Job 20:21 · Bible study
Job 20:21 Commentary: Insatiable Greed Leads to Lost Prosperity
Hebrew · 10 what the commentators say
Meaning in one sentence
How the wicked man’s devouring everything causes his prosperity to fail. Hebrew wordplay, grammar, and pastoral application.
Research Summary
- Meaning: Because the wicked man consumes everything greedily, his wealth will not last, divine justice ensures loss matches the sin.
- Key words: śārîd (H8300, “survivor, remnant”); ṭûḇ (H2898, “goodness, prosperity”); yāḥîl (H2342, from ḥûl, “to be firm, endure”).
- Main debate: Whether “meat” (food) or “goods” (property) is primary; most agree both are connected, his physical consumption symbolizes his consuming greed for wealth.
- Theological theme: Retributive justice in wisdom literature: ill‑gotten gain does not endure; greed self‑destructs.
- Best use: A sober warning against covetousness and a mirror for examining our own appetites, read within Job’s larger question about undeserved suffering.
Translation Comparison
BSB Berean Standard Bible 2020
Nothing is left for him to consume; thus his prosperity will not endure.
WEB World English Bible 2000
There was nothing left that he didn’t devour, therefore his prosperity will not endure.
KJV King James Version 1769
There shall none of his meat be left; therefore shall no man look for his goods.
ASV American Standard Version 1901
There was nothing left that he devoured not; Therefore his prosperity shall not endure.
YLT Young's Literal Translation 1898
There is not a remnant to his food, Therefore his good doth not stay.
Darby Darby Bible 1890
Nothing escaped his greediness; therefore his prosperity shall not endure.
Douay-Rheims Douay-Rheims Bible 1899
There was nothing left of his meat, and therefore nothing shall continue of his goods:
Translations in other languages (10 available)
No quedó nada que no comiese: por tanto su bien no será durable.
Nada lhe restou para que devorasse; por isso sua riqueza não será duradoura.
Rien n’ échappait à sa voracité;
Nichts blieb übrig vor seinem Fressen; darum wird sein gutes Leben keinen Bestand haben.
Er zal niets overig zijn, dat hij ete; daarom zal hij niet wachten naar zijn goed.
La sua voracità non risparmiava nulla, perciò il suo benessere non durerà.
Nic nie zostanie z pokarmów jego, ani się rozmnoży dobro jego.
Ничего не спаслось от обжорства его, зато не устоит счастье его.
其餘的 沒有 一樣他不吞滅,所以 他的福樂 不能 長久。
He had never enough for his desire; for this cause his well-being will quickly come to an end.
Verse in Context
Original Language (Biblical Hebrew)
Old Testament · Biblical Hebrew · Job 20:21
Source: STEPBible TAGNT/TEHB (CC-BY 4.0). Click or tap a morphology code to see the full parsing.
Scholars' Consensus
Commentators agree that this verse describes a direct link between a wicked person's unending greed and the loss of his wealth. The Hebrew śārîd (“survivor” or “remnant”) combined with the verb ʼākal (“to eat, devour”) pictures someone who consumes without sparing even a trace. Barnes notes that nothing remains of his food, it is all wasted. Keil and Delitzsch stress that śārîd carries the sense of “that which escapes” and that the wicked man devours everything, leaving no remnant. The consequence uses the verb yāḥîl (from ḥûl, “to twist, be firm”): his prosperity (ṭûḇ) will not be stable or enduring. Cambridge Bible sums it up: “the insatiable greediness is recompensed by utter loss and want.” The retribution matches the sin in a perfect moral symmetry.
How settled is the interpretation?
Interpretive difficulty: Low
What is clear: The wicked man consumes everything greedily, and as a direct consequence his prosperity will not endure—the moral logic of the verse is undisputed across traditions.
What Scholars Agree and Debate
| Topic | Agreed | Debated |
|---|---|---|
| The cause of lost prosperity | The wicked man's insatiable devouring, both literal eating and covetous taking, is the direct reason his prosperity fails. | Some emphasise literal gluttony (Gill mentions a profuse lifestyle); others interpret it more broadly as greedy acquisition of wealth (Barnes, Keil). Both agree the action leads to ruin. |
| Does this apply to Job? | Zophar intends it to apply to Job, accusing him of hidden greed. | Traditional Christian interpretation often reads it as a general principle that false for the righteous sufferer; the book of Job itself challenges this retribution formula. |
| Interpretation of 'his goods' (prosperity) | It refers to the wicked man's material wealth or well‑being. | Some render it ‘his prosperity’ (WEB, KJV margin), others ‘his good things’ (LXX) or ‘his substance’ (Gill). Every tradition agrees it means the possessions he valued. |
Historical & Cultural Context
Job 20 is Zophar’s second speech. He and the other friends hold that suffering is always punishment for wrongdoing, and here he paints a vivid picture of the wicked man’s end. The cultural background draws on ancient Near Eastern wisdom traditions, which often taught that prosperity gained by oppression would not last. Verses 17, 19 accuse the wicked of oppressing and forsaking the poor, violently taking houses. Then verse 20 says he “knew no quietness within him,” and verse 21 describes his greedy consumption. The imagery is visceral: the wicked man devours like a beast, leaving nothing. But instead of increasing his wealth, this gluttony ensures its destruction. In the broader context of Job, Zophar’s description subtly implies that Job’s own losses match this pattern, a claim the book later refutes. Theologically, this passage reflects the common wisdom principle that ill-gotten gain soon vanishes (cf. Proverbs 13:11, 21:6). The Hebrew word ṭûḇ (translated “prosperity” or “goods”) often denotes material wealth and well‑being; its instability here is the direct result of the wicked man’s ravenous, unrestrained appetite.
Textual Notes
The Hebrew text of Job 20:21 is stable across major manuscripts. The Masoretic reading ʾên-śārîd leʼokhlô (“there is no survivor for his eating”) is well attested. A few ancient versions (LXX, Syriac) vary slightly in wording but preserve the same sense of total consumption. The consulted sources note no significant variants that change the meaning.
Reception History
In early and medieval interpretation, this verse was frequently cited to illustrate the certainty of divine justice against oppressors. Jerome’s Vulgate rendered it “non erit reliquum de cibo eius” (“nothing will remain of his food”), emphasising total loss. Reformers like Calvin and Luther saw it as a warning against trusting in riches. Many sermons have used it to comfort the poor and afflicted: God sees the greed that exploits them and will not let it stand. In modern scholarship, the verse is studied as part of Zophar’s rhetorical strategy, showing how the friends’ theology oversimplifies suffering. Across traditions, it has remained a pointed reminder that hoarded wealth never truly satisfies.
Preaching This Verse
Three-point outline
- Greed consumes everything. The wicked man devours without leaving a scrap (śārîd). His insatiable hunger mirrors his oppression of the poor (v. 19).
- Greed consumes itself. The very act of devouring destroys the source of prosperity. He leaves nothing for himself or his heirs.
- God ensures that greed backfires. The verb yāḥîl (from ḥûl, “to be firm, endure”) is negated: his prosperity will not hold. Divine justice turns gluttony into loss.
Five-point outline
- The portrait of the wicked man. He is described earlier as one who crushes the poor and takes houses (vv. 18, 19). His inner life is restless (v. 20).
- His consuming behavior. The Hebrew śārîd suggests nothing escapes his mouth, he swallows even the last morsel.
- The immediate consequence. Because he leaves nothing, there is nothing left for him to enjoy. The prosperity (ṭûḇ) vanishes.
- The larger lesson from Zophar. The friends argue that earthly reward follows conduct; here Zophar insists that the wicked man loses even what he had.
- An invitation to self‑examination. The verse probes the reader: what are we devouring? Is our appetite for gain leaving room for God’s provision?
Illustration hooks
- The all‑you‑can‑eat buffet. You pile the plate high, but can’t finish, and it feels like waste. The wicked man never stops filling his plate, but ends up empty.
- Over‑fishing a lake. Taking every fish leaves nothing for the future. Greed that doesn’t safeguard the source destroys the very thing it craves.
- Scrooge’s counting house. A miser who hoards and trusts only in his gold, and loses it all when he dies, leaving nothing of lasting value.
Questions your congregation is asking
- “I see greedy people who seem to get away with it, does this verse still apply in a world where injustice often goes unpunished?”
- “How do I know if my own desire for more has crossed into the kind of devouring Zophar condemns?”
- “If God is just, why do innocent people sometimes lose everything while the wicked seem to thrive?”
Leading a Discussion
This verse is part of Zophar’s speech in Job 20. He is trying to convince Job that his suffering must be punishment for hidden sin. The verse describes a greedy person who devours everything, and then loses it all. As you read, think about the difference between Zophar’s viewpoint and the larger message of the book of Job.
Discussion questions
- Read Job 20:21 in several translations. What different words are used for “prosperity” (ṭûḇ)? How does that affect your understanding?
- Look at Job 20:19. How does the wicked man’s treatment of the poor connect to the greed described in verse 21?
- The Hebrew word śārîd means “survivor” or “remnant.” Why is it significant that nothing survives this man’s eating?
- Zophar believes that sin always leads to visible punishment. Is that true in every case? Share a time you saw someone suffer who seemed innocent, or someone prosper who seemed guilty.
- What does this verse reveal about the heart of greed? How can we guard against an insatiable appetite for more?
- Jesus taught about a rich fool who stored up treasure but died that night (Luke 12:16, 21). How does that story echo the message of Job 20:21?
- How does this verse point forward to the need for a better hope, one not built on earthly prosperity?
Word Study
The key original-language words in this verse. Select any word for its full lexicon entry — meaning, every occurrence in Scripture, and related words.
Cross-References
Source: Treasury of Scripture Knowledge (TSK, public domain)
| Job 15:29 | He will not be rich, neither will his substance continue, neither will their possessions be extended on the earth. |
| Job 18:19 | He will have neither son nor grandson among his people, nor any remaining where he lived. |
| Jeremiah 17:11 | As the partridge that sits on eggs which she has not laid, so is he who gets riches, and not by right. In the middle of his days, they will leave him. At his end, he will be a fool. |
| Luke 16:24 | He cried and said, ‘Father Abraham, have mercy on me, and send Lazarus, that he may dip the tip of his finger in water and cool my tongue! For I am in anguish in this flame.’ |
| Luke 16:25 | “But Abraham said, ‘Son, remember that you, in your lifetime, received your good things, and Lazarus, in the same way, bad things. But here he is now comforted and you are in anguish. |
Interlinear and lexical data from STEPBible (CC BY 4.0). Cross-reference data from OpenBible.info (CC BY 4.0). Commentaries are public domain.
For personal reflection
Read the devotional page — prayer, application, and "for families"
What the Commentators Say
10 public-domain commentaries, condensed into plain language.
Adam Clarke's Commentary Methodist/Wesleyan 1826
Clarke notes that the phrase means no food belonging to him will remain because he ate excessively. His possessions will also disappear as a result.
Barnes' Notes on the Bible Protestant 1832
Barnes focuses on the Hebrew root behind the word for "look," which conveys twisting and thus firmness or stability. His central point is that the wicked man's property will lack that stability: nothing remains of his food, and his goods will not endure or flourish.
Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges Anglican 1880
Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges notes that in these verses the punishment matches the sin exactly (his prosperity corresponds to his greed). This shows that extreme greed leads directly to complete loss.
Geneva Bible Notes Reformed 1599
The Geneva notes highlight that the wicked man will have nothing left of his own provisions, not even food. This complete loss carries a warning: no one should set their hopes on acquiring such a person's possessions, because they will all vanish along with him.
Gill's Exposition of the Bible Baptist 1748
Gill zeroes in on the complete disappearance of the wicked man's wealth: none of it remains for himself or his heirs. Consequently, no one even bothers to look for his goods, because there is nothing left to inherit. This total stripping leaves no expectation, not even hope for survivors.
Jamieson-Fausset-Brown Commentary Protestant 1871
Jamieson Fausset Brown notes that prosperity will not last because it depends on things that cannot endure. This gives hope that what truly endures is available to those who trust God.
Keil & Delitzsch OT Commentary Protestant 1876
Keil and Delitzsch explain that the Hebrew word for "nothing escaped" implies the wicked man devoured everything greedily, leaving no remnant. Because his insatiable appetite consumed even the last scrap, his prosperity cannot endure; the verse states this as a settled fact, not a future prediction.
Lange's Commentary Reformed 1857
Lange observes that Zophar's description of the wicked's swift destruction is objectively true, yet he wrongly applies it to Job out of suspicion. The truth becomes a fearful lie when directed at an innocent sufferer. This reveals how sound doctrine can be misused to condemn rather than comfort.
Matthew Henry's Commentary Reformed/Presbyterian 1710
Henry notes that the wicked man will give back everything he stole without enjoying it because his sins will follow him to the grave. He believes this punishment ensures no part of his stolen wealth remains.
Wesley's Explanatory Notes Methodist/Wesleyan 1754
Wesley observes that once a person's complete ruin becomes public knowledge, even his own relatives will not bother with whatever scraps of his estate remain. The point hinges on visibility: when disgrace or poverty is openly known, family ties offer no protection from abandonment.