Hebrews 5:3 Meaning: Why the High Priest Offered for Himself
Because of this, he must offer sacrifices for sins for the people, as well as for himself.
And by reason hereof he ought, as for the people, so also for himself, to offer for sins.
and by reason thereof is bound, as for the people, so also for himself, to offer for sins.
and because of this infirmity he ought, as for the people, so also for himself to offer for sins;
and, on account of this [infirmity], he ought, even as for the people, so also for himself, to offer for sins.
Meaning in one sentence
Hebrews 5:3 shows that the Levitical high priest had to sacrifice for his own sins, revealing his weakness and our need for a sinless High Priest, Jesus Christ.
Context
The writer of Hebrews is showing how Jesus is a better high priest than any who served in the Tabernacle. In chapter 5, he describes the qualifications of a human high priest: he is chosen from among people, appointed to act on their behalf before God, and able to deal gently with those who wander because he knows his own weakness firsthand. Verse 3 draws the necessary conclusion from that weakness. Because the high priest is surrounded by the same frailties as everyone else, he cannot come before God without first offering sacrifices for himself. This sets the stage for the contrast with Christ, who had no sin of his own to atone for.
Key Words
The word translated “he ought” or “he is obligated” comes from the Greek opheilei. It carries the sense of a debt, something that is owed. The high priest did not have the option to skip this step: his own sin made it morally necessary. That small word underlines the honesty of the old system and the seriousness of sin.
“To offer” (prospherein) means to bring something to God, especially a sacrifice. In the Old Testament law, the high priest literally brought a bull and a goat to the altar, laying his hands on them and confessing his sins. The word reminds us that coming close to God required a substitution.
“Sins” (hamartion) originally meant missing the mark, like an arrow falling short of its target. The high priest knew he had missed the target himself. He could not pretend to be perfect. That honest admission is what made him a fitting representative for a people who also missed the mark.
How Christians Read This Verse
Christians from many traditions agree that this verse highlights the inferiority of the Levitical priesthood compared to Christ, though they draw slightly different emphases. Wesleyan readers, following Adam Clarke, often note the high priest’s “fellow feeling” with the people, his own sin made him gentle. Reformed commentators like Matthew Henry stress the moral necessity of the offering: the priest could not approach without atonement. Anglicans in the Cambridge Bible point out that the high priest was regarded as guilty until he had offered for himself, which explains why he could not mediate for others first. Catholic and Orthodox readers see here a picture of human frailty that finds its answer in Christ, the one High Priest who needed no sacrifice for himself. All point to the same bottom line: the old priesthood could not save because the priests themselves needed saving.
A common misunderstanding
Some readers think the high priest’s offering for himself was a mere ritual, a formality without real need. They assume he was already holy enough to approach God on behalf of others. In fact, the text says he “ought” to do it because of his weakness. The law required him to make atonement for his own sins before he could mediate for anyone else. If he did not, he remained guilty and could not stand before God. The ritual was not empty; it reflected a genuine spiritual debt.
Living This Out
If you lead others in any way, as a parent, teacher, pastor, or friend, this verse asks you to remember your own need before you try to meet theirs. You cannot hand someone else a solution you have not received yourself. Before you speak truth into another person’s life, spend time confessing your own failures to God. Let the high priest’s example free you from pretending you have it all together. Your weakness is not a liability; it is what makes you gentle with those who stumble. And it points you back to the One who never needed to offer for himself.
Main takeaway: Even the highest human priest needed forgiveness for his own sins, showing why we need a sinless High Priest, Jesus Christ.
For Families
For ages 5, 8
In the Old Testament, the priest who helped people say sorry to God had to say sorry for his own sins first. That shows us everyone needs God’s forgiveness. Jesus never did anything wrong, so He could be the perfect priest for us.
For ages 9, 12
The high priest had to offer a sacrifice for his own sins before he could offer for the people. That tells us even the most spiritual leader is just as human as anyone else. Only Jesus, who never sinned, could offer a perfect sacrifice once for all. When you feel like you have to be perfect to come to God, remember Jesus already made the way.
Questions People Ask
Why did the high priest have to offer sacrifices for himself?
Because he was also a sinner. The law assumed every high priest would be weak and guilty, so he needed atonement before he could stand before God for others. Leviticus 4:3 and 9:7 make this clear, he offered a bull for his own sin first.
What does 'infirmity' or 'weakness' mean in Hebrews 5:2-3?
It refers to the high priest's own sinfulness and moral frailty. Not just physical weakness, but the reality that he missed the mark like everyone else. That is why he had to offer for himself, his weakness made it necessary.
How is Jesus different from the Levitical high priest?
Jesus had no sin of his own. Hebrews 7:27 says he did not need to offer sacrifices for himself, only for the people. He offered himself once, and that one sacrifice was enough. The Levitical priest offered repeatedly, for himself and for others.
Does this verse mean pastors today must confess their sins before leading worship?
Not in the same ceremonial way, but the principle applies: leaders should come humbly before God, acknowledging their own need for grace. Barnes' commentary says ministers plead the same blood for themselves that they preach to others.
What does 'offer for sins' refer to as a specific term?
In the Greek, 'peri hamartion' can mean 'sin offerings' as a technical term. The high priest brought specific sacrifices, a bull for himself, a goat for the people, as the law commanded in Leviticus 16. It was a concrete act of atonement.
For pastors & researchers
Greek interlinear, 8 commentaries & word study