Hosea 7:3 · Bible study
Hosea 7:3 Commentary: The Danger of Pleasing Rulers with Sin
Hebrew · 11 what the commentators say
Meaning in one sentence
Explore how the people's wickedness and lies delighted Israel's kings, revealing the mutual corruption that afflicted both rulers and ruled in the nation.
Research Summary
- Meaning: The people deliberately delighted the king and princes with their sinful deeds and false words, exposing a nation-wide conspiracy in evil.
- Key words: "Make glad" (יְשַׂמְּחוּ, Piel causative), "wickedness" (רָעָה, evil), "lies" (כַּחַשׁ, deception or false worship).
- Main debate: Which specific king is in view, Jeroboam I, Jehu, Jeroboam II, or the kings collectively? The commentaries differ, but the pattern is clear regardless.
- Theological theme: Mutual corruption between rulers and the ruled; sin as a social contagion that both classes embrace and promote.
- Best use: A warning against flattering the powerful and against accommodating faith to political or cultural pressure. Calls both leaders and citizens to repentance.
Translation Comparison
BSB Berean Standard Bible 2020
They delight the king with their evil, and the princes with their lies.
WEB World English Bible 2000
They make the king glad with their wickedness, and the princes with their lies.
KJV King James Version 1769
They make the king glad with their wickedness, and the princes with their lies.
ASV American Standard Version 1901
They make the king glad with their wickedness, and the princes with their lies.
YLT Young's Literal Translation 1898
With their wickedness they make glad a king, And with their lies--princes.
Darby Darby Bible 1890
They make the king glad with their wickedness, and the princes with their lies.
Douay-Rheims Douay-Rheims Bible 1899
They have made the king glad with their wickedness: and the princes with their lies.
Translations in other languages (10 available)
Con su maldad alegran al rey, y á los príncipes con sus mentiras.
Com sua maldade alegram ao rei, e com suas mentiras aos príncipes.
Ils réjouissent le roi par leur méchanceté,
Sie vertrösten den König durch ihre Bosheit und die Fürsten durch ihre Lügen;
Zij verblijden den koning met hun boosheid, en de vorsten met hun leugenen.
Essi rallegrano il re con la loro malvagità, e i capi con le loro menzogne.
Króla uweselają złością swoją a książąt kłamstwy swemi.
Злодейством своим они увеселяют царя и обманами своими - князей.
他們行惡 使君王 歡喜,說謊 使首領喜樂。
In their sin they make a king for themselves, and rulers in their deceit.
Verse in Context
Original Language (Biblical Hebrew)
Old Testament · Biblical Hebrew · Hosea 7:3
Source: STEPBible TAGNT/TEHB (CC-BY 4.0). Click or tap a morphology code to see the full parsing.
Scholars' Consensus
Commentators agree that this verse exposes a tragic feedback loop: the people of Israel deliberately served their own sinful impulses by flattering their rulers, and the rulers enjoyed it. The Hebrew verb יְשַׂמְּחוּ (yəśamməḥū) is a Piel form meaning "to cause gladness", the people actively worked to delight the king with their evil and their lies. Barnes notes that "wicked sovereigns and a wicked people are a curse to each other, each encouraging the other in sin." Calvin adds that the people cannot shift the blame to the king alone; their prompt obedience to idolatrous commands proved that hypocrisy already lay hidden in their hearts. Gill specifies that the king was glad because the people eagerly adopted the calf worship he had established, securing his political power. The "lies" (כַּחַשׁ, kachash) here refer both to the flattery with which they pleased the court and to the false worship they embraced, worship that was itself a lie about God. The consensus is that both rulers and ruled are complicit, and the nation's corruption is now total.
How settled is the interpretation?
Interpretive difficulty: Medium
Main views:
- Historical-specific king: Kimchi and others identify Jeroboam I as the king, since he instituted calf worship and the people followed readily.
- General pattern of monarchy: Gill and the Septuagint see it as referring to the kings in general, as the same dynamic recurred with many rulers.
- Focus on political flattery: Wesley and some modern readings emphasize the lies as flattery and false reports, not just idolatry.
What is clear: It is not disputed that the people's sinful deeds and words delighted the rulers, and that this reveals a society in which both leaders and citizens are complicit in evil and blind to God.
What Scholars Agree and Debate
| Topic | Agreed | Debated |
|---|---|---|
| Which king is intended? | The verse refers to the king and princes of Israel during a period of widespread idolatry and moral decay. | Some (Kimchi, Gill) identify Jeroboam I, who established the calves. Grotius suggests Jehu. Others see a reference to Jeroboam II, or read it as a collective description of successive northern kings. |
| Who is primarily responsible for the corruption? | Both the rulers and the people share responsibility; the text holds the people accountable for making the king glad. | Calvin emphasizes the people's hidden hypocrisy that surfaces when an occasion arises; Barnes stresses the mutual encouragement between king and subjects. The degree of coercion or free choice is not specified, so traditions may differ on how to apply it today. |
| What do the 'lies' refer to? | The lies include both flattering speech and the false religious system of Israel (idolatry). | Some (Gill, Barnes) highlight flattery and false accusations against the innocent; others (Calvin, Keil) emphasize the idolatrous worship as a lie about God. Both readings are supported by the context. |
Historical & Cultural Context
Hosea prophesied to the northern kingdom of Israel during the eighth century BC, a period of political instability following Jeroboam I's establishment of calf worship at Dan and Bethel (1 Kings 12:25, 33). The kings of Israel needed to prevent their people from traveling to Jerusalem for worship, so they promoted state-sponsored idolatry. The people's willingness to comply, indeed, their eagerness, showed that their hearts were already far from Yahweh.
The phrase "they make the king glad" likely refers to the succession of northern kings who followed Jeroboam's religious policy. Some commentators associate the verse specifically with Jeroboam I (Kimchi), Jehu (Grotius), or Jeroboam II (others); Gill notes that the Septuagint renders it generically, suggesting a pattern across multiple reigns. The "princes" (שָׂרִים, śārîm) were the court officials who benefited from the system. The cross-references (1 Kings 22:6, 13; Jeremiah 5:31) show that prophets and people often told the rulers what they wanted to hear. The surrounding context in Hosea 7 describes the nation as an oven overheated by its own passions (v. 4, 7), devouring its judges and kings, a picture of self-destructive chaos. The people's "lies" include both deceptive speech and the false religious system they adopted, which was built on the lie that Yahweh could be worshipped through idols.
Textual Notes
The consulted sources note no significant textual variants for Hosea 7:3. The Hebrew text is stable across major manuscripts, and the meaning is not disputed at the level of wording. Some minor differences in English translations (e.g., "delight" vs. "make glad") reflect translation choices rather than textual uncertainty.
Reception History
Hosea 7:3 has been consistently read across church history as a warning against the mutual corruption of leaders and the people who enable them. Calvin used it to argue that subjects cannot blame their rulers for national sin when they eagerly comply. Puritans like Matthew Henry applied it to court flattery and the dangers of telling rulers what they want to hear. Wesley's Notes saw it as a description of courtiers inventing pleasant wickedness. In modern contexts, the verse is often cited in sermons critiquing nationalism or political idolatry: when a people delights its rulers by sin, both are condemned. Despite different applications, the core interpretation, that the verse depicts a society where sin pleases the powerful, has been remarkably stable across Protestant, Catholic, and Orthodox traditions.
Preaching This Verse
Three-point outline
- The people's willing participation: The verse does not describe reluctant compliance but active delight-making. The people conspired with their rulers in sin, flattering them with wicked deeds and lies.
- The rulers' corrupt delight: Instead of calling the nation back to righteousness, the king and princes took pleasure in the people's lawlessness. Their joy was sick, a sign of total moral collapse.
- The spiral of mutual corruption: Sin becomes a currency traded between leaders and citizens. Each side feeds the other's appetite, and the no one turns to God. As verse 7 says, "There is none among them who calls to me."
Five-point outline
- Leadership and flattery: Rulers are especially vulnerable to those who tell them what they want to hear.
- The danger of accommodating sin: The people changed their worship to please the king, compromising their loyalty to God.
- Corporate responsibility: Both the governors and the governed are accountable. The prophet does not let the people escape blame by pointing upward.
- Sin's intoxicating effect: The king is "made glad", the language suggests a kind of drunkenness on evil, echoed in v. 5 where princes are sick with wine.
- The only escape: The rest of Hosea 7 shows that human corruption, left unchecked, devours itself. The hope lies in the God who continues to call (v. 13, 15), even when no one answers.
Illustration hooks
- A workplace where everyone knows the boss appreciates cutting corners, so employees compete to suggest ethically dubious shortcuts. The culture rewards the worst instincts.
- A political environment where leaders are surrounded by advisors who only repeat popular slogans, and truth-tellers are pushed out. The crowd loves the false peace.
- A church community that avoids uncomfortable teachings to keep the pastor or the prominent members pleased, mistaking silence for unity.
Questions your congregation is asking
- What makes a leader "glad" in our society, and is that gladness rooted in righteousness or in sin?
- How do we as ordinary people contribute to corrupt systems by going along with what pleases those in power?
- Where does flattery cross the line from politeness to participation in evil?
Leading a Discussion
This small-group session considers how our words and actions can either encourage righteousness in leaders or reinforce sinful patterns. The verse forces us to examine our own hearts: are we, like ancient Israel, offering a king what he wants because it is convenient or profitable? The commentaries agree that no one in this scenario is innocent, not the rulers who delighted in evil, and not the people who made them glad.
Discussion questions
- Observation: What specific actions does the verse say the people performed? Why would these actions "gladden" the king and princes?
- Interpretation: Calvin argued that the people could not blame the king for their corruption because they were eager to obey. Does the verse support that view? What earlier chapters of Hosea describe the people's own sinful choices?
- Interpretation: The word for "lies" (כַּחַשׁ) can mean deception or false worship. How might both meanings apply to the situation in Israel?
- Application: Can you think of a situation where a group of people has flattered a leader into continuing unethical practices? What does this verse say to such a situation?
- Application: How can Christians today support leaders in a way that builds up the common good rather than feeding personal ambition or sin?
- Theological reflection: Verse 2 says "They don't consider in their hearts that I remember all their wickedness." How does forgetting God's presence enable the mutual corruption described here?
- Prayer: Ask God to reveal any ways you have tempted leaders, at work, church, or government, toward sin by offering flattery or silent approval. Pray for courage to speak truth in love.
Word Study
The key original-language words in this verse. Select any word for its full lexicon entry — meaning, every occurrence in Scripture, and related words.
Cross-References
Source: Treasury of Scripture Knowledge (TSK, public domain)
| I Kings 22:6 | Then the king of Israel gathered the prophets together, about four hundred men, and said to them, “Should I go against Ramoth Gilead to battle, or should I refrain?” They said, “Go up; for the Lord will deliver it into the hand of the king.” |
| I Kings 22:13 | The messenger who went to call Micaiah spoke to him, saying, “See now, the prophets declare good to the king with one mouth. Please let your word be like the word of one of them, and speak good.” |
| Jeremiah 5:31 | The prophets prophesy falsely, and the priests rule by their own authority; and my people love to have it so. What will you do in the end of it? |
| Jeremiah 9:2 | Oh that I had in the wilderness a lodging place of wayfaring men, that I might leave my people and go from them! For they are all adulterers, an assembly of treacherous men. |
| Jeremiah 28:1 | That same year, in the beginning of the reign of Zedekiah king of Judah, in the fourth year, in the fifth month, Hananiah the son of Azzur, the prophet, who was of Gibeon, spoke to me in Yahweh’s house, in the presence of the priests and of all the people, saying, |
| Jeremiah 28:4 | I will bring again to this place Jeconiah the son of Jehoiakim, king of Judah, with all the captives of Judah, who went to Babylon,’ says Yahweh; ‘for I will break the yoke of the king of Babylon.’” |
| Jeremiah 37:19 | Now where are your prophets who prophesied to you, saying, ‘The king of Babylon will not come against you, nor against this land’? |
| Hosea 4:2 | There is cursing, lying, murder, stealing, and committing adultery; they break boundaries, and bloodshed causes bloodshed. |
Interlinear and lexical data from STEPBible (CC BY 4.0). Cross-reference data from OpenBible.info (CC BY 4.0). Commentaries are public domain.
For personal reflection
Read the devotional page — prayer, application, and "for families"
What the Commentators Say
11 public-domain commentaries, condensed into plain language.
Adam Clarke's Commentary Methodist/Wesleyan 1826
Clarke notes some people delighted their rulers by joining them in idolatry. They said this new religion brought them great joy and advantage.
Barnes' Notes on the Bible Protestant 1832
Barnes notes that Israel preferred its kings to God and approved whatever the rulers allowed. This unhappy complaisance led them to commit sin willingly.
Calvin's Commentaries Reformed 1564
Calvin notes that the people’s widespread wickedness caused their leaders to act wrongly. This shared sin meant no one was free from guilt.
Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges Anglican 1880
Some high leaders allow themselves great sexual sins. They are filled with intense lust just like fire in a furnace. They celebrate special days by acting in very sinful ways.
Geneva Bible Notes Reformed 1599
The Geneva note observes that the people's wickedness and lies actually please their rulers. Both the king and the princes take delight in the nation's sin rather than punishing it, revealing a thoroughly corrupt leadership that benefits from the people's disobedience.
Gill's Exposition of the Bible Baptist 1748
Gill sees the king's gladness not as general approval of wickedness but as political calculation: the idolatrous worship at Dan and Bethel kept his subjects from traveling to Jerusalem, thereby securing his own kingdom. The "lies" that please the princes are the false gods and empty idolatrous practices themselves.
Jamieson-Fausset-Brown Commentary Protestant 1871
Christians who hold this view point to Hosea 7:3 while others emphasize Isaiah 1:20. Both seek to be faithful to Scripture.
Keil & Delitzsch OT Commentary Protestant 1876
Keil and Delitzsch view God's healing attempts in Hosea as exposing Israel's incurable moral corruption rather than curing it. The people openly practice deceit and violent robbery without fearing God's judgment, and the rulers themselves delight in these sins.
Lange's Commentary Reformed 1857
Lange emphasizes that the corruption reaches the highest ranks, making the situation far worse. He insists the adultery
Matthew Henry's Commentary Reformed/Presbyterian 1710
Henry notes that God first intended to heal Israel. He then points out that the nation’s iniquity became obvious when God tried to show them mercy.
Wesley's Explanatory Notes Methodist/Wesleyan 1754
Wesley notes that high officials deliberately create evil plans and present them as truth to the king. He sees these lies as false accusations against innocent people. Your trust in God gives you hope.