Job 41:6 · Bible study
Job 41:6 Commentary: Human Inability to Profit from Leviathan
Hebrew · 10 what the commentators say
Meaning in one sentence
An analysis of Job 41:6, examining the Hebrew terms for companions and merchants, and the theological point that Leviathan cannot be controlled or commodified.
Research Summary
- Meaning: God questions whether anyone can capture and sell Leviathan, underscoring human inability to control or profit from this creature.
- Key words: “traders” (companions, partners) and “merchants” (Canaanites), indicating a commercial framework that fails.
- Main debate: Whether the verb yikârû means “make a banquet” or “barter”; the parallel with merchants supports the trade sense.
- Theological theme: God’s sovereign authority over creation; humans cannot commodify what belongs to Him alone.
- Best use: A passage for sermons on humility, God’s power, and the limits of human ambition.
Translation Comparison
BSB Berean Standard Bible 2020
Will traders barter for him or divide him among the merchants?
WEB World English Bible 2000
Will traders barter for him? Will they part him among the merchants?
KJV King James Version 1769
Shall the companions make a banquet of him? shall they part him among the merchants?
ASV American Standard Version 1901
Will the bands of fishermen make traffic of him? Will they part him among the merchants?
YLT Young's Literal Translation 1898
(Feast upon him do companions, They divide him among the merchants!)
Darby Darby Bible 1890
Shall partners make traffic of him, will they divide him among merchants?
Douay-Rheims Douay-Rheims Bible 1899
His body is like molten shields, shut close up with scales pressing upon one another.
Translations in other languages (10 available)
¿ Harán de él banquete los compañeros? ¿ partiránlo entre los mercaderes?
Os companheiros farão banquete dele? Repartirão dele entre os mercadores?
Ses magnifiques et puissants boucliers
[40:30] Meinst du die Genossen werden ihn zerschneiden, daß er unter die Kaufleute zerteilt wird?
Zullen de metgezellen over hem een maaltijd bereiden? Zullen zij hem delen onder de kooplieden?
(H40-30) Ne trafficheranno forse i pescatori? Lo spartiranno essi fra i negozianti?
Łuski jego mocne jako tarcze, bardzo ściśle spojone.
Кто может отворить двери лица его? круг зубов его — ужас;
搭夥 的漁夫豈可拿牠 當貨物嗎?能把牠分 給 商人嗎?
Will the fishermen make profit out of him? will they have him cut up for the traders?
Verse in Context
Scholars' Consensus
Commentators broadly agree that this verse questions whether anyone can capture and profit from Leviathan. Barnes notes the Hebrew verb yikârû (from kârâh) can mean “make a bargain” or “make a banquet,” but the parallel with “merchants” (literally Canaanites) supports the idea of trade, not feasting. Keil and Delitzsch take the same line: fishermen form a guild, and the question is whether they can sell the crocodile among the Canaanites. The Cambridge Bible adds that “the partners” refers to the company of fishermen (Luke 5:7, 10). The shared point: God presses Job to see that this creature cannot be bought or sold, it is not a commodity under human control.
How settled is the interpretation?
Interpretive difficulty: Medium
Main views:
- Literal animal description: The detailed physical attributes (scales, teeth, snorting) match a real creature like the crocodile, as many commentators affirm (Keil & Delitzsch, Gill). The question about trading assumes a concrete animal that can be caught, killed, and sold—only it cannot be.
- Symbolic representation of chaos: Parallels with Ugaritic mythology where Leviathan is a chaos monster, and the broader biblical theme of God subduing cosmic forces (Psalm 74:14; Isaiah 27:1). This reading understands the creature as a figure for evil or the powers that oppose God.
- Rhetorical device for humility: Some interpreters (e.g., Matthew Henry) treat the description as a poetic exaggeration designed to humble Job, regardless of the creature’s zoological identity. The focus is on Job’s response, not on the animal itself.
What is clear: God uses Leviathan to demonstrate that humans cannot control, profit from, or even survive the encounter with this powerful creature, thereby showing His own absolute sovereignty.
What Scholars Agree and Debate
| Topic | Agreed | Debated |
|---|---|---|
| Identity of Leviathan | Leviathan is a real, powerful sea creature described by God in Job 41. It is not a mythical beast but a concrete animal known to ancient audiences. | Some interpreters (e.g., Matthew Henry, Keil & Delitzsch) lean toward a literal crocodile, while others (Gill, Barnes) also consider a whale. The symbolic reading sees it as a representation of chaos or Satan, though this is less common in the chapter's context. |
| Meaning of the verb yikârû | The verb is from kârâh, which can mean to buy, to make a bargain, or to prepare a feast. The context of trade and division among merchants is clear. | Barnes notes that the majority of versions favor the idea of feasting together, but the parallelism with ‘merchants’ supports a transaction. The debate does not change the point: no one can profit from Leviathan. |
| Historical fulfillment | The verse asserts that Leviathan is not a regular article of commerce in the ancient world. | Gill observes that in later times whale products (oil, bone) did become trade goods, but he doubts that was known in Job’s era. Others see this as evidence that Leviathan is a crocodile, which was never a commodity. |
Historical & Cultural Context
The verse stands in the climax of God’s speech to Job (Job 38, 41), where the Creator parades two immense creatures, Behemoth and Leviathan, to humble the suffering patriarch. Leviathan was likely a crocodile, common in Egypt’s Nile, or possibly a whale. Both were well known in the ancient Near East, but neither could be subdued by human strength. The imagery of traders and merchants draws on the Canaanites, a people famed for commerce (Isaiah 23:8; Zechariah 14:21). The Phoenicians, a Canaanite branch, dominated sea trade.
Herodotus records that crocodiles were sometimes killed and eaten in Egyptian towns like Apollonopolis and Elephantis, but even there they were dangerous to catch. The question “Will traders barter for him?” suggests a commercial transaction for food or other goods. Barnes points out that the crocodile was never a regular article of commerce, and Gill adds that the whale’s oil and bone do create trade in later times, but in Job’s context this use was unknown. The rhetorical force is stark: every attempt to treat this creature as a marketable good is absurd. It resists capture, killing, and sale.
Literarily, the verse belongs to a series of questions that expose human weakness (vv. 1, 10). Each question moves from physical capture to commercial exploitation to simple survival. By the end, God turns the argument back on Job: “Who then is he who can stand before me?” (v. 10). The historical and cultural backdrop of fishing cooperatives and merchant networks makes the point concrete: no guild, no trade route, no transaction can bring Leviathan under human authority.
Textual Notes
The consulted sources note no significant textual variants for Job 41:6. The differences among English translations (e.g., ‘banquet’ vs. ‘barter’) arise from the semantic range of the Hebrew verb yikârû, not from manuscript divergence.
Reception History
In early and medieval interpretation, Leviathan was often allegorized as a figure of Satan or the forces of chaos, and these verses were read as God’s triumph over evil. The Church Fathers (e.g., Gregory the Great in his Moralia in Job) saw in the untamability a picture of the devil’s power, which only Christ could subdue. During the Reformation, interpreters such as Calvin and Luther preferred a literal reading, treating Leviathan as a real animal, most often the crocodile, and emphasizing the lesson of human frailty before God. Modern commentaries (Barnes, Keil & Delitzsch, Cambridge) continue this literal approach while also appreciating the rhetorical and theological force of the passage. Across eras, the verse has consistently been used to humble human pride and exalt God’s sovereignty over creation.
Preaching This Verse
Three-point outline
- Leviathan cannot be purchased. The question about traders bartering shows this creature is not a product for sale. It resists all commercial logic.
- Leviathan cannot be partitioned. Dividing it among merchants is impossible, no one can butcher and package this beast. It is whole and untouchable.
- Human power meets its limit. If we cannot control a mere animal, how can we stand before its Creator? The verse humbles pride and invites worship.
Five-point outline
- God questions human ability to extract economic value from Leviathan.
- The Hebrew terms (chabbâriym for partners, kena aniym for merchants) stress a network of trade that fails.
- Historical context: crocodiles were rarely caught and never commercially traded in the ancient world.
- The theological thrust: human beings cannot commodity what God alone owns and rules.
- Application: we often try to domesticate or profit from what belongs to God, including our own lives. This verse calls us to release that false control.
Illustration hooks
- A fisherman tries to sell a great white shark at a local fish market, the buyers laugh because no one can safely catch one, and it’s not the kind of fish you eat or sell.
- A businessperson treats a wild animal as a resource (e.g., attempting to farm crocodiles without proper containment), only to discover nature is not so easily mastered.
- In prayer, someone keeps trying to “bargain” with God as if His gifts were goods to be traded, until they realize God’s creation, and God Himself, cannot be bartered with.
Questions your congregation is asking
- Why does God spend so much time describing a scary sea monster? What does that have to do with my suffering?
- Does this verse suggest that some parts of creation are simply beyond human usefulness? What does that mean for our stewardship?
- If I cannot control even a crocodile, how can I think I can control my future or my circumstances?
Leading a Discussion
This small group guide helps you explore Job 41:6 as part of God’s larger speech about power and humility. The verse challenges the assumption that everything exists for our use or profit. Instead, it invites us to recognize God’s sovereignty over what we cannot tame, buy, or sell.
Discussion questions
- Read Job 41:1, 10 aloud. What stands out to you about the list of human actions that fail against Leviathan?
- The Hebrew word for “traders” (chabbâriym) means companions or partners, often in fishing. Why do you think God mentions a failed fishing enterprise?
- Barnes and other commentators note that “merchants” translates “Canaanites,” a people famous for trade. How does this cultural detail sharpen the verse’s point?
- In what areas of your life do you try to “barter” with God, offering good behavior in exchange for safety or blessing? How does this verse expose the futility of that approach?
- What does the untamable Leviathan reveal about God’s character that we might otherwise miss?
- How can the truth that some things are not “for sale” reshape the way we face pain or uncertainty?
- Pray together, thanking God for being the one who holds power over everything we cannot control.
Cross-References
Source: Treasury of Scripture Knowledge (TSK, public domain)
| Judges 14:11 | When they saw him, they brought thirty companions to be with him. |
Cross-reference data from OpenBible.info (CC BY 4.0). Commentaries are public domain.
For personal reflection
Read the devotional page — prayer, application, and "for families"
What the Commentators Say
10 public-domain commentaries, condensed into plain language.
Adam Clarke's Commentary Methodist/Wesleyan 1826
Clarke notes some read this verse as a literal description of eating a giant fish. He adds that people in Egypt ate such animals according to a historian. This shows the text includes historical details.
Barnes' Notes on the Bible Protestant 1832
Barnes notes that this line is one of the most disputed passages in Job, with scholars divided over whether it describes fishermen laying traps for the crocodile or friends making a banquet of its flesh. He finds the banquet interpretation the more simple and obvious, concluding that the crocodile is never made part of a feast or an article of commerce.
Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges Anglican 1880
Christians who hold this view point to Job 41:6 while others emphasize verses that describe other sea creatures. Both seek to be faithful to Scripture.
Geneva Bible Notes Reformed 1599
Geneva Bible Notes says the weight on each scale is as heavy as solid shields. This shows how immense his strength truly is.
Gill's Exposition of the Bible Baptist 1748
Gill points out that the fishermen cannot catch Leviathan to make a feast over it, nor can merchants divide it for trade. He notes that while crocodile flesh was sometimes eaten, whale flesh was not, and the commercial uses of whales may not have been known in Job's time.
Jamieson-Fausset-Brown Commentary Protestant 1871
Christians who hold this view understand the word for partners here as those who share in fishing work. They think the mention of a banquet shows these people might want to catch the giant creature for food.
Keil & Delitzsch OT Commentary Protestant 1876
Keil and Delitzsch note that the questions ask whether people could sell or divide the crocodile among traders. They explain that the language points to ordinary hunting methods used by ancient fishermen.
Lange's Commentary Reformed 1857
Lange emphasizes that God's second discourse aims to convict Job of doubting divine justice, not merely to display power. The behemoth and leviathan symbolize God's punitive justice—proud creatures no human can tame, yet fully subject to the Creator. Their description teaches that omnipotence and justice are inseparable, and all pride must yield to God's righteous rule.
Matthew Henry's Commentary Reformed/Presbyterian 1710
Henry notes that some read this creature as a whale while others see it as a crocodile though both are very large and fierce. He believes the Creator’s power is shown in their strength.
Wesley's Explanatory Notes Methodist/Wesleyan 1754
Wesley notes that not every eagle species feeds on carcasses, but many do. He then emphasizes the eagle's remarkable speed, flying to the prey in an instant with astonishing swiftness.