John 10:21 Meaning: A Demon Cannot Open Blind Eyes
Others said, “These are not the sayings of one possessed by a demon. It isn’t possible for a demon to open the eyes of the blind, is it?”
Others said, These are not the words of him that hath a devil. Can a devil open the eyes of the blind?
Others said, These are not the sayings of one possessed with a demon. Can a demon open the eyes of the blind?
others said, `These sayings are not those of a demoniac; is a demon able blind men's eyes to open?'
Others said, These sayings are not [those] of one that is possessed by a demon. Can a demon open blind people's eyes?
Meaning in one sentence
Those who defended Jesus argued his words were wise and good, and a demon cannot heal a man born blind. This verse shows Christ's works confirm his identity.
Context
Jesus had just finished speaking about himself as the good shepherd who lays down his life for the sheep. His words landed differently on different ears. Some listeners said he had a demon and had gone mad. But others spoke up in his defense. They pointed to two things: the character of his words and the power of his deeds. The miracle they had in mind was recent, a man born blind now able to see, healed by Jesus in the previous chapter. So this verse is part of a public debate. A crowd divided over one person. One side dismisses Jesus as dangerous. The other side asks a question that cuts to the heart of the matter.
Key Words
Three Greek words matter here. Daimonizomenou means literally “one who is demonised.” It is a passive word. The person is under control of an evil spirit, unable to speak or act freely. The defenders say Jesus cannot be in that state because his words are not the kind a demon produces.
Rhēmata (translated “sayings” or “words”) means specific declarations, spoken things that carry weight. These are not random sounds. They are purposeful, serious teachings. Wesley notes the word covers actions too, the whole manner of Jesus. His whole life speaks.
And the little word mē that starts the final question is not a neutral “can it?” It expects a firm “no.” The question is really a statement: “It is not possible for a demon to open blind eyes.” Think about that. Demons tear down, lie, harm. They do not restore sight to people born blind. The work Jesus did contradicts the accusation. So the crowd is using plain logic: good fruit from a good tree.
How Christians Read This Verse
Christians across traditions see this as a striking moment of reason in the middle of hostility. Calvin (Reformed) said the truth here speaks for itself, wicked men cannot keep God’s power from shining through the gospel. Clarke (Methodist) pointed out the meekness of Jesus under attack. He did not respond with anger. Cambridge Bible (Anglican) notes that the defenders stopped short of saying who Jesus must be, they only said what he cannot be. They saw the evidence but hesitated to name him Messiah. The argument itself, arising from the miracle of the blind man, stands as a kind of testimony that the gospel writers carefully preserved. It shows that even among the skeptics, some could not ignore what their eyes had seen.
A common misunderstanding
Some readers think this verse is mainly about whether Jesus was mentally unstable, a debate over his sanity. In fact, the defenders do more than deny madness. They make a theological argument: a demon cannot produce wise, holy words or heal the blind. The question is not about Jesus’ mental state but about the nature of his power. His works show the source of his words.
Living This Out
You may face a situation this week where someone dismisses what you believe or who you follow. The accusation might feel like a personal attack. This verse offers a different way to respond. Instead of defending yourself, consider pointing to what Jesus actually said and did. His words are full of wisdom and grace. His works, the changed lives, the healings, the kindness, are public facts. You do not need to argue about his sanity or your own. Let the evidence stand. A demon does not open blind eyes. And Jesus still opens eyes today. You can trust him because what he says matches what he does.
Main takeaway: Jesus’ words and works agree: no demon brings healing or speaks truth, so we can trust him completely.
For Families
For ages 5, 8
Some people said Jesus had a bad spirit in him. But other people said no. A bad spirit does not help blind people see. So Jesus must be good and from God.
For ages 9, 12
The people who defended Jesus used simple logic. They said his words were wise and kind, not the kind of words an evil spirit would say. And his miracle of healing a man born blind was a good thing, not a bad thing. Evil spirits do evil, not good. So Jesus’ works proved his words were true. You can use the same kind of clear thinking when you wonder if someone can be trusted: look at what they do, not just what they say.
Questions People Ask
What does 'a demon cannot open the eyes of the blind' mean?
It means a demon does not have the power or the desire to do good works like healing. Jesus’ opponents accused him of being controlled by a demon, but his defenders argued that a demon could not and would not restore sight to a man born blind. The miracle itself proved the accusation false.
Why did some people think Jesus had a demon?
Jesus’ teaching was challenging and he claimed authority over God’s people. In John 10:20, some said he had a demon and was insane. These were religious leaders and others who were offended by his words and unwilling to accept his identity. Accusing someone of demon possession was a strong way to discredit them.
How does this verse connect to the miracle in John 9?
John 9 tells the story of Jesus healing a man who was born blind. That miracle is still fresh in everyone’s mind when John 10 happens. The people defending Jesus directly reference it: a demon cannot open the eyes of the blind. The miracle becomes evidence that Jesus is not demon-possessed but sent by God.
What is the rhetorical device in the question 'It isn’t possible for a demon to open the eyes of the blind, is it?'
The Greek word mē at the beginning of the question expects a negative answer. It is like saying 'Surely a demon cannot do this, right?' This makes the question a strong statement, a rhetorical way of saying that Jesus’ work is clearly good and powerful, coming from God, not from an evil spirit.
What is a 'demoniac' or 'one possessed by a demon'?
In the New Testament, a demoniac is a person under the power of an evil spirit. The Greek word daimonizomenos means 'demonized' or 'having a demon.' It implies the person’s words and actions are controlled by an unclean spirit. The defenders of Jesus say his words are not those of someone in that condition.
For pastors & researchers
Greek interlinear, 8 commentaries & word study