Job 31:15 · Bible study
Job 31:15 Commentary: Shared Creation, Shared Dignity
Hebrew · 9 what the commentators say
Meaning in one sentence
Job argues for equal treatment of servants from the shared creation in the womb. The same God made both master and servant.
Research Summary
- Meaning: Shared creation in the womb grounds the equal dignity of master and servant.
- Key words: womb (beten, rechem), one (echad).
- Main debate: Does echad refer to the one God or to "one womb" (same kind of womb)?
- Theological theme: The image of God and common creation as foundation for human equality.
- Best use: Ethical teaching on social justice, treatment of workers, and the dignity of all people.
Translation Comparison
BSB Berean Standard Bible 2020
Did not He who made me in the womb also make them? Did not the same One form us in the womb?
WEB World English Bible 2000
Didn’t he who made me in the womb make him? Didn’t one fashion us in the womb?
KJV King James Version 1769
Did not he that made me in the womb make him? and did not one fashion us in the womb?
ASV American Standard Version 1901
Did not he that made me in the womb make him? And did not one fashion us in the womb?
YLT Young's Literal Translation 1898
Did not He that made me in the womb make him? Yea, prepare us in the womb doth One.
Darby Darby Bible 1890
Did not he that made me in the womb make him? and did not One fashion us in the womb?
Douay-Rheims Douay-Rheims Bible 1899
Did not he that made me in the womb make him also: and did not one and the same form me in the womb?
Translations in other languages (10 available)
El que en el vientre me hizo|strong="H6213, H3559" á mí, ¿ no lo hizo á él? ¿ y no nos dispuso uno mismo en la matriz?
Aquele que me fez no ventre materno também não fez a ele? E não nos preparou de um mesmo modo na madre?
Celui qui m’ a créé dans le ventre de ma mère ne l’ a-t-il pas créé?
Hat ihn nicht auch der gemacht, der mich in Mutterleibe machte, und hat ihn im Schoße ebensowohl bereitet?
Heeft Hij niet, Die mij in den buik maakte, hem ook gemaakt en Een ons in de baarmoeder bereid?)
Chi fece me nel seno di mia madre non fece anche lui? non ci ha formati nel seno materno uno stesso Iddio?
Izaż nie ten, który mię w żywocie uczynił, nie uczynił też i onego? a nie onże nas sam w żywocie wykształtował?)
Не Он ли, Который создал меня во чреве, создал и его и равно образовал нас в утробе?
造 我在腹中的,不也是 造他嗎?將他與我摶 在腹中 的豈不是一位嗎?
Did not God make him as well as me? did he not give us life in our mothers' bodies?
Verse in Context
Original Language (Biblical Hebrew)
Old Testament · Biblical Hebrew · Job 31:15
Source: STEPBible TAGNT/TEHB (CC-BY 4.0). Click or tap a morphology code to see the full parsing.
Scholars' Consensus
Commentators agree that Job grounds his refusal to exploit servants in a shared creation by the same God. The verse asks two rhetorical questions that expect a positive answer: the God who formed Job also formed his servant, and one Creator fashioned them both in the womb. Barnes notes that this argument undercuts any claim of original inferiority between master and servant. Gill and Keil-Delitzsch highlight that the Hebrew word echad ("one") likely refers to God, as in Malachi 2:10: "Has not one God created us?" The effect is to place master and servant on a level playing field before their Maker. Cambridge Bible observes that Job admits his servants could contend with him as persons, not as property. Whether echad is taken as God or as the same kind of womb, the point holds: human beings share a common origin and therefore a common dignity.
How settled is the interpretation?
Interpretive difficulty: Low
What is clear: The verse declares that God is the common maker of both Job and his servant, and that this shared creation establishes a standard of equal treatment before God.
What Scholars Agree and Debate
| Topic | Agreed | Debated |
|---|---|---|
| The referent of 'one' (echad) | Whether it refers to God directly or to 'one womb,' both readings support a common origin that grounds human dignity. | Some (Keil-Delitzsch, Gill, Geneva Bible) read echad as referring to God, citing Malachi 2:10. Others (Syriac, Septuagint, and some Jewish interpreters) read it as modifying 'womb', 'one womb', meaning the same kind of human origin. Both views converge on equality. |
| Ground for equal treatment of servants | The shared act of creation by God gives every person an inherent dignity that demands justice. | A few commentators emphasize the literal shared womb (same human process) while most stress the single Creator. The difference is grammatical but not practical. |
| Application to slavery and social hierarchy | The verse condemns treating servants as inferior or property, and has historically been used to argue against slavery. | Some (Barnes) see it as directly abolishing slavery, while others (Gill, Matthew Henry) apply it to fair treatment within existing structures, not necessarily to the institution itself. |
Historical & Cultural Context
Job 31:15 sits within the hero's final oath of innocence, a series of "if...then" statements that call down judgment on himself should he have committed hidden sins. The immediate context (v. 13, 15) covers his treatment of male and female servants. In the ancient Near East, servants could be debt-slaves or purchased slaves; the master held extensive power, including the power of life and death in some cultures. Job's claim that he did not "despise" their legal cause implies that servants had some right to bring complaints. This matches the biblical legal tradition (Exodus 21, Deuteronomy 15) where Hebrew slaves had protections, but it goes further: Job extends equal consideration even to non-Israelite or permanent servants. The rhetorical question draws on a creation theology already visible in Job 10:8 ("Your hands have framed me") and Psalm 139:13, 16, where God's forming of the child in the womb grounds human value. By invoking the womb, Job uses the most intimate, undeniable point of common human origin: every person enters the world through the same vulnerable process. This creates a bond that supersedes social rank. Cross-references like Proverbs 14:31 ("He who oppresses the poor shows contempt for his Maker") and Job 34:19 (God does not respect rich more than poor, for they are all His handiwork) show this was a consistent biblical principle. The verse thus repudiates any system that would treat one class of humans as inherently lower.
Textual Notes
The supplied sources note no significant textual variants for Job 31:15. The Masoretic Text is consistent across manuscripts. A minor accentual issue affects whether to join echad with the preceding word for "womb" or read it independently, but the sense is not materially affected.
Reception History
Job 31:15 has been read throughout Christian history as a foundational text for human equality. Early church fathers like Ambrose and Augustine cited it to argue that all humans share the same Creator and therefore the same dignity before God, regardless of social standing. During the 18th and 19th centuries, the verse was a key text for abolitionists, including William Wilberforce, who used it to challenge the dehumanization of enslaved people. More recently, it has been employed by Christians advocating for racial equality, worker rights, and pro-life ethics. Its testimony that God forms each person in the womb has made it a touchstone for both social justice and the dignity of every human being.
Preaching This Verse
Three-point outline
- One Creator, one humanity. Job argues from a simple but profound fact: the God who made me also made my servant. There is no second-class creation. This demolishes any attempt to rank people by status, race, or wealth.
- Shared origin produces shared obligation. If we come from the same hand, we owe the same respect. Job knew that mistreating a fellow creature of God would anger the Creator (v. 14). The cross-reference in Malachi 2:10 drives the point home: one God fathered us all.
- Dignity is located in the womb, not the wallet. Social position changes nothing about a person's worth. The womb levels every human being: no one enters the world wealthy or powerful. This gives Christians a reason to treat every person as a neighbor worthy of justice and love.
Five-point outline
- Job's context: an oath of innocence before God and community.
- The specific charge: did I despise servants when they had a legal complaint?
- The theological argument: one Creator, one human nature.
- The motivation: fear of God's judgment (v. 14) and reverence for His image in all people.
- The implication: any oppression of the vulnerable is an assault on the Creator. This verse underpins modern convictions about racial equality, worker dignity, and care for the poor.
Illustration hooks
- Think of two people born in the same hospital on the same day. One grows up wealthy, one impoverished. Did their origin make them different? No. The womb distributes no privileges. That parity is what Job insists on, even for a master and a slave.
- A factory owner and a janitor both come into the world as helpless infants. The same hands that knit the owner's body in the womb also knit the janitor's. What does that mean for pay, respect, and workplace dignity?
- When we look at photos of refugee children, it is easy to feel distance. But every one of those children was formed by the same God who formed our own children. Job's logic erases the distance.
Questions your congregation is asking
- How can I respect someone whose lifestyle or beliefs I strongly disagree with?
- Does the Bible actually teach that all people are equal, or does it support hierarchy?
- What does this verse say about how Christians should treat employees, neighbors, or people of other races?
Leading a Discussion
This verse invites us to examine how we treat people who hold less power or status than we do. Job's argument is simple: the same God who made him also made his servant. That shared creation by one God means shared value. Use the questions below to explore the passage together.
Discussion questions
- Read Job 31:13, 15. What specific sin is Job denying, and why does he bring God into it?
- Job uses two Hebrew words for "womb" (beten and rechem). What effect does that repetition have on the argument?
- How does the rhetorical question format ("Did not...?") strengthen Job's claim?
- Cross-reference Malachi 2:10 and Acts 17:26. How do those passages echo Job's reasoning?
- In a world of sharp social hierarchies, what makes Job's view countercultural? How does it challenge unspoken assumptions about status?
- Can you think of a situation where treating someone with equal dignity was costly for you? What helped you do it?
- What would change in your workplace, church, or neighborhood if Christians took Job's logic seriously every day?
Word Study
The key original-language words in this verse. Select any word for its full lexicon entry — meaning, every occurrence in Scripture, and related words.
Cross-References
Source: Treasury of Scripture Knowledge (TSK, public domain)
| Nehemiah 5:5 | Yet now our flesh is as the flesh of our brothers, our children as their children. Behold, we bring our sons and our daughters into bondage to be servants, and some of our daughters have been brought into bondage. It is also not in our power to help it, because other men have our fields and our vineyards.” |
| Job 10:3 | Is it good to you that you should oppress, that you should despise the work of your hands, and smile on the counsel of the wicked? |
| Job 10:8 | “‘Your hands have framed me and fashioned me altogether, yet you destroy me. |
| Job 10:12 | You have granted me life and loving kindness. Your visitation has preserved my spirit. |
| Job 34:19 | He doesn’t respect the persons of princes, nor respect the rich more than the poor, for they all are the work of his hands. |
| Psalms 139:14 | I will give thanks to you, for I am fearfully and wonderfully made. Your works are wonderful. My soul knows that very well. |
| Psalms 139:16 | Your eyes saw my body. In your book they were all written, the days that were ordained for me, when as yet there were none of them. |
| Proverbs 14:31 | He who oppresses the poor shows contempt for his Maker, but he who is kind to the needy honors him. |
Interlinear and lexical data from STEPBible (CC BY 4.0). Cross-reference data from OpenBible.info (CC BY 4.0). Commentaries are public domain.
For personal reflection
Read the devotional page — prayer, application, and "for families"
What the Commentators Say
9 public-domain commentaries, condensed into plain language.
Adam Clarke's Commentary Methodist/Wesleyan 1826
Clarke notes that the Creator made both the master and the slave. He believes all people will appear before God without any differences (Job 31:15). This gives reason to treat others as one wishes to be treated.
Barnes' Notes on the Bible Protestant 1832
Barnes argues that Job's insistence on a common Creator for all people was a remarkably advanced insight for its time, directly opposing the usual justifications for slavery that rely on claims of racial or intellectual inferiority. He holds that this view, if truly embraced, would necessarily abolish the entire system of slavery wherever it exists.
Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges Anglican 1880
Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges notes Job denies he ever abused his authority by harming servants or ignoring the poor. He also says he never wronged anyone despite having legal advantages.
Geneva Bible Notes Reformed 1599
The Geneva Note stresses that the same God who formed the speaker in the womb also made the other person. Both were fashioned by God alone, so no one can claim superiority based on birth. The point is shared, equal creation by the one Creator.
Gill's Exposition of the Bible Baptist 1748
Gill emphasizes that Job's argument rests on the shared origin of master and servant: God alone makes every person in the womb, regardless of rank. Since both are equally God's workmanship, possessing the same rational powers, mistreating a fellow creature made by the same Creator is unreasonable and invites God's resentment.
Jamieson-Fausset-Brown Commentary Protestant 1871
Christians who hold the view that all people share the same origin point to Job 31:15 as evidence that masters should treat servants with brotherly love. Both groups seek to be faithful to Scripture.
Keil & Delitzsch OT Commentary Protestant 1876
Keil-Delitzsch highlight that Job's fair treatment of servants rests on the truth that the same God formed both master and servant in the womb. This shared origin, with "One" referring to God, makes them essentially equal and strips pride away, preventing any despotic attitude.
Lange's Commentary Reformed 1857
Lange reads
Matthew Henry's Commentary Reformed/Presbyterian 1710
Henry notes Job had no desire for his neighbor’s wife and never planned to harm that marriage. He saw adultery as such a terrible sin it caused destruction and required judgment by God.