the Law rigorously and followed traditions they believed set them apart. They looked down on the common people as “accursed” and ignorant (John 7:49). So when Jesus spoke of the blind becoming sighted and the sighted becoming blind, they instantly understood the implication: he was calling them blind. Their self-image as enlightened leaders could not accept that label. The question they ask, “Are we also blind?”, is framed in Greek with mē (μή), a particle that signals the expected answer is “No.” They are not asking for information; they are pushing back against what they perceive as an insult.
Jesus’ reply in verse 41 drives the point home: “If you were blind, you would have no sin; but now you say, ‘We see.’ Therefore your sin remains.” The Pharisees’ refusal to acknowledge their spiritual need is what condemns them. Their pride, though, is not unique to them, it is a warning for anyone who trusts in their own spiritual insight rather than in Christ.
Textual Notes
The supplied sources note no significant textual variants for John 9:40. The Greek text is stable across major manuscripts. The only minor variation is that some early witnesses read “also blind” as “blind also,” but the sense is unchanged.
Reception History
Early church fathers such as Irenaeus and Chrysostom saw this verse as a classic example of the Pharisees’ hardness of heart: they were offended by the truth. Augustine, in his Tractates on the Gospel of John, used the passage to discuss the nature of sin and pride, how refusing to acknowledge one’s blindness deepens the darkness. During the Reformation, Calvin and Luther employed this text to critique the self-righteousness of religious leaders who trust in their own knowledge rather than in Christ. In later preaching, John 9:40 has been used to call believers to humble self-examination, warning that the greatest obstacle to grace is thinking we already have it.
Preaching This Verse
Three-point outline
- The Danger of Pride: The Pharisees heard Jesus’ words and immediately took offense. Their question bristles with indignation because they cannot conceive of themselves as spiritually blind. Pride closes the heart to correction.
- The Question That Condemns: “Are we also blind?” is not an open query but a defensive challenge. By rejecting the diagnosis, they reject the Physician. Their sin remains because they claim to see (v. 41).
- The Tragedy of Self-Sufficiency: The Pharisees had the Scriptures, the traditions, the appearance of piety, but they missed the Messiah. Their self-assurance kept them from the very grace they thought they already possessed.
Five-point outline
- Jesus’ declaration sets up a reversal: the humble blind man sees; the proud religious leaders are blind.
- The Pharisees overhear and immediately understand the target of Jesus’ words.
- Their reaction reveals their heart: indignation, not repentance.
- The Greek construction (mē + emphatic hēmeis) shows they consider blindness impossible for people like them.
- Jesus’ response in verse 41 seals their condition: claiming sight while rejecting the Light of the World leaves them in sin.
Illustration hooks
- A patient at the doctor’s office: The doctor says, “You have a serious illness,” but the patient replies, “Are you saying I am sick?” The question is defensive, not curious. The refusal to accept a diagnosis prevents treatment.
- A veteran driver taking a driving test for a license renewal: When the instructor points out a blind spot, the driver scoffs, “I’ve been driving forty years, I know what I’m doing.” The confidence that comes from long experience can block feedback.
- Students in a classroom: A teacher says, “Some of you are not understanding the basics.” A student who has always gotten good grades blurts out, “Are you saying I don’t get it?” The indignation reveals a belief that past success means present mastery.
Questions your congregation is asking
- “How do I know if I am spiritually blind without realizing it?”
- “What does it look like in daily life to say ‘I see’ while actually being blind?”
- “If I’ve been a Christian for years, is it possible that pride still blinds me to something Jesus wants to show me?”
Leading a Discussion
This short exchange cuts to the heart of self-deception. The Pharisees heard Jesus’ claim that he came so the blind would see and the sighted would become blind. Instead of examining themselves, they reacted with pride. Their question revealed everything. As you guide your group, let the text do its work: our natural tendency is to defend ourselves against the very diagnosis we most need.
Discussion questions
- What exactly did the Pharisees hear from Jesus that prompted their question (v. 39)?
- Why do you think they answered not with a statement but with a question?
- The Greek word mē in their question expects a “no” answer. Why does that matter for understanding their tone?
- How would you describe the difference between the blind man’s response to Jesus (vv. 35, 38) and the Pharisees’ response here?
- Jesus says in v. 41, “If you were blind, you would have no sin; but now you say, ‘We see.’ Therefore your sin remains.” What does that mean for people who think they already understand God and themselves?
- Can you think of an area in your own life where you have been reluctant to admit you “can’t see”? What makes it hard to accept help or correction?
- How does this passage invite us to come to Jesus not as experts but as people in need of sight?
Word Study
The key original-language words in this verse. Select any word for its full lexicon entry — meaning, every occurrence in Scripture, and related words.
Cross-References
Source: Treasury of Scripture Knowledge (TSK, public domain)
| Matthew 15:12 | Then the disciples came and said to him, “Do you know that the Pharisees were offended when they heard this saying?” |
| Matthew 15:14 | Leave them alone. They are blind guides of the blind. If the blind guide the blind, both will fall into a pit.” |
| Matthew 23:16 | “Woe to you, you blind guides, who say, ‘Whoever swears by the temple, it is nothing; but whoever swears by the gold of the temple, he is obligated.’ |
| Matthew 23:28 | Even so you also outwardly appear righteous to men, but inwardly you are full of hypocrisy and iniquity. |
| Luke 11:39 | The Lord said to him, “Now you Pharisees cleanse the outside of the cup and of the platter, but your inward part is full of extortion and wickedness. |
| Luke 11:54 | lying in wait for him, and seeking to catch him in something he might say, that they might accuse him. |
| John 7:47 | The Pharisees therefore answered them, “You aren’t also led astray, are you? |
| John 7:52 | They answered him, “Are you also from Galilee? Search and see that no prophet has arisen out of Galilee.” |
Interlinear and lexical data from STEPBible (CC BY 4.0). Cross-reference data from OpenBible.info (CC BY 4.0). Commentaries are public domain.
For personal reflection
Read the devotional page — prayer, application, and "for families"
What the Commentators Say
9 public-domain commentaries, condensed into plain language.
Adam Clarke's Commentary Methodist/Wesleyan 1826
Clarke notes that the Pharisees immediately understood Jesus was speaking about spiritual blindness, not physical. Their question was a defensive challenge: they wanted to know if he actually considered them to be in that condition.
Calvin's Commentaries Reformed 1564
Calvin reads the Pharisees' question not as honest inquiry but as wounded pride. Their indignation reveals they refuse to be counted among the blind, because accepting Christ's offer of sight would mean admitting they were blind before. The word "also" shows they consider themselves above the common rank.
Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges Anglican 1880
This commentary points out that the Pharisees' question means they consider themselves the most enlightened people, not that they are asking about physical blindness. The writer also notes this passage is thoroughly in the style of the Synoptic Gospels and supports reading miracles as having a typical or symbolic meaning.
Geneva Bible Notes Reformed 1599
And some of the Pharises which were with him, heard these things, and sayd vnto him, Are we blinde also?
Gill's Exposition of the Bible Baptist 1748
Gill highlights the Pharisees’ indignation at being grouped with the ignorant common people. They considered themselves wise and learned, so Jesus’ words felt like a direct insult to their status as teachers of Israel.
Jamieson-Fausset-Brown Commentary Protestant 1871
Are we blind also? —We, the constituted, recognized guides of the people in spiritual things? pride and rage prompting the question.
Lange's Commentary Reformed 1857
Lange sees the pool of Siloam, meaning "Sent," as a direct type of Christ, the true Sent One. He emphasizes that the healing unfolds gradually through external means to awaken faith step by step, not through instantaneous power. The blind man's growing spiritual sight mirrors his physical recovery, while the Pharisees' refusal to see turns their claimed insight into deeper blindness.
Matthew Henry's Commentary Reformed/Presbyterian 1710
Matthew Henry sees Christ not primarily as a teacher but as a judge holding court. His coming is a judicial act that tests and distinguishes every person, revealing their true character by how they respond to him. The blind who admit their need are given sight; the self-seeing are left in darkness.
Vincent's Word Studies Evangelical 1887
Vincent draws attention to the Greek phrasing, where "also" attaches to "we" and the pronoun is emphatic. The question carries the force of a strong denial: "we are surely not blind." The Pharisees are not asking for information but indignantly rejecting the possibility.