John 12:11 · Bible study
John 12:11 Commentary: The Miracle That Drew Many to Faith
Greek · 6 what the commentators say
Meaning in one sentence
Explore John 12:11, where many Jews leave the religious leaders to believe in Jesus.
Research Summary
- Meaning: Many Jews left the religious leadership and put their faith in Jesus because Lazarus was a living witness to his power.
- Key words: ὑπῆγον (were going away), imperfect tense showing an ongoing defection; ἐπίστευον (were believing), continuous act of trust; “on account of him”, Lazarus as the reason.
- Main debate: Does “went away” mean leaving the location or defecting from the Jewish authorities? The imperfect and context favor defection.
- Theological theme: The divisive effect of Jesus’ miracles: they draw some to faith and harden others in unbelief.
- Best use: A short passage for illustrating the power of personal testimony, the nature of faith as a response to what God has done, and the reality of religious jealousy.
Translation Comparison
BSB Berean Standard Bible 2020
for on account of him many of the Jews were deserting them and believing in Jesus.
WEB World English Bible 2000
because on account of him many of the Jews went away and believed in Jesus.
KJV King James Version 1769
Because that by reason of him many of the Jews went away, and believed on Jesus.
ASV American Standard Version 1901
because that by reason of him many of the Jews went away, and believed on Jesus.
YLT Young's Literal Translation 1898
because on account of him many of the Jews were going away, and were believing in Jesus.
Darby Darby Bible 1890
because many of the Jews went away on his account and believed on Jesus.
Douay-Rheims Douay-Rheims Bible 1899
Because many of the Jews, by reason of him, went away and believed in Jesus.
Translations in other languages (10 available)
Porque muchos de los Judíos iban y creían en Jesús por causa de él.
Porque muitos dos judeus iam por causa dele, e criam em Jesus.
parce que beaucoup de Juifs se retiraient d’ eux à cause de lui, et croyaient en Jésus.
denn um seinetwillen gingen viele Juden hin und glaubten an Jesus.
Want velen van de Joden gingen heen om zijnentwil, en geloofden in Jezus.
perché, per cagion sua, molti de’ Giudei andavano e credevano in Gesù.
Bo wiele z Żydów dla niego odstępowali i wierzyli w Jezusa.
потому что ради него многие из Иудеев приходили и веровали в Иисуса.
因 有好些 猶太人 為拉撒路 的緣故,回去 信 了 耶穌。
For because of him a great number of the Jews went away and had belief in Jesus.
Verse in Context
Original Language (Koine Greek)
New Testament · Koine Greek · John 12:11
Source: STEPBible TAGNT/TEHB (CC-BY 4.0). Click or tap a morphology code to see the full parsing.
Scholars' Consensus
Commentators agree that this verse describes an ongoing movement of people away from the religious leadership and toward faith in Jesus. The Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges notes that the imperfect tense verbs, ὑπῆγον (“were going away”) and ἐπίστευον (“were believing”), point to a continual process, not a single event. Gill’s Exposition explains that “they withdrew themselves from their party, and deserted them.” Vincent’s Word Studies similarly renders ὑπῆγον as “withdrew from their company.”
The cause is a person: Lazarus, raised from the dead. The Jewish leaders see their influence eroding day by day, which is why they conspire to kill him (John 12:10). Matthew Henry comments that the priests “could not bear” that interest in Christ was increasing. The verse thus sits inside a larger pattern in John’s Gospel: miracles produce faith (John 11:45, 12:18), but also harden those who refuse to see (John 11:47-48). On this side of the cross, the same miracle that draws some to belief presses others into deeper opposition.
How settled is the interpretation?
Interpretive difficulty: Low
What is clear: The verse states that many Jews believed in Jesus because of Lazarus’s resurrection, and this belief caused a visible split between the people and the religious authorities.
What Scholars Agree and Debate
| Topic | Agreed | Debated |
|---|---|---|
| Meaning of 'went away' | The verb indicates a departure, seen positively as a turn toward faith. | Some read it as a simple change of location (going to Jesus). The majority, following the imperfect tense and context, understand it as defecting from the religious establishment. |
| Role of miracles in producing faith | Miracles can lead people to believe in Jesus, as seen throughout John’s Gospel. | Catholics and some Protestants emphasize that faith is a gift of grace, while others stress that signs serve as rational evidence that prompts decision. |
| The jealousy of the religious leaders | The leaders act out of fear of losing their influence and authority. | Some traditions focus on the corruption of institutional religion, while others see this as a warning against allowing jealousy to block the truth. |
| Which 'Jews' are meant | The term here refers to the general Jewish population, not a hostile group. | Occasionally readers import a negative connotation of 'the Jews' from other Johannine contexts, but most commentators see this as simply the local people. |
Historical & Cultural Context
The narrative moves fast. In John 11, Jesus raises Lazarus from the tomb. Many who saw it believed (John 11:45). The chief priests and Pharisees immediately convene the Sanhedrin and resolve to put Jesus to death, fearing a Roman crackdown (John 11:47-53). Three chapters later, Jesus returns to Bethany for a supper in his honor. Lazarus sits at the table, a living sign. Crowds come not just to see Jesus but to see the man who died and now lives (John 12:9).
John 12:11 explains why the religious leaders decide to kill Lazarus. The imperfect tense of hupēgon is key: they “were going away”, it happened repeatedly, day after day. This was not a one-time defection but a steady leak. Lange’s Commentary points out that the “Jews” here means the general populace, not the Pharisaic opposition. Ordinary people were shifting their allegiance. The leaders’ jealousy mirrors the reaction in Acts 13:45, where other Jews were “filled with jealousy” when multitudes believed Paul’s message.
Passover week is about to begin. Jerusalem will soon swell with pilgrims. For the authorities, the situation is urgent. The miracle of Lazarus, still fresh, threatens to undermine their authority completely. Their response, suppress the witness, not the truth, shows the lengths to which unbelief will go when it feels its power slipping.
Textual Notes
The supplied sources note no significant textual variants for John 12:11. The readings across manuscripts are consistent, with no dispute over the wording of the verse.
Reception History
Augustine of Hippo commented on the folly of the priests, noting that they could not see that Jesus could raise Lazarus a second time, or raise himself (John 2:19). The verse has been read in the Eastern tradition as a demonstration of the transforming power of Christ’s miracles, with Lazarus as a type of the resurrection. In Reformation exegesis, Matthew Henry and John Calvin used it to show how God’s signs both gather believers and expose the hardness of the human heart. In modern preaching, the passage is often used to discuss the cost of following Jesus when faith creates a rift with family or religious community.
Preaching This Verse
Three-point outline
- A living testimony that cannot be silenced. Lazarus walks among them, and people draw their own conclusions. Miracles do not force belief, but they make unbelief harder to sustain.
- An ongoing departure. The imperfect tense (were going away, were believing) suggests a steady drift. Faith grows one step at a time. So does opposition.
- A countermove by those in power. The leaders attack the witness rather than confront the truth. Their strategy reveals the heart of religious jealousy.
Five-point outline
- The setting: Bethany, six days before the Passover, Lazarus alive again (John 12:1-2).
- The crowd: both believers and the curious gather to see the resurrected man (v. 9).
- The turning point: many Jews break away from the established leadership and put their trust in Jesus (v. 11).
- The reaction of the chief priests: they decide to kill Lazarus to stop the movement (v. 10).
- The result: the spread of belief continues, setting the stage for Jesus’ triumphal entry (vv. 12-19).
Illustration hooks
- A co-worker who overcame a life-threatening illness and whose recovery leads others to rethink their beliefs. The person himself becomes a silent “testimony” that challenges the skepticism around him.
- A local church known for its care for the poor, where visitors are drawn in by the visible community life, not by arguments but by the warmth of changed lives.
- A public figure who converts to Christianity and suddenly faces intense scrutiny from former allies. His decision creates a division that mirrors the split in this passage.
Questions your congregation is asking
- “Why would a miracle draw some people to faith and push others further away?”
- “What does it look like in my life to ‘go away’ from a worldview or social group that does not honor Christ?”
- “How do we handle it when our faith causes tension with religious or family authorities?”
Leading a Discussion
This short verse sits at the hinge of John’s story. A miracle has happened, and it pulls people in opposite directions. Some step away from the religious establishment and toward Jesus. Others, the leaders, dig in their heels. The questions below will help your group see both the historical dynamics and what they mean for following Jesus today.
Discussion questions
- Read John 12:9-11. What reasons do the chief priests give for wanting to kill Lazarus? What does their reasoning tell you about how they saw the world?
- The Greek verb for “went away” is an imperfect tense, it describes an ongoing action. Why does that matter for understanding how the crowd responded?
- Lazarus does not preach a sermon. He simply exists, alive. In what ways can a person’s changed life speak louder than words?
- The leaders try to silence the witness instead of reconsidering their own position. Have you ever seen someone dismiss a hard truth by attacking the person who told it?
- This verse uses the word “believed”, the same word John uses throughout his Gospel. What does it mean to “believe in Jesus” in the context of a miracle you can see with your own eyes?
- The crowd comes for Jesus but also for Lazarus (v. 9). Is there a danger in being attracted to the signs rather than the Sign-maker? How do you tell the difference?
- Verse 11 shows division deepening. In your own life or community, where do you see belief and unbelief growing more defined? How does that feel?
Word Study
The key original-language words in this verse. Select any word for its full lexicon entry — meaning, every occurrence in Scripture, and related words.
Cross-References
Source: Treasury of Scripture Knowledge (TSK, public domain)
| John 7:31 | But of the multitude, many believed in him. They said, “When the Christ comes, he won’t do more signs than those which this man has done, will he?” |
| John 11:45 | Therefore many of the Jews who came to Mary and saw what Jesus did believed in him. |
| John 11:48 | If we leave him alone like this, everyone will believe in him, and the Romans will come and take away both our place and our nation.” |
| John 12:18 | For this cause also the multitude went and met him, because they heard that he had done this sign. |
| John 15:18 | If the world hates you, you know that it has hated me before it hated you. |
| John 15:25 | But this happened so that the word may be fulfilled which was written in their law, ‘They hated me without a cause.’ |
| Acts 13:45 | But when the Jews saw the multitudes, they were filled with jealousy, and contradicted the things which were spoken by Paul, and blasphemed. |
| James 3:14 | But if you have bitter jealousy and selfish ambition in your heart, don’t boast and don’t lie against the truth. |
Interlinear and lexical data from STEPBible (CC BY 4.0). Cross-reference data from OpenBible.info (CC BY 4.0). Commentaries are public domain.
For personal reflection
Read the devotional page — prayer, application, and "for families"
What the Commentators Say
6 public-domain commentaries, condensed into plain language.
Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges Anglican 1880
The commentary highlights that the Greek imperfect tense in the description of people going away and believing implies an ongoing process, not a one-time event. It also corrects Augustine's reading of the priests' folly: their mistake was not thinking Christ could not raise Lazarus again, but failing to see that He could raise Himself.
Geneva Bible Notes Reformed 1599
The
Gill's Exposition of the Bible Baptist 1748
Gill observes that the religious leaders plotted to kill Lazarus, reasoning that as long as he lived, his resurrection would keep drawing people to believe in Jesus. They thought that if he died, the miracle would fade from memory or be easier to deny.
Lange's Commentary Reformed 1857
Lange emphasizes that the crowd’s actions during the entry were an unconscious fulfillment of Zechariah’s prophecy. They treated Jesus as a king without realizing the prophecy required a humble colt. This providential direction, unknown to the people, showed that God orchestrates events, even when participants are unaware, highlighting Jesus’ lowly yet kingly character.
Matthew Henry's Commentary Reformed/Presbyterian 1710
Henry sees Jesus's visit to Bethany as a deliberate prelude to the Passover, placing the raising of Lazarus at the very doorstep of Jerusalem's festival crowds. The miracle is not finished with; it now becomes the magnet drawing people to Jesus and the reason the chief priests want Lazarus dead too.
Vincent's Word Studies Evangelical 1887
Vincent highlights the Greek verb behind “went away,” noting it means Jesus deliberately withdrew from the company of those around him. His point is that Jesus intentionally separated himself from the group, a more purposeful departure than a simple leave-taking.